Description
when do we see religion on our local community?
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Nice! Really impressed with the quality.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Impact Of The Civil Rights Movement On Other Movements
Impact of the Civil Rights Movement on Other Movements The Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s primarily advocate ...
Impact Of The Civil Rights Movement On Other Movements
Impact of the Civil Rights Movement on Other Movements The Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s primarily advocated for AfricanAmericans' ...
Understanding Inequality: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender
Describe the difference between individual and institutional discrimination. Then provide a specific example of institutio ...
Understanding Inequality: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender
Describe the difference between individual and institutional discrimination. Then provide a specific example of institutional discrimination (also known as systematic inequality) from current events. Your example may be based on either race or gender, using a local or national news source. APA citing
PSY4830 Keiser University Attention & Concentration In Sport & Exercise Article
of an Article on Attention and Concentration In Sport and Exercise
It is important that you learn how to critically revie ...
PSY4830 Keiser University Attention & Concentration In Sport & Exercise Article
of an Article on Attention and Concentration In Sport and Exercise
It is important that you learn how to critically review research. In our society today, we are exposed to many studies. Some are excellent, some are useful, and some are invalid and unreliable. How can you determine what information is useful and what is dangerous? The most important thing you will learn from this course—and from your college education—is how to critically evaluate information presented to you. Critical thinking involves asking five questions: who, what, when, where, how.1. Find and read an article in the media, journal, Wall Street Journal or a video clip that reports the results of a scientific study on attention and concentration in sport and exercise. You must include the link to the website.2. How accurately did the media report the study?3. Answer the above five questions about the article (Who, What, When, Where, and How).Upload assignment using the Week 1 Critical Review link below. Please be sure that your article is research based.Your review must have at least a 200 word count.Directions and Critical Review Examples to follow below:DirectionsYou will write a one-page critical review of the article. The review should answer each of the five questions. You must cite your source. If it is a website, please make sure you put the entire web address. Remember you are evaluating critically, not just summarizing. See the examples below the grading rubric:Critical ReviewPoint ValueTotalAdequately covers and answers the 5 questions, plus the summary section (10 points per section) 60 points Chooses a scholarly/researchable topic 10 Correct use of spelling/grammar/punctuation/capitalization 10Meets the required word minimum (200 words) and posts word count 10Follows APA formatting with parenthetical citations and referencing 10Total100 CRITICAL THINKING REVIEW EXAMPLECritical thinking involves asking five questions—who, when, what, where, how. You should organize your paper in the following manner:Your Name Critical ReviewAuthor, I. (date of publication). Title of article. Name of Publication, volume #, page #-#.ORAuthor, I. (date of publication if available). Title of article. Retrieved [date accessed] from the World Wide Web: [Web site address]Where: Where did this article/Web page appear? Is this reasonable? Is the publishing entity respectable/responsible?Who: Who wrote/published the article/Web page? What are their credentials? Are the credentials appropriate for their argument?When: Is this current information? If yes, do you think it will stand the “test of time”? If no, is it outdated or is it classic?What: What argument is/are the author(s) making? Is it logical? Based on what you know, is it reasonable? What evidence is given to support the argument? Can you think of evidence to refute it?How: How was the supporting/refuting evidence collected? Is this credible? What kind of evidence do you think needs to be gathered to test the argument? Did the author(s) do this?Summarize the quality of the article (it does not have to be a “good” article in your opinion), and whether you consider this to be a worthwhile and trustworthy article. Did you think it was biased? Could the author have underlying motives? What do you think? Is it valid?NOTE: Do not simply answer yes or no to the questions above. Write a thoughtful response to each section.SAMPLE CRITICAL REVIEWVirginia Norris Critical ReviewEggenberger, T. Sentinel node biopsy. Retrieved August 30, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.intellihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WSIHW000/910...Where: The Intellihealth Web site is a general information health Web site. It draws information from “trusted sources” (e.g., Harvard Medical School, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine); however, it sells health products and is financed by an insurance company. They do not endorse specific products. In general, the information on this site should be viewed with caution but may be an appropriate first step.Who: Ty Eggenberger, a correspondent for Intellihealth. No evidence is given for the author’s credentials, but the Web site indicates that the editors are experts and use trusted sources.When: Although the site was last updated 8/27/01, there is no indication when the article was written. It appears to be current, but this cannot be evaluated.What: This article reviews a new diagnostic procedure, sentinel node biopsy, for breast cancer. They suggest that women investigate this option, but caution that the surgeon’s experience level is associated with diagnostic accuracy. The information is supported with quotations from a surgeon at a prestigious hospital. The argument appears reasonable and is appropriately cautious. If I were looking for advice on this issue, I would search in more clinically oriented databases to look for data on hits and misses for this diagnostic tool.How: I was disappointed that no source was cited. This makes it difficult for me to evaluate how the evidence was collected.In summary, this is a good first-step article that presents a new diagnostic tool; however, before insisting on this type of biopsy over an axillary dissection, I would look for further information.
4 pages
Carmen
Carmen is motivated by a need to assist others. She is confident in her ability to assist people in making positive change ...
Carmen
Carmen is motivated by a need to assist others. She is confident in her ability to assist people in making positive changes in their lives, motivating ...
PSY 315 UOP Wk 1 Statistical Reasoning In Psychology Practice Worksheet
Please help with the attched worksheet Provide a response to the following prompts. Utilize electronic readings for the we ...
PSY 315 UOP Wk 1 Statistical Reasoning In Psychology Practice Worksheet
Please help with the attched worksheet Provide a response to the following prompts. Utilize electronic readings for the week and our textbook to help you answer appropriately.Cite/Reference all sources using proper APA 6th edition format. Citing and referencing our course textbook is REQUIRED on ALL practice worksheets. Explain and provide an example for each of the following types of variables:The following are the speeds of 40 cars clocked by radar on a particular road in a 35 miles-per-hour zone on an afternoon: Raskauskas and Stoltz (2007) asked a group of 84 adolescents about their involvement in traditional and electronic bullying. The researchers defined electronic bullying as “…a means of bullying in which peers use electronics {such as text messages, emails, and defaming Web sites} to taunt, threaten, harass, and/or intimidate a peer” (p. 565). The table below is a frequency table showing the adolescents’ reported incidence of being victims or perpetrators or traditional and electronic bullying. Describe whether each of the following data words best describes descriptive statistics or inferential statistics. Explain your reasoning. (Note: You are not defining each of these words, but rather stating whether each word indicates whether you should use descriptive or inferential statistics or both).Regarding gun ownership in the United States, data from Gallup polls over a 40-year period show how gun ownership in the United States has changed. The results are described below, with the percentage of Americans who own guns given in each of the 5 decades. Refer to the Simpson-Southward et al. (2016) article from this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings. Was this an example of inferential statistics and research or descriptive statistics and research? Justify your response.Explain and provide an example for each of the following shapes of frequency distributions (a visual example may be helpful – ensure your answer is thorough). Nominal: Ordinal: Interval: Ratio scale: Continuous: Discrete: Quantitative: 30, 36, 42, 36, 30, 52, 36, 34, 36, 33, 30, 32, 35, 32, 37, 34, 36, 31, 35, 20 24, 46, 23, 31, 32, 45, 34, 37, 28, 40, 34, 38, 40, 52, 31, 33, 15, 27, 36, 40 Create a frequency table and a histogram. Then, describe the general shape of the distribution. Using the table below as an example, explain the idea of a frequency table to a person who has never taken a course in statistics.Explain the general meaning of the pattern of results. Incidence of Traditional and Electronic Bullying and Victimization (N = 84) Forms of bullying N % Electronic victims 41 48.8 Text-message victim 27 32.1 Internet victim (websites, chatrooms) 13 15.5 Camera-phone victim 8 9.5 Traditional victims 60 71.4 Physical victim 38 45.2 Teasing victim 50 59.5 Rumors victim 32 38.6 Exclusion victim 30 50 Electronic bullies 18 21.4 Text-message bully 18 21.4 Internet bully 11 13.1 Traditional bullies 54 64.3 Physical bully 29 34.5 Teasing bully 38 45.2 Rumor bully 22 26.2 Exclusion bully 35 41.7 Describe: Infer: Summarize: Year % 1972 43 1982 42 1992 48 2002 40 2012 43 Are the percentages reported above an example of descriptive statistics or inferential statistics? Why? Based on the table, how would you describe the changes in gun ownership in the United States over the 40 years shown? Symmetrical: Skew: References References Copyright ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Similar Content
choose an agency or organization to research more in-depth and write an essay, writing homework help
You will be researching a specific area of the Federal Bureaucracy in
order to better understand all of the areas that i...
2 pages respond to this article
I want you to read and react to the following article***. In your understanding, is school funding a determinant of succe...
AHS The Hen Who Dreamed She Could Fly by Sunmi Hwang Question
In 250 words, explain what the work we are reading now tells us about what the future might hold.
The Hen Who Dreamed She ...
Higher College of Technology Collaborative Electronic Media at Work Report
Write about Electronic media at work and follow the structure below:Report Structure: - Abstract - introduction - lit...
SO 332 Park Univesity The Concept of Ageism in Our Society Discussion
Unit 4: DiscussionNo unread replies.No replies.AgeismDiscuss the concept of ageism in our society and give an example [thi...
History Question
1. Can the history of the modern world be defined by the rise, fall, clash or mixing of
civilizations? Explain all four ap...
Ethical And Philosophical Questions
The “instinctive man” according to Russell, is self-centered who concerns themselves only with their issues and what t...
Question 2 Modernity
Modernity is neither a sociological nor a political concept, either a historical concept. It is a characteristic used to o...
Free Will In Philosophy1
Free will and determinism can be compatible just as some philosopher’s argue though not all situation allow that they be...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Extreme Ownership - How US Navy SEALs Lead and Win
by Jocko Willink and Leif Babin
Shutter Island
by Dennis Lehane
Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone
by J. K. Rowling
The Knife of Never Letting Go
by Patrick Ness
Fahrenheit 451
by Ray Bradbury
The Magic Mountain
by Thomas Mann
The Turn of the Screw
by Henry James
The Handmaids Tale
by Margaret Atwood
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Impact Of The Civil Rights Movement On Other Movements
Impact of the Civil Rights Movement on Other Movements The Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s primarily advocate ...
Impact Of The Civil Rights Movement On Other Movements
Impact of the Civil Rights Movement on Other Movements The Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s primarily advocated for AfricanAmericans' ...
Understanding Inequality: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender
Describe the difference between individual and institutional discrimination. Then provide a specific example of institutio ...
Understanding Inequality: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender
Describe the difference between individual and institutional discrimination. Then provide a specific example of institutional discrimination (also known as systematic inequality) from current events. Your example may be based on either race or gender, using a local or national news source. APA citing
PSY4830 Keiser University Attention & Concentration In Sport & Exercise Article
of an Article on Attention and Concentration In Sport and Exercise
It is important that you learn how to critically revie ...
PSY4830 Keiser University Attention & Concentration In Sport & Exercise Article
of an Article on Attention and Concentration In Sport and Exercise
It is important that you learn how to critically review research. In our society today, we are exposed to many studies. Some are excellent, some are useful, and some are invalid and unreliable. How can you determine what information is useful and what is dangerous? The most important thing you will learn from this course—and from your college education—is how to critically evaluate information presented to you. Critical thinking involves asking five questions: who, what, when, where, how.1. Find and read an article in the media, journal, Wall Street Journal or a video clip that reports the results of a scientific study on attention and concentration in sport and exercise. You must include the link to the website.2. How accurately did the media report the study?3. Answer the above five questions about the article (Who, What, When, Where, and How).Upload assignment using the Week 1 Critical Review link below. Please be sure that your article is research based.Your review must have at least a 200 word count.Directions and Critical Review Examples to follow below:DirectionsYou will write a one-page critical review of the article. The review should answer each of the five questions. You must cite your source. If it is a website, please make sure you put the entire web address. Remember you are evaluating critically, not just summarizing. See the examples below the grading rubric:Critical ReviewPoint ValueTotalAdequately covers and answers the 5 questions, plus the summary section (10 points per section) 60 points Chooses a scholarly/researchable topic 10 Correct use of spelling/grammar/punctuation/capitalization 10Meets the required word minimum (200 words) and posts word count 10Follows APA formatting with parenthetical citations and referencing 10Total100 CRITICAL THINKING REVIEW EXAMPLECritical thinking involves asking five questions—who, when, what, where, how. You should organize your paper in the following manner:Your Name Critical ReviewAuthor, I. (date of publication). Title of article. Name of Publication, volume #, page #-#.ORAuthor, I. (date of publication if available). Title of article. Retrieved [date accessed] from the World Wide Web: [Web site address]Where: Where did this article/Web page appear? Is this reasonable? Is the publishing entity respectable/responsible?Who: Who wrote/published the article/Web page? What are their credentials? Are the credentials appropriate for their argument?When: Is this current information? If yes, do you think it will stand the “test of time”? If no, is it outdated or is it classic?What: What argument is/are the author(s) making? Is it logical? Based on what you know, is it reasonable? What evidence is given to support the argument? Can you think of evidence to refute it?How: How was the supporting/refuting evidence collected? Is this credible? What kind of evidence do you think needs to be gathered to test the argument? Did the author(s) do this?Summarize the quality of the article (it does not have to be a “good” article in your opinion), and whether you consider this to be a worthwhile and trustworthy article. Did you think it was biased? Could the author have underlying motives? What do you think? Is it valid?NOTE: Do not simply answer yes or no to the questions above. Write a thoughtful response to each section.SAMPLE CRITICAL REVIEWVirginia Norris Critical ReviewEggenberger, T. Sentinel node biopsy. Retrieved August 30, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.intellihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WSIHW000/910...Where: The Intellihealth Web site is a general information health Web site. It draws information from “trusted sources” (e.g., Harvard Medical School, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine); however, it sells health products and is financed by an insurance company. They do not endorse specific products. In general, the information on this site should be viewed with caution but may be an appropriate first step.Who: Ty Eggenberger, a correspondent for Intellihealth. No evidence is given for the author’s credentials, but the Web site indicates that the editors are experts and use trusted sources.When: Although the site was last updated 8/27/01, there is no indication when the article was written. It appears to be current, but this cannot be evaluated.What: This article reviews a new diagnostic procedure, sentinel node biopsy, for breast cancer. They suggest that women investigate this option, but caution that the surgeon’s experience level is associated with diagnostic accuracy. The information is supported with quotations from a surgeon at a prestigious hospital. The argument appears reasonable and is appropriately cautious. If I were looking for advice on this issue, I would search in more clinically oriented databases to look for data on hits and misses for this diagnostic tool.How: I was disappointed that no source was cited. This makes it difficult for me to evaluate how the evidence was collected.In summary, this is a good first-step article that presents a new diagnostic tool; however, before insisting on this type of biopsy over an axillary dissection, I would look for further information.
4 pages
Carmen
Carmen is motivated by a need to assist others. She is confident in her ability to assist people in making positive change ...
Carmen
Carmen is motivated by a need to assist others. She is confident in her ability to assist people in making positive changes in their lives, motivating ...
PSY 315 UOP Wk 1 Statistical Reasoning In Psychology Practice Worksheet
Please help with the attched worksheet Provide a response to the following prompts. Utilize electronic readings for the we ...
PSY 315 UOP Wk 1 Statistical Reasoning In Psychology Practice Worksheet
Please help with the attched worksheet Provide a response to the following prompts. Utilize electronic readings for the week and our textbook to help you answer appropriately.Cite/Reference all sources using proper APA 6th edition format. Citing and referencing our course textbook is REQUIRED on ALL practice worksheets. Explain and provide an example for each of the following types of variables:The following are the speeds of 40 cars clocked by radar on a particular road in a 35 miles-per-hour zone on an afternoon: Raskauskas and Stoltz (2007) asked a group of 84 adolescents about their involvement in traditional and electronic bullying. The researchers defined electronic bullying as “…a means of bullying in which peers use electronics {such as text messages, emails, and defaming Web sites} to taunt, threaten, harass, and/or intimidate a peer” (p. 565). The table below is a frequency table showing the adolescents’ reported incidence of being victims or perpetrators or traditional and electronic bullying. Describe whether each of the following data words best describes descriptive statistics or inferential statistics. Explain your reasoning. (Note: You are not defining each of these words, but rather stating whether each word indicates whether you should use descriptive or inferential statistics or both).Regarding gun ownership in the United States, data from Gallup polls over a 40-year period show how gun ownership in the United States has changed. The results are described below, with the percentage of Americans who own guns given in each of the 5 decades. Refer to the Simpson-Southward et al. (2016) article from this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings. Was this an example of inferential statistics and research or descriptive statistics and research? Justify your response.Explain and provide an example for each of the following shapes of frequency distributions (a visual example may be helpful – ensure your answer is thorough). Nominal: Ordinal: Interval: Ratio scale: Continuous: Discrete: Quantitative: 30, 36, 42, 36, 30, 52, 36, 34, 36, 33, 30, 32, 35, 32, 37, 34, 36, 31, 35, 20 24, 46, 23, 31, 32, 45, 34, 37, 28, 40, 34, 38, 40, 52, 31, 33, 15, 27, 36, 40 Create a frequency table and a histogram. Then, describe the general shape of the distribution. Using the table below as an example, explain the idea of a frequency table to a person who has never taken a course in statistics.Explain the general meaning of the pattern of results. Incidence of Traditional and Electronic Bullying and Victimization (N = 84) Forms of bullying N % Electronic victims 41 48.8 Text-message victim 27 32.1 Internet victim (websites, chatrooms) 13 15.5 Camera-phone victim 8 9.5 Traditional victims 60 71.4 Physical victim 38 45.2 Teasing victim 50 59.5 Rumors victim 32 38.6 Exclusion victim 30 50 Electronic bullies 18 21.4 Text-message bully 18 21.4 Internet bully 11 13.1 Traditional bullies 54 64.3 Physical bully 29 34.5 Teasing bully 38 45.2 Rumor bully 22 26.2 Exclusion bully 35 41.7 Describe: Infer: Summarize: Year % 1972 43 1982 42 1992 48 2002 40 2012 43 Are the percentages reported above an example of descriptive statistics or inferential statistics? Why? Based on the table, how would you describe the changes in gun ownership in the United States over the 40 years shown? Symmetrical: Skew: References References Copyright ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents