Grand Canyon University Foodborne Outbreak Investigation Powerpoint

User Generated

PuvPuv4567

Humanities

Grand Canyon University

Description

When an incident of a disease occurs in higher number of cases than expected among a population over a period of time, or in a particular area, public health professionals investigate the issue to establish an intervention and prevent future outbreaks.

For this assignment, apply the steps of an outbreak by investigating a foodborne illness.

Create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation. Include photos, graphs, maps, and other data to illustrate your points. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, Include additional slides at the beginning for the Title page and an additional slide for References at the end. Include the following components:

Introduction

  1. Define "foodborne outbreak." (What is a foodborne outbreak?)

Current Outbreak

  1. Using the "List of Selected Multistate Foodborne Outbreak Investigations" resource, choose a current foodborne outbreak that occurred in your city, state, or region. Describe the food and agent associated with the outbreak.
  2. Using the “At a Glance” pane (you may click on the underlined areas to view maps and details), provide descriptive statistics (person, place, time) for this event. Discuss the location in which the outbreak occurred, morbidity and mortality rates, hospitalizations, and whether the food item was recalled.

Outbreak Investigation

  1. Identify and describe the steps involved in determining an outbreak. Include how you will communicate your findings to the public.
  2. Using the "Compendium of Acute Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases" resource, discuss the agent responsible for the foodborne outbreak, the clinical syndrome (symptoms of the infection), incubation period, pathophysiology, foods typically associated in transmission, and the specimens used to identify agent.
  3. Discuss how epidemiologists use epidemic curves to identify an outbreak.

Outbreak Response 

  1. Describe the key players and their roles involved in the response to outbreaks.

Outbreak Prevention

  1. Discuss the steps and measures taken to prevent outbreaks from occurring. Include primary, secondary, and tertiary measures to reduce morbidity and mortality for your specific outbreak.
  2. Discuss approaches to inform the public health of the outbreak and how you would increase public health awareness of the foodborne outbreak.


 

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code PUB- Class Code PUB- Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Define Foodborne Outbreak 2.0% Foodborne Outbreak 6.0% Steps Involved in Determining Outbreak 6.0% Agent and Compendium Information on Agent (Clinical syndrome, incubation period, pathophysiology, foods typically associated in transmission, and specimens used to identify agent) 8.0% Epidemic Curve 4.0% Key Players and Roles in Response to Outbreak 6.0% 1 Steps and Measures to Prevent Outbreaks 8.0% Presentation of Content 30.0% Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 30.0% Layout 10.0% Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 10.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% 2 Assignment Title Outbreak Investigation Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Foodborne outbreak is not defined. A foodborne outbreak is not presented. The steps to determine an outbreak investigation are omitted. An agent listed in the Compendium of Acute Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases is omitted. A discussion on how epidemiologists use epidemic curves to identify an outbreak is omitted. Key players and their roles in response to the foodborne outbreak are omitted. 3 Steps and measures taken to prevent outbreaks from occurring are omitted. The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Sources are not documented. 4 Total Points 100.0 Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Foodborne outbreak definition is incomplete or inaccurate. A foodborne outbreak is identified but the discussion is largely incomplete. The steps to determine an outbreak investigation are incomplete. An agent listed in the Compendium of Acute Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases is selected. The compendium information is incomplete or not relevant to the agent selected. A discussion on how epidemiologists use epidemic curves to identify an outbreak is incomplete. Key players and their roles in response to the foodborne outbreak are incomplete; or, the key players and their roles are not relevant to the foodborne outbreak. 5 Steps and measures taken to prevent outbreaks from occurring are incomplete; or, they are not relevant to the foodborne outbreak. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 6 Satisfactory (75.00%) Foodborne outbreak definition is presented. The definition lacks a key aspect. A foodborne outbreak is identified. The location, food, and agent associated with the outbreak, and morbidity and mortality rates and descriptive statistics related to the foodborne outbreak are summarized, but there are some inaccuracies and minor omissions. The steps to determine an outbreak investigation are summarized. There are some gaps or inaccuracies. An agent listed in the Compendium of Acute Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases is selected. The compendium information is presented. There are some inaccuracies. A summary on how epidemiologists use epidemic curves to identify an outbreak is presented. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed. Some key players and their roles in response to the foodborne outbreak are presented. It is unclear one or two key players are needed or what their role is in responding to the foodborne outbreak. 7 Steps and measures taken to prevent outbreaks from occurring are outlined. There are some inaccuracies. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 8 Good (85.00%) Foodborne outbreak is adequately defined. Some detail or information is needed for clarity or accuracy. A current foodborne outbreak is identified. The location, food and agent associated with the outbreak, and morbidity and mortality rates and descriptive statistics related to the foodborne outbreak are summarized, but there are some inaccuracies and minor omissions. The steps to determine an outbreak investigation are described. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies. An agent listed in the Compendium of Acute Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases is selected. The compendium information is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. A discussion on how epidemiologists use epidemic curves to identify an outbreak is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. The key players and their roles in response to the foodborne outbreak are presented. Some information in needed to better clarify a player or their role. 9 Steps and measures taken to prevent outbreaks from occurring are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 10 Excellent (100.00%) Comments Foodborne outbreak is clearly defined. The definition demonstrates a strong understanding of a foodborne outbreak illness. A current foodborne outbreak is identified. The location, food and agent associated with the outbreak, and morbidity and mortality rates and descriptive statistics related to the foodborne outbreak are thoroughly discussed. The steps to determine an outbreak investigation are thoroughly described. An agent listed in the Compendium of Acute Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases is selected. The compendium information is accurate and clearly presented. A discussion on how epidemiologists use epidemic curves to identify an outbreak is clearly presented. The key players and their roles in response to the foodborne outbreak are presented. The key players and their roles are significant to responding to the foodborne outbreak. 11 Steps and measures taken to prevent outbreaks from occurring are detailed. The discussion is logical and welldeveloped. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 12 Points Earned 13 14 Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations Sample A. Student Objectives • Outlining the objectives allows readers to identify the • • • reason for the presentation. Objectives should be brief and to the point. List information about what the reader should learn from the presentation. Objectives should be listed in presentation order. Slide Structure • Use bullets to separate out ideas. • Try to follow the 6 X 6 rule. • Limit to 6 bullets per slide. • Limit to 6 words per bullet. • Too much slide information causes confusion. • The audience may become distracted. Slide Appearance • Stay consistent. • Use one theme throughout the presentation. • Align text for consistency between slides. • Use transition effects wisely. • Use readable fonts. • Font must be readable. • Font and background colors should contrast. • Font size must remain consistent. Content • Keep it simple. • Break up information between slides. • One slide need not house everything. • Be concise. • Wordiness will confuse the reader. • Brevity is always preferred. Visual Aids • Visual Aids can enhance a • • presentation. Images must pertain to the presentation. An abundance of images can be distracting. Charts and Graphs • Graphs/charts should tell a • • story. Graphs/charts must be clear and pertinent. Use bullets to provide supporting information. Presentation of Information • Always check spelling, grammar, and formatting. • Check for consistency before presenting. • Slide theme • Slide transitions • Punctuation • Ensure that key points are delivered accurately. Questions • End the presentation with a section for questions. • This encourages audience involvement. Review • Revisit the objectives to ensure all were met. • Briefly review the key information covered. • Check for any need to follow up. References • Provide references for any outside sources. • Follow the guidelines for the required citation style. • Follow the citation style rules on when and how to cite images and graphics.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

GROUND TURKEY
FOODBORNE
OUTBREAK.

INTRODUCTION
FOODBORNE OUTBREAK
A foodborne outbreak refers to a situation where the same illness
manifests itself in many people in a locality after ingesting the same meal
or food (Omer, 2018).There is also a type of foodborne outbreak that is
known as sporadic foodborne outbreak. A sporadic foodborne outbreak is a
type of food poisoning outbreak that involves a patient who has been
exposed to a similarly ill person. The sporadic cases are however, more
common than foodborne outbreaks yet they are far much difficult to
investigate.

GROUND TURKEY FOODBORNE OUTBREAK
Ground turkey is also known as minced turkey . Ground turkey is
formed from a mixture of dark turkey meat and light turkey meat and
the remaining visible fat and skin are unanimously processed until a
ground form is formed. The final product from the mixture of meat,
skin and fat after processing is therefore composed of a pink color and
a non crumbly texture. The meat is majorly taken from the turkey
thighs and drumsticks instead of breast meat due to high cost

LOCATION AND AGENTS OF GROUND TURKEY OUTBREAK.

• The ground turkey foodborne outbreak in the USA occurred this year
2021 in fourteen states. The states were Arizona, Missouri, Indiana,
North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Peninsular, Newyork, New
Hampshire, Connecticus, Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine and
Newjersey.
• The ground turkey outbreak was transmitted by an agent that is
known as Salmonella Hadar

THE NUMBER OF SICK PEOPLE PER STATE.
• The table below shows sick people’s distribution per state:
STATE

NO.

STATE

NO.

Arizona

1

New Hampshire

1

connecticus

2

New Jersey

3

Indiana

1

New York

4

Missouri

2

North Carolina

3

Maine

1

Pennsylvania

4

Maryland

1

Vermont

1

Massachusetts

7

Virginia

2

MOBIDITY, MORTALITY AND HOSPITALISATION
• There were a total of 33 people across the country who registered
infection by the disease.
• The total number of hospitalizations were 4.
• There was no death case realize...

Related Tags