Presentation of Resilience and Risk Management, economics homework help

Anonymous
timer Asked: Mar 27th, 2017
account_balance_wallet $30

Question Description

I want a presentation with the notes about these 4 files that I attached.


Unformatted Attachment Preview

Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper Ethiopia: camels replacing cattle While cattle and goats become emaciated in times of drought and no longer produce milk, camels are capable of surviving long periods without water and their milk provides a crucial source of nutrition. By herding camels, pastoralists are adapting and maintaining their traditional way of life. Picture: Tim Waites/DFID 2 Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper CONTENTS Contents Foreword 4 1. Introduction 5 2. What is disaster resilience? 6 2.1 Defining resilience 6 2.2 How resilient is a country, community or household? 7 3. What do DFID disaster resilience programmes look like? 10 3.1 Conflict and fragility 10 3.2 Resilience-building interventions 11 3.3 Cost-effectiveness of building resilience to disasters 13 4. How will DFID take disaster resilience forward? 14 5. What can DFID contribute to the disaster resilience agenda? 16 Annex 1: Useful reading 18 Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper 3 FOREWORD Foreword In 2010 natural disasters affected more than 200 million, killed nearly 270,000 people and caused $110 billion in damages. In 2011, we faced the first famine of the 21st Century in parts of the Horn of Africa and multiple earthquakes, tsunamis and other natural disasters across the world. The World Bank predicts that the frequency and intensity of disasters will continue to increase over the coming decades. The June 2011 UK Government Response to the Humanitarian Emergency Response Review presented disaster resilience as ‘a new and vital component [of our] humanitarian and development work.’1 Building on this, the UK Government’s Humanitarian Policy, Saving lives, preventing suffering and building resilience, puts resilience at the centre of our approach to addressing disasters, both natural and man-made. This includes commitments to embed resilience-building in all DFID country programmes by 2015, integrate resilience into our work on climate change and conflict prevention and improve the coherence of our development and humanitarian work. Bangladesh: small changes make a big difference The women in this photo are trained in how to feed, house and prevent disease among their ducks. Small changes, like rearing ducks instead of chickens, will help families to maintain a livelihood during the monsoon season. Picture: Zul Mukhida/Practical Action. 1 www.dfid.gov.uk/Documents/publications1/hum-emer-resp-rev-uk-gvmt-resp.pdf?epslanguage=en 4 Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction Adopting resilience as our core approach to tackling disasters means identifying where different areas of our work can complement and enhance one another. This includes disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, social protection, working in fragile contexts and humanitarian preparedness and response. We will start by focusing on the key challenges: the need for common analysis that supports a coherent approach to risk; financing mechanisms that allow early, predictable and sustained commitments; early warning systems that lead to early action; political commitment among governments in countries at risk of disasters and donor agencies; and a stronger interface between development and humanitarian actors. Disaster resilience draws together several strands of DFID’s work, and in the wake of the ongoing global financial crisis has become a concern at the highest level. Increasing efforts are being made in social protection, disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation, aiming to build the resilience of poor and vulnerable communities in developing countries. There is increasing attention being paid to issues such as the resilience of macroeconomic growth2 and ‘crisis-proofing’ progress towards the MDGs3. At the same time, there has been a growing interest in how principles of resilience can be employed in conflict-affected and fragile states.4 This Approach Paper is intended to inform the next phase of DFID’s work on resilience to both natural and man-made disasters,5 by providing a starting point for discussion within the Department and with our partners. Although the focus is on disasters, this is part of a wider process to mainstream resilience across all of DFID’s work which is being led by Policy Division. The paper begins with an outline of what resilience is and sets out a framework to improve understanding of the different elements to be considered in building resilience through DFID’s country operations. It then looks at a range of existing DFID resilience interventions at country and regional levels. The paper concludes by providing suggestions for what DFID can do to strengthen its work in this area and how it can provide strategic leadership across the international system. 2 www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2010/car051710a.htm ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/COMM_NATIVE_SEC_2009_0445_4_MDGS_EN.pdf 4 See 2009 European Development Report Background Paper: erd.eui.eu/media/BackgroundPapers/ERD-Background_Paper-Kaplan.pdf 5 This Approach Paper is based on a small-scale research process conducted in July 2011, with some 30 DFID staff and representatives of external partners consulted, and over 50 documents, books and reports reviewed. Details of external experts and essential documents can be found in Annex 1. 3 Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper 5 WHAT IS DISASTER RESILIENCE? 2. What is disaster resilience? 2.1 Defining resilience Resilience is the focus of a large and growing body of research. This work has sought to understand what the properties are that make a country, community or household resilient, to establish the principles and processes which strengthen resilience and to build the evidence for what projects and programmes really make people better able to withstand and recover from disasters. As a result of the research and its applications, the term resilience has acquired a range of definitions. Three widely cited examples are set out below6. Definitions of resilience “The ability of a system, community or society exposed to hazards to resist, absorb, accommodate to and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner” United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction “The ability of a social or ecological system to absorb disturbances while retaining the same basic structure and ways of functioning, the capacity for self-organisation, and the capacity to adapt to stress and change” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change “The capacity of a system to absorb disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change” The Resilience Alliance DFID has adopted a working definition: Disaster Resilience is the ability of countries, communities and households to manage change, by maintaining or transforming living standards in the face of shocks or stresses - such as earthquakes, drought or violent conflict - without compromising their long-term prospects. This has been designed to support our latest thinking on resilience. It is intended to provide part of the basis for discussion, both internally and with our partners. Consequently, we are open to it developing and changing as these discussions progress. 6 For a more detailed discussion of different definitions and implications see the 2010 DFID funded report: The Resilience Renaissance community.eldis.org/.59e0d267/resilience-renaissance.pdf 6 Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper WHAT IS DISASTER RESILIENCE? 2.2 How resilient is a country, community or household? Determining levels of resilience is an important part of understanding the concept. And most definitions of resilience share four common elements which can be used to do this: context; disturbance; capacity; and reaction. Together these elements form a resilience framework (see below) which can be used to examine different kinds of resilience (for example, of growth or of governance systems) and help determine the level of resilience that exists. The four elements of a resilience framework 1. Context 2. Disturbance e.g. social group, region, institution. e.g. natural hazard, conflict, insecurity, food shortage, high fuel prices. Shocks 3. Capacity to deal with disturbance Exposure 4. Reaction to disturbance e.g. Survive, cope, recover, learn, transform. Bounce back better Bounce back System or Process Sensitivity Stresses Adaptive capacity Recover but worse than before Collapse Resilience of what? Resilience to what? The framework above is a simplified representation of the elements to be considered when examining resilience. In practice the picture is more complex: the response curve could be slow and uneven due to, for example, the political context, secondary shocks or lack of information. Stresses can be cumulative, building slowly to become a shock, and both shocks and stresses may result in a number of different reactions. Each element of the resilience framework is explored below with specific reference to disaster resilience. Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper 7 WHAT IS DISASTER RESILIENCE? Context Resilience should always be clearly contextualised – allowing a coherent answer to the question ‘resilience of what?’ Resilience can be identified and strengthened in a social group, socio-economic or political system, environmental context or institution. Each of these systems will display greater or lesser resilience to natural or man-made disasters. More work is needed to differentiate the significance of resilience for different social groups, resources and institutions across a range of different contexts. Disturbance Once the system or process of interest is determined, the next stage is to understand the disturbances faced, addressing the question ‘resilience to what?’ These disturbances usually take two forms:  Shocks are sudden events that impact on the vulnerability of the system and its components. There are many different types of disaster-related shocks that can strike at different levels. These include disease outbreaks, weather-related and geophysical events including floods, high winds, landslides, droughts or earthquakes. There can also be conflict-related shocks such as outbreaks of fighting or violence, or shocks related to economic volatility.  Stresses are long-term trends that undermine the potential of a given system or process and increase the vulnerability of actors within it. These can include natural resource degradation, loss of agricultural production, urbanisation, demographic changes, climate change, political instability and economic decline. Of course, countries will often face multiple interconnected shocks and stresses. Capacity to deal with disturbance The ability of the system or process to deal with the shock or stress is based on the levels of exposure, the levels of sensitivity and adaptive capacities.  Exposure to risk is an assessment of the magnitude and frequency of shocks or the degree of stress. For example, exposure to conflicts could be measured by the size and frequency of violent events caused by conflict or fragility, or the extent of political instability in other factors such as rule of law or human rights.  Sensitivity is the degree to which a system will be affected by, or respond to, a given shock or stress. This can vary considerably for different actors within a system. For example, women accounted for up to 80% of those who died during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, and death rates among women were almost four times higher than those among men in the 1991 Bangladesh cyclone. Limited mobility, skills set and social status exacerbated sensitivity to the shock.  The adaptive capacities of actors – individuals, communities, regions, governments, organisations or institutions – are determined by their ability to adjust to a disturbance, moderate potential damage, take advantage of opportunities and cope with the consequences of a transformation. Adaptive capacities allow actors to anticipate, plan, react to, and learn from shocks or stresses. 8 Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper WHAT IS DISASTER RESILIENCE? Sensitivity and adaptive capacity are determined by the pool of assets and resources that can be mobilised in the face of shocks and stresses. Assets and resources can be social, human, technological, physical, economic, financial, environmental, natural, and political. Whether a system or a process is resilient is a function of its sensitivity and adaptive capacity. The other side to this is vulnerability - the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with, the adverse effects of shocks and stresses. Reaction to disturbance In the best case, the reaction to a shock or stress might be a ‘bounce back better’ for the system or process concerned. In this case capacities are enhanced or sensitivities and exposures are reduced, leaving a system that is more able to deal with future shocks and stresses (see below). An alternative reaction might be a ‘bounce back’ to a normal, preexisting condition, or to ‘recover, but worse than before’ – the latter resulting in reduced capacities. In the worst-case scenario, the system or process might not bounce back at all, but ‘collapse’, leading to a catastrophic reduction in capacity to cope in the future. ‘Bounce back better’ The Zambezi Floodplain Management programme in Mozambique supports vulnerable communities to deal with persistent flooding of their farms. There has always been drought and flooding in this area, but in the last 10 years weather patterns have become more unpredictable. Instead of planting seeds in the main agricultural season in the lowlands, irrigation projects encourage farmers to plant in the highlands away from the floods. Alongside this, communities are helped to learn new skills which provide them with alternative sources of income. Communities decide on the kinds of livelihoods they want to develop and Save the Children provides training, technical support and funding to help them get started. Helping communities to grow crops all year and reduce their vulnerability to drought, whilst also diversifying livelihoods, increases their resilience to the effects of climate change. Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper 9 WHAT DO DFID DISASTER RESILIENCE PROGRAMMES LOOK LIKE? 3. What do DFID disaster resilience programmes look like? To date, many humanitarian and development interventions supported by DFID have focused on individual elements of the resilience framework. For example, much disaster risk reduction work has focused on reducing sensitivity and exposure to particular shocks and stresses, while livelihoods work has focused on adaptive capacity, looking at assets and diversification of income. In DFID, and among its partner organisations, using resilience as a concept has enabled stronger dialogue and cross-fertilisation of ideas between different disciplines and programming areas. This has in some cases strengthened the harmonisation of different kinds of programmes – especially between disaster risk reduction, social protection and climate change adaptation (see below).7 Integration of disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation and social protection Rwanda’s Vision 2020 Umurenge Program makes direct cash transfers to households without labour, connects poor households with an able-bodied member to public works and provides access to subsidised credit. The Vision 2020 Umurenge Program’s public works projects are dominated by anti-erosive ditches and ‘radical’ hillside terraces which explicitly aim at environmental protection. Such public works have clear disaster risk reduction, food security and climate change adaptation impacts as they reduce exposure and sensitivity to natural disasters – for example droughts and floods – improve soil productivity and increase the amount of land that can be cultivated. 3.1 Conflict and fragility Resilience has been applied more extensively in relation to natural disasters than to conflict and fragility, areas to which DFID can usefully take a consolidated approach. Work by International Alert indicates that the broader factors that enhance climate resilience are the same as those that enhance conflict resilience – including effective governance, equity and strong social contracts. A comprehensive approach to resilience across natural and conflict-related areas requires a focus on strengthening institutions at national, regional and local levels incorporating political, security, humanitarian and development considerations.8 This requires bringing together diverse disciplines, interests and groups to address the question: “What does disaster resilience look like in our context?” 7 The view of one external expert was frequently repeated: ‘resilience can act as a boundary term which facilitates cross-institutional and disciplinary dialogue and learning’. 8 erd.eui.eu/media/BackgroundPapers/ERD-Background_Paper-Kaplan.pdf 10 Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper WHAT DO DFID DISASTER RESILIENCE PROGRAMMES LOOK LIKE? 3.2 Resilience-building interventions A key determinant of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity is the set of resources and assets that can be utilised in the face of a stress or shock. As such, resilienceenhancing activities can be usefully classified using the ‘assets pentagon’ from the sustainable livelihoods framework – social, human, physical, financial, and natural (see below). Types and levels of resilience building activities9 Social/ Human Technological/ Physical LEVELS OF INTERVENTION     Financial / Economic Global / regional National Municipal / local Community / household Political Environmental/ Natural However, the relationship between, for example, an environmental shock or stress and an environmental resilience intervention is not linear. Instead, as in the livelihoods approach, the full range of asset types needs to be considered when considering a resilience intervention. By classifying different interventions by type and level of operation, it is possible to map the existing portfolio of disaster resilience activities in a country or a region. DFID programmes that build resilience to disasters DFID is already doing valuable work in this area across a number of country and regional offices. This spans countries such as China, Bangladesh and Ethiopia and regions such as the Caribbean. Examples on page 12 show a range of these projects and programmes, ranging from rural livelihoods support to regional disaster insurance mechanisms and from pre-disaster household asset protection to housing upgrades. Interventions can also vary in scale, from global and regional level to that of communities and households. They can also focus on building disaster resilience before the shock or stress reaches a tipping point, during a disaster response, or after an event. 9 www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/2339.pdf Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper 11 WHAT DO DFID DISASTER RESILIENCE PROGRAMMES LOOK LIKE? Examples of DFID projects on enhancing resilience to disasters DFID Ethiopia The Productive Safety Net Programme covers 7.8 million vulnerable people and has helped break the need for emergency food programmes by providing people with regular and predictable cash and food transfers. A new Risk Financing mechanism allows the Programme to expand in times of shock. This can for example increase the period of time over which an individual receives transfers (beyond the normal six months) or add more people to the programme. This mechanism is integral to protecting the asset base of households in times of shock and helps to prevent the programme f ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

Robert__F
School: Boston College

Good luck in your study and if you need any further help in your assignments, please let me know Can you please confirm if you have received the work? Once again, thanks for allowing me to help you R

Resilience and Risk
Management
Name

What is resilience?
–The capacity to adapt
to setbacks in life,
and “bounce back”

Understanding Resiliency

–The levels of
resilience change
over time; hence, it is
not always present

Additional Resilience
Skills
–Patience and time-taking
–Seeking assistance if nee
d be
–Implementation of a
suitable action plan

Areas to develop
capacity for resilience
1. Being autonomous
2. Being socially competent

3. Having a positive attitude

Improving Resiliency
–Stay in touch
–Obtain meaning

–Make journal
entries

–Staying jovial

–Be ready to change

–Learn from past
mistakes

–Create a workable
goal

–Don’t lose hope

–Stay focused

Resilience and Mental Health

–Inequalities in Mental
Health
–Community and
individual are interdependent on each other

Resilience as Protection
–Evading depression and
social anxiety
–Social support
–Treatment of ...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Good stuff. Would use again.

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors