Directions:This week, you will use role theory to apply to your chosen case study. In other words, your theoretical orientation—or lens—is role theory as you analyze the case study.Use the same case study that you chose in Week 2. (Remember, you will be using this same case study throughout the entire course). Use the “Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study” worksheet to help you dissect the theory. You do not need to submit this handout. It is a tool for you to use to dissect the theory, and then you can employ the information in the table to complete your assignment.To prepare:Review and focus on the same case study that you used in Week 2.Use Personal Capture to record the PPT slides on your screen and your audio as you present the information. Submit a narrated PowerPoint presentation that includes 11 to 12 slides.Each slide should be written using bullet points, meaning no long paragraphs of written text should be in the slides.The recorded audio takes the place of any written paragraphs, while the bullet points provide context and cues for the audience to follow along).Your presentation should address the following: Also use this information to develop Que-cards for verbal presentation slides.Identify the presenting problem for the case study you selected. (Remember the presenting problem has to be framed from the perspective of role theory. For example, the presenting problem can be framed within the context of role functioning).Identify all the relevant roles assumed by the client.Analyze the social expectations and social and cultural norms revolving around the role, social position, and role scripts of one of the roles assumed by the client.Explain the role and social position of the social worker in working with the client in the case study.Describe how the role(s) and social position(s) assumed by the social worker will influence the relationship between the social worker and the client.Identify three assessment questions that are guided by role theory that you will ask the client to better understand the problem.Identify and describe two interventions that are aligned with the presenting problem and role theory.Identify one outcome that you would measure if you were to evaluate one of the interventions you would implement to determine if the intervention is effective.Evaluate one advantage and one limitation in using role theory in understanding the case.Be sure to:Identify and correctly reference the case study you have chosen.Use literature to support your claims.Use APA formatting and style.Include the reference list on the last slide.

Early computer systems relied on command line interfaces to perform all actions. Today, the majority of systems use direct manipulation rather than a command line interface. The goal of designing a direct manipulation interface is to make use of the system intuitive to the end user. One industry that has been extremely successful designing intuitive direct manipulation inputs is the video game industry. Most game players are able to learn controls as they play a game and then apply the same controls to similar games.  Rarely do they need to read a user manual.   Describe the three (3) principles of direct manipulation and give examples as to how they are used in video game controls. Analyze video game-type interfaces and discuss three (3) reasons why video game-type interfaces would not be effective for real-world applications. Describe at least three (3) advantages of direct manipulation versus command line interfaces. Evaluate direct manipulation and describe three (3) problems with it.

English 124 Evaluation Essay 2 PromptFor your second paper you will be required to write an essay at least5 pages longUsing evaluation to write a persuasive argument. Choose a topic and use an evaluation approach toorganize and create an argument about that topic. Review the Toulmin methods of organizingarguments of value for guidance on how to structure your own essay. How can we judge your topic based on specific criteria? What criteria should we use to judge itsvalue? Where does the value criterion come from? A key element of evaluation isconvincing readers to understand and accept your method of judging your subject. How does your judgment of the subject help up to better understand the subject as a whole? Create your own criteria for judging your subject, and argue in your essay if yoursubject either completely, partially, or doesn’t meet the standards you use.Your essay needs to be clear and unified under your thesis. Make sure to include specificevidence from the article you read, to show how and why you analyzed the article the way youdid in your essay. Make sure to review the section in your textbook on proper MLA citation forany quotes or paraphrases you use from your outside source. What is the writer’s thesis? Quote it. Does it state the article they’ll analyze, evaluation determination if the article was fully, partially, or not persuasive and why?Does their introduction identify the criteria that they used to analyze the article? What are they?Does the writer explain what the most persuasive evidence was from the article and why?Are any quotes used to support the argument? Are they all properly cited?Which quote was most effective to support their argument? Why?Does the writer explain how the organization of the article makes it more persuasive or less so and why?Were you convinced of their argument overall? What was the strongest and weakest area of their argument? Why? Grading CriteriaSuccessful papers will have:1. A developed introductory paragraph, with a clear thesis. State your topic and yourjudgement of it. (10 points)2. Well-supported, unified body paragraphs with specific examples that reinforce yourthesis. What is your evaluation system, where does it come from, andhow does your topic rate using this system? Include your originalpoints on how your evidence supports your argument. (90 points)3. Smoothly integrated quotes from an outside source. (15 points)4. A conclusion that summarizes your main point, and offers a final thought about the valueof your argument. (5 points)5. Your paper will also be thoroughly edited for sentence-level errors. If you have anyquestions on sentence structure or grammar, visit the Writing Center, or see me in myoffice. (5 points)Total points: 125ARTICLE:Romantic comedies make us 'unrealistic about relationships', claim scientistsWatching romantic comedies could ruin love lives because they create unrealistic expectations of relationships, scientists claim.Jennfier Lopez and Matthew McConaughey in The Wedding Planner Photo: COLUMBIA PICTURESBy Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent4:53PM GMT 15 Dec 2008Unlikely happy endings, improbable plots and faux philosophy are to blame, they say.Researchers believe that the influence of Hollywood films is instilling a warped sense of the "perfect" relationship within society and providing unrealistic expectations about romance.They are also oversimplifying the process of falling in love and wrongly giving the impression that it could and should be achieved without any effort, it is claimed.The team at Heriot Watt University in Edinburgh studied 40 top box office films released between 1995 and 2005, to establish common themes.They then asked hundreds of people to fill out a questionnaire to describe their beliefs and expectations when it came to relationships.The psychologists found that fans of films such as You've Got Mail, The Wedding Planner and While You Were Sleeping, often fail to communicate with their partners effectively, with many holding the view that if someone is meant to be with you, then they should know what you want without you needing to tell them.Dr Bjarne Holmes, a psychologist who led the research, said: "Marriage counsellors often see couples who believe that sex should always be perfect, and if someone is meant to be with you then they will know what you want without you needing to communicate it."We now have some emerging evidence that suggests popular media play a role in perpetuating these ideas in people's minds."The problem is that while most of us know that the idea of a perfect relationship is unrealistic, some of us are still more influenced by media portrayals than we realise."Dr Holmes said that the team had spent a year "thoroughly analysing" and discovered a number of common themes that were unrealistic.They included the idea of "the one" soul mate who we were all pre-destined to meet and that they should know us instinctively so well they can "almost read out minds"."We all want to be successful in our relationships," said Dr Holmes. "We want to be the special one and meet the special one. Unfortunately people tend to believe the Hollywood idea of a perfect relationship."That is just unrealistic. People feel if their relationship is not like a Hollywood film then it is not any good.Dr Holmes said you have to invest time and energy into a relationship. "Investing time and energy are not themes that are popular in Hollywood films," he addedKimberly Johnson, who worked on the study, added: "Films do capture the excitement of new relationships but they also wrongly suggest that trust and committed love exist from the moment people meet, whereas these are qualities that normally take years to develop."In order to find out more the researchers have launched a much larger, international study on the effects of the media on relationships.They are asking people to participate by answering questions about personality, relationships, and media consumption habits.