Description
QUANTITATIVE JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW
You will review both quantitative and qualitative research. The topic is up to you as long as you choose a peer-reviewed, academic research piece. I suggest choosing a topic that is at least in the same family as your expected dissertation topic so that you can start viewing what is out there. There are no hard word counts or page requirements as long as you cover the basic guidelines. You must submit original work, however, and a paper that returns as a large percentage of copy/paste to other sources will not be accepted. (Safe Assign will be used to track/monitor your submission for plagiarism. Submissions with a Safe Assign match of more than 25% will not be accepted.)
Please use APA formatting and include the following information:
- Introduction/Background: Provide context for the research article. What led the author(s) to write the piece? What key concepts were explored? Were there weaknesses in prior research that led the author to the current hypothesis or research question?
- Methodology: Describe how the data was gathered and analyzed. What research questions or hypotheses were the researcher trying to explore? What statistical analysis was used?
- Study Findings and Results: What were the major findings from the study? Were there any limitations?
- Conclusions: Evaluate the article in terms of significance, research methods, readability and the implications of the results. Does the piece lead into further study? Are there different methods you would have chosen based on what you read? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article in terms of statistical analysis and application? (This is where a large part of the rubric is covered.)
Explanation & Answer
Please view explanation and answer below.
1
Sexual Harassment in the working environment
Student’s name
Affiliation
Course
Professor
Date
2
Introduction
Sexual harassment in the workplace is an issue since it produces negative ramifications for
representatives and the execution and image of the relationship in which it occurs. The experience
of sexual harassment in the workplace significantly impacts the psychological and actual
flourishing of representatives. There are many adverse consequences of sexual harassment:
afflictions, a shortfall of duty, excessive delay or nonappearances, bad quality execution, and
abandonment. Both male and female workers who have experienced sexual harassment feel
negative sentiments.
The current assessment plans to begin making up for the shortfall in the momentum writing
by investigating client incitement, developing an action mainly made to assess the sexual conduct
of expert women by clients and reviewing a model of client bullying forerunners and results for
women. Despite being unlawful for the huge piece of a century, sexual harassment remains today
an unavoidable kind of severity against women, often wrapping various types of viciousness in its
ambit (Goh et. l 2021). This diligent and threatening assurance generally lays on a particular plan
of perspectives and feelings, gathering more than many years and embedded in various social
foundations that deny and support the basic misusing of women and the progressive and
institutional performing craftsmen that serve to keep up this structure (McLaughlin et. l 2017).
This wonder has come to be known as institutional selling out. Sexual harassment remains today
the most specific violence against women, the most transcendent, and consistently consolidates
various types of brutality in its ambit (Goh et. l 2021). An opening exis...
