Criminal Justice Capstone

Anonymous
timer Asked: Apr 4th, 2017
account_balance_wallet $10

Question Description

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

Scenario Part 1

On March 12, 2014, at approximately 2200 hours, the Sunnyville, Utah Police Department received a 911 call of an armed robbery at 201 SE 2nd Ave. Upon the police arriving on scene, Victim 1, Luke Roberts, had been shot in the head and deceased. Victim 2, Liam O'Neil, was pistol-whipped. Both victims were robbed of their cell phones and wallets at gunpoint. Liam O'Neil was able to identify both suspects and the getaway vehicle. A short distance away, police stopped the suspect vehicle with two Caucasian males that matched the description provided by Mr. O'Neil. After the two suspects were positively identified, they were arrested and brought to the police station for interviews.
Before the police interviewed the suspects, they read them their Miranda rights. Suspect 1 refused to speak to the police, invoked his Miranda rights, and stated that he wanted a lawyer. The police began asking Suspect 2 specific questions about the crime. Suspect 2 stated “I’m not sure I should talk to you,” but then hesitantly proceeded to answers questions, making several incriminating statements.

Review the Miranda v. Arizona case using the Web resources assigned to this class.

  • What legal aspects from the scenario need to be addressed?
  • What legal aspects may come up at the trial?
  • Is his statement of "I am not sure if I want to talk anymore" enough to invoke his Miranda Rights? If not, what must the police officer do next

Tutor Answer

benwamonicah
School: Rice University

Attached.

Running Head: MIRANDA RIGHTS

1

Miranda Right
Institution Affiliation
Date:

MIRANDA RIGHTS

2

In law enforcement, some legal aspects are considered during the arrest and integrations
of a suspect of a crime. Before the detention of an individual suspected of committing or being
involved in offense, police are supposed to have a warrant for arrest (Henham and Behrens,
2009). Moreover, during investigations, a suspect deserves to be informed of his or her Miranda
rights. The primary purpose of the Miranda rights to protect citizens from giving selfincriminating information that can be used to lay the blame on them a law court. Therefore, as
the officers of law try to preserve peace and safety for all individuals they are also expected to
protect people deemed to be criminals...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Tutor went the extra mile to help me with this essay. Citations were a bit shaky but I appreciated how well he handled APA styles and how ok he was to change them even though I didnt specify. Got a B+ which is believable and acceptable.

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors