Description
Post two (2) questions that you have from the material which I will give you later.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Hey, please review the following questions and pick 2 that meet your requirements. get back to me for anything else.Thanks
Running head: FREDERICK DOUGLASS
1
Frederick Douglass
Institutional Affiliation
Name
Date
FREDERICK DOUGLASS
2
1. Describe who is Mr. Covey and show whether he succeed or not in brea...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Awesome! Made my life easier.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Answer questions for Psychology Assessment Course NO PLAGIARISM
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A PSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT COURSE AND THE ANSWERS SHOULD BE GIVEN ACCORDING TO THE TOPIC OF THE COUR ...
Answer questions for Psychology Assessment Course NO PLAGIARISM
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A PSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT COURSE AND THE ANSWERS SHOULD BE GIVEN ACCORDING TO THE TOPIC OF THE COURSE. AT LEAST 200 WORDS EACH POST AND CITE ALL REFERENCES!1. How can the interview be used to instill self-confidence in the consumer just before the beginning of the vocational assessment process? Please cut and paste your responses and provide feedback to two of your classmates.2. Can you describe the ideal office setting that would contextually stimulate rapport between you and the consumer? Please cut and paste your responses and provide feedback to two of your classmates.3. Do you feel more comfortable with a structured or an unstructured interview? Why? Please cut and paste your responses and provide feedback to two of your classmates.
PHIL 004 California State University Sacramento Critical Thinking Essay
Assignment Details:For this “essay assignment” you will be provided with an essay (at the end of this prompt) and you ...
PHIL 004 California State University Sacramento Critical Thinking Essay
Assignment Details:For this “essay assignment” you will be provided with an essay (at the end of this prompt) and you will be asked to
identify argument components and argument forms and to partially evaluate the overall argument by answering the a
series of questions. All answers to these questions are to be written on the accompanying “Writing Assignment #3
Worksheet” included as the last page of this prompt. There is no additional essay that you must write. The “essay”
is the worksheet and ONLY the worksheet! You should print out the worksheet and hand-write your answers (you may
type them in if you choose using Adobe). Please Note: You must be able to convert said document to a PDF and submit
using a PDF. All other document types will NOT BE accepted. Make sure you write neatly. If I cannot read it, I will not
grade it. This assignment is worth a total of 80 possible points.
Complete each of the sections on the worksheet below (AGAIN NOTE: NO additional essay must be written)
1) Section I: Identify the following in the article provided:
(1) What is the article about – what is the general topic of the essay (here I do not mean the author’s
position but what the author will be addressing - not the author’s specific topic but the general topic)
(2) The Author’s Position on the topic (What is the author’s thesis – here you should state what the
author is going to argue about the topic)
(3) The Three arguments used to support the author’s position (using the included worksheet, present
each argument using the proper form – Categorical or Propositional/Sentential). Note: I am NOT
asking for the symbolic form here. Please format the arguments using words.
2) Section II: At least one of the three arguments can be understood/treated as a Truth-Functional argument
(Propositional Logic). You must (1) identify which of the three arguments can be understood as a truth-
functional argument, (2) provide the symbolic notation, and you MUST (3) provide a truth table and identify
if it is valid or invalid. (Again: Please be sure to answer each # in each section on the worksheet)
3) Section III: One of the arguments can also be re-stated as a categorical syllogism. Note: Unlike the
propositional argument from Section II, this categorical argument will need to be reformatted. I have done
MOST of the reformatting, but you must complete it. In this section, you must (1) complete the categorical
syllogism by providing the minor premise in the correct format, (2) provide the symbolic form for the
categorical syllogism as well as the Mood and Figure, and (3) you must provide a Venn Diagram for the
argument that demonstrates whether it is a valid or invalid argument. You should also circle whether it is
valid or invalid for this last part.
Columbia Southern University High Degree of Impairment Discussion
Imagine you are working in a state mental hospital with individuals diagnosed with severe and profound intellectual disabi ...
Columbia Southern University High Degree of Impairment Discussion
Imagine you are working in a state mental hospital with individuals diagnosed with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Besides significant cognitive and adaptive skill limitations, many of these individuals may also have multiple physical and sensory impairments. Those most impaired are likely totally dependent upon others for their care.What do you believe are some important issues to consider when working with people with a high degree of impairment? What kinds of things do you need to consider to be sure you are respecting the dignity of those for whom you care?Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting', philosophy homework help
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting'Immanuel Kant’s “Categorical Imperative” not only says that you should do ...
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting', philosophy homework help
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting'Immanuel Kant’s “Categorical Imperative” not only says that you should do the right thing because it is the right thing to do, but that you should ask yourself if you would want what you are considering to do to become universal law (i.e., something that everyone should HAVE to do, including TO you, in the very same situation) and if it still respected the other person as someone who had the ability to make his or her own decisions in a rational way. His defense of imprisonment and capital punishment was that anyone, including you, who rationally chose to break the law and who had also rationally chosen to accept whatever punishment would result because of getting caught for the crime, would not be getting the respect they deserved if we did not punish the person for their rational choices (even if they had made the choice to act irrationally and commit the crime). So, in Kant’s view, punishment is the choice that a rational person makes and wants to see made universal and applied to himself and everyone else when they choose to break the law; not punishing the person would be a show of disrespect for his ability to be rational.And, yes, for all of you CJ majors, Kant DID accept the notion of mitigating circumstances (i.e., acts of passion that are outside the realm of pure rationality). But, in truth, they are not common and even harder to prove. For the most part, Kant assumes that most crimes are planned (even the stupid ones in which things go very wrong). And, keep in mind that Kant does not worry about whether there is a virtuous 'just right' decision between one virtuous 'mean' and an infinite number of vicious and wrong possibilities (like Aristotle did) or the results (like Mill did); his only concern is that you do the right thing because it is the right thing to do and that you rationally and willingly choose to accept your punishment if you consciously choose to do the wrong thing.The scenario:You left your cell phone in your car while visiting your best friend in another city, and you just remembered that you were supposed to text your spouse to let him or her know that you arrived safely. So, your friend is in the kitchen and his or her partner is still at work; and, rather than run back out to your car to get your own phone, you pick up your friend’s phone and click on the Messages app. The phone has not been cleared, and you see really racy posts from someone besides your friend’s husband or wife. It is clear to you that there is a sexual affair of some sort going on. So, what are you going to do?You can go ahead and call your own spouse and tell them about the affair, but then you remember that Kant said that you should do only what you would want done to you in the same situation---and, you are not sure that you would want someone spreading those kinds of rumors about you if they happened to pick up your cell phone. You could confront your friend, and either cheer them on or tell them that they are acting like an idiot and about to screw up the best thing they have ever had in life; but, would you want someone to do that for you if you were in the same situation? You could do nothing; it’s a cop-out, but maybe it is what you would want your friend to do if you were the one having an affair and did not want to hear anyone telling you that the right thing to do is the right thing. What would you do, and why? If you were the person cheating on his or her spouse, what would you want your friend who found out to do to you, and why?
Judgement and decision making, psychology homework help
To prepare for this discussion, please read Chapter 5 of your textbook (Feenstra, 2013). In addition, read Judgment under ...
Judgement and decision making, psychology homework help
To prepare for this discussion, please read Chapter 5 of your textbook (Feenstra, 2013). In addition, read Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974). Finally, review Instructor Guidance and Announcements. In this discussion, you will consider judgment and decision making. Be sure to use your own academic voice and apply in-text citations appropriately throughout your post. Locate an additional peer-reviewed source to support your ideas.Outline one of the following options:Identify an example (not from the textbook) to illustrate one of the following heuristics: availability heuristic and representativeness heuristic, or affect heuristic. Examine the use of heuristics. How are our judgments, including attitudes and behaviors, influenced by social and cognitive factors? Identify an example (not from the textbook) to illustrate one of the following errors in judgment: belief perseverance, confirmation bias, or illusion of control. Examine errors in judgment. How are our judgments, including attitudes and behaviors, influenced by social and cognitive factors? Post your initial response of 250 words or more by Day 3 (Thursday).
PSYC5703 Grantham University Child and Adolescent Development Essay
I REALIZE THIS IS VERY SHORT NOTICE...SO PLEASE INCLUDE DATA, GRAPHS, and PICTURES TO TAKE UP SPACE IN THE PAPER!!! In thi ...
PSYC5703 Grantham University Child and Adolescent Development Essay
I REALIZE THIS IS VERY SHORT NOTICE...SO PLEASE INCLUDE DATA, GRAPHS, and PICTURES TO TAKE UP SPACE IN THE PAPER!!! In this course, you learned about development across childhood and adolescence, and gathered research articles related to topics of interest; last week, you crafted an annotated outline on a research topic that crosses childhood and adolescence that you are interested in. This week, you expand your annotated outline and write a research paper.Your Signature Assignment requires you to complete the following:Provide an overview of the topic selected; this must be a topic that spans both childhood and adolescence.Review the theories that help individuals understand this topic across childhood and adolescence.Explain how the three domains of development interact with one another in this topic across childhood and adolescent.Provide examples of research recent, in the last 10 years, on this topic.Conclude by considering the role that Positive Youth Development could play in understanding/addressing the topic you have chosen.Length: 12-15 pages, not including title and reference pages References: Include a minimum of 10 scholarly resources. Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University's Academic Integrity Policy.
Similar Content
KSU Philosophy Moral Foundations John Rawls Justice as Fairness Question
4 essays and some questions on Kant, Hume, Mill, and Rawls....
SNHU Qualitative Findings and Social Work Interventions Discussion
Discussion: Qualitative Findings and Social Work InterventionsEvidence-based social work practice calls for the use of res...
Homework
For this assignment, refer back to what you learned last week about rhetorical strategies and reread The Coddling of the A...
UMUC The Advancing of The Civil Rights Movement of The 50s & 60s Annotated Bibliography
My topic selection is: The advancing of the Civil Rights movement of the 50's and 60's. Moreover, the courts’ role in ad...
Georgia Military College Milledgeville Campus WK2 Edmund Morgan on Slavery Paper
There were a lot of obvious labor and economic benefits to creating a race based slave system; however, the transition to ...
FDTC Three Equations for a Happy Life Even During a Pandemic Article Summary
three quarter to 1 page response paper. 12 font double spaced paper. writing one (1) page summary paper of https://www.t...
Superteacher Myth.
According to filmmaker Steven Spielberg, the power of cinema is a lot than the influence of writing. Based on his analysis...
Immigration
Abolish Ice! Fighting For Humanity over Profit in Immigration Policy According to studies and reports, numerous factors in...
Vocaburaly Presentation
...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Answer questions for Psychology Assessment Course NO PLAGIARISM
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A PSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT COURSE AND THE ANSWERS SHOULD BE GIVEN ACCORDING TO THE TOPIC OF THE COUR ...
Answer questions for Psychology Assessment Course NO PLAGIARISM
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A PSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT COURSE AND THE ANSWERS SHOULD BE GIVEN ACCORDING TO THE TOPIC OF THE COURSE. AT LEAST 200 WORDS EACH POST AND CITE ALL REFERENCES!1. How can the interview be used to instill self-confidence in the consumer just before the beginning of the vocational assessment process? Please cut and paste your responses and provide feedback to two of your classmates.2. Can you describe the ideal office setting that would contextually stimulate rapport between you and the consumer? Please cut and paste your responses and provide feedback to two of your classmates.3. Do you feel more comfortable with a structured or an unstructured interview? Why? Please cut and paste your responses and provide feedback to two of your classmates.
PHIL 004 California State University Sacramento Critical Thinking Essay
Assignment Details:For this “essay assignment” you will be provided with an essay (at the end of this prompt) and you ...
PHIL 004 California State University Sacramento Critical Thinking Essay
Assignment Details:For this “essay assignment” you will be provided with an essay (at the end of this prompt) and you will be asked to
identify argument components and argument forms and to partially evaluate the overall argument by answering the a
series of questions. All answers to these questions are to be written on the accompanying “Writing Assignment #3
Worksheet” included as the last page of this prompt. There is no additional essay that you must write. The “essay”
is the worksheet and ONLY the worksheet! You should print out the worksheet and hand-write your answers (you may
type them in if you choose using Adobe). Please Note: You must be able to convert said document to a PDF and submit
using a PDF. All other document types will NOT BE accepted. Make sure you write neatly. If I cannot read it, I will not
grade it. This assignment is worth a total of 80 possible points.
Complete each of the sections on the worksheet below (AGAIN NOTE: NO additional essay must be written)
1) Section I: Identify the following in the article provided:
(1) What is the article about – what is the general topic of the essay (here I do not mean the author’s
position but what the author will be addressing - not the author’s specific topic but the general topic)
(2) The Author’s Position on the topic (What is the author’s thesis – here you should state what the
author is going to argue about the topic)
(3) The Three arguments used to support the author’s position (using the included worksheet, present
each argument using the proper form – Categorical or Propositional/Sentential). Note: I am NOT
asking for the symbolic form here. Please format the arguments using words.
2) Section II: At least one of the three arguments can be understood/treated as a Truth-Functional argument
(Propositional Logic). You must (1) identify which of the three arguments can be understood as a truth-
functional argument, (2) provide the symbolic notation, and you MUST (3) provide a truth table and identify
if it is valid or invalid. (Again: Please be sure to answer each # in each section on the worksheet)
3) Section III: One of the arguments can also be re-stated as a categorical syllogism. Note: Unlike the
propositional argument from Section II, this categorical argument will need to be reformatted. I have done
MOST of the reformatting, but you must complete it. In this section, you must (1) complete the categorical
syllogism by providing the minor premise in the correct format, (2) provide the symbolic form for the
categorical syllogism as well as the Mood and Figure, and (3) you must provide a Venn Diagram for the
argument that demonstrates whether it is a valid or invalid argument. You should also circle whether it is
valid or invalid for this last part.
Columbia Southern University High Degree of Impairment Discussion
Imagine you are working in a state mental hospital with individuals diagnosed with severe and profound intellectual disabi ...
Columbia Southern University High Degree of Impairment Discussion
Imagine you are working in a state mental hospital with individuals diagnosed with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Besides significant cognitive and adaptive skill limitations, many of these individuals may also have multiple physical and sensory impairments. Those most impaired are likely totally dependent upon others for their care.What do you believe are some important issues to consider when working with people with a high degree of impairment? What kinds of things do you need to consider to be sure you are respecting the dignity of those for whom you care?Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting', philosophy homework help
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting'Immanuel Kant’s “Categorical Imperative” not only says that you should do ...
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting', philosophy homework help
The Case of the Best Friend’s ‘Sexting'Immanuel Kant’s “Categorical Imperative” not only says that you should do the right thing because it is the right thing to do, but that you should ask yourself if you would want what you are considering to do to become universal law (i.e., something that everyone should HAVE to do, including TO you, in the very same situation) and if it still respected the other person as someone who had the ability to make his or her own decisions in a rational way. His defense of imprisonment and capital punishment was that anyone, including you, who rationally chose to break the law and who had also rationally chosen to accept whatever punishment would result because of getting caught for the crime, would not be getting the respect they deserved if we did not punish the person for their rational choices (even if they had made the choice to act irrationally and commit the crime). So, in Kant’s view, punishment is the choice that a rational person makes and wants to see made universal and applied to himself and everyone else when they choose to break the law; not punishing the person would be a show of disrespect for his ability to be rational.And, yes, for all of you CJ majors, Kant DID accept the notion of mitigating circumstances (i.e., acts of passion that are outside the realm of pure rationality). But, in truth, they are not common and even harder to prove. For the most part, Kant assumes that most crimes are planned (even the stupid ones in which things go very wrong). And, keep in mind that Kant does not worry about whether there is a virtuous 'just right' decision between one virtuous 'mean' and an infinite number of vicious and wrong possibilities (like Aristotle did) or the results (like Mill did); his only concern is that you do the right thing because it is the right thing to do and that you rationally and willingly choose to accept your punishment if you consciously choose to do the wrong thing.The scenario:You left your cell phone in your car while visiting your best friend in another city, and you just remembered that you were supposed to text your spouse to let him or her know that you arrived safely. So, your friend is in the kitchen and his or her partner is still at work; and, rather than run back out to your car to get your own phone, you pick up your friend’s phone and click on the Messages app. The phone has not been cleared, and you see really racy posts from someone besides your friend’s husband or wife. It is clear to you that there is a sexual affair of some sort going on. So, what are you going to do?You can go ahead and call your own spouse and tell them about the affair, but then you remember that Kant said that you should do only what you would want done to you in the same situation---and, you are not sure that you would want someone spreading those kinds of rumors about you if they happened to pick up your cell phone. You could confront your friend, and either cheer them on or tell them that they are acting like an idiot and about to screw up the best thing they have ever had in life; but, would you want someone to do that for you if you were in the same situation? You could do nothing; it’s a cop-out, but maybe it is what you would want your friend to do if you were the one having an affair and did not want to hear anyone telling you that the right thing to do is the right thing. What would you do, and why? If you were the person cheating on his or her spouse, what would you want your friend who found out to do to you, and why?
Judgement and decision making, psychology homework help
To prepare for this discussion, please read Chapter 5 of your textbook (Feenstra, 2013). In addition, read Judgment under ...
Judgement and decision making, psychology homework help
To prepare for this discussion, please read Chapter 5 of your textbook (Feenstra, 2013). In addition, read Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974). Finally, review Instructor Guidance and Announcements. In this discussion, you will consider judgment and decision making. Be sure to use your own academic voice and apply in-text citations appropriately throughout your post. Locate an additional peer-reviewed source to support your ideas.Outline one of the following options:Identify an example (not from the textbook) to illustrate one of the following heuristics: availability heuristic and representativeness heuristic, or affect heuristic. Examine the use of heuristics. How are our judgments, including attitudes and behaviors, influenced by social and cognitive factors? Identify an example (not from the textbook) to illustrate one of the following errors in judgment: belief perseverance, confirmation bias, or illusion of control. Examine errors in judgment. How are our judgments, including attitudes and behaviors, influenced by social and cognitive factors? Post your initial response of 250 words or more by Day 3 (Thursday).
PSYC5703 Grantham University Child and Adolescent Development Essay
I REALIZE THIS IS VERY SHORT NOTICE...SO PLEASE INCLUDE DATA, GRAPHS, and PICTURES TO TAKE UP SPACE IN THE PAPER!!! In thi ...
PSYC5703 Grantham University Child and Adolescent Development Essay
I REALIZE THIS IS VERY SHORT NOTICE...SO PLEASE INCLUDE DATA, GRAPHS, and PICTURES TO TAKE UP SPACE IN THE PAPER!!! In this course, you learned about development across childhood and adolescence, and gathered research articles related to topics of interest; last week, you crafted an annotated outline on a research topic that crosses childhood and adolescence that you are interested in. This week, you expand your annotated outline and write a research paper.Your Signature Assignment requires you to complete the following:Provide an overview of the topic selected; this must be a topic that spans both childhood and adolescence.Review the theories that help individuals understand this topic across childhood and adolescence.Explain how the three domains of development interact with one another in this topic across childhood and adolescent.Provide examples of research recent, in the last 10 years, on this topic.Conclude by considering the role that Positive Youth Development could play in understanding/addressing the topic you have chosen.Length: 12-15 pages, not including title and reference pages References: Include a minimum of 10 scholarly resources. Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University's Academic Integrity Policy.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents