Race & Ethnicity, history homework help

Anonymous
timer Asked: Apr 9th, 2017
account_balance_wallet $10

Question Description

Final Paper Prep



To prepare for your Final Paper (due in Week Five), complete the following written assignment and then submit it to your instructor for feedback.



Topic:


  • Race & Ethnicity – Discuss the role of race and ethnicity in 20th century Europe.



Thesis: Develop your thesis statement. This will become the point or perspective you will argue or prove in the paper. Please see the Ashford Writing Center for information on how to develop a solid thesis.



List of sources researched: The purpose of creating a list of sources is to assist you in organizing and evaluating your research. The list should include the following information for each source (minimum of six):

  • Name of the source, including the complete bibliographic citation in proper APA format.
  • Summary of the source (at least one paragraph), including how the source will contribute to your paper.


For this paper, you need to conduct research in peer-reviewed journals or other sources that are considered to have reliable information. In addition to your required course text, you need at least six professional scholarly sources, three of which must be peer reviewed journal articles. Please visit the Academic Research section on your course homepage (accessible through the Student Responsibilities and Policies tab on the left navigation toolbar) to review what types of materials are, and are not, acceptable for academic, university-level research.



The paper must be two to four pages in length (in addition to a cover page) and formatted according to APA style as outline in the Ashford Writing Center. You must use at least six scholarly sources (at least three of which can be found in the Ashford University Library) other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. To further help you in your research for this assignment and for the Final Paper, it is recommended that you view the Resources for Potential Research. Cite your sources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.




Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Thesis Development Total: 2.00 Distinguished - Thesis is exceptionally well designed and focus is considerably more developed than the general topic. Thesis concerns one specific idea and expertly argues a position. Firm and succinct thesis statement is included at end of introductory paragraph or section regarding thesis development. Proficient - Thesis is well designed and focus is more developed than the general topic. Thesis concerns one specific idea and clearly argues a position. Distinct thesis statement is included at end of introductory paragraph or section regarding thesis development. Basic - Thesis is adequately designed. Focus is more developed than the general topic, but is vague or unclear. Thesis concerns one specific idea. Thesis either neglects to argue a position or no distinct thesis statement is included at end of introductory paragraph or section regarding thesis development. Below Expectations - Thesis development is attempted, but thesis is either vague or confusing. Topic is chosen, but thesis concerns more than one major idea, neglects to argue a position on the topic, or does not narrow focus beyond the general topic. No distinct thesis statement is included at end of introductory paragraph or section regarding thesis development. Non-Performance - The thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Summaries of Sources Total: 3.00 Distinguished - Source summaries provide a rich and detailed generalization of the academic source materials and clearly explain the manner in which they will contribute to the paper. Proficient - Source summaries provide reasonable generalizations of the academic source materials and explain the manner in which they will contribute to the paper. Some details could use clarification or be more fully developed. Basic - Source summaries provide basic generalizations of the academic source materials and explain the manner in which they will contribute to the paper. Summaries are either vague and/or under-developed, or they neglect to fully explain the manner in which the sources will be utilized in the paper. Below Expectations - Source summaries are attempted, but they lack a number of required components described in the assignment instructions. Summaries do not attempt to explain the manner in which they will contribute to the paper. Non-Performance - The source summaries are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions. Quality of Sources Total: 3.00 Distinguished - The totality of the academic source materials utilized is of the highest quality university-level standards. Proficient - The totality of the academic source materials utilized meets university-level standards. A minority of academic sources may be of limited value to the thesis. Basic - A majority of the academic source materials utilized meet university-level standards. A minority of sources utilized are either commercial websites of dubious academic merit or may be unrelated to the thesis. Below Expectations - A minimal number of academic sources utilized are of university level standards. The majority of sources utilized are either commercial websites or of dubious academic merit. A majority of sources may be unrelated to the thesis. Non-Performance - The academic source materials are either nonexistent or the quality of the source materials lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Reading: Comprehension Total: 1.00 Distinguished - Distinguishes probable implications of the text for contexts, perspectives, or issues outside the assigned task or beyond the author's explicit message. Proficient - Uses the text and/or specific knowledge of the author’s context to draw more intricate inferences about the author’s message and approach. Basic - Considers how textual features (e.g., sentence and paragraph structure or tone) contribute to the author’s message. Draws fundamental inferences about context and rationale of text. Below Expectations - Inadequately captures vocabulary but makes an effort to paraphrase or summarize the information the text communicates. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Written Communication: Evidence and Sources Total: 0.50 Distinguished - Demonstrates consistent use of reliable, appropriate sources and/or evidence to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing. Proficient - Demonstrates mostly consistent use of reliable sources that are appropriate to the discipline and genre of the writing. Sources offer some support to the ideas in the writing. Basic - Demonstrates somewhat inconsistent use of sources that are mostly reliable to the discipline and genre of the writing. Sources offer little support to the ideas in the writing. Below Expectations - Inconsistently utilizes sources and/or evidence that may be unrelated and offer little support to the ideas in the writing. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics Total: 0.50 Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand. Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand. Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader. Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Powered by ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

chemtai
School: Duke University

please find the attached file. i look forward to working with you again. good bye

Running head: RACE AND ETHNICITY IN 1900S

Race and Ethnicity in 1900s
Name
Tutor
Course
Institution
Date

1

RACE AND ETHNICITY IN 1900S

2

RACE AND ETHNICITY IN 1900s
Thesis:
In the 20th Century, minority groups in Europe suffered racist and ethnically inclined
injustices based on the perceived of racial inferiority and xenophobia having of scientific or
factual truth.
Herf, J. (2006). The Jewish enemy: Nazi propaganda during World War II and the
Holocaust.
Jeffrey Herf is the author of the above article. Herf is a distinguished American historian
and a history professor at the University of Mary Land. The ideas and conclusions of this article
are therefore reliable scholarly information that can be used to further the thesis. In the article, he
explains that many Jews participated in the First World War as loyal German soldiers. Nazi
regime howev...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
awesome work thanks

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors