Read Case Study 3.1 and "Government Saw Flood Risk but Not Levee Failure.

User Generated

Qbggvr58

Other

Description

nswer Questions 1 and 3 at the end of Case Study 3.1.

Each question should be answered in an essay format of approximately 250-500 words. Ensure your paper answers the questions and uses concepts studied in the module and from both readings. Support your answers with personal experiences, current events, and references to the readings.

Use the GCU library to locate four to six scholarly sources to support your analysis.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Government Saw Flood Risk but Not Levee Failure

Read "Government Saw Flood Risk but Not Levee Failure" to complete the Katrina Breakdown assignment.http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/national/nationalspecial/02response.html?_r=1

here you can read case study ( http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/us/nationalspeci... )

and below are questions

1. Which of the three perspectives do you find most persuasive? Least persuasive? Support your answer.

3. Setting aside the philosophical and legal issues this case raises, what are the management or efficiency arguments for and against a more centralized response to large national disasters like Hurricane Katrina? Why would we not want to have a federal fire department? If the federal government tells the states and cities they will receive no assistance in the event of a disaster, what do you think will happen?

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Good luck in your study and if you need any further help in your
assignments, please let me know.Goodbye.

Running head: ANALYZING THE CASE STUDY ON DISASTER MANAGEMENT

CASE STUDY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS

NAME

INSTITUTION AFFILIATION

1

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

2
Case Study Analysis

Question one
While analyzing the effects on and objectivity of each perspective, it would be worth to
mention that these aspects should be critically analyzed from the magnitude of the disaster and
the potential of each methodology to deliver the required results. The inclination being that the
comparison of the two perspectives lies in their ability to serve the immediate needs of the
suffering masses who need the emergency services.
The perspective that I find least effective is...


Anonymous
Awesome! Perfect study aid.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags