Description
For this discussion you will present the facts of the case and the conclusions that you have drawn from them. You will then get to see if others investigating the same case and the same evidence are in agreement with your analysis of the evidence and your conclusions.
Post Requirements:
This assignment requires two posts, each completed individually.
First Post - Due Thursday
- What is your hypothesis for who committed the murder? What do you think happened to Chelsie Vapolt?
- What evidence do you have from the timeline, autopsy, hair analysis, body fluids, blood, and DNA to support this?
- What evidence do you have from the timeline, autopsy, hair analysis, body fluids, blood, and DNA that may point to a different suspect(s)?
- What facts of the case are you certain of? Which do feel might be true, but lack evidence to support them?
Second Post - Due Sunday
Please read the posts and choose one classmate's post to which to respond. Try to respond to someone that hasn't yet received a response.
- Do you have the same hypotheses for who committed the murder? If not, what is your hypothesis?
- Analyze their evidence and facts. Which ones do you agree on? Which ones (if any) do you disagree on? For full credit, explain your reasoning.
- Choose one piece of evidence. What is a potential innocent or alternate explanation, other than murder, for this evidence to have been found where it was?
Example: The suspect owns an orange cat and an orange cat hair was found on the victim's coat. However, the victim's neighbor also owns an orange cat. Therefore, the cat hair could have been from the neighbor's cat.
Grading
To see how this assignment will be graded, click on the three dots in the upper right corner of this page, then click "Show Rubric". If you're reviewing this assignment using the Canvas mobile app, the rubric is included in the Grade tab.
While I am not specifically grading you on your spelling or grammar, scientific communication is an important skill. Please proofread and spellcheck before posting/submitting to ensure that your ideas come across clearly. Up to 10% may be deducted for excessive grammar and spelling errors that affect the readability of your work.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Please view explanation and answer below.
CSI Part 3 - Facts of the Case
Student’s name
Institutional affiliation
Post 1
What is your hypothesis for who committed the murder? What do you think happened to
Chelsie Vapolt?
Hypothesis: Dave is the perpetrator of Chelsie’s murder.
Based on the autopsy report Chelsie was strangled to death and then taken to the pool.
What evidence do you have from the timeline, autopsy, hair analysis, body fluids, blood, and
DNA to support this?
This aspect is evident through the fracture observed on her hyoid bone, which showed aspects of
trauma and the lack of water in her lungs. This situation shows that she was killed before she was
drugged into the pool. The majority of evidence obtained from the people interrogated, the autopsy,
and the scene all add to the same conclusion. the timeline o events that preceded the death of
Chelsie shows the leading cause of her death and the time the murder was executed. Chelsie's
insurance policy transfer from her husband to her mother, the intentions to secure a divorce, and
her reconciliation with her ex-boyfriend directly affect her husband. This aspect was the leading
cause of the problem. Anger was identified as the primary motive that made Dave execute the
murder. The murder i...