Course Code
CNL-501
Class Code
CNL-501-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
A brief description of two common empirically
researched substance use disorder treatments
from the provided options (C4.1)
20.0%
A discussion about the differences of each
treatment listed
20.0%
A discussion about which method the student
would prefer to use and why as well as a review
of the benefits and risks of each method
20.0%
A discussion about the considerations for age,
disabilities, developmental level, culture, and any
other significant factors
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Benchmark - Treatment Interventions (Obj. 3.3)
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Essay omits or incompletely describes two common
empirically researched substance use disorder treatments
from the provided options.Essay does not demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
Essay omits or incompletely discusses the differences of each
treatment listed.Essay does not demonstrate understanding
of the topic.
Essay omits or incompletely discusses which method the
student would prefer to use and why as well as a review of
the benefits and risks of each method.Essay does not
demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Essay omits or incompletely includes a discussion about the
considerations for the age, disabilities, developmental level,
culture, and any other significant factors.Essay does not
demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
100.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Essay inadequately describes two common empirically
researched substance use disorder treatments from the
provided options, but description is weak and missing
evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor
understanding of the topic.
Essay inadequately discusses the differences of each
treatment listed, but description is weak and missing
evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor
understanding of the topic.
Essay inadequately discusses which method the student
would prefer to use and why as well as a review of the
benefits and risks of each method, but description is weak
and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates
poor understanding of the topic.
Essay inadequately includes a discussion about the
considerations for the age, disabilities, developmental level,
culture, and any other significant factors, but description is
weak and missing evidence to support claims.Essay
demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Essay adequately describes two common empirically
researched substance use disorder treatments from the
provided options, but description is limited and lacks some
evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topic.
Essay adequately discusses the differences of each treatment
listed, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to
support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of
the topic.
Essay adequately discusses which method the student would
prefer to use and why as well as a review of the benefits and
risks of each method, but description is limited and lacks
some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topic.
Essay adequately includes a discussion about the
considerations for the age, disabilities, developmental level,
culture, and any other significant factors, but the discussion is
limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay
demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure
and audience-appropriate language are used.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Essay clearly describes two common empirically researched
substance use disorder treatments from the provided
options, and description is strong with sound analysis and
some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates
understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
Essay clearly discusses the differences of each treatment
listed, and description is strong with sound analysis and some
evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates
understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
Essay clearly discusses which method the student would
prefer to use and why as well as a review of the benefits and
risks of each method, and description is strong with sound
analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay
demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface
the topic.
Essay clearly includes a discussion about the considerations
for the age, disabilities, developmental level, culture, and any
other significant factors, and the discussion is strong with
sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay
demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface
the topic.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the
arguments, and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Essay expertly describes two common empirically researched
substance use disorder treatments from the provided
options, and description is comprehensive and insightful with
relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of the topic.
Essay expertly discusses the differences of each treatment
listed, and description is comprehensive and insightful with
relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of the topic.
Essay expertly discusses which method the student would
prefer to use and why as well as a review of the benefits and
risks of each method, and description is comprehensive and
insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay
demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
Essay expertly includes a discussion about the considerations
for the age, disabilities, developmental level, culture, and any
other significant factors, and the discussion is comprehensive
and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay
demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Comments
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment