DNR - Ethics Complete the DNR interactive case study. Associate what you have studied in your weekly materials with what is presented in this case study. After you complete the case study, use the journal tool in Blackboard to reflect upon what you've learned from the case study and related learning materials this week. Compare this case study to your nursing practice and give a similar example from your nursing experience in which you might have run into an ethical situation. DNR - Ethics Complete the DNR interactive case study. Associate what you have studied in your weekly materials with what is presented in this case study. After you complete the case study, use the journal tool in Blackboard to reflect upon what you've learned from the case study and related learning materials this week. Compare this case study to your nursing practice and give a similar example from your nursing experience in which you might have run into an ethical situation. ntions After you view the case study, reflect upon what you have learned and how it is related to the learning materials. Compare the case study to your nursing practice and give a similar example from your experience in which you might have run into an ethical situation. Submit your entry by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time). Your reflection content should be a minimum of 500 words, equal to five to six paragraphs, and is worth 50 points. NURS_440_OL - Case Study Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Critical Analysis 40 to >35.6 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all questions. Makes keen observations, making note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions. 35.6 to >30.0 pts Mostly Meets Expectations Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most questions. Makes occasional note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions. 30 to >23.6 pts Below Expectations Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for most questions. Fails to address essential information provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion. 23.6 to >0 pts Not Meeting Expectations Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound. 40 pts Content 40 to >35.6 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Makes insightful, clear and accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high- level understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 35.6 to >30.0 pts Mostly Meets Expectations Makes mostly accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 30 to >23.6 pts Below Expectations Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations, although attempts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the 23.6 to >O pts Not Meeting Expectations Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 40 pts case. Mechanics 15 to >13.35 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical 13.35 to >11.25 pts Mostly Meets Expectations Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors. 11.25 to >8.85 pts Below Expectations Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors. 8.85 to >0 pts Not Meeting Expectations Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors. 15 pts errors. APA Format 5 to >4.45 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. 4.45 to >3.75 pts Mostly Meets Expectations Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. 3.75 to >2.95 pts Below Expectations Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. 2.95 to >0 pts Not Meeting Expectations Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. 5 pts
Purchase answer to see full attachment