MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML In Semester Coursework Individual Assignment Module: Mobile and Pervasive Computing (COMP 30017) Level: 3 Duration: 5 Weeks Proposal Submission Last Date: 22th April, 2017 Max. Marks: 100 Last Date of Submission: 20th May, 2017 Instructions to Student: • Present the relevant citation / references at the end of document • Marks will be awarded for the content written in your own words • All the tasks will be evaluated through viva. Students absent for viva will be awarded zero marks for the assignment. • Report must be uploaded on Moodle on or before the date of submission. Objectives: This is research based assignment which allow students work independently and providing evidence and critical evaluation of the topic. Tasks: Task 1: (10 Marks) Submit a work proposal for this assignment which must include: • Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables • General overview of proposed plan - initial understanding of solution to all the tasks • Resources identified COMP 30017 (QP) Page 1 of 8 MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML Task 2: (40 Marks) In 1997, different wireless mobile companies such as Ericson, Nokia, and Motorola start to work for a common standard to provide mobile computing services such as (access to the internet and advanced telephony services) and their efforts result in the foundation of WAP (Wireless Application Protocols) forum. This group defined a set of communications protocols for portable wireless devices (such as mobile phones, PDA) to send/receive and interpret data, independent of vendors and air link. The WAP basically provides a layered architecture known as WAP Protocol Stack similar to the OSI network model for bringing internet content to mobile phones and other wireless devices. Each layer performs almost the same functions as the corresponding layer of the OSI model. Given the background, provide a detailed report not more than 3,000 words on the following aspects of the WAP. a) Technically analyze the WAP layered architecture and protocol stack b) Elaborate the strength and weakness of the WAP and the future of WAP Task 3: (50 Marks) Broadband wireless networks offers and alternative solution to the problem of information accessing in the areas where wired connection is not practical or economical. In addition, a major driving force towards the broadband wireless network adoption is due to the demand of accessing corporate network remotely form any place, anywhere and anytime. Further, the people want communication and the sharing of informations by eliminating the limitation of distance and location. Commonly the broadband wireless networks technologies can be classified into two types named (1) fixed and (2) mobile wireless broadband. The fixed broadband wireless network technology, provide internet connectivity to the user specific or permanent locations such like home and office. While in comparison in the mobile wireless broadband, the services are provides via smart phones and other wireless devices at any place at any time. With respect to the above extract, provide a detailed report on the following aspects of the broadband wireless network. a) Critically evaluate the fixed and mobile broadband wireless network b) Elaborate the strength and weakness of the fixed and mobile broadband wireless network COMP 30017 (QP) Page 2 of 8 MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML Evaluation Criteria: The evaluation will be done on the strength of analysis presented in the assignment: • Task 1: Assignment work proposal submission : 10 Marks Submit a work proposal for this assignment on or before, which must include:     Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables  General overview of proposed plan - initial understanding of solution to all the tasks  Resources identified  Work proposal should be submitted in the form of word document in Moodle on or before 22th April, 2017. • Assignment report submission : 90 Marks Submit the assignment report on or before 20th May, 2017, which must include: Task 2: Students are required to write a report, not more than 3,000 words, the report should include: • Technically analyze the WAP layered architecture and protocol stack • Elaborate the strength and weakness of the WAP and the future of WAP Task 3: Broadband wireless networks technologies • Critically evaluate the fixed and mobile broadband wireless network • Elaborate the strength and weakness of the fixed and mobile broadband wireless network Guidelines: Follow the guidelines mentioned below for your assignment:       The document should not be more than 15 to 19 pages in (size A4) paper.  The document should be well presented and neatly done.  Assignment should be submitted through Moodle (Turnitin).  Handwritten assignments will not be accepted.  Assignment should have a title page. Title page should contain the following information: o Title of the assessment, o Names of the student, o Student ID, o Session, COMP 30017 (QP) Page 3 of 8 MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML   o Department Name, o Semester Name, Academic Year  It should have Table of Contents, references.  Use page numbers  Assignment should be computer typed using Calibri size 12 font and the Softcopy is to be submitted through Moodle (Turnitin).     Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Underline  Use Diagrams and Examples to explain your topic.  Copy paste from the Internet is strictly not acceptable.  In-text citation and referencing using CU Harvard referencing Style. Rules & Regulations • If any topic or diagram of an assignment is found copied from the other then marks will be deducted from both assignments. • The purpose of assignment is to do some research work so you can consult books in Library or use internet or computer magazines or any other source. • Zero Marks will be awarded if the student is absent from viva. The performance will be evaluated through viva and there is no mark for viva. Late Submission Policy Penalty for late report submission - 5% of the obtained marks for the assessment will be deducted for each working day. Document submitted beyond a period of one week after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be marked as zero for that assessment. Feedback to Students Work proposal should be submitted through Moodle on or before 22th April, 2017. Feedback will be given by 29th April, 2017. The student will obtain the final feedback on assignment through Moodle by 14th week. COMP 30017 (QP) Page 4 of 8 MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML Plagiarism Policy As per MEC policy, any form of violation of academic integrity will invite severe penalty. Plagiarized documents, in part or in whole, submitted by the students will be subject to this policy. A. First offence of plagiarism a. A student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. b. Mark deduction: When the work is resubmitted, the marking will be undertaken according to the marking criteria. In compliance with this policy, the 25% deduction is then made on the marks obtained. For example, in an assessment that carries a maximum of 50 marks, suppose a student were to obtain 30 marks for the resubmitted work, the final marks for that assessment will be 22.5 (after deducting 25% of the marks actually obtained for the resubmitted work). c. Period of resubmission: The student will have to resubmit the work one week from the date he or she is advised to resubmit. For example, if the formal advice to resubmit was communicated to the student on a Sunday (latest by 5 pm), the student will have to resubmit the work latest by next Sunday 5 pm. d. If the re-submitted work is also detected to be plagiarized, then the work will be awarded a zero. e. Resubmission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be accepted and the work will be awarded a zero. B. Any further offence of plagiarism a. If any student is again caught in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (either in the same module, same semester or in any other semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to re-submit the work. COMP 30017 (QP) Page 5 of 8 MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML C. Guidelines a. Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. b. Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students. c. Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. d. Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: 1. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. 2. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. The policy will then be applied to that student alone. COMP 30017 (QP) Page 6 of 8 MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML 3. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment). D. Amount of similar material a. The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from all sources put together should not exceed 30% (including direct quotations). b. The total amount of quoted material (direct quotations) in any form of student work from all sources put together should not exceed 10%. c. The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from a single source should not exceed 7 percent. However, cases having a similarity of less than 7 percent in such cases may still be investigated by the faculty depending on the seriousness of the case. d. If faculty member find enough merit in the case of a student work with a similarity (with a single source) of more than 7 percent as not a case of plagiarism, the faculty member should provide detailed comments/remarks to justify the case. COMP 30017 (QP) Page 7 of 8 MPC (COMP 30017)–Spring –17–CW2 (ASSMNT)–ALL–QP-ML COMP 30017 – Mobile and Pervasive Computing (Assignment) – Spring 2017 ASSESSMENT EVALUATION SHEET Student Name: _________________________________________________ Student ID: ____________ Deliverables Task 1 Aspects Submission of Work proposal 0-10    Deliverables Task 2.a Deliverables Task 2.b Deliverables Task 3. a Deliverables Task 3. b Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables General overview of proposed plan - initial understanding of solution to all tasks Resources identified Aspects 0 Analyze the Not attempted/ WAP layered Plagiarized Report architecture and protocol stack Aspects 0 1-8 Partially correct Analyzed and missing intext citations 1-8 Elaborate the Partially correct strength No Attempt / report weakness and Plagiarized Report with missing future of the citations WAP Aspects Marks 0 1-10 9-16 17-20 Satisfactory Excellent work with Analyzed complete and with some Accurate missing citations analyzation accompanied by diagrams 9-16 17-20 11-20 21-25 Marks Critically Partially correct Satisfactory Excellent work with evaluate the No Attempt / Critical evaluation Critical evaluation Complete and fixed and Plagiarized Report and missing inwith some correct critical mobile evaluation text citations missing broadband accompanied by citations wireless diagrams network Aspects 0 1-10 No Attempt / Partially correct Elaborate the Plagiarized Report report strength and with missing weakness of citations the fixed and mobile broadband wireless 11-20 Satisfactory report with some missing citations 21-25 Excellent work with complete and Accurate details Total Marks Penalty Final Marks COMP 30017 (QP) Marks Satisfactory Excellent work with report complete and with some Accurate details missing citations network Comments: Marks Page 8 of 8 Marks
Purchase answer to see full attachment