ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6000: Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 2 - Individual Report: PMBoK versus PRINCE2 or Agile in contemporary projects Individual/Group Individual Length 1,200 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. Task Summary Following group discussions, individually write a 1,200-word report that discusses the strengths, weaknesses, similarities, and contrasts of PMBoK and PRINCE2 or Agile in contemporary projects. Context There are several project management methodologies and approaches that are used in contemporary project management. Among these are PMBoK, PRINCE2, Waterfall, Agile, Extreme Programming (XP), and Adaptive Project Framework (APF). Each of them has certain specific elements that proponents say make it easier to use, more applicable, more robust, or otherwise more appropriate for particular environments or circumstances. Whilst these methodologies are all valid and reliable tools for a project manager to use, it is important to be able to contrast them and to form a view of how they may best be used in a project. This analysis includes their usefulness, application in various types of projects, and how they view project risk. Such context can help project managers identify which methodologies/approaches may be best for specific projects. PROJ6000_Assessment_2_Brief_Report_Module 3.2 Page 1 of 7 Instructions In this Assessment, you will write a 1,200-word (+/- 10%) report that considers the application of a project management methodology to a project as described in an assigned case study. In particular, you will review the assigned case study, then compare and contrast the application of the PMBoK project management approach to the highlighted project with your choice of one of the following methodologies/approaches: a) PRINCE2, or b) Agile The report must use the following headings: 1. INTRODUCTION: Develop an introduction to PMBoK and the other 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. methodology/approach you have selected (PRINCE2 or Agile) that includes their background and historical context (approximately 200 words) SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES: List 2–3 similarities and 2–3 differences between them and why these similarities and differences are relevant to the assigned case study (approximately 200 words combined) RISK: How each method treats project risk and how these approaches to risk are relevant to the assigned case study (approximately 200 words) PROJECT CONTEXT: The types of projects in which each is used (approximately 200 words) LIFECYCLE IMPLICATIONS: How each differs across different phases of a project’s lifecycle (approximately 200 words) APPLICATION: Explain which methodology you would choose to apply for the project in the assigned case study, and why (approximately 200 words) Be sure to cite any source material, including learning resources or other academic or industry literature you research, used to inform your analysis. You will need to consult the literature and use at least 6 references (and not more than 12 references) from academic and industry sources. The word count does not include the reference list. Each reference must be cited in-text in your report. The assessment requires that you submit your report via Blackboard. You do not need to upload anything relating to your group discussions in Weeks 4 and 5. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool PROJ6000_Assessment_2_Brief_Report_Module 3.2 Page 2 of 7 PROJ6000_Assessment_2_Brief_Report_Module 3.2 Page 3 of 7 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Knowledge and understanding of project management methodologies and approaches Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of PMBoK and either PRINCE2, and/or Agile methodologies/approac hes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Demonstrates a limited understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Pass (Functional) 50-64% Demonstrates a functional understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Demonstrates a thorough knowledge or understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates a highly developed knowledge or understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Demonstrates a capacity to explain in significant detail and thoughtfully apply relevant concepts. Demonstrates an exceptional capacity to explain in substantial and relevant detail critical concepts and apply these concepts in a manner that makes strong connections. Percentage for this criterion = 30% PROJ6000_Assessment_2_Brief_Report_Module 3.2 Page 4 of 7 Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited or no comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approache s. Demonstrated basic comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Well-developed comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Thoroughly developed and creative comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Highly sophisticated and creative comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches . Compares and evaluates two project management methodologies/approac hes Limited application/recommendat ions based upon analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Demonstrated basic application/recommendation s based upon analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Well-developed application/recommendatio ns based upon proficient analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Thoroughly developed application/recommendatio ns based upon to analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Limited ability to present information related to two selected project management methodologies/approache s and their distinguishing elements. Presents in a basic manner information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Presents in a coherent and readable manner information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Presents coherently and concisely information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Communicates eloquently, coherently, concisely, and creatively information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Accurately employs some specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches. Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches . Highly developed application/recommendati ons based upon to analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Percentage for this criterion = 30% Effective communication (written) Effectively presents two selected project management methodologies/approac hes and their distinguishing/differing elements Specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approache s is rarely or inaccurately employed. PROJ6000_Assessment_2_Brief_Report_Module 3.2 Occasionally employs specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches with accuracy, with some inaccuracies. Page 5 of 7 Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or the acknowledgment of sources. Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information; arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical. Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive. Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are insightful, persuasive, and expertly presented. Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. Occasional minor errors present in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are mostly free from errors. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are free from errors. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. APA referencing is free from errors. APA referencing is free from errors. Percentage for this criterion = 30% Correct citation of key resources and evidence Less than six references employed. Percentage for this criterion = 10% Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. PROJ6000_Assessment_2_Brief_Report_Module 3.2 Referencing resembles APA with frequent or repeated errors. Referencing resembles APA with occasional errors. Page 6 of 7 The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. SLO b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. SLO c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. PROJ6000_Assessment_2_Brief_Report_Module 3.2 Page 7 of 7 29/05/2021 Parliament of Canada Parliamentary Precinct Renewal Project Case Study  Certifications Blog  Membership  Learning & Events  More CEO Corner Register Log In    Ottawa Parliamentary Precinct Renewal Case Study Strengthening the Heart of Canada's Democracy A multi-decade effort to rehabilitate the buildings of Canada's Parliamentary Triad in Ottawa is preserving and modernizing the buildings that house the country's democracy. The buildings that comprise the Parliamentary Triad—the West Block, Centre Block, and East Block—are some of Canada’s most significant historic and cultural landmarks. https://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/case-studies/ottawa-parliamentary-precinct-renewal-case-study 1/6 29/05/2021 Parliament of Canada Parliamentary Precinct Renewal Project Case Study At the turn of the 21st century, leaders in the federal government recognized the need both to preserve and modernize these iconic symbols of Canadian democracy. Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) is managing the multi-decade effort to rehabilitate these heritage buildings while also meeting accommodation and accessibility requirements and maintaining a secure and welcoming environment for parliamentarians, staff, and visitors. The Long Term Vision and Plan called for relocating Parliament from the Centre Block during the building’s renovation, which is expected to be the largest heritage restoration project of its kind in Canada. (There are approximately 25,000 heritage elements in the Centre Block alone, ranging from light fixtures to frescoes.) This required planning to complete work on the the Government Conference Centre and the West Block first so these buildings could accommodate the Senate of Canada and the House of Commons respectively during Centre Block construction. Restoration of the Government Conference Centre began in 2014. Project scope included complete rehabilitation of the building and accommodation of Senate functions. Restoration of the West Block began in 2011. Project scope included complete rehabilitation of the West Block building and transformation of the central courtyard from an outdoor space into an interim House of Commons for the next 10 years. Hear More on the Projectified Podcast PMI's Projectified podcast interviewed Rob Wright, assistant deputy minister with the Science and Parliamentary Infrastructure branch within Public Services and Procurement Canada, about this massive project to transform Canada's seat of government. https://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/case-studies/ottawa-parliamentary-precinct-renewal-case-study One of the Most Influential Projects 2020 The Parliament Hill Rehabilitation was selected as the No. 1 Most Influential Project in Canada among the PMI Most Influential Projects 2020. PSPC's Comprehensive Project Management Approach National Project Management System (NPMS). PSPC uses a project management framework that provides direction and tools and ensures critical knowledge capture. Proven Practices. Sound project management practices for the project were affirmed by Canada’s Auditor General in 2010, and confirmed by a 2012 independent review. 2/6 29/05/2021 Parliament of Canada Parliamentary Precinct Renewal Project Case Study LISTEN NOW Independent Reviews. Experts review all construction proposals from prime contractors, and evaluate cost estimates monthly. The Senate of Canada Building Preserve Beaux-Arts Style Grandeur https://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/case-studies/ottawa-parliamentary-precinct-renewal-case-study Strengthen, Upgrade and Open 3/6 29/05/2021 Parliament of Canada Parliamentary Precinct Renewal Project Case Study The Senate of Canada Building (formerly the Government Conference Centre) was originally Ottawa’s Union Station, a Beaux-Arts style building from the early 20th century with a barrel-vaulted ceiling inspired by classical Roman baths. Transforming the former Government Conference Centre into the Senate of Canada Building called for structural upgrades to meet modern building codes and seismic requirements as well as the removal of hazardous materials. Architectural heritage elements requiring restoration included the vaulted plaster ceiling in the general waiting room, the plaster faux travertine walls and columns in the general waiting room, the heritage windows and columns, and the plaster ceiling in the interim Senate Chamber. Updates included replacing obsolete electrical, mechanical and life-safety systems, modernizing the interior, and upgrading security systems. Renovations to meet universal accessibility requirements included creating a barrier-free path of travel and ensuring the accessibility of all elevators and washrooms. Cost and Schedule Economic Impact Sustainability $219 million CAD The project created or sustained approximately 1,400 jobs More than 90% of waste from construction was diverted from landfills. Green features included water-efficient plumbing, energy-efficient LED lighting, and energy-efficient heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems Construction started in 2014. The Senate held its first meeting in the building in February 2019. The West Block https://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/case-studies/ottawa-parliamentary-precinct-renewal-case-study 4/6 29/05/2021 Parliament of Canada Parliamentary Precinct Renewal Project Case Study Preserve 19th Century Gothic Revival Heritage A New Home for the House of Commons The West Block stands as an exemplar of 19th century Gothic Revival architecture. Restoration efforts extended to the exterior masonry, sculptural elements, wood carvings, stone carvings, plasterwork, and decorative ironwork. Bringing the West Block into the 21st century demanded improvements from the ground up. The building required structural reinforcement to withstand earthquakes, excavation and construction to accommodate the interim House of Commons, and the safe removal of asbestos. Almost half the building’s 140,000 stones had to be removed, numbered, and reinstalled. At the height of the project, more than 200 masons experienced in historical restoration worked daily on the building. Updates included the replacement of electrical, mechanical, and safety systems, new information technology and multimedia capabilities, and sustainable improvements such as LED lighting, which will reduce the building’s carbon footprint. Renovations to increase accessibility included barrier-free paths on all levels of the building, an elevator that can accommodate a power-assisted wheelchair, barrier-free stalls within washrooms, Braille signage, and stairs with aids for the visually impaired. https://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/case-studies/ottawa-parliamentary-precinct-renewal-case-study 5/6 29/05/2021 Parliament of Canada Parliamentary Precinct Renewal Project Case Study Cost and Schedule Economic Impact Sustainability $863 million CAD The project created or sustained approximately 5,000 jobs. 93% of waste from West Block construction was diverted from landfills. Construction started in January 2011 and completed in November 2018. The House of Commons moved into West Block in January 2019. Indigenous-owned businesses provided goods and services including artisanal millwork and furniture. © 2021 Project Management Institute, Inc. | 14 Campus Blvd, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA https://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/case-studies/ottawa-parliamentary-precinct-renewal-case-study 6/6 
Purchase answer to see full attachment