Introduction to Philosophy of Mind: philosophy paper

May 9th, 2013
DreamIt
Category:
Social Science
Price: $500 USD

Question description

Topic & Structure

Your assignment is to write a 1000 word (approximately 3 page) essay about either: 

The Correlation Argument for Physicalism.

The Knowledge Argument for Dualism.

You must chose only ONE of these two arguments, and you should use the version of the arguments contained in the handouts. (You must also use the readings to support your discussion.) Your job is to describe the argument, then describe and evaluate one objection to the argument.

Your short essay must consist of eight paragraphs with the following structure:

Paragraph 1.

Paragraph 2.

Paragraph 3. Paragraph 4. Paragraph 5.

Paragraph 6.

Paragraph 7.

Introduction

Outline of the paper.

Start your paper with the words, “In this paper, I will...” Then explain the outline of the paper. What will you be saying? What will you conclude?

The Argument

Introduce the argument.

What is the name of the argument? What is the point of the argument? Does it support Dualism or Physicalism? Provide any necessary back- ground or scene-setting for Premises 1 and 2.State and explain Premise 1.

State and explain Premise 2.
State and explain the conclusion, as well as how the conclusion fol- lows from the premises.

Dialectic

Describe ONE objection to ONE premise of the argument.

You can use an objection discussed in class or come up with your own. Either way:

(a) Specify which premise the objection is targeted at.
(b) Describe the content of the objection.
(c) Describe how the objection undermines the argument.

Justify the objection.

Why would anyone believe your objection? Why is it plausible? What is a supporting example?

1

Paragraph 8. Evaluate the objection.In your opinion, does the objection successfully defeat the argument or not? If you think the objection succeeds, defend it against a possible reply. If you think the objection is not successful, explain why.

NOTE: Your job is not to evaluate the overall merits of the argument. Instead, your job is to describe the argument, and then to describe and then evaluate one objection. If you don’t understand this distinction, talk to your TA!!!

Remember, this paper is worth nearly 30% of your total grade. That’s 10% of your total grade per page. Make your words count!

Specifics

  • The paper must be no more than 1000 words. (Title and bibliography do not count towards the word limit.)

  • NO SENTENCE MAY BE LONGER THAN 18 WORDS!!! (Phrases connected by a semicolon, colon, or comma still count as one sentence.)

  • Do not quote (see the "Style Guide" for details).

  • The paper must be double spaced.

  • The font size must be 12 point.

    Evaluation

    Your paper will be graded along four dimensions:

    1. (1)  Understanding. Have you correctly described the views and claims at is- sue? Have you clearly distinguished between your own opinion and the position you are describing?

    2. (2)  Clarity & Precision. Have you expressed yourself in a way that is both clear and precise? Have you avoided ambiguity and merely suggestive language?

    3. (3)  Dialectic. Do you understand how the argument works? Do you under- stand how the objection to the argument works? Does your evaluation of

      the objection make sense?

    4. (4)  Citation + Sentence Length. Have you followed the citation policy? Are

      your sentences really under 16 words long?

    Citation Policy

    1. (1)  Use at least two readings from this unit as sources for your discussion.

    2. (2)  Do not cite handouts or lectures.

    3. (3)  Do cite all readings (or external sources) which you use, in the following

      way. At the end of the sentence or paragraph in which you make reference

      to that reading write (Author Date, Page) e.g. (Huxley 1874, p.13).

    4. (4)  Any readings (or external sources) that are cited in the text must be listed in the bibliography. Check the syllabus for how to write up the bibliography

      entries.

    5. (5)  The bibliography does not count towards the word limit. 



dennett 1991 %22a visit to the phenomenological garden%22.pdf

crick 1994 %22the astonishing hypothesis- introduction%22.pdf

chalmers 1995 %22the puzzle of conscious experience%22.pdf

nagel 1974 %22what is it like to be a bat?%22.pdf

fesser 2005 %22the knowledge argument%22.pdf

hill 1984 %22in defense of type materialism%22.pdf

blackmore 2004 %22the neural correlates of consciosuness%22.pdf

tye 200 %22knowing what its like%22.pdf

lewis 1983 %22postscript%22.pdf

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: Rice University
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

5 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
ashleyisgod
Dec 1st, 2016
" Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back! "
Molly_Moon
Nov 8th, 2016
" AMAZING as always! "
Hemapathy
Oct 17th, 2016
" all I can say is wow very fast work, great work thanks "
BlueOcean
Oct 3rd, 2016
" Awesome! Exactly what I wanted. "
kevin12622
Sep 24th, 2016
" Goes above and beyond expectations ! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1821 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors