EEC 2500 RC Lisa and Danielle Positions on Support & Development Discussion

User Generated

FnzVnz315

Humanities

EEC 2500

Rasmussen University

EEC

Description

Instructions

For this assignment, you will be reflecting on the scenario and discussion that occurred about the different positions of Lisa and Danielle.

In a two-page reflection, address the following:

  • Who was your assigned person, Lisa or Danielle?
  • Do you agree with your assigned person's position?
  • If yes, give three examples of ways their position was aligned to your educational philosophy and cultural beliefs.
  • If no, give three examples of ways their position was not aligned to your educational philosophy and cultural beliefs.
  • Would you have chosen a side if given the opportunity? Why or why not?
  • Describe how Lisa and Danielle's practices support development across all domains:
  • Physical
  • Social and Emotional
  • Language and Communication
  • Cognitive and Intellectual
  • If you were faced with a similar scenario, how would your knowledge of development support your collaboration and communication to address differences of practice with colleagues?

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Rubric for- EEC2500 M3 Understanding Infant Toddler Development Levels of Achievement Criteria Educational Philosophy and Cultural Beliefs (15 Total Pts) Choosing a Side (15 Total Pts) Practices to Support Development (15 Total Pts) Collaboration and Communication (15 Total Pts) Emerging Limited or developing demonstration of criteria Description: Confusing or incomplete explanation of whether you agree or disagree with your assigned person missing examples and details on your educational philosophy and cultural beliefs. Points: 8 Description: Confusing or incomplete explanation of whether you would have chosen a side missing details on why and who you would have chosen or why you would not have chosen a side. Points: 8 Description: Confusing or incomplete description of how Lisa and Danielle’s practices support development across all domains missing details. Points: 8 Description: Confusing or incomplete description of how your knowledge of development supports collaboration and communication missing example of how to address differences of practice with colleagues. Competence Adequate or basic demonstration of criteria. Description: Basic explanation of whether you agree or disagree with your assigned person, including three examples with minimal supporting details on your educational philosophy and cultural beliefs. Points: 11 Description: Basic explanation of whether you would have chosen a side with minimal details on why and who you would have chosen or why you would not have chosen a side. Proficiency Clear or effective demonstration of criteria. Description: Accurate explanation of whether you agree or disagree with your assigned person, including three examples with supporting details on your educational philosophy and cultural beliefs. Points: 13 Description: Accurate explanation of whether you would have chosen a side with details on why and who you would have chosen or why you would not have chosen a side. Mastery Advanced or exceeds demonstration of criteria. Description: Exemplary explanation of whether you agree or disagree with your assigned person, including three examples with comprehensive supporting details on your educational philosophy and cultural beliefs. Points: 15 Description: Exemplary explanation of whether you would have chosen a side with comprehensive details on why and who you would have chosen or why you would not have chosen a side. Points: 11 Description: Basic description of how Lisa and Danielle’s practices support development across all domains with minimal details. Points: 11 Description: Basic description of how your knowledge of development supports collaboration and communication with minimal example of how to address differences of practice with colleagues. Points: 15 Description: Exemplary description of how Lisa and Danielle’s practices support development across all domains with comprehensive supporting details. Points: 15 Description: Exemplary description of how your knowledge of development supports collaboration and communication with comprehensive example(s)of how to address differences of practice with colleagues. Points: 8 Points: 11 Points: 13 Description: Accurate description of how Lisa and Danielle’s practices support development across all domains with supporting details. Points: 13 Description: Accurate description of how your knowledge of development supports collaboration and communication with example(s)of how to address differences of practice with colleagues. Points: 13 Points: 15 Janice Im, Rebecca Parlakian, and Sylvia Sanchez ToddlERS, ANd ThElR FAMIUES Lisa and Danielle are collegial coteachers in an infant and toddler classroom. Occasionally what seem like minor Issues cause them to make some pointed comments that silence them both. For example, Lisa believes that babies need to be held and cuddled as often as possible; she carries them throughout the day or picks them up at the first sign of fussiness. She frequently observes aloud, "Babies need lots of love and attention." Danielle responds by rolling her eyes and saying, "They also need to learn to soothe themselves. You're going to spoil them if you pick them up and carry them all the time." Their different views about feeding can also lead to minor conflicts. Lisa refuses to let babies eat with their fingers. She thinks they won't get enough to eat and that it's too messy. Danielle lets babies pick up food off their trays as soon as they are able, stating that "it helps them to deveiop independence and small muscles." Why do Lisa and Danielle each get exasperated with the other's "illogical" way of thinking? Their own upbringings and cultural perspectives about children influence their views on everyday activities such as holding, responding to, and feeding infants and toddlers. naeyc 1,3,7 Young Ch/Vdren'September 2007 Understanding the Influence of Culture on Caregiving Practices • • • From the Inside Out Everyone bring^s specific vaiues, beliefs, and assumptions about child reciring and child development to their work with infants and toddlers. Even two teachers who share the same ethnic culture may not share the same beliefs about what is best for young children. Conflicts around these issues can arise with colleagues and families in early care and education programs. Recognizing and acknowledging another person's point of view and coming to a shared solution is critical in providing high-quality care to infants and toddlers. cultures, beliefs, values, and attitudes—and these views become a part of us. When our culture differs from that of a colleague or child and family in our program, it may create a barrier to understanding how best to support children's learning (Orange & Horowitz 1999). A colleague can be a great asset in the journey to understanding oneself. Teachers and caregivers who work together Cein take time to reflect on and discuss questions such as the following: • What do I believe a child can do and not do at this particular age? The roots of caregiving It is helpful to understand and explore two particular areas when caring for infants and toddlers—self-knowledge and knowledge of culturally informed teaching (AbtPerkins & Rosen 2000). Self-knowledge Self-knowledge is defined here as "a thorough understanding of one's own cultural roots and group affiliations" (Haberman & Post 1998). Before we as teachers can address the needs of very young children, we must first become more aware of our own cultural beliefs and practices. By taking a good look at our early relationships and childhood experiences, we can recognize the influence that these factors have on our role as caregivers, as well as on our feelings, attitudes, and beliefs about children. The people we were close to as we grew up—and our experiences with them—shape who we are today. Most of us still believe much of what those special people taught us about ourseives, other people, and the world. The messages our caregivers conveyed in words and actions reflected their Janice Im, MS, is a senior program manager at ZERO TO THREE: National Center for Infants, Toddlers, and Famiiies, in Washington, D.C. Rebecca Parlakian, BA, is a senior writer with the parenting resources department at ZERO TO THREE. She researches, writes, and edits publications for parents—most recently a booklet on the feeding relationship. Previously, Rebecca developed professional materials and curricula at ZERO TO THREE. Sylvia Y. Sanchez, EdD, is an associate professor in the College of Education and Human Development, George Mason University, Fairfax. Virginia, where she is coordinator of the early childhood education program. This column is adapted from an articie in ZERO TO THREE'S training curriculum. Cradling Literacy: Building Teachers' Skills to Nurture Early Language and Literacy from Birth to Five, by Janice Im, Carol Osborn, Syivia Sanchez, and Eva Thorp. Illustration by Melanie Hope Greenberg. "Rocking and Rolling" is available online in Beyond ihe Journal, September 2007, at www.journal.naeyc.org/btj. • What child behaviors do 1 feel are acceptable and not acceptable—why? • Should boy babies be treated differently from girl babies? If so, in what ways? • What do 1 believe about how to best care for, support, and nurture the children in our program? How are my beliefs the same as or different from yours? Reflecting on our own cultural beliefs and practices about caring, teaching, and learning can help us recognize the cultural perspective we bring to our work. Oniy then can we begin to address any preconceived notions that make it difficult to accept, understand, and effectively support the children and families we serve (Willis 2000). Knowledge of culturally informed teaching Knowledge of culturally informed teaching comprises the information a caregiver needs to create a learning environment that welcomes children from diverse cultures. This environment includes not only the physical setup of the classroom, but also a culturally sensitive pattern of caregiver-child interactions and the use of approaches that engage and encourage the participation of children from a variety of cultures. Culturally informed teaching strategies help us individualize learning experiences based on each child's needs. Delpit (in Willis 2000, 6) notes, "The question is not necessarily how to create the perfect 'culturally matched' learning situation for each ethnic group, but rather how to recognize when there is a problem for a particular child." As we get to know different children, families, and cultures, we may find our caregiving practices challenged in various ways. For instance, having learned to value and support autonomy and independence, a teacher encourages young toddlers to feed and dress themselves. She believes this practice builds pride and self-esteem. Then a toddler from a culture in which children are generally hand fed and dressed by their families into their kindergarten year enters the program. The family's cultural beliefs value interdependent love, and they want 66 their children to understand the meaning of giving and receiving help. Both approaches can benefit children. Talking with families about their cultural practices, traditions, and beliefs provides the message that they are valued. However, just talking with families may not be enough. Teachers need to be open to and accepting of different ways of caring and teaching, and thoughtfully explore the many ways to help children and families feel welcome. Visiting the families' communities and inviting families to share what they believe is important for their children to learn and achieve are the first steps for teachers in building a knowledge of families' cultures. From these interactions and observations, teachers can gain an understanding of the strengths children and families bring with them to the program. Such knowledge can help teachers provide care and support that honor and celebrate families' cultures. Conciusion Every interaction that a teacher has with a child or a colleague is a cultural exchange. How we diaper, our expectations for children's behavior, the topics or issues we choose to discuss with families—all are a reflection of our cultural beliefs. If we go back to our opening scenario. Lisa and Danielle would benefit from taking time to discuss the beliefs behind the caregiving decisions they make. By doing so, they can begin to establish a shared understanding and, in time, appreciation for why each operates the way she does. It is an ongoing process of self-awareness, learning, and discovery that is repeated at intervals throughout our professional careers. This process of exploration and questioning may not be simple or easy, but it is an essential part of working respectfully and effectively with young children and their families. the years? What brought about the changes or reinforced what you already believed? • Think about other cultures. Recognize that there are differences and similarities among all cultures. When you feel yourself judging a practice that a colleague or a family prefers, or a family's request for how they want their child cared for, stop and ask yourself: Could this be a culture bias of mine? Do I really understand what this family is asking and why? Explore your feelings and potential biases about others' practices in regard to child rearing and your own beliefs about how infants and toddlers should be cared for. TRY iT • Share information about your own culture, beiiefs. at)dpractices. Make a book about you and your family and share it with your colleagues and the children and families in your program. • Encoutage families to discuss their culture with you. Ask questions and listen closely without judgment. Ask families how you can support their children's leaming and development. Be open to, and include, a variety of approaches in your caring practices. • Suggest that a staff meeting be scheduled around this topic and discuss your beliefs with your colleagues. References Abt-Perkins, D., & L. Rosen. 2000. Preparing English teachers to teach diverse student populations: Beliefs, challenges, proposals for change. English Education 32 (4): 251-66. Haberman, M., & L. Post. 1998. Teachers for multicultural schools: The power of selection. Theory into Practice 37 (2): 96-104. Orange. C, & R. Horowitz. 1999. An academic standoff: Literacy task preferences of African American and Mexican American male adolescents versus teacher-expected preferences. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy A3 Oy. 28-39. Willis. A- 2000. Critical issue: Addressing literacy needs in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. Online: www.ncrel.org/ sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/reading/ Ii400.htm. THINK FIRST • Think about your own family and how you were brought up. How have your beliefs, attitudes, and values about how to care for and support infants and toddlers changed or stayed the same over Copyright © 2007 by the National Association for the Education of Young Children. See Permissions and Reprints online atwww.journal.naeycorg/about/permissions.asp. Young Ch/Wren'September 2007 DE NUESTRO PRESIDENTE (contmcion dep^g. 6} Index of Advertisers 2007 de Young Children. Como profesionales del cuidado y educacion de iiinos (lequenos, tenemos la responsabilidad de actuar en armonia con nuestro conocimiento acerca de lo que es mejor para ios nifios. y debemos responsabilizarnos de trabajar en armonia con dicho conocimiento. El ser profesional nos exige nada menos que eso. A menos que nosotros, como iideres en la profesion de ia educacion de ninos pequenos, estemos al nivel de ias circunstancias tai vez nos hailaremos observando desde un lado mientras ios iideres dei mundo de negocios. ios politicos y otros intervienen para formar el futuro de nuestra profesion. Estemos preparados o no, Goffin y Washington nos piden contestar la pregunta: ^Qi-i^ define y iimita el cimbito dei cuidado y educacion de ninos pequenos? Con las contribuciones de todas las personas interesadas en ia primera infancia. somos nosotros -los Iideres de NAEYC y de sus entidades afiliadas- quienes necesitamos ponernos ai nivei de las circunstancias para deiiberar sobre nuestro proposito y definir nuestra profesion. De ciertas maneras. Ready or Not es un libro dificii de ieer. con sus criticas francas de ias faiias dei Smbito y de nuestras acciones . . . o nuestra falta de accion. Sin embargo, es util considerar su ilamada a ia accion. con una perspectiva que necesitamos escuchar y tomar a pecho. Anticipo tener muchas discusiones profundizadas y estimuiadoras sobre ias cuestiones y las dificuitades que el iibro piantea. y espero ia accion con proposito para definir y adelantar ei Ambito a fin de mejorar todos ios programas que instruyen y/o cuidan a ninos pequenos. (Nuestra integridad depende de elio! Referenda Goffin. S.G., & V. Washington. 2007. Ready or nol: Leadership choices in early care and education. New York; Teachers Coiiege Press. Available from NAEYC. AccuCut/91 Angeles/cover pages: inside front, inside back, and back Bright Horizons Family Solutions/77 Clarion University/96 Core Knowledge/63 Crayola/28 Creative Pre-K/9 Creati veCurrlculum, net/5 Discount School Supply/29 Environments/17 Erikson Institute/7 £xc/?a/jge-Early Childhood Leaders' Magazine/97 ffrsfhand Heinemann/61 Gryphon House/81 High/Scope Educational Research Foundation/55 Insect Lore/41 Kansas State University/43 Know & Grow/39 Knowledge Learning Cofporation/93 Learning Resources/57 Music Together/95 NITV Preschoo!First/64 Pacific Oaks Coilege/75 PBS Kids WordWorld/33 Pearson Allyn&Bacon Merrill/83 PlaySafe, LLC/18 Project Construct National Center/85 Rada Cutlery/70 Rollee Pollee/98 Scholastic/3 School Kids HealthCare/89 Sopris West Educational Services/69 Teachers College Columbia University/67 Teachers College Press/71 Teaching Strategles/5, 25 Thomas Buiit Buses/19 ZB Zaner-Bloser/87 Observing and Assessing the Pre-School Learner Friday, November 30 and Saturday, December 1,2007 Teachers College Columbia University in New York City The conference will focus on : • Screening, assessing, intervention and evaluation • Review of recent assessment measures • Cognitive and early literacy skills Don't miss discussions and presentations by regional experts. Be sure to participate in roundtable discussions on hot topics. Avaiiabie for credit and non-credit. To register or for more information visit: www.tc.eclu/continuingeducation or cali 800.209.1245. TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY THE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH ANO INNOVATION
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

1

Reflection

Student Name
Department of & Institutional Affiliation
Instructors Name
Course Number
Date

2
Reflection
Who was your assigned person, Lisa or Danielle? Do you agree with your assigned person's
position?
My assigned person is Lisa, and I completely agree with her position. I concur with
Lisa’s position since children need connections with compassionate grown-ups who participate
in many face-to-face relations and uphold their oral growth. For babies to grow strong, they need
lots of love and attention. Moreover, young children learn through observation of other’s
behavior and direct experience. In this regard, soothing toddlers at the first sign of fussing will
teach them to be responsible and caring to others. Consequently, I am convinced that childhood
experiences have a powerful long-term consequence later in life.
If yes, give three examples of ways their position was aligned to your educational
philosophy and cultural beliefs. If no, give three examples of ways their position was not
aligned to your educational philosophy and cultural beliefs.
Lisa’s position is aligned with my educational beliefs since cuddling offers children a
sense of security. According to research, babies who do not experience cuddling have
significantly lower levels of vasopressin and oxytocin hormones. These two hormones play
significant roles in regulating social and stress behaviors. In this regard, lower levels may explain
...


Anonymous
Great content here. Definitely a returning customer.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags