Health Care Information Review Proposal

User Generated

wf99710

Health Medical

Florida National University

Description

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Assessment 3 Instructions: Health Care Information Review Proposal • Write a proposal (5-7 pages) for a health care information review of the quality of care given to a specific patient population. Instructions You now know: What information or data you will be reviewing. • From where the information or data will come. • Which standards or goals you are trying to reach. You now need to determine how to make all of this happen. In this part of the process, you will put together your action plan. Who is going to do the work? What type of skills will they need? How long will it take them to do the work? This is your game plan. Each and every step needs to be clearly laid out and explained. • Keep in mind that you are writing a proposal. You are telling your physician group what you would like to do, why you want to do it, and how you are going to do it. You are not buying new devices or starting a new process. You are reviewing documentation that is already present in the office, or potentially in hospital records, to identify whether your group's physicians provided quality care. This assessment will complete your proposal for the health information review that you recommend. Throughout this assessment, explicitly state the reasons for each and all of your choices. Please carefully review this assessment's scoring guide to better understand the performance levels relating to each criterion on which you will be evaluated. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: • • • Competency 1: Outline the steps of the health care information life cycle. • Map the flow of health record information. • Detail steps and time frames for implementing a study. Competency 2: Apply laws governing health information confidentiality, privacy, and security. • Plan data security measures. Competency 3: Assess system applications used to operationalize health information. • Explain rationale for proposed health care • • • information review procedures. • Plan procedures and human resource requirements to manage the information. Competency 4: Determine how a health information exchange (HIE) affects the management of patient data, clinical knowledge, and population data. • Plan evidence-based best practices or procedures to ensure data meet standards for interoperability with an HIE. Competency 5: Integrate quality and change management strategies. • Plan evidence-based quality and change management strategies. Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, and consistent with the expectations for health care professionals. • Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and good organization. • Apply proper APA formatting and style to citations and references. Instructions You do not need to write your proposal in APA format. You do need to complete a cohesive, coherent, organized, and wellwritten proposal. Much of the information you include in your proposal will come from your previous assessments. Be sure your proposal includes all of the following headings and your narrative addresses each of the bullet points. Introduction • • • Explain what information you propose to collect. Provide the reasons for collecting this information. Describe how could this information be used to validate or improve the quality of care at your facility. Data Collection Plan • • • Propose an implementation plan and detail the information you plan to collect at your facility, including where and how it will be collected: Specify the following: • The time period you propose to review. • The system applications you will use to collect the health information. Write a narrative, create a timeline, build a flowchart, or use any other method of your choosing to demonstrate the flow of health record information through the • • • information life cycle from creation to destruction. Identify those sections within the life cycle from which you will retrieve information. Explain the use of information from an HIE and describe how it may affect patient care, clinical knowledge, and population health data. Detail the personnel required to complete the health information review, including their needed skills and required training and job aids. Describe strategies that will be employed to help personnel implement the review study. Data Security Plan • • • Plan measures to protect PHI. Apply laws governing health information confidentiality, privacy, and security. Plan for the impact of HIPAA on health care personnel, policies, and procedures. Benchmarking Plan • • • Identify the sources of national data and quality measures. Describe how you will use the national data and quality measures as benchmarks to compare with data from your facility. Explain how you will ensure data standardization, along with any other factors you need to take into account, so the data • from these sources is compatible with the data you plan to collect. Explain how the collected data will be compared to the benchmarking and quality standards. Quality and Change Management Strategies • • • Explain how data outcomes could be used to perform quality improvement reviews and recommend evidencebased best practices for policies and procedures based on outcomes. Recommend best practices for departmental workflow that will support the information review you are proposing. Describe relevant evidencebased best practices and procedures from peer-reviewed articles or Internet resources that could facilitate needed changes. Implementation • Detail the steps for implementing the information review study along with the expected time frames. Conclusion • Summarize how the proposed study will improve the quality of patient care for your physician group. Additional Requirements • • • • • Written communication: Your paper does not need to be in APA format. It does need to be clear and well organized, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, to support orderly exposition of content. Title page: Develop a descriptive title of 5–15 words. It should stir interest yet maintain professional decorum. References: Include a minimum of two citations of peerreviewed sources in APA format. Length: 5–7 typed and doublespaced content pages, not including the title page and references page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. 1 Discussion: Benchmark and Quality Measures Introduction Data compatibility is a data-enabled system that is important to health care since it allows effective collaboration of the data systems within and outside the healthcare organization. The compatible data systems work as integral elements in the data ecosystem that works together to achieve the set objectives. 2 Data Compatibility The ways that are effective in ensuring that the data obtained from multiple sources are compatible include verifying and validating the data fields. The other approach to ensure compatibility of the data from multiple sources is combining all the data into one list. The other approach is standardizing the data. The other strategy is identifying and merging data duplicates by determining the current record to approve the data. The practical approach to ensure the applied data is compatible with the office data includes comparing valid data to the official data. The other method is measuring the consistency of the compatible data to the office data. Collecting data from multiple sources is essential in comparing and evaluating the statistical of the infection in a country, thus obtaining an adequate understanding of the state of the condition. The potential challenges associated with data standardization include incomplete and inaccurate data collection, which reduces its reliability compared to the office data. The other challenge is the patient matching issues which reduces the specificity of the data, thus impacting the health care organization workflow (Shary, 2020). Effects of Health Information Quality on the HIE The national database is data storage used by health care professionals to capture clinical and laboratory information. The HIE refers to an electronic health information exchange program that is applied to improve the efficiency and quality of health care services. HIE system enables the health care professionals to obtain and share data relating to a patient using electronic like a computer. The database can be presented in a paper approach, while HIE can be shown in an electronic format. The possible challenges that can develop when the facilities provide incomplete or inaccurate data to an HIE relating to the patient may contribute to adverse outcomes. The submission of incomplete and inaccurate data results from delays in the medication process. 3 The possible problem that may result when facilities submit inaccurate and incomplete information to a national database relating to the patient results in negative outcomes. The negative impacts include adverse responses when any medications or services are administered. In addition, submitting incomplete data in the national database may contribute to legal actions to the facility, adverse reactions from medication to patient and wrong billing codes. Inaccurate or incomplete data would affect the proposal. Incorrect data will contribute to the wrongful decision that contributes to adverse outcomes for the patient (Wilkinson et al., 2019). Conclusion Data compatibility is an essential component in comparing data obtained from the office to a national database. When implementing the national database and HIE program, it is vital to ensure the data is comparable to the accessed data. Therefore it is critical to ensure the collection of accurate and complete data to provide accurate results to the patients. References Shary, S. (2020). Weak and Strong Compatibility in Data Fitting Problems Under Interval Uncertainty. Advances In Data Science and Adaptive Analysis, 12(01), 2050002. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424922x20500023 4 Wilkinson, S., Borycki, E., & Kushniruk, A. (2019). Best practices for EHR implementation: A BC First Nations community’s experience. Healthcare Management Forum, 33(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419860863
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

1
Diabetes Management Healthcare Documentation Review- Outline
Thesis Statement: This proposed documentation review exercise focuses on diabetes patients to
identify methods of improving the quality of care for diabetic patients.
I. Introduction
A. Diabetes management is one of the key focus area of this physician group.
B. Collecting this information will help outline the current state of care provided to
patients and gaps for improvement.
II. Data Collection Plan
A. The data collection process will involve collection of diabetes management and
outcome information for the last twelve months in the healthcare practice.
B. The information flow from creation to destruction is a process of managing
information to ensure it serves its intended purpose and is handled in compliance
with legal and ethical considerations.
C. The use of information from the HIE is important for this documentation review
especially because it helps improve clinical knowledge and access to population
data.
D. Lastly, the personnel to be included in the review include nurses and medical
administrators in the office.
III. Data Security Plan
A. Data security is also an important part of the review and this will be ensured
through protection of protected health information (PHI) privacy, confidentiality,
and security.

2
B. The data security plan will be based on the Health Information Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy and Security Rules.
IV. Benchmarking Plan
A. The quality of care provided will be determined after comparison of collected data
and information with national data and quality outcomes.
B. Moreover, specific data that will be accessed from the NHQDR includes data that
could also be accessed from the EHR and administration records.
V. Quality and Change Management
A. The documentation review process should be an ongoing quality improvement
project and the management process will ensure implementation of better patient
management.
B. Additionally, departmental workflow should encourage the review process and
support improvements in diabetes management in the future.
C. Change management during the document review will be maintained through staff
education and organizational support.
VI. Implementation
A. The implementation will involve four main steps
B. At the same point, PHI will be destroyed for security purposes.
VII.

Conclusion
A. The document review will improve patient care by assessing current care levels
and providing the basis for improvements in diabetes management.
B. The proposed document review project supports continuous quality and the

group’s focus on quality care.


1

Diabetes Management Healthcare Documentation Review

Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date

2
Diabetes Management Healthcare Documentation Review
Diabetes management is one of the key focus area of this physician group.
Documentation evaluation on diabetes management and outcomes will determine the quality of
care provided to this patient population by the physician group. The information to be accessed
will be patient records and...

Similar Content

Related Tags