Team Self-Leadership How do the terms self-leadership and teams not contradict one another? What are the key components of “team-self leadership” and how do those (if they do) differ from individual self-leadership? What are the key behavioral team-self-leadership practices and how do these differ from individual level approaches? Are these aspects of self-leadership ones that can only be applicable at the individual level, the team level, or both? Why Explain the basic premise of mental team self-leadership and how (if it does) it differs from individual level self-leadership. What are the key collective mental strategies and what does each skill add to mental team self-leadership?

In Chapter 9 (Moore) it discusses the role of the coach. As you are progressing towards holding a coaching session with a co-worker in week seven, discuss the co-worker you will be meeting with. What area of change is he or she seeking? What do you see may be some challenges from that coaching session?Requirements: 250 words minimum initial post, 100 words minimum reply

Assignment # 1—Research Paper CritiqueHide Assignment InformationInstructionsPlease select any nursing research article from any one of the scientific journals found in the Nursing-Related Databases and Journals list. Select an article from an area that you are interested in or from the field you are working in. The article must be a peer-reviewed research report that was published in the last 5 years. Using the article selected, construct a critique of the article, 6 to 10 pages (including cover page and references).It is strongly recommended that you send your article via e-mail to the instructor for approval before your begin your critique.The critique shouldidentify the problem statement or statement of purpose of the articlecomment the on article’s literature review (usually found in the introduction or background sections)describe the participants being studied, stating inclusion and exclusion criteriadiscuss the sampling issues, such as probability or nonprobability and number of subjects usedidentify the study setting—where data collection occurreddiscuss informed consent—whether the participants were fully informed, how their consent was obtained, and any other ethical considerationsidentify the hypothesis or research questionidentify the research design—for example, experimental or nonexperimental; descriptive, exploratory, explanatory, or predictive?identify research variables, both independent and dependentdescribe how the study data were analyzed (what statistical measures were used)describe the results of the study and appropriateness of the methods used; include study limitationsaccurately comment on level of evidence used, nursing theory addressed (including if no theory is described) and implications for nursing practice or researchdiscuss how the research findings can be applied to the clinical areaYou must submit a pdf copy of the article that you are critiquing along with the assignment. The following resources, in the week 4 Learning Resources section of the LEO classroom, will provide helpful guidelines for constructing a critique of a nursing research article.VideoFramework for how to read and critique a research study: Research Article Critique. ArticlesVance, D. E., Talley, M., Azuero, A., Pearce, P. F., & Christian, B. J. (2013). Conducting an article critique for a quantitative research study: perspectives for doctoral students and other novice readers. Nursing: Research and Reviews, 3: 67–75.Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1): 38-43.The Learning Resources page lists resources that provide several guidelines for constructing a critique of a nursing research article you may find helpful. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your instructor.Start DateMar 18, 2019 12:00 AMDue DateApr 15, 2019 8:00 AMHide RubricsRubric Name: Assignment #1: Research Paper CritiqueThis table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaLevel 3Level 2Level 1Description of Study10 points(7-10 points)Provides clear, accurate comments on the title, abstract, introduction, and purpose of the study6 points(3 - 6 points) Provides comments on the title, abstract, introduction, or purpose of the study2 points (0-2 points)Lacks comments on the title, abstract, introduction, or purpose of the study/ 10Participants10 points(7-10 points)Discusses participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size, consent, and other ethical considerations6 points(3-6 points)Includes information on participants, but lacks information regarding sample size and/or consent2 points(0-2 points)Provides little or no information regarding participants, sample size, or consent/ 10Research Question/hypothesis20 points(13 - 20 points)Accurately identifies research question/hypotheses, including independent and dependent variables12 points(6-12 points)May not accurately identify research question/hypotheses or independent and dependent variables5 points(0-5 points)Lacks discussion of research question/hypotheses and/or study variables/ 20Review, Methods & Results20 points(13-20 points)Accurately comments on literature review, research methods, data analyses, and limitations of the study12 points(6-12 points)Includes comments on literature review, research methods, data analyses, and limitations of the study, but discussion was somewhat vague5 points(0-5 points)Does not comment on literature review, research methods, data analyses, and limitations of the study; or inaccurately discusses these aspects/ 20Article Evaluation20 points(13-20 points)Accurately comments on level of evidence used, nursing theory, and implications for nursing practice or research12 points(6-12 points)Comments on level of evidence used, nursing theory, or implications for nursing practice or research5 points(0-5 points)Inaccurately comments on level of evidence used, nursing theory, or implications for nursing practice or research/ 20Application to the Clinical Area10 points(7-10 points)Discusses realistic applications of the research to the clinical area6 points(3-6 points)Discusses somewhat realistic applications of the research to the clinical area2 points(0-2 points)Does not discuss realistic applications of the research to the clinical area/ 10APA, Organization, Grammar & Spelling10 points(7-10 points)Expertly applies APA guidelines in formatting and referencing; exhibits excellent spelling and grammar throughout the paper; is well organized and easy to read6 points(3-6 points)Applies APA, but exhibits some formatting or referencing mistakes; has some spelling and grammar errors; is generally well written and easy to read, with minimal organization problems2 points(0-2 points)Has many APA, spelling, and/or grammar mistakes throughout the paper; is difficult to read; may be ineffectively organized/ 10Total/ 100Overall ScoreLevel 361 points minimumLevel 224 points minimumLevel 10 points minimum