Assignment Your assignment is to write a critical review on the ethical dilemmas that have been presented. Be sure to discuss how a new supervisor would be able to prevent these types of actions from occurring in the future. Your written response is to be supported by additional research and written at a graduate level. Your paper should go beyond the obvious and must be no less than 1550 words. You must use no less than three additional resources (other than your required text) that support your position. All resources used must be properly cited using the APA style. For credit, in your response, you must include at least three journal articles that support your information. The journal articles to be used must come from the Saint Leo University Online Library. Instructions for locating journal articles are found in the Resources section. Remember, all resources including, but not limited to, journals, magazines, and/or books must be properly cited using the APA style. Make sure that you follow the exact way to cite your references. Please rad and follow the scenario I have attached.

Que : 1 Reflect on the assigned readings for the week.chapter 11 & 12 Chapter 11. Advanced Topics in Planning and Scheduling: Agile and Critical Chain, Chapter 12. Resource Management Identify what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding.Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:(a) What are the practical implications internally (in terms of team motivation) and externally (for the customer) of making overly optimistic project delivery promises?(b)It has been argued that a project schedule that has not been resource-leveled is useless. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why or why not?Que : 2 Case Study 11.1: It’s an Agile WorldThis case illustrates a common problem in software and IT development, where programmers and IT staff are anxious to lock in specifications as early as possible so they can “get to work” without having to worry about invasive or disruptive input from the end users. Unfortunately, what typically happens is that the finished product is not what the users needed or thought they needed and a long list of fixes and modifications are needed to make it work correctly. This case is based on a true story in a hospital IT department that routinely struggled with these sorts of user conflicts until they sifted to an Agile methodology. Questions:(a)Why does the classic waterfall project planning model fail in this situation? What is it about the IT department’s processes that leads to their finished systems being rejected constantly?(b)How would an Agile methodology correct some of these problems? What new development cycle would you propose?(c)Why are “user stories” and system “features” critical components of an effective IT software development process?(d)Using the terms “Scrum,” “Sprint,” and “User stories,” create an alternative development cycle for a hypothetical software development process at Northwest Regional Hospital.Que : 3 Case Study 12.2: “First Come, First Served”: Resource Challenges for Sunrise RestorationThis case is intended to highlight the challenges in resource assignment, particularly in the common cases where project managers within the same firm are competing with each other for the use of scarce and valuable human resources to accomplish their tasks. Without clear guidance from top management and a valid priority system, the ability to acquire resources is often the result of chaotic bargaining and negotiation among equals. This case is based on a real situation and the outcomes were very much in line with the way they are described in the case. The business owner did not want to simply invest in more resources for fear that they would be underutilized. He much preferred the system of negotiating among his project managers, even if that led to inefficient utilization of the resources that were available. Students can be asked to take the side of the owner or Tyler to debate the options that Sunrise can use to manage its resources.QuestionsDescribe some of the resource constraints that Sunrise and its project managers are facing.Is Sunrise’s current model of prioritizing resource assignments viable? Why or why not?How could technology alleviate some of Sunrise’s resource management issues?Would Tyler’s suggestion to hire additional technicians and purchase more equipment solve the resource problems at Sunrise? Why or why not?

Mexican-American War Portfolio DirectionsDirections: For this portfolio project, you will evaluate whether the Mexican-American War was justified.DescriptionYou have been reading about the war between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848. It sprang out of a dispute between two countries over the southern border of Texas. The U.S. claimed the Rio Grande as the border, while Mexico claimed the Nueves River farther north. Each based its claim, in part, on agreements made at the end of the Texas war for independence, which ended in 1836. Each also based its claim on nationalism, or national self-interest, and a desire to expand its territory. For this portfolio project, you will explore different perspectives regarding the Mexican-American War. You will then present your findings in a short essay. Your final product will describe each point of view. It should give historically accurate facts. Your portfolio assignment has four steps: Research the Mexican-American War—its causes, the course of the conflict, and its results. Examine the Pearson Realize Civic Discussion Sources A–E for additional information. Analyze your research. Form your judgment and write your essay. Step 1Conduct the following research to complete your assignment: Research Source of Information List basic facts about the root of the conflict—include who, what, when, where, and why. Describe the Texans’ actions—how Texas came to exist. List some differences between the Texan and Mexican perspectives. Describe the beginnings of the conflict. Describe the course of the war and its results. You can use note cards, type your notes on a computer, or use another note-taking method. You may use EBSCOhost databases and Grolier Online™ encyclopedias to identify reference materials for this activity. Follow the directions below to access these resources.EBSCO From your EMS home page, select EBSCO under Links. Select Student Research Center – High School & Middle School. Narrow your search using the Search By Topic menu. Narrow your search further or use the Find field, and then select the Search button. Grolier From your EMS home page, select Grolier Online™ under Links. Select a resource from the menu on the left or type your search criteria into the Find it Fast! Field and select the Go button. Alternatively, conduct a safe search on the Internet or at your local library for information about the Mexican-American War. Step 2Before you write your essay, answer the following questions: What allowed settlers to establish a colony in Texas.How did the interaction between the settlers in Texas and the Mexican government develop and change over time?How do you think the perspectives of the Texas settlers and the Mexican government would vary?On what things might the Mexican government and the Texas settlers agree?How can you demonstrate the differences in the perspectives about Texas and its independence with historically accurate facts?Step 3You will be writing a short essay for your final product. In order to evaluate whether the Mexican-American War was justified, you need to consider the perspective of each side. In establishing the perspective of each side, you will need to use the actions, words, and circumstances of each side and how the sides interacted with one another in order to build your logical argument.