Description
Are you FOR or AGAINST Cartesian Dualism?
Descartes’ (Cartesian) Metaphysics: DUALISM
METAPHYSICS Debate Question: What is the nature of reality?
God = Infinite Immaterial Substance; transcendent, teleological substance. | |
Mind (Soul) | Body (brain) |
Immaterial/Transcendent: No extension in time and space; transcendent | Material: Extended in time and space; measureable objectively |
Consciousness | Matter in motion, governed by the laws of nature, e.g. physics, biology, etc. |
Free will (thinking, affirming, denying) | Mechanism (Determinism) |
Terminology: for Descartes, Soul = Mind =
Transcendent Substance
Select an opponent for dualism from these philosophical alternatives:
Darwin & Dennett | Monism |
Sartre’s Existentialism | Nihilism |
Instructions: Write a one page essay in which you: single space
- State your thesis for or against Cartesian dualism.
- Select (and include in your thesis statement) an opponent for Cartesian dualism: either Darwinian monism OR existentialist nihilism.
- Clarify the basis/criteria of your argument, e.g. logical, rational, parsimonious, common-sensical, etc.
EXAMPLE: “In this paper I will argue Cartesian dualism offers a more parsimonious explanation of reality than Darwinian monism.”
- Make an argument for your position and support it with an original analogy, e.g. reality is like a machine, e.g. clock or computer; or, mind/body relation is like a captain steering the ship.
- Consider and refute your opposition, including a critique of their analogy.
- Use only textual sources assigned in this course in the composition of your essay. Indicate the pages numbers, e.g. (23) for all references to text.
Reminders:
- DO NOT USE ANY PHILOSOPHICAL SOURCES IN YOUR PAPER OTHER THAN THOSE ASSIGNED. This is not a research paper.
- One page limit means keep it on one side of one piece of paper with standard margins. Everyone strive to respect this length limitation as an invitation to be concise, on point, towards an end-in view.
Do not plagiarize! Please read everything very carefully, make sure you understand what you going to write.
Make sure that you write 2 entirely different essay,
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Hi there! Your paper is ready. Kindly look at it. I will be much humbled to receive your feedback. Best regards.
Surname 1
Name
Tutor
Course
Date
Cartesian Dualism vs. Darwinian Monism
Dualism is a philosophical theory advanced by the French philosopher, Descartes. The
theory argues that there is a profound distinction between the mind and the body, a position that
sets forth an unprecedented controversy among several other famous philosophies, i.e. nihilism,
pluralism, monism, and the Cartesian dualism itself. According to Darwin, the physical kind is
the only provable principle since it can be tested scientifically. Monism holds that there is no
other kind apart from the one theorized by Darwin. Therefore, the present paper will favor the
perspective that argues that Cartesian dualism convincingly offers a more parsimonious
reasonin...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great content here. Definitely a returning customer.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
MCRC Secure Videoconferencing Communications Paper & PPT
Cybersecurity professionals are frequently required to assess the security, risk applications, and systems for business co ...
MCRC Secure Videoconferencing Communications Paper & PPT
Cybersecurity professionals are frequently required to assess the security, risk applications, and systems for business communications before they can be added to an organization's network. CISOs need to assess risks posed to the organization and develop new security measures or adjust current measures to address these risks appropriately. These evaluations involve comparing competing applications or systems against the organization's baseline to determine the best balance between business needs and the security and risk appetite of the organization. Videoconferencing and collaboration systems vary in cost, configuration, functionality, use, and collaboration capability. These systems are trusted to facilitate sensitive and proprietary discussions through their use of encrypted communication channels. Yet these systems have vulnerabilities and are prone to threats and attacks ranging from phishing, credential compromise, and even malware insertion. Therefore, analysis of possible threats, attacks, and vulnerabilities inherent in these systems is critical in developing defense and protection strategies for voice and video data at all endpoints and during transit. In this project, you will present your proposal in the form of a narrated slide deck. Be sure to refer to Guidelines for Presentation on Secure Videoconferencing. Also, you will complete a lab report on secure videoconferencing. There are six steps to the project, and the project as a whole should take about two weeks to complete. Begin with the workplace scenario above and then continue to Step 1.
6 pages
Drama Analysis Paper
RACISM AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IN THE PLAY FENCES Racism and the American Dream in the Play Fences RACISM AND THE AMERICAN ...
Drama Analysis Paper
RACISM AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IN THE PLAY FENCES Racism and the American Dream in the Play Fences RACISM AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IN THE PLAY FENCES
MGT-445: Week 7 - Training Evaluation
MGT-445 Corporate Training & Development Week 7 - Training EvaluationTwo Parts to this assignment:Part I: Answer the DQ i ...
MGT-445: Week 7 - Training Evaluation
MGT-445 Corporate Training & Development Week 7 - Training EvaluationTwo Parts to this assignment:Part I: Answer the DQ in 50 words or more (be specific):In your own words, define “benchmarking” and explain a process you would use to benchmark your company’s safety training program.Part II: Assignment Detail: Complete an evaluation plan of approximately 750 words for the training you developed in week 4 of this course. (This builds on two other assignments...week 2 and 4; see attahcments).Your evaluation plan should include an explanation of how you will evaluate your training or learning intervention to measure its effectiveness. For example, you may discuss the measures you will use (e.g., test, survey, skill demonstration), and what sources you will collect data from (e.g., self-report, independent rater, supervisor). Provide a copy of each proposed measure.Include a minimum of two scholarly sources.
9 pages
Rounding To Prevent Falls.edited
The quality of nursing care has been the focus of health care organizations, especially following multiple articles that d ...
Rounding To Prevent Falls.edited
The quality of nursing care has been the focus of health care organizations, especially following multiple articles that documented the serious health ...
Family Case Study (FCS)
Write an essay by following instruction:Section 1: Background Information on the Family (approx. 2 pages; 5 points)This is ...
Family Case Study (FCS)
Write an essay by following instruction:Section 1: Background Information on the Family (approx. 2 pages; 5 points)This is an introduction of your family—please feel free to include any information necessary or feel comfortable sharing that you believe is important for me to know about in order to fully understand your family system.NOTE: if you have a family of your own that you have created with your partner and have children, I advise you to do your family of procreation and not family of origin.Briefly describe the following characteristics of your current family:1. Composition of the family: marital status, ages, children, and sibling order (including yourself)—who’s in your immediate family that you live with or are dependent upon.2. Occupation of parents (if you still live with them) or if you are independent then your occupation, educational achievement of family members, ethnicity, religious/faith background, and family social class.3. Description of community/neighborhood in which your family lives—what was/is your neighborhood like (i.e. friendly, disconnected, diverse, family-centered, ect.)4. Level of interaction and connection with extended family.Section 2: Brief Commentary and Illustrations of Challenges and Strengths of your family system (approx. 3-4 pages; 18 points)*First, make sure you have read chapters 2 (regarding Family Systems Theory) and 11 (cohesion and communication).Then, rate your family on the three dimensions of family cohesion, family flexibility, and family communication based on the scale and rating forms (See Tables 1 and 2 below).Upon completion of rating your family (provided above), you will write up the results of your family assessment on the Couple and Family Map Rating Form (see Table 2), which will be what you address in your "case study." This means rating your family on each of the concepts and then making a global rating (average rating) related to the three major dimensions using the rating scales provided (see rating form and scale in Tables 1 and 2). Please use the Utilizing the Couple and Family Map for how to calculate all ratings.Begin, by looking over the Scales to get an understanding of what each dimension (e.g., cohesion) looks like and then you will use that understanding to fill out the rating form. Therefore, when you fill out the Couple and Family Rating Form to get your ratings for each dimension of cohesion, flexibility, and communication, you will take your cohesion global/average rating and flexibility global/average rating to find out where your family fell on the Couple and Family Map (See Table 3). Basically, tell me what system your family fell into based on your family's global scores of cohesion and flexibility in addition to what you scored overall in cohesion, flexibility, and communication (e.g. “After mapping my family on the Couple and Family Map, I found that my family is Structurally Connected with a global rating of a 3 in cohesion, a 4 in flexibility, and a 3.5 in communication…”).Once you have identified your current type of family system (e.g. structurally connected or rigidly enmeshed), you will then discuss in your case study the perceived strengths and challenges for each dimension with this type of family system based off how you rated your family—what areas did you score high versus areas you scored lower in; where does your family thrive but where can they improve. This section is designed for you to look at each dimension of the Couple and Family Map (i.e., cohesion, communication, and flexibility) and to pick at least 2 concepts under each—one strength and one challenge (for example, under cohesion: you may choose loyalty as a strength and shared activities as a challenge) and discuss it by providing examples and illustrations of what that concept looks like in your family and why you scored it the way you did.Do NOT be general or abstract in explanations and descriptions such as: "My family is very loyal so it is a strength for us and we scored an 8 on it." But in what ways are you loyal and how did you come to give your family such a high score? What examples can you provide to demonstrate loyalty to the family among the members? Think of it this way: after you score your family in cohesion—ask yourself, "What is a strength for us in this area and what is a challenge/growth area or something we could work on?" You will need to explain why by choosing from the various dimensions. For example again, you may choose "activities" as a strength; thus you will need to explain how by illustrating and describing—“We have high cohesion due to our activities. We enjoy doing things together such as: we have a game night every Tuesday and every weekend we try to get together because we enjoy being in each other's presence and doing activities together...it is a strength for us.” In short, you are to explain through examples why you scored your family a certain number for the areas of Cohesion, Flexibility, and Communication and talk about the strengths and challenges you believe your family has in each dimension.Concluding Reflection (2 points):Finally, you are to include at the end of your analysis study a reflection of the process. Some examples of what you could discuss though you are NOT limited to these considerations: Were you surprised at the results? Did you find it difficult or easy to rate your family? Which dimensions did you feel were the most challenging and why? What do you think of where your family fell on the Map? After assessing your family, what would you recommend that your family could do to become a stronger and healthier system? What do you like best about your family?Here is the link you might need to use: Utilizing the Couple and Family Map
SMC The Power of An Image to Encourage Faulty Deductive Thinking and False Ethos
Hello bids, this is english 2 , *Critical Thinking EssayThis assignment it's 2 part, first part it's an 1000 words Essay, ...
SMC The Power of An Image to Encourage Faulty Deductive Thinking and False Ethos
Hello bids, this is english 2 , *Critical Thinking EssayThis assignment it's 2 part, first part it's an 1000 words Essay, all the questions, material and grading rubric need for the essay it's explain under clearly so please make sure you follow the guide and finish all the requirement.second part it's read other student essay and respond 125 words for each student and total need respond to 4 student. how you respond students essay it's explain under clearly so please make sure follow the guide. also 4 students (peers) essay it's attached to files under for you to review and respond. ( please make sure PART 2 OF ASSIGNMENT --> Peer Evaluations FOUR respond it's different document than part 1 )I attached some of files under, please check it out it's necessary for the assignment and please ask me ASAP if u have anything can't open, missing or have questions or needs about essay.Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment !Part 1: EssayHow Time Picks Person of the YearADOLF HITLER (Links to an external site.)Adolf Hitler, Time," March 13, 1933 | Vol. XXI No. 11 (Links to an external site.)Iconic (Links to an external site.) Image: A Boy (Man) and His Dog(Cover Story: "Germany: National Revolution") (Links to an external site.)Overview: 1933 Cover of Time Magazine Featuring Adolf HitlerOur purpose in this assignment is threefold: to ponder ..How media coverage may stop people from thinking critically;Whether media sources have an obligation to report information as factually as possible--in both words and images.The power of an image to shape people's thoughts and ideas about individuals, groups, organizations, events, and places.Who was Trayvon Martin?Part 1: Essay 1. On the Internet, research evidence about what kind of leader Adolf Hitler was before and up to March 13, 1933, when Time put him on its cover--in an artist's rendering--sitting in a garden with a dog, dressed in a casual Schutzstaffel (SS) uniform.Helpful SourcesThe Nazi Party (Links to an external site.)/ Beer Hall Putsch (Links to an external site.) / Mein Kampf (Links to an external site.)/ Reichstag Fire (Links to an external site.)/ Dachau (Links to an external site.)/ Early Warnings: How American Journalists Reported the Rise of Hitler (Links to an external site.)2. In 1,000 words (four pages), argue A, B or C.A. The 1933 Time cover of Hitler with a dog in a garden was irresponsible and dangerously misleading news coverage of Hitler on the part of Time, encouraging faulty deductive reasoning (a faulty syllogism (Links to an external site.)) on the part of people who viewed the cover but did not read the article. The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.) is a weak argument justifying its unethical choice to publish more than one positive image of Hitler on its covers (1933 and 1938 (Links to an external site.)) at a time when Hitler's demagoguery (Links to an external site.) was public knowledge. Time actively helped to promote a false ethos (Links to an external site.) of Hitler. Thus, the 1933 cover, in particular, shows that Time is in direct opposition to these four lessons from Timothy Snyder's 2017 book On Tyranny: Take responsibility for the face of the world, Stand out, Believe in truth, and Be as courageous as you can.Quoting: The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.), syllogism definition, and Snyder's On Tyranny.ORB. The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.) is logical, and is not opposed to these four lessons from Timothy Snyder's 2017 book On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century: Take responsibility for the face of the world, Stand out, Believe in truth, and Be as courageous as you can.Quoting: Snyder's On Tyranny and the explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.)ORC. Arguing about whether or not the Time cover of Hitler was ethical reporting, and using deductive reasoning and Snyder's lessons in On Tyranny to prove or disprove this point, makes your teacher guilty of the false dilemma fallacy, (Links to an external site.)stopping you from thinking more creatively (and abductively?) about why Time depicted Hitler on the 1933 cover with his dog in a garden. If so, explain how your teacher is stopping you from thinking more creatively; provide concrete examples. In what other ways should you be thinking about the 1933 cover of Hitler? Are there questions you should be asking about the 1933 cover that assignment directions A or B preclude you from asking?Quoting: Snyder's On Tyranny, source for false dilemma fallacy, and assignment directionsessay requirements 1. Do not write online because you may lose your work; write in Word, and then copy and paste your work onto the assignment screen. 2. Do NOT attach your work. You are participating in a discussion, and your work must be visible to peers; they should not have to download your work. Attached work will NOT be downloaded and evaluated.3. Use Times-New Roman font in size 12 with black type.4. Do NOT write a Five-Paragraph Essay; write an essay with a variety of paragraphs, as in the Chapter 1 and Chapter 3 essays in our textbook THIS LITTLE BOOK About How to Write a College-Level Essay (Links to an external site.). 5. Quote sources per assignment directions.6. Use the first-person singular judiciously (Links to an external site.). See: https://wordvice.com/first-person-pronouns-in-research-paper/ (Links to an external site.).Grading discussion rubric :An "A" discussion essay ...1. Supports thoughts and ideas about the text(s) by …a. Providing interesting insights to and interpretations of the text(s)b. Demonstrating an excellent factual knowledge of the text(s).c. Quoting ably from the text(s) in mostly correct MLA format.d. Using textual terms and related vocabulary with few, if any, errors.2. Provides meaningful, constructive feedback to two peers in peer evaluations by …a. Showing empathy/compassion for peers’ feelings.b. Demonstrating that peers’ thoughts/ideas have been considered.3. Does not make distracting English usage skills errors: errors that prevent the reader from focusing on content.4. Does not plagiarize.Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment, please make different page for part 2!Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment !PART 2 : PEER EVALUATIONSRespond to 4 of your peers' postings; --> four of peers posting it's attached to files under !!write 125 words (a half-page) for each response, for a total of 500 words (two pages).How should you respond?Compare your peers' thinking regarding this assignment to your own thinking; in each evaluation, quote your peer briefly, agreeing or disagreeing with how he or she thinks, and provide logical reasons as to why, but be respectful, compassionate and courteous. And … if someone evaluates your work, respond! In your response, don't just write "thank you for evaluating my work" or something like that--demonstrate that you have read the evaluation and considered it carefully.
Similar Content
CJU 407 Belhaven University Adult Criminals Discussion
Do you believe that childhood victims often become adult criminals? Why or why not? What criminological theories support ...
Likelihood of A Drone Attack on Oil Refineries in Dammam Essay
S Ask a new question - Studypoc X
G terrorism definition - Google SEX
Bb Announcements - Capstone
Bb Case Study Assignment...
Normal Sleep Patterns and Sleep Disorders Discussion
J South Med Univ, 2019, 39(5): 505-507
doi 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2019.05.01
·505·
Original Article
Psychoanalyti...
Georgia Institute of Technology Aging Workforce Outline
Research Proposal Outline- Project Interim Report . You are able to choose 1 topic from #2 on the project description atta...
University of Central Florida Willard Brinton Data Visualization Pioneer Report
research report
Willard Brinton, one of the data visualization pioneers.
...
ER Diagram Essay
Submit the document with the title ER_Diagram in a PDF format.This assignment utilizes the terms required in ER Dropbox as...
1945684 Bio Development
Thomas Jimmy was born in New York City in 1982 and later relocated to California. During his childhood, Thomas experienced...
Common Information Model Cim
The Common Information Model (or CIM) refers to a standard that accommodate the various characteristics of computer applic...
Class Exercise 1
In class #1, I enjoyed how fast I was able to focus and control my breathing at the beginning of the class. I have had pro...
Related Tags
Book Guides
100 Side Hustles
by Chris Guillebeau
Homo Deus
by Yuval Noah Harari
Twelve Years A Slave
by Solomon Northrup
Moby Dick
by Herman Melville
Beowulf
by Anonymous Anglo-Saxon poet
The Sun Is Also a Star
by Nicola Yoon
Othello
by Wiliam Shakespeare
The Mayor of Casterbridge
by Thomas Hardy
The Underground Railroad
by Colson Whitehead
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
MCRC Secure Videoconferencing Communications Paper & PPT
Cybersecurity professionals are frequently required to assess the security, risk applications, and systems for business co ...
MCRC Secure Videoconferencing Communications Paper & PPT
Cybersecurity professionals are frequently required to assess the security, risk applications, and systems for business communications before they can be added to an organization's network. CISOs need to assess risks posed to the organization and develop new security measures or adjust current measures to address these risks appropriately. These evaluations involve comparing competing applications or systems against the organization's baseline to determine the best balance between business needs and the security and risk appetite of the organization. Videoconferencing and collaboration systems vary in cost, configuration, functionality, use, and collaboration capability. These systems are trusted to facilitate sensitive and proprietary discussions through their use of encrypted communication channels. Yet these systems have vulnerabilities and are prone to threats and attacks ranging from phishing, credential compromise, and even malware insertion. Therefore, analysis of possible threats, attacks, and vulnerabilities inherent in these systems is critical in developing defense and protection strategies for voice and video data at all endpoints and during transit. In this project, you will present your proposal in the form of a narrated slide deck. Be sure to refer to Guidelines for Presentation on Secure Videoconferencing. Also, you will complete a lab report on secure videoconferencing. There are six steps to the project, and the project as a whole should take about two weeks to complete. Begin with the workplace scenario above and then continue to Step 1.
6 pages
Drama Analysis Paper
RACISM AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IN THE PLAY FENCES Racism and the American Dream in the Play Fences RACISM AND THE AMERICAN ...
Drama Analysis Paper
RACISM AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IN THE PLAY FENCES Racism and the American Dream in the Play Fences RACISM AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IN THE PLAY FENCES
MGT-445: Week 7 - Training Evaluation
MGT-445 Corporate Training & Development Week 7 - Training EvaluationTwo Parts to this assignment:Part I: Answer the DQ i ...
MGT-445: Week 7 - Training Evaluation
MGT-445 Corporate Training & Development Week 7 - Training EvaluationTwo Parts to this assignment:Part I: Answer the DQ in 50 words or more (be specific):In your own words, define “benchmarking” and explain a process you would use to benchmark your company’s safety training program.Part II: Assignment Detail: Complete an evaluation plan of approximately 750 words for the training you developed in week 4 of this course. (This builds on two other assignments...week 2 and 4; see attahcments).Your evaluation plan should include an explanation of how you will evaluate your training or learning intervention to measure its effectiveness. For example, you may discuss the measures you will use (e.g., test, survey, skill demonstration), and what sources you will collect data from (e.g., self-report, independent rater, supervisor). Provide a copy of each proposed measure.Include a minimum of two scholarly sources.
9 pages
Rounding To Prevent Falls.edited
The quality of nursing care has been the focus of health care organizations, especially following multiple articles that d ...
Rounding To Prevent Falls.edited
The quality of nursing care has been the focus of health care organizations, especially following multiple articles that documented the serious health ...
Family Case Study (FCS)
Write an essay by following instruction:Section 1: Background Information on the Family (approx. 2 pages; 5 points)This is ...
Family Case Study (FCS)
Write an essay by following instruction:Section 1: Background Information on the Family (approx. 2 pages; 5 points)This is an introduction of your family—please feel free to include any information necessary or feel comfortable sharing that you believe is important for me to know about in order to fully understand your family system.NOTE: if you have a family of your own that you have created with your partner and have children, I advise you to do your family of procreation and not family of origin.Briefly describe the following characteristics of your current family:1. Composition of the family: marital status, ages, children, and sibling order (including yourself)—who’s in your immediate family that you live with or are dependent upon.2. Occupation of parents (if you still live with them) or if you are independent then your occupation, educational achievement of family members, ethnicity, religious/faith background, and family social class.3. Description of community/neighborhood in which your family lives—what was/is your neighborhood like (i.e. friendly, disconnected, diverse, family-centered, ect.)4. Level of interaction and connection with extended family.Section 2: Brief Commentary and Illustrations of Challenges and Strengths of your family system (approx. 3-4 pages; 18 points)*First, make sure you have read chapters 2 (regarding Family Systems Theory) and 11 (cohesion and communication).Then, rate your family on the three dimensions of family cohesion, family flexibility, and family communication based on the scale and rating forms (See Tables 1 and 2 below).Upon completion of rating your family (provided above), you will write up the results of your family assessment on the Couple and Family Map Rating Form (see Table 2), which will be what you address in your "case study." This means rating your family on each of the concepts and then making a global rating (average rating) related to the three major dimensions using the rating scales provided (see rating form and scale in Tables 1 and 2). Please use the Utilizing the Couple and Family Map for how to calculate all ratings.Begin, by looking over the Scales to get an understanding of what each dimension (e.g., cohesion) looks like and then you will use that understanding to fill out the rating form. Therefore, when you fill out the Couple and Family Rating Form to get your ratings for each dimension of cohesion, flexibility, and communication, you will take your cohesion global/average rating and flexibility global/average rating to find out where your family fell on the Couple and Family Map (See Table 3). Basically, tell me what system your family fell into based on your family's global scores of cohesion and flexibility in addition to what you scored overall in cohesion, flexibility, and communication (e.g. “After mapping my family on the Couple and Family Map, I found that my family is Structurally Connected with a global rating of a 3 in cohesion, a 4 in flexibility, and a 3.5 in communication…”).Once you have identified your current type of family system (e.g. structurally connected or rigidly enmeshed), you will then discuss in your case study the perceived strengths and challenges for each dimension with this type of family system based off how you rated your family—what areas did you score high versus areas you scored lower in; where does your family thrive but where can they improve. This section is designed for you to look at each dimension of the Couple and Family Map (i.e., cohesion, communication, and flexibility) and to pick at least 2 concepts under each—one strength and one challenge (for example, under cohesion: you may choose loyalty as a strength and shared activities as a challenge) and discuss it by providing examples and illustrations of what that concept looks like in your family and why you scored it the way you did.Do NOT be general or abstract in explanations and descriptions such as: "My family is very loyal so it is a strength for us and we scored an 8 on it." But in what ways are you loyal and how did you come to give your family such a high score? What examples can you provide to demonstrate loyalty to the family among the members? Think of it this way: after you score your family in cohesion—ask yourself, "What is a strength for us in this area and what is a challenge/growth area or something we could work on?" You will need to explain why by choosing from the various dimensions. For example again, you may choose "activities" as a strength; thus you will need to explain how by illustrating and describing—“We have high cohesion due to our activities. We enjoy doing things together such as: we have a game night every Tuesday and every weekend we try to get together because we enjoy being in each other's presence and doing activities together...it is a strength for us.” In short, you are to explain through examples why you scored your family a certain number for the areas of Cohesion, Flexibility, and Communication and talk about the strengths and challenges you believe your family has in each dimension.Concluding Reflection (2 points):Finally, you are to include at the end of your analysis study a reflection of the process. Some examples of what you could discuss though you are NOT limited to these considerations: Were you surprised at the results? Did you find it difficult or easy to rate your family? Which dimensions did you feel were the most challenging and why? What do you think of where your family fell on the Map? After assessing your family, what would you recommend that your family could do to become a stronger and healthier system? What do you like best about your family?Here is the link you might need to use: Utilizing the Couple and Family Map
SMC The Power of An Image to Encourage Faulty Deductive Thinking and False Ethos
Hello bids, this is english 2 , *Critical Thinking EssayThis assignment it's 2 part, first part it's an 1000 words Essay, ...
SMC The Power of An Image to Encourage Faulty Deductive Thinking and False Ethos
Hello bids, this is english 2 , *Critical Thinking EssayThis assignment it's 2 part, first part it's an 1000 words Essay, all the questions, material and grading rubric need for the essay it's explain under clearly so please make sure you follow the guide and finish all the requirement.second part it's read other student essay and respond 125 words for each student and total need respond to 4 student. how you respond students essay it's explain under clearly so please make sure follow the guide. also 4 students (peers) essay it's attached to files under for you to review and respond. ( please make sure PART 2 OF ASSIGNMENT --> Peer Evaluations FOUR respond it's different document than part 1 )I attached some of files under, please check it out it's necessary for the assignment and please ask me ASAP if u have anything can't open, missing or have questions or needs about essay.Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment !Part 1: EssayHow Time Picks Person of the YearADOLF HITLER (Links to an external site.)Adolf Hitler, Time," March 13, 1933 | Vol. XXI No. 11 (Links to an external site.)Iconic (Links to an external site.) Image: A Boy (Man) and His Dog(Cover Story: "Germany: National Revolution") (Links to an external site.)Overview: 1933 Cover of Time Magazine Featuring Adolf HitlerOur purpose in this assignment is threefold: to ponder ..How media coverage may stop people from thinking critically;Whether media sources have an obligation to report information as factually as possible--in both words and images.The power of an image to shape people's thoughts and ideas about individuals, groups, organizations, events, and places.Who was Trayvon Martin?Part 1: Essay 1. On the Internet, research evidence about what kind of leader Adolf Hitler was before and up to March 13, 1933, when Time put him on its cover--in an artist's rendering--sitting in a garden with a dog, dressed in a casual Schutzstaffel (SS) uniform.Helpful SourcesThe Nazi Party (Links to an external site.)/ Beer Hall Putsch (Links to an external site.) / Mein Kampf (Links to an external site.)/ Reichstag Fire (Links to an external site.)/ Dachau (Links to an external site.)/ Early Warnings: How American Journalists Reported the Rise of Hitler (Links to an external site.)2. In 1,000 words (four pages), argue A, B or C.A. The 1933 Time cover of Hitler with a dog in a garden was irresponsible and dangerously misleading news coverage of Hitler on the part of Time, encouraging faulty deductive reasoning (a faulty syllogism (Links to an external site.)) on the part of people who viewed the cover but did not read the article. The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.) is a weak argument justifying its unethical choice to publish more than one positive image of Hitler on its covers (1933 and 1938 (Links to an external site.)) at a time when Hitler's demagoguery (Links to an external site.) was public knowledge. Time actively helped to promote a false ethos (Links to an external site.) of Hitler. Thus, the 1933 cover, in particular, shows that Time is in direct opposition to these four lessons from Timothy Snyder's 2017 book On Tyranny: Take responsibility for the face of the world, Stand out, Believe in truth, and Be as courageous as you can.Quoting: The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.), syllogism definition, and Snyder's On Tyranny.ORB. The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.) is logical, and is not opposed to these four lessons from Timothy Snyder's 2017 book On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century: Take responsibility for the face of the world, Stand out, Believe in truth, and Be as courageous as you can.Quoting: Snyder's On Tyranny and the explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.)ORC. Arguing about whether or not the Time cover of Hitler was ethical reporting, and using deductive reasoning and Snyder's lessons in On Tyranny to prove or disprove this point, makes your teacher guilty of the false dilemma fallacy, (Links to an external site.)stopping you from thinking more creatively (and abductively?) about why Time depicted Hitler on the 1933 cover with his dog in a garden. If so, explain how your teacher is stopping you from thinking more creatively; provide concrete examples. In what other ways should you be thinking about the 1933 cover of Hitler? Are there questions you should be asking about the 1933 cover that assignment directions A or B preclude you from asking?Quoting: Snyder's On Tyranny, source for false dilemma fallacy, and assignment directionsessay requirements 1. Do not write online because you may lose your work; write in Word, and then copy and paste your work onto the assignment screen. 2. Do NOT attach your work. You are participating in a discussion, and your work must be visible to peers; they should not have to download your work. Attached work will NOT be downloaded and evaluated.3. Use Times-New Roman font in size 12 with black type.4. Do NOT write a Five-Paragraph Essay; write an essay with a variety of paragraphs, as in the Chapter 1 and Chapter 3 essays in our textbook THIS LITTLE BOOK About How to Write a College-Level Essay (Links to an external site.). 5. Quote sources per assignment directions.6. Use the first-person singular judiciously (Links to an external site.). See: https://wordvice.com/first-person-pronouns-in-research-paper/ (Links to an external site.).Grading discussion rubric :An "A" discussion essay ...1. Supports thoughts and ideas about the text(s) by …a. Providing interesting insights to and interpretations of the text(s)b. Demonstrating an excellent factual knowledge of the text(s).c. Quoting ably from the text(s) in mostly correct MLA format.d. Using textual terms and related vocabulary with few, if any, errors.2. Provides meaningful, constructive feedback to two peers in peer evaluations by …a. Showing empathy/compassion for peers’ feelings.b. Demonstrating that peers’ thoughts/ideas have been considered.3. Does not make distracting English usage skills errors: errors that prevent the reader from focusing on content.4. Does not plagiarize.Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment, please make different page for part 2!Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment !PART 2 : PEER EVALUATIONSRespond to 4 of your peers' postings; --> four of peers posting it's attached to files under !!write 125 words (a half-page) for each response, for a total of 500 words (two pages).How should you respond?Compare your peers' thinking regarding this assignment to your own thinking; in each evaluation, quote your peer briefly, agreeing or disagreeing with how he or she thinks, and provide logical reasons as to why, but be respectful, compassionate and courteous. And … if someone evaluates your work, respond! In your response, don't just write "thank you for evaluating my work" or something like that--demonstrate that you have read the evaluation and considered it carefully.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents
