I need a two page document answering the question below.

Jan 5th, 2015
Sigchi4life
Category:
Psychology
Price: $35 USD

Question description

I NEED A TWO PAGE ANSWER FOR THIS TOPIC.

Develop literature review on your construct of interest and the 5-7 instruments used to assess it. Thus, the literature review should explain your construct of interest thoroughly, as well as provide thorough reviews of the 5-7 instruments used to measure it. This is slightly different from other literature reviews, whereby the idea is to review and critique the study and findings. For this literature review you are not reviewing the study but rather are reviewing and critiquing the instrument based on what studies and other researchers have found. The idea here is to review the instrument and its usefulness in measuring your construct. Thus, what does the instrument measure, how reliable and valid is it, and what are its strengths and weaknesses?  What is lacking in the instrument which paves the way for the necessity of your newly developed instrument? How are these instruments different from what you will develop?

Five Instruments:

  1. Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)

  2. Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS)

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

  4. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS

  5. Personality Depression Questionnaire( PDQ-4)

{Please be sure to include the following in your literature review:

1.  A discussion of your construct of interest.

2. A thorough discussion of each instrument you review for your construct, including the name of the test, what the test is used for, whether the test is appropriate for this area, what the reliability and validity of the test is, and what reviewers say about the strengths and weaknesses of it with regard to assessing this construct.

3. What, in general, appears to be adequately assessed on each test with respect to the construct that you selected?

4. What does not appear to be adequately assessed?

Use the Forbush, Wildes, Pollack, Dunbar, Patterson and  Watson (2013) Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) and the O'Neill, and Sevastos (2013) The development and validation of a new multidimensional Job Insecurity Measure (JIM): An inductive methodology articles for examples of how to conduct literature reviews of current or previous instruments/tests.


Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: UCLA
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

8 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
darnay
Nov 29th, 2016
" The best tutor out there!!!! "
dontuwannaknow
Nov 20th, 2016
" Excellent work as always thanks so much "
SjSurvivor143
Nov 6th, 2016
" Thanks for the help. "
ddg82
Oct 28th, 2016
" Thanks, good work "
tinytim47
Oct 15th, 2016
" Wow this is really good.... didn't expect it. Sweet!!!! "
jestin7
Oct 6th, 2016
" This tutor is great! "
mixedballz
Oct 1st, 2016
" excellent work as always thanks for the help "
lilmoe415
Sep 22nd, 2016
" Thank you, Thank you, for top quality work, this is your guy!! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1831 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors