29. What is the most effective way to communicate changes in the relationship
User Generated
sberireurbpppp
Humanities
Description
between automotive accidents and distracted driving in the last decade?1.video That features An explanation Of theseChanges2.pictureOf aCellPhone 3.lineGraph that illustratesChanges 4.graphic of a billboard that reads “Hang Up and Drive!"
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Medical University of South Carolina Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation EssayNote: Please review the source guidelines below ve ...
Medical University of South Carolina Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation EssayNote: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose from the provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmit the assignment.For this assignment, you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your >nal draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the >nal. Your second draft will be graded. Now that you have completed Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley's novel. You may focus most of your attention on this >rst critique. If the author of your critique is not speci?ed, focus on the publication of the critique.Choose from among these sources:Romantic Circle's Critiques:Critique 1 Critique 2 Critique 3 Critique 4 Critique 5 Critique 6Professor Naomi Hetherington’s critiqueThe questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:Evaluate the critic/author:Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to >nd these easily)Find the thesis of the article:What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?Evaluate the thesis:Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you >nd points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.Evaluate the support:Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide suacient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classi>cation, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the >rst critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.For instance, if the >rst critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the >rst critic's thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the >rst critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the >rst critic's thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical-- if that's the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides.Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).OR(Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).More speci>c thesis examples:John Smith uses "Frankenstein Critique Essay" to adequately argue that Victor's mother created the Mrst monster by coddling Victor as a boy.ORJohn Smith's "Frankenstein Critique Essay" does not effectively argue that Victor's mother created the Mrst monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible. The guidelines for this assignment are:Length: This assignment should be a minimum of 3 typed pages or at least 750 words.Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:Your >rst and last nameCourse Title (Composition II)Assignment name (Evaluation Essay, Writing Assignment 4)Current DateFormat:Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.Rubric: Grading Rubric for the Critical AnalysisLast modi>ed: Monday, July 22, 2019, 1:07 PM MLA-style source documentation and Works CitedYour last name and page number in the upper- right corner of each pageDouble-spacing throughoutStandard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri) Title, centered after heading1” margins on all sidesSave the >le using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt Once you have >nished with your essay and are ready for it to be reviewed by a grader, submit your assignment using the Draft or Final upload links for this assignment.Please note that drafts are optional.Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Anglia Ruskin University Book Review Bound for Freedom Paper
You may write your book review on 1 of the books listed below:Molina, Natalie. How Race Is Made in America: Immigration, C ...
Anglia Ruskin University Book Review Bound for Freedom Paper
You may write your book review on 1 of the books listed below:Molina, Natalie. How Race Is Made in America: Immigration, Citizenship, and the Racial Historical Power of Racial Scripts (University of California Press, 2014)ISBN: 978-0520280083Flamming, Douglas. Bound for Freedom: Black Los Angeles in Jim Crow America (University of California Press, 2005)ISBN: 978-0520239197I do not have the book you must have access to it Directions for the Book Review:Summarize the narrative and author’s argumentsHow does this book discuss race and other major topics (e.g., government policies, de facto segregation, residential segregation, etc.)?What is the author’s point of view on race and its impact on our society historically? Can you make any connections to contemporary issues? Explain.What surprised you about this book? Why did it surprise you?What will you remember six months from now about this book? Why?If you could ask the author two questions, what would they be?Requirements Checklist must be 5 pages long.Papers must be double-spaced, typed, and aligned left with 1-inch margins (all around) in 12-point Times New Roman font, and numbered.At the top of your paper include (single-spaced):Your first and last name; course title and section number; date; title of book being reviewedAs with all assignments in this course, your essay must be well-written; your work will be evaluated on the basis of both content and form (grammar, organization, etc.).Citation FormatChicago Manual of Style formatChicago citation format requires footnotes, not parenthetical / in-text citations. A simple google and/or Youtube search can show you how to insert footnotes on your word document if you are unfamiliar with these tools.No Plagerism
1 page
Second Question Walzer
The Captain’s complaint against the French Guerilla’s was that in no way did the Frenchmen try to identify themselves ...
Second Question Walzer
The Captain’s complaint against the French Guerilla’s was that in no way did the Frenchmen try to identify themselves as enemy combatants. ...
PHI208 Ashford Utilitarianism Applied to Just War and Military Ethics Paper
Applying an Ethical Theory
Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often du ...
PHI208 Ashford Utilitarianism Applied to Just War and Military Ethics Paper
Applying an Ethical Theory
Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions. Please also utilize the assignment guidance and the outlined model provided.OverviewThe following short essay assignment is designed to help prepare you for an important part of the Final Paper. In this essay, you will do the following:Choose either the same ethical question you formulated and introduced in the Week One Assignment, or a different one based off the list of acceptable topics.Choose either utilitarian or deontological ethical theory to apply to the ethical question.Explain the core principles of that theory.Demonstrate how the principles of the theory support a certain position on that question.Articulate a relevant objection to that position.InstructionsWrite a five-paragraph essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be at least 1,000 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:IntroductionThe introduction should clearly state the ethical question under consideration, and define the essential issues. You may build upon the question and introduction you provided in the Week One Assignment; or you may choose a different question, but it must be based off the list of acceptable topics. Your introduction should include a brief remark about the kind of theory you will be using to approach this question. The last sentence of the introduction should briefly summarize the or position on the issue you think is best supported by this theory and succinctly state what the objection will be. Bear in mind that your essay will not be concerned with your own position on this issue, but what someone reasoning along the lines of the chosen theory would conclude; this may or may not be the position you took in the Week One Assignment.
Body ParagraphsEach paragraph in the body should start with a topic sentence that clearly identifies the main idea of the paragraph.
Theory explanationExplain the core principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory and the general account of moral reasoning it provides.You must quote from at least one required resource other than your textbook that defends or represents that theory. Refer to the list of acceptable resources.ApplicationDemonstrate how the principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory apply to the question under consideration and identify the specific conclusion that results from applying the reasoning characteristic of that kind of approach.Your application should clearly show how the conclusion follows from the main principles and features of the theory as addressed in the previous paragraph. Please see the associated guidance for help in fulfilling this requirement.ObjectionRaise a relevant objection to the argument expressed in your application. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument problematic. This can be a false or unsupported claim or assumption, fallacious reasoning, a deep concern about what the conclusion involves, a demonstration of how the argument supports other conclusions that are unacceptable, etc. You should aim to explain this objection as objectively as possible, (i.e., in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with the argument from the previous paragraph).Note that this does not necessarily mean that the objection succeeds, or that the conclusion the theory supports is wrong. It may be an obstacle that any adequate defense of the conclusion would have to overcome, and it may be the case that the theory has the resources to overcome that obstacle. Your task here is simply to raise the objection or present the “obstacle.”
ConclusionThe conclusion should very briefly summarize the main points of your essay.Resource RequirementsYou must use at least two resources to support your claims.At least one of the resources should be one of the Required or Recommended Resources that represent the theory you have chosen, and must be drawn from the list of acceptable resources available in your online classroom.The other source should pertain to the particular issue you are writing about and should be drawn from the required or recommended readings in the course, or be a scholarly source found in the Ashford Unversity Library.You are encouraged to use additional resources, so long as at least two conform to the requirements above.The textbook does not count toward satisfying the resources requirement.
1 page
Summer And Winter
Summer and winter are two distinct seasons but with some unique similarities. Both seasons are distinct in terms of extrem ...
Summer And Winter
Summer and winter are two distinct seasons but with some unique similarities. Both seasons are distinct in terms of extreme weathers, with the summer ...
Similar Content
PSY 477 Illinois State University Psychology Play and Work Discussion
Week One DiscussionDiscussion Questions (Select one): Please make one substantive post (answer) and one substantive and th...
Critical Reading & Thoughtful (Communal) Engagement
Assignment 3: Critical Reading & Thoughtful (Communal) EngagementIn order to write effectively in psychology, you need...
Need help with Wk 4 Popular Culture and Art
Review "The Principle of Selection," Ch. 7 of Oxford Historyof Art: Twentieth-Century American Art, and the Week Four Elec...
A Place For Us Journal Entry
Read pages 284-342 in A Place for Us and complete a journal entry for each chapter. Each journal about 50-100 words...
MSSW 611 Springfield Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977 PPT
Presentation
...
ENG 101 Chattahoochee The Myth of Mythical Creatures Argumentative Essay
The Myth of Mythical Creatures Argumentative Essay
...
Mental Illness
What did we learn about media representation as it relates to mental health disability? The media has a unique ability to ...
Compliance.edited
Compliance is a social influence where one does what someone else wants them to do after being requested. This is similar ...
Boslonaro
The article “Covid-19 vaccine scandal could be the final straw for Bolsonaro supporters” depicts the current scandal a...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Twilight
by Stephenie Meyer
Where'd You Go Bernadette
by Maria Semple
You Are a Badass
by Jen Sincero
Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone
by J. K. Rowling
Underground A Human History of the Worlds Beneath our Feet
by Will Hunt
Cry the Beloved Country
by Alan Paton
Tess of the DUrbervilles
by Thomas Hardy
Little Women
by Louisa May Alcott
Othello
by Wiliam Shakespeare
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Medical University of South Carolina Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation EssayNote: Please review the source guidelines below ve ...
Medical University of South Carolina Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation EssayNote: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose from the provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmit the assignment.For this assignment, you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your >nal draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the >nal. Your second draft will be graded. Now that you have completed Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley's novel. You may focus most of your attention on this >rst critique. If the author of your critique is not speci?ed, focus on the publication of the critique.Choose from among these sources:Romantic Circle's Critiques:Critique 1 Critique 2 Critique 3 Critique 4 Critique 5 Critique 6Professor Naomi Hetherington’s critiqueThe questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:Evaluate the critic/author:Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to >nd these easily)Find the thesis of the article:What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?Evaluate the thesis:Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you >nd points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.Evaluate the support:Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide suacient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classi>cation, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the >rst critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.For instance, if the >rst critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the >rst critic's thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the >rst critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the >rst critic's thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical-- if that's the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides.Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).OR(Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).More speci>c thesis examples:John Smith uses "Frankenstein Critique Essay" to adequately argue that Victor's mother created the Mrst monster by coddling Victor as a boy.ORJohn Smith's "Frankenstein Critique Essay" does not effectively argue that Victor's mother created the Mrst monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible. The guidelines for this assignment are:Length: This assignment should be a minimum of 3 typed pages or at least 750 words.Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:Your >rst and last nameCourse Title (Composition II)Assignment name (Evaluation Essay, Writing Assignment 4)Current DateFormat:Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.Rubric: Grading Rubric for the Critical AnalysisLast modi>ed: Monday, July 22, 2019, 1:07 PM MLA-style source documentation and Works CitedYour last name and page number in the upper- right corner of each pageDouble-spacing throughoutStandard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri) Title, centered after heading1” margins on all sidesSave the >le using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt Once you have >nished with your essay and are ready for it to be reviewed by a grader, submit your assignment using the Draft or Final upload links for this assignment.Please note that drafts are optional.Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Anglia Ruskin University Book Review Bound for Freedom Paper
You may write your book review on 1 of the books listed below:Molina, Natalie. How Race Is Made in America: Immigration, C ...
Anglia Ruskin University Book Review Bound for Freedom Paper
You may write your book review on 1 of the books listed below:Molina, Natalie. How Race Is Made in America: Immigration, Citizenship, and the Racial Historical Power of Racial Scripts (University of California Press, 2014)ISBN: 978-0520280083Flamming, Douglas. Bound for Freedom: Black Los Angeles in Jim Crow America (University of California Press, 2005)ISBN: 978-0520239197I do not have the book you must have access to it Directions for the Book Review:Summarize the narrative and author’s argumentsHow does this book discuss race and other major topics (e.g., government policies, de facto segregation, residential segregation, etc.)?What is the author’s point of view on race and its impact on our society historically? Can you make any connections to contemporary issues? Explain.What surprised you about this book? Why did it surprise you?What will you remember six months from now about this book? Why?If you could ask the author two questions, what would they be?Requirements Checklist must be 5 pages long.Papers must be double-spaced, typed, and aligned left with 1-inch margins (all around) in 12-point Times New Roman font, and numbered.At the top of your paper include (single-spaced):Your first and last name; course title and section number; date; title of book being reviewedAs with all assignments in this course, your essay must be well-written; your work will be evaluated on the basis of both content and form (grammar, organization, etc.).Citation FormatChicago Manual of Style formatChicago citation format requires footnotes, not parenthetical / in-text citations. A simple google and/or Youtube search can show you how to insert footnotes on your word document if you are unfamiliar with these tools.No Plagerism
1 page
Second Question Walzer
The Captain’s complaint against the French Guerilla’s was that in no way did the Frenchmen try to identify themselves ...
Second Question Walzer
The Captain’s complaint against the French Guerilla’s was that in no way did the Frenchmen try to identify themselves as enemy combatants. ...
PHI208 Ashford Utilitarianism Applied to Just War and Military Ethics Paper
Applying an Ethical Theory
Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often du ...
PHI208 Ashford Utilitarianism Applied to Just War and Military Ethics Paper
Applying an Ethical Theory
Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions. Please also utilize the assignment guidance and the outlined model provided.OverviewThe following short essay assignment is designed to help prepare you for an important part of the Final Paper. In this essay, you will do the following:Choose either the same ethical question you formulated and introduced in the Week One Assignment, or a different one based off the list of acceptable topics.Choose either utilitarian or deontological ethical theory to apply to the ethical question.Explain the core principles of that theory.Demonstrate how the principles of the theory support a certain position on that question.Articulate a relevant objection to that position.InstructionsWrite a five-paragraph essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be at least 1,000 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:IntroductionThe introduction should clearly state the ethical question under consideration, and define the essential issues. You may build upon the question and introduction you provided in the Week One Assignment; or you may choose a different question, but it must be based off the list of acceptable topics. Your introduction should include a brief remark about the kind of theory you will be using to approach this question. The last sentence of the introduction should briefly summarize the or position on the issue you think is best supported by this theory and succinctly state what the objection will be. Bear in mind that your essay will not be concerned with your own position on this issue, but what someone reasoning along the lines of the chosen theory would conclude; this may or may not be the position you took in the Week One Assignment.
Body ParagraphsEach paragraph in the body should start with a topic sentence that clearly identifies the main idea of the paragraph.
Theory explanationExplain the core principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory and the general account of moral reasoning it provides.You must quote from at least one required resource other than your textbook that defends or represents that theory. Refer to the list of acceptable resources.ApplicationDemonstrate how the principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory apply to the question under consideration and identify the specific conclusion that results from applying the reasoning characteristic of that kind of approach.Your application should clearly show how the conclusion follows from the main principles and features of the theory as addressed in the previous paragraph. Please see the associated guidance for help in fulfilling this requirement.ObjectionRaise a relevant objection to the argument expressed in your application. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument problematic. This can be a false or unsupported claim or assumption, fallacious reasoning, a deep concern about what the conclusion involves, a demonstration of how the argument supports other conclusions that are unacceptable, etc. You should aim to explain this objection as objectively as possible, (i.e., in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with the argument from the previous paragraph).Note that this does not necessarily mean that the objection succeeds, or that the conclusion the theory supports is wrong. It may be an obstacle that any adequate defense of the conclusion would have to overcome, and it may be the case that the theory has the resources to overcome that obstacle. Your task here is simply to raise the objection or present the “obstacle.”
ConclusionThe conclusion should very briefly summarize the main points of your essay.Resource RequirementsYou must use at least two resources to support your claims.At least one of the resources should be one of the Required or Recommended Resources that represent the theory you have chosen, and must be drawn from the list of acceptable resources available in your online classroom.The other source should pertain to the particular issue you are writing about and should be drawn from the required or recommended readings in the course, or be a scholarly source found in the Ashford Unversity Library.You are encouraged to use additional resources, so long as at least two conform to the requirements above.The textbook does not count toward satisfying the resources requirement.
1 page
Summer And Winter
Summer and winter are two distinct seasons but with some unique similarities. Both seasons are distinct in terms of extrem ...
Summer And Winter
Summer and winter are two distinct seasons but with some unique similarities. Both seasons are distinct in terms of extreme weathers, with the summer ...
Earn money selling
your Study Documents