Description
Project leadership is about coping with
a.Formulating plans and objectives
b.Monitoring results against plans
c.Change
d.Taking corrective action when necessary
e.All of these are part of leadership
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
e.All of these are part of leadership
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Very useful material for studying!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
5 pages
Case Study Six Sigma Dmaic To Improve The Quality Of The Production Process Done
Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process Case Study: Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the ...
Case Study Six Sigma Dmaic To Improve The Quality Of The Production Process Done
Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process Case Study: Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process
MGT 517 Grantham University Week 3 Its Just a Matter of Time Case Study
Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 1Final Project – ReferencesBenjamin Franklin once quoted, “By failing t ...
MGT 517 Grantham University Week 3 Its Just a Matter of Time Case Study
Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 1Final Project – ReferencesBenjamin Franklin once quoted, “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.” This week’s written assignment is designed to ensure you stay on track with your final project and have adequately researched your organization of choice and planned intervention. For this week, provide a set of references you have read in preparation for your final project. Each reference should include the following: APA formatted citation of the source as it will appear on your References page A brief description of the source A short summary of its primary points or arguments A brief explanation of how the source is relevant to your project A minimum of 5 references is required for this assignment. Exemplary 18-20 points Proficient 16-17 points Developing 14-15 points Beginning 12-13 points Inadequate 0-11 points Comprehension of Assignment (20% of grade) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. Addressed the majority of the question(s). Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). Did not address the question(s). Application of Course Knowledge and Content (20% of grade) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. Organization of Ideas (20% of grade) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Writing Skills (20% of grade) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. Research Skills (20% of grade) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. No evidence of resources apparent.Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 2It’s Just a Matter of Timing Case StudyReview the It’s Just a Matter of Timing Case Study (pp. 133-134) and answer the three discussion questions. Responses to each question should range from 100-200 words. Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, 1" margins, title and reference pages). Be sure to use the text and/or other sources to support your responses and properly cite the use of such.What did Teresa learn?Other than quitting, what can Teresa do to resolve the problem? What learning and perception factors should she consider as she analyzes the situation? If you were an outside consultant to the firm, could you recommend solutions that might not occur to Teresa or Vegas? What would they be? Exemplary 18-20 points Proficient 16-17 points Developing 14-15 points Beginning 12-13 points Inadequate 0-11 points Comprehension of Assignment (20% of grade) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. Addressed the majority of the question(s). Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). Did not address the question(s). Application of Course Knowledge and Content (20% of grade) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. Organization of Ideas (20% of grade) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Writing Skills (20% of grade) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. Research Skills (20% of grade) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. No evidence of resources apparent.
Marketing Question
The SBU is Corning Inc. For each of the following topics:Generate a short summary of the top 2-3 major factors impacting t ...
Marketing Question
The SBU is Corning Inc. For each of the following topics:Generate a short summary of the top 2-3 major factors impacting the project SBU. Use referenced research.In addition, be sure to indicate the implications of those factors on the product or product strategy. You will then after your analysis need to make a commentary on the effect on strategy from these environmental factors.Your search strategy should include using terms such as: industry news trends (place in industry name). You can also use sources that are specifically designed to provide macro trend information. A few examples of macro trend sources were outlined in the discussion. This information is not industry specific, so you would need to make and justify linkages.1. Sociocultural Forces & Demographic Shifts2. Economic Trends3. Competitive Trends4. Science and Technology5. Political and Legal6. Major Global ForcesIdentify the top 2-3 most relevant items for your SBU related to the criteria below:
Cost Volume Profit Analysis
Cost-Volume-Profit AnalysisPurpose of Assignment The Case Study focuses on CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit), break-even, and margi ...
Cost Volume Profit Analysis
Cost-Volume-Profit AnalysisPurpose of Assignment The Case Study focuses on CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit), break-even, and margin of safety analyses which allows students to experience working through a business scenario and applying these tools in managerial decision making. Assignment Steps Resources: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Tutorial help on Excel® and Word functions can be found on the Microsoft® Office website. There are also additional tutorials via the web offering support for Office products. Scenario: Mary Willis is the advertising manager for Bargain Shoe Store. She is currently working on a major promotional campaign. Her ideas include the installation of a new lighting system and increased display space that will add $24,000 in fixed costs to the $270,000 in fixed costs currently spent. In addition, Mary is proposing a 5% price decrease ($40 to $38) will produce a 20% increase in sales volume (20,000 to 24,000). Variable costs will remain at $24 per pair of shoes. Management is impressed with Mary's ideas but concerned about the effects these changes will have on the break-even point and the margin of safety.Complete the following: Compute the current break-even point in units, and compare it to the break-even point in units if Mary's ideas are used.Compute the margin of safety ratio for current operations and after Mary's changes are introduced (Round to nearest full percent).Prepare a CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit) income statement for current operations and after Mary's changes are introduced.Prepare a maximum 700-word informal memo to management addressing Mary's suggested changes. Explain whether Mary's changes should be adopted. Why or why not? Analyze the above information (three bullet points above) and use this information to support your suggestion.Show your work in Microsoft® Word or Excel®. Complete calculations/computations using Microsoft® Word or Excel®. Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
MGMT 3720 G Briant Ryan College of Business HR Policies and Practices Journal
This reflective journal includes a summary of your key learnings from each module.Fill out the Reflective Journal Template ...
MGMT 3720 G Briant Ryan College of Business HR Policies and Practices Journal
This reflective journal includes a summary of your key learnings from each module.Fill out the Reflective Journal Template based on each chapter presentation.
methods by quality of information, business and finance homework help
Compare the results of the three (3) methods by quality of information for decision making. Using what you have learned ab ...
methods by quality of information, business and finance homework help
Compare the results of the three (3) methods by quality of information for decision making. Using what you have learned about the three (3) methods, identify the best project by the criteria of long term increase in value. (You do not need to do further research.) Convey your understanding of the Time Value of Money principles used or not used in the three (3) methods. Review the video titled “NPV, IRR, MIRR for Mac and PC Excel” (located at and previously listed in Week 4) to help you understand the foundational concepts: Scenario Information:Assume that two gas stations are for sale with the following cash flows; CF1 is the Cash Flow in the first year, and CF2 is the Cash Flow in the second year. This is the time line and data used in calculating the Payback Period, Net Present Value, and Internal Rate of Return. The calculations are done for you. Your task is to select the best project and explain your decision. The methods are presented and the decision each indicates is given below.InvestmentSales PriceCF1CF2Gas Station A$50,000$0$100,000Gas Station B$50,000$50,000$25,000Three (3) Capital Budgeting Methods are presented:Payback Period: Gas Station A is paid back in 2 years; CF1 in year 1, and CF2 in year 2. Gas Station B is paid back in one (1) year. According to the payback period, when given the choice between two mutually exclusive projects, the investment paid back in the shortest time is selected.Net Present Value: Consider the gas station example above under the NPV method, and a discount rate of 10%:NPVgas station A = $100,000/(1+.10)2 - $50,000 = $32,644NPVgas station B = $50,000/(1+.10) + $25,000/(1+.10)2 - $50,000 = $16,115Internal Rate of Return: Assuming 10% is the cost of funds; the IRR for Station A is 41.421%.; for Station B, 36.602.Summary of the Three (3) Methods: Gas Station B should be selected, as the investment is returned in 1 period rather than 2 periods required for Gas Station A.Under the NPV criteria, however, the decision favors gas station A, as it has the higher net present value. NPV is a measure of the value of the investment.The IRR method favors Gas Station A. as it has a higher return, exceeding the cost of funds (10%) by the highest return.
Similar Content
"Opioid Overdose Task Force"
Out of 200 applicants, you have been selected to work as the manager in the research department for a special task force w...
SCC Audiences and Advertisers Tv Shows Questions
...
marketing mix (word count: 700 words, APA format, references )
MKG425 - CT 4
...
Management Question
Assignment Question(s):
Read carefully the mini case No 18 from your textbook (entitled ‘Tesla Motors Inc.) and briefly ...
Saudi Electronic University Tastie Fast Food Restaurant Start up Business Plan
المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
الجامعة السعودية...
EC Growing a Promising Sanitation Startup Discussion
Apply Your Knowledge. Strategic leadership is a process and requires an acquired skill set. RESOURCES:For this discussion,...
Global Marketing Mix
According to Kotabe & Helsen (2014), in the current world, there has been an increase in the level of trade as most of the...
Cost Accounting
The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated Students are advised to make their work cl...
Focused improvement class lectures_181996597-sode-lecture-pdf
uploads/services/161584/Focused improvement class lectures_181996597-sode-lecture-pdf.pdf...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
5 pages
Case Study Six Sigma Dmaic To Improve The Quality Of The Production Process Done
Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process Case Study: Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the ...
Case Study Six Sigma Dmaic To Improve The Quality Of The Production Process Done
Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process Case Study: Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process
MGT 517 Grantham University Week 3 Its Just a Matter of Time Case Study
Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 1Final Project – ReferencesBenjamin Franklin once quoted, “By failing t ...
MGT 517 Grantham University Week 3 Its Just a Matter of Time Case Study
Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 1Final Project – ReferencesBenjamin Franklin once quoted, “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.” This week’s written assignment is designed to ensure you stay on track with your final project and have adequately researched your organization of choice and planned intervention. For this week, provide a set of references you have read in preparation for your final project. Each reference should include the following: APA formatted citation of the source as it will appear on your References page A brief description of the source A short summary of its primary points or arguments A brief explanation of how the source is relevant to your project A minimum of 5 references is required for this assignment. Exemplary 18-20 points Proficient 16-17 points Developing 14-15 points Beginning 12-13 points Inadequate 0-11 points Comprehension of Assignment (20% of grade) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. Addressed the majority of the question(s). Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). Did not address the question(s). Application of Course Knowledge and Content (20% of grade) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. Organization of Ideas (20% of grade) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Writing Skills (20% of grade) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. Research Skills (20% of grade) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. No evidence of resources apparent.Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 2It’s Just a Matter of Timing Case StudyReview the It’s Just a Matter of Timing Case Study (pp. 133-134) and answer the three discussion questions. Responses to each question should range from 100-200 words. Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, 1" margins, title and reference pages). Be sure to use the text and/or other sources to support your responses and properly cite the use of such.What did Teresa learn?Other than quitting, what can Teresa do to resolve the problem? What learning and perception factors should she consider as she analyzes the situation? If you were an outside consultant to the firm, could you recommend solutions that might not occur to Teresa or Vegas? What would they be? Exemplary 18-20 points Proficient 16-17 points Developing 14-15 points Beginning 12-13 points Inadequate 0-11 points Comprehension of Assignment (20% of grade) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. Addressed the majority of the question(s). Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). Did not address the question(s). Application of Course Knowledge and Content (20% of grade) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. Organization of Ideas (20% of grade) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Writing Skills (20% of grade) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. Research Skills (20% of grade) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. No evidence of resources apparent.
Marketing Question
The SBU is Corning Inc. For each of the following topics:Generate a short summary of the top 2-3 major factors impacting t ...
Marketing Question
The SBU is Corning Inc. For each of the following topics:Generate a short summary of the top 2-3 major factors impacting the project SBU. Use referenced research.In addition, be sure to indicate the implications of those factors on the product or product strategy. You will then after your analysis need to make a commentary on the effect on strategy from these environmental factors.Your search strategy should include using terms such as: industry news trends (place in industry name). You can also use sources that are specifically designed to provide macro trend information. A few examples of macro trend sources were outlined in the discussion. This information is not industry specific, so you would need to make and justify linkages.1. Sociocultural Forces & Demographic Shifts2. Economic Trends3. Competitive Trends4. Science and Technology5. Political and Legal6. Major Global ForcesIdentify the top 2-3 most relevant items for your SBU related to the criteria below:
Cost Volume Profit Analysis
Cost-Volume-Profit AnalysisPurpose of Assignment The Case Study focuses on CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit), break-even, and margi ...
Cost Volume Profit Analysis
Cost-Volume-Profit AnalysisPurpose of Assignment The Case Study focuses on CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit), break-even, and margin of safety analyses which allows students to experience working through a business scenario and applying these tools in managerial decision making. Assignment Steps Resources: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Tutorial help on Excel® and Word functions can be found on the Microsoft® Office website. There are also additional tutorials via the web offering support for Office products. Scenario: Mary Willis is the advertising manager for Bargain Shoe Store. She is currently working on a major promotional campaign. Her ideas include the installation of a new lighting system and increased display space that will add $24,000 in fixed costs to the $270,000 in fixed costs currently spent. In addition, Mary is proposing a 5% price decrease ($40 to $38) will produce a 20% increase in sales volume (20,000 to 24,000). Variable costs will remain at $24 per pair of shoes. Management is impressed with Mary's ideas but concerned about the effects these changes will have on the break-even point and the margin of safety.Complete the following: Compute the current break-even point in units, and compare it to the break-even point in units if Mary's ideas are used.Compute the margin of safety ratio for current operations and after Mary's changes are introduced (Round to nearest full percent).Prepare a CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit) income statement for current operations and after Mary's changes are introduced.Prepare a maximum 700-word informal memo to management addressing Mary's suggested changes. Explain whether Mary's changes should be adopted. Why or why not? Analyze the above information (three bullet points above) and use this information to support your suggestion.Show your work in Microsoft® Word or Excel®. Complete calculations/computations using Microsoft® Word or Excel®. Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
MGMT 3720 G Briant Ryan College of Business HR Policies and Practices Journal
This reflective journal includes a summary of your key learnings from each module.Fill out the Reflective Journal Template ...
MGMT 3720 G Briant Ryan College of Business HR Policies and Practices Journal
This reflective journal includes a summary of your key learnings from each module.Fill out the Reflective Journal Template based on each chapter presentation.
methods by quality of information, business and finance homework help
Compare the results of the three (3) methods by quality of information for decision making. Using what you have learned ab ...
methods by quality of information, business and finance homework help
Compare the results of the three (3) methods by quality of information for decision making. Using what you have learned about the three (3) methods, identify the best project by the criteria of long term increase in value. (You do not need to do further research.) Convey your understanding of the Time Value of Money principles used or not used in the three (3) methods. Review the video titled “NPV, IRR, MIRR for Mac and PC Excel” (located at and previously listed in Week 4) to help you understand the foundational concepts: Scenario Information:Assume that two gas stations are for sale with the following cash flows; CF1 is the Cash Flow in the first year, and CF2 is the Cash Flow in the second year. This is the time line and data used in calculating the Payback Period, Net Present Value, and Internal Rate of Return. The calculations are done for you. Your task is to select the best project and explain your decision. The methods are presented and the decision each indicates is given below.InvestmentSales PriceCF1CF2Gas Station A$50,000$0$100,000Gas Station B$50,000$50,000$25,000Three (3) Capital Budgeting Methods are presented:Payback Period: Gas Station A is paid back in 2 years; CF1 in year 1, and CF2 in year 2. Gas Station B is paid back in one (1) year. According to the payback period, when given the choice between two mutually exclusive projects, the investment paid back in the shortest time is selected.Net Present Value: Consider the gas station example above under the NPV method, and a discount rate of 10%:NPVgas station A = $100,000/(1+.10)2 - $50,000 = $32,644NPVgas station B = $50,000/(1+.10) + $25,000/(1+.10)2 - $50,000 = $16,115Internal Rate of Return: Assuming 10% is the cost of funds; the IRR for Station A is 41.421%.; for Station B, 36.602.Summary of the Three (3) Methods: Gas Station B should be selected, as the investment is returned in 1 period rather than 2 periods required for Gas Station A.Under the NPV criteria, however, the decision favors gas station A, as it has the higher net present value. NPV is a measure of the value of the investment.The IRR method favors Gas Station A. as it has a higher return, exceeding the cost of funds (10%) by the highest return.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents