thesis on abortions, law assignment help

Anonymous
timer Asked: Mar 26th, 2017
account_balance_wallet $10

Question Description

Here is the Thesis Statement:

Thesis Sentence: Abortions should not be sanction unless a woman has been raped, have an ongoing medical condition that may cause serious harm or danger to the baby, or if the unborn child was conceived through incest.

Please use the sources attached to complete a 2 page report with the thesis above. APA style formatting, cover sheet, intro, and reference page please. Absolutely no plagiarism!

Unformatted Attachment Preview

P r e g n a n c y a s P u n i s h m e n t f o r L o w -I n c o m e S e x u a l A s s a u l t V i c t i m s : A n A n a l y s is o f S o u t h D a k o t a ’s D e n i a l o f M e d i c a i d - F u n d e d A b o r t i o n f o r R a p e a n d I n c e s t V ictim s a n d W hy t h e H y d e A m e n d m e n t M ust B e R e pe a l e d Brooke McGee* I n t r o d u c t io n Beginning at dawn, Jane drives over 450 miles from her small town of Buffalo, South Dakota to Sioux Falls, South Dakota to obtain an abortion for an unintended pregnancy. Spending over seven hours in her car without a break, Jane arrives at the only clinic that offers abortion services in the state. Once there, she meets with the doctor scheduled to perform the abortion. Under state law, the doctor and Jane discuss several items before she can obtain the abortion. The doctor warns Jane that the “abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being,” “that by having an abortion, her existing relationship and her existing constitutional rights with regards to that relationship will be terminated,” and that the medical risks associated with the procedure include suicide and infertility.*1 Once the doctor confirms Jane has not been coerced into having an abortion and performs an exam, Jane must wait seventy-two hours before she is allowed to return to the clinic for the procedure.2 During the seventy-two-hour waiting period, Jane debates whether to make the 450 mile drive back home, in which case she would have to turn around in two days to make the same long drive, * George Mason University, J.D. Candidate, December 2016; University of Nebraska at Kearney, M.A. History, 2011, B.A, Political Science, magna cum laude, 2008. I would like to thank Pablo for his love and encouragement while I wrote this Comment. I would also like to thank everyone on the Civil Rights Law Journal for their feedback and support. 1 S.D. Codified Laws §34-23A-10.1 (1980; last amended 2005); G u ttm a cher I nst ., State Facts About Abortion: South Dakota (2015), https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/sfaa/pdf/ south_dakota.pdf [hereinafter State Facts About Abortion: South Dakota]: see also Maria L. La Ganga, The Abortion Wars: Doctor Goes to Great Lengths to Keep Abortion Accessible, L.A. T im es , (Oct. 14, 2014) http://www.latimes.eom/nation/la-na-abortion-south-dakota-20141014story.html. 2 S.D. Codified Laws §34-23A-56 (1980; last amended 2005); State Facts About Abortion: South Dakota, supra note 1; see also La Ganga, supra note 1. 77 78 C iv i l R i g h t s L aw J o u r n a l [Vol. 27:1 or spend the waiting period in a rundown hotel in Sioux Falls. Not wanting to make the 900-mile round-trip drive in the same week, Jane decides to stay in the hotel for $50 each night. On Thursday, Jane returns to the clinic for the procedure. The doctor informs Jane that, because she is now ten weeks pregnant, she must have a surgical abor­ tion rather than a medication abortion.3 A surgical abortion costs up to $1,500 in the first trimester.4 Conversely, a medication abortion, which is available to women who are under nine weeks pregnant, costs up to $800.5 Once the procedure is complete, Jane begins her journey back home. In total, Jane spends nearly a week’s time obtaining an abortion, not to mention the travel, lodging, medical, and food expenses, plus time taken off work. Jane’s story is not unlike the stories of other middle-class women who seek to terminate an unintended pregnancy. Despite South Dakota’s restrictive abortion laws, Jane’s job as an accountant enables her to take vacation time to have the procedure performed and to pay for it out-of-pocket. But, consider Jane’s story from the perspective of an impoverished woman, Rosie. Rosie, unlike Jane, is a struggling, part-time community college student, a waitress at a local restaurant, and a mother to a toddler.6 Because Rosie is a single mom in college 3 In March 2016, the Food and Drug Administration released guidance stating the abortion pill can be taken to terminate a pregnancy up to ten weeks gestation. See Am. College of Obste­ tricians and Gynecologists, ACOG Statement on Medication Abortion, (Mar. 30, 2016), http:// www.acog.org/Abou t-ACOG/News-Room/Statemen ts/2016/A COG-Statement-on-MedicationAbortion. See also U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Mifeprex (mifepristone) Information, http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarkelDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandPro viders/ucml 11323.htm (last visited June 23, 2016). 4 The price of a surgical abortion varies based on the state and gestational time. This is an estimate from Planned Parenthood. See Planned Parenthood, In-Clinic Abortion Procedures, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/in-clinic-abortion-procedures (last visited May 30, 2016); see also Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania, Fees for Services, https:// www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-western-pennsylvania/patients/fees-services (last visited May 30, 2016); Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwestern Mis­ souri, Abortion Services, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-st-louisregion-southwest-missouri/shadow-pages/health-services/abortion-services (last visited May 30 2016). 5 The price of a medication abortion (sometimes referred to as the “abortion pill”) varies based on the state and other factors. This is an estimate from Planned Parenthood. See Planned Parenthood, The Abortion Pill, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/the-abortionpill (last visited May 30, 2016); see also Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania, Fees for Services, supra note 4; Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwestern Missouri, Abortion Services, supra note 4. 6 Fifty-nine percent of women seeking an abortion to terminate a pregnancy previously had given birth to a child. This statistic is important to note as women often seek abortions to termi- 2016] W hy t h e H y d e A m e n d m e n t M ust B e R e p e a l e d 79 relying on tips from her waitressing job, she receives support from the federal government, namely Medicaid health care for her child and herself. Rosie, unlike Jane, becomes pregnant a second time after she was raped. Not wanting to relive the trauma of the rape every day of her pregnancy, Rosie seeks an abortion after learning she is seven weeks pregnant. Upon calling the abortion clinic to schedule the procedure, Rosie learns Medicaid will not cover her abortion in South Dakota, even though every other state in the country provides an exception for Medicaid-dependent women seeking to terminate pregnancies after being victims of rape or incest. Distraught, Rosie is unsure of what to do. She decides to sell valuable possessions, pick up extra shifts at her job, and eat one meal a day to save money for the abortion. Despite her best efforts, Rosie is unable to raise the hundreds of dollars she needs for either a medication or surgical abortion, on top of the other expenses she would incur, including childcare for her toddler, travel costs, and time taken off work to obtain the abortion. Because Rosie is unable to raise the money she needs, she seeks help from an unlicensed midwife. The midwife agrees to perform the abortion for one-third of the clinic’s price, so Rosie schedules the pro­ cedure. Following the procedure, Rosie begins to have extreme abdominal pain. Eventually, she is rushed to the hospital after she begins hemorrhaging. Once at the hospital, the doctors discover Rosie has a bacterial infection in her uterus. Even after the doctors perform a hysterectomy, the infection spreads to other organs and, within a few days, Rosie dies. Rosie’s inability to pay for a safe, legal abortion, a procedure that should have been covered under federally funded Medicaid health care, ends up costing Rosie her life. *7 Despite abortion’s legality in the United States, many states pass restrictions yearly that limit low-income women’s access to abortion, forcing these nate unintended pregnancies because they know they cannot afford to raise another child. See Jenna Jerman, Rachel K. Jones & Tsuyoshi Onda, Characteristics o f U.S. Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes Since 2008, G u t t m a c h e r I n s t ., (May 2016), https://www.guttmacher.org/ sites/default/files/reporLpdf/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014.pdf. 7 Rosie’s story is based on actual events. Rosie Jimenez tragically died after she sought out an illegal abortion because she was too poor to pay for an abortion in a clinic after the Hyde Amendment took effect. See Alexa Garcia-Ditta, Reckoning with Rosie, T e x a s O b s e r v e r (Nov. 3, 2015), http://www.texasobserver.org/rosie-jimenez-abortion-medicaid/. See generally E l l e n F r a n k f o r t , R o s ie : T h e I n v e s t ig a t io n o f a W r o n g f u l D e a t h (1978). 80 C iv il R ig h t s L aw J o u r n a l [Vol. 27:1 w om en to take extrem e m easures to receive necessary m edical procedures.8 In 1973, th e Suprem e C ourt held in Roe v. Wade that a w om an has a fundam ental right to term in ate a pregnancy.9 Since the Roe decision, ab o rtio n opponents have successfully chipped away at a b o r­ tion rights through both state and federal legislative processes and court cases.10 N otably, during the federal appropriations process in 1976, C ongress passed a rid er now widely know n as the H yde A m en d ­ m en t,*11 which p rohibited the use of federal M edicaid funds for a b o r­ tion, with the exception of en dangerm ent to the w om an’s life.12 In 1993, the H yde A m endm ent was expanded to add exceptions for rape and incest victim s.13 A lthough m any states initially refused to com ply with these newly added exceptions, every state except South D akota currently com plies with the H yde A m e n d m e n t’s th ree exceptions to M edicaid-funded a b o rtio n .14 South D a k o ta continues to allow only M edicaid-funded abortion in cases w here the w om an’s life is en d a n ­ gered, but it provides no exceptions for rape or incest victim s.15 First, this C om m ent will discuss the legalization of abortion. Sec­ ond, this C om m ent will analyze the H yde A m e n d m e n t’s trajectory 8 In 2015, lawmakers introduced 396 provisions that sought to restrict access to abortion services, enacting fifty-seven of these restrictions. See generally Rachel Benson Gold & Eliza­ beth Nash, Attacks on Abortion Rights Continued in 2015, Ensnaring Family Planning Funding and Fetal Tissue Research, R ew ir e (Jan. 4, 2016), http://rewire.news/article/2016/01/04/attacksabortion-rights-continued-2015-ensnaring-family-planning-funding-fetal-tissue-research/ [herein­ after Attacks on Abortion Rights Continued in 2015], In 2014, lawmakers considered 335 provi­ sions that sought to restrict access to abortion services, enacting twenty-six of these restrictions. Moreover, from 2010 through 2014, lawmakers in states across the country adopted 231 new abortion restrictions. See G u ttm a c h e r I nst ., In Just the Last Four Years, States Have Enacted 231 Abortion Restrictions (Jan. 5, 2015), https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2015/01/just-lastfour-years-states-have-enacted-231-abortion-restrictions [hereinafter In Just the Last Four Years, States Have Enacted 231 Abortion Restrictions], 9 See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 155 (1973). 10 See generally Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007); Planned Parenthood o f South­ eastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). In Carhart, the Supreme Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. In Casey, the Supreme Court upheld a state law restricting abortion that included mandatory waiting periods, parental consent, and biased information. See also supra note 8 and accompanying text. 11 This Comment refers to the Hyde Amendment as “Hyde” or “the Amendment” interchangeably. 12 The Hyde Amendment, Pub. L. No. 94-439, 90 Stat 1418 (1976). 13 Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agen­ cies Appropriations Act, 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-112, 107 Stat. 1082 (1993). 14 S.D. Codified Laws § 28-6-4.5 (1978). is Id. 2016] W hy t h e H y d e A m e n d m e n t M u st B e R e p e a l e d 81 through Congress and subsequent challenge at the Supreme Court. Third, this Comment will discuss the Hyde Amendment’s evolution from its original language and expansion beyond Medicaid. Fourth, this Comment will examine South Dakota’s refusal to comply with these exceptions by analyzing how other states initially implemented the original Amendment and later complied with the added excep­ tions. Fifth, this Comment will analyze how the Amendment harms low-income women, particularly women of color, in South Dakota and the United States generally. Lastly, this Comment will propose two different solutions. The first and superior solution is to repeal the Hyde Amendment because it inherently discriminates against low-income women. Because M edicaid-dependent women often lack the financial resources to fund abortion services independently, South Dakota’s version of the Hyde Amendment further victimizes sexual assault vic­ tims by forcing them to carry unintended pregnancies to term. The alternate solution is for abortion providers and Medicaiddependent women in South Dakota to file a lawsuit against the state in order to force South Dakota to comply with the Hyde Amend­ ment’s rape and incest exceptions. A reform is desperately needed, as rape and incest victims in South Dakota are entitled to the same reproductive choices as women in other states. I. A. Background The Legalization o f Abortion In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law that prohibited abortion except in cases where necessary to save the woman’s life.16 Finding the Texas statute unconstitutional, the Court held that a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy is found in the constitutional right to privacy.17 When Roe was decided in 1973, nearly two-thirds of the states had already banned abortion.18 As a result of these pre-Roe laws, it is estimated that 1.2 million women each year sought out illegal abortion19 “despite the known hazards of 16 See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113. 155. 17 See id. See id. at 118-19 n.2. 19 See NARAL Pro-Choice America Fact Sheet on Roe v. Wade and the Right to Choose, http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/media/fact-sheets/government-federal-courts-scotus-roe.pdf 82 C iv il R ig h ts L aw J o u r n a l [V o l. 27:1 frightening trips to dangerous locations in strange parts of town, of whiskey as an anesthetic, doctors who were often marginal or unli­ censed practitioners, unsanitary conditions, incompetent treatment, infection, hemorrhag[ing] disfiguration, and death. ” 20 In the Roe decision, the Court established the trimester frame­ work for abortion regulation: during the first trimester of pregnancy, a woman may make the decision free from state interference.21 After the first trimester, the state has a compelling interest in protecting the woman’s health and may reasonably regulate abortion to promote that interest.22 After the point of fetal viability—generally during the third trimester—the state has a compelling interest in protecting potential life and may ban abortion, except when necessary to pre­ serve the woman’s life or health.23 B. Restrictions on Abortion Funding: Introduction o f the Hyde Amendment After the Supreme Court decided Roe, abortion opponents worked to undermine the right to abortion.24 One of the principal avenues abortion opponents pursued was eliminating federal funding for abortion.2'' Specifically, abortion opponents at the state and fed­ eral level fought to eliminate Medicaid26 funding for abortion.27 Prior to the introduction of the Hyde Amendment, Medicaid funded nearly [hereinafter NARAL Fact Sheet on Roe v. Wade] (citing Willard Cates, Jr. et al, Comment: The Public Health Impact o f Legal Abortion: 30 Years Later, 35 P f.rsp . on Se x u a l & R e p r o d . H ea lt h 25 (2003); Willard Cates Jr., Legal Abortion: The Public Health Record, 215 Science 1586 (1982); R ic h a r d Sc h w a r z , Septic : A bortio n 7 (1968)). 20 See NARAL Fact Sheet on Roe v. Wade, supra note 19 (citing Walter Dellinger & Gene B. Sperling, Abortion and the Supreme Court: The Retreat from Roe v. Wade, 138 LJ. F a . L. R ev . 83, 117 (Nov. 1989)). 21 See Roe, 410 U.S. at 163. 22 See id. 23 See id. at 163-64. 24 See The Hyde Amendment, Pub. L. No. 94-439, 90 Stat 1418 (1976). 25 See id. 26 The Medicaid statute, found in Title XIX of the Social Security Act, is a federal govern­ ment program administered by the states to provide health care funding for the impoverished. See 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (2010) (establishing Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission). 27 See id. See also F r e d e r ic k S. J a ffe e t a l ., A bo rtion P o litics : P r iv a t e M o rality and P ublic P olicy 132 (1981); Heather D. Boonstra, The Heart o f the Matter: Public Funding o f Abortion for Poor Women in the United States, 10 G u ttm a c h e r P o l ’y R ev . 1 (2007), http:// www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/10/l/gprl00112.pdf [hereinafter The Heart o f the Matter]. 2016] W hy t h e H y d e A m e n d m e n t M ust B e R e p e a l e d 83 one-fourth of abortions performed.28 Although federal legislative efforts to restrict Medicaid-funded abortion proved unsuccessful for a few years, individual states passed legislation to restrict abortion in their states’ Medicaid programs.29 After a few years of lobbying, in 1976, Congress passed the Hyde Amendment as a policy rider to the annual appropriations bill for the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.30 This rider prohib­ ited federal funds from paying for abortion unless the woman's life was endangered.31 The rider affects low-income women almost exclu­ sively.32 The late Henry Hyde (R-IL), the conservative congressman who proposed the amendment, acknowledged this reality during a Medicaid funding debate in 1977, when he told his colleagues: “I cer­ tainly would like to prevent, if I could legally, anybody having an abortion: a rich woman, a middle-class woman, or a poor woman. Unfortunately, the only vehicle available is the . . . Medicaid bill.”33 Although abortion rights activists obtained an injunction against the rider, this injunction was later vacated by the Supreme Court in the case of Harris v. McRae, paving the way for Congress to continue including the Hyde Amendment in annual appropriations bills.34 From 1977 through 1980, city, state, and federal funding restric­ tions for abortion were challenged at the Supreme Court. These cases, collectively known as the “abortion funding cases,” are Maher v. Roe, Poelker v. Doe, Beal v. Doe, and Harris v. McRae?5 Both Beal and Maher challenged state laws that prohibited Medicaid cover­ age for abortion unless the procedure preserved the woman’s health 28 See J a ff e , supra note 27 at 128. 29 See J affe , supra note 27 at 132. After the Roe decision and prior to the implementation of the Hyde Amendment, thirteen states restricted Medicaid funding for abortion services. Id. Just prior to the McRae decision in 1979, forty state legislatures restricted Medicaid funding for abortion services. Id. 30 The Hyde Amendment, Pub. L. No. 94-439, 90 Stat 1418 (1976). 31 Id. The statute’s language stated, “None of the funds contained in this Act shall be used to perform abortions except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term.” 32 See Jessica Arons, Unhappy Birthday to the Amendment That Started the War on Women. T h e D a ii .y B e a s t , (Sept. 30, 2012), http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/30/ unhappy-birthday-to-the-amendment-that-started-the-war-on-women.html. 33 123 C o n g . R ec . 19,700 (1977). 34 See Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 302-04 (1 ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

Geontiry
School: Carnegie Mellon University

Hello! I have attached the answer in word document for you.
:) Let me know if you have any further questions.

Running Head: EXCEPTIONAL CASES TO ABORTION SANCTIONS

Title of Writing
Institutional Affiliations
Name
Date

EXCEPTIONAL CASES TO ABORTION SANCTIONS
Abortions should not be sanction unless a woman has been raped, have an ongoing
medical condition that may cause serious harm or danger to the baby, or if the unborn child was
conceived through incest.
Several reasons for abortion may be presented some of which may be considered bad and
others good, but according to the thesis statement, it can be argued that life endangerment, rape,
and incest as exceptions to the “prohibitions of the Hyde amendments” are eligible for abortion.
Further, it can be argued that would like to defend that these three cases should be considered as
being exceptional to abortion sanctions.
While some pro-life thinkers may argue that all cases of abortion ...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Thank you! Reasonably priced given the quality not just of the tutors but the moderators too. They were helpful and accommodating given my needs.

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors