Enterprise Architecture Framework Research Paper Assignment
Purpose of this Assignment
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply your research skills, analysis, and
critical thinking skills to describe one of the enterprise architecture (EA) frameworks. This
will provide you an opportunity to gain an in-depth understanding of one of the frameworks
commonly used. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes:
•
•
describe enterprise architecture (EA), the appropriate application of EA frameworks,
and an overall ongoing EA program
analyze and examine how enterprise architecture and enterprise systems influence,
support, and enable an organization's ability to contribute to strategic decision
making and to respond and adapt to the business environment
Assignment
Select one of the enterprise architecture frameworks listed below:
•
•
•
•
•
Zachman Framework
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF)
DoD Architecture Framework (DODAF)
Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework (TEAF)
Research and write a paper that describes the chosen framework. Your description will
include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Beginning paragraph to introduce the selected framework
Framework’s purpose, scope, principles, and the kinds of structures it uses, as
appropriate to the framework. Ensure that you adequately cover these four
attributes.
Provide a Graphic or image that shows the structure of the model you have chosen.
This provides a good visual of what you are explaining and provides additional
context.
Provide analysis of the framework’s strengths and weaknesses.
Find more than two examples of organizations that have used the framework and
briefly discuss them. (NOTE: More than two examples are required to receive all
possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) Apply critical thinking, especially when
describing the structure and its strengths and weaknesses.
Concluding paragraph to wrap-up key points.
Your paper will be graded on both the accuracy and completeness of your description.
Please be mindful of how you research and provide on-line sources. Refer to UMUC’s policy
on plagiarism especially as it pertains to unauthorized student resources.
Your paper should be 3-5 pages in length (not counting any cover sheet or reference
pages). The use of at least three external scholarly resources (other than class
materials) is required. (NOTE: More than three external resources are required to receive all
possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) You should use scholarly journals (rather
than Wikipedia and authorless website postings). If you need assistance with determining
what a scholarly journal is, the UMUC library is a very good source of information, accessed
03/15/2019
via the following link: http://www.umuc.edu/library/libhow/articles.cfm. Remember to
correctly cite and reference all sources using APA format.
Submit your paper in Word format via your Assignments Folder as an attached document
with your last name included in the filename.
Grading Rubric
Use the rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of this assignment.
Criteria
Introduction
Description
of
Framework Quality
Description
of
Framework Coverage
Strengths
and
Weaknesses
of
Framework
90-100%
Far Above
Standards
80-89%
Above
Standards
70-79%
60-69%
Meets Standards Below
Standards
< 60%
Well Below
Standards
Possible
Points
5 Points
4 Points
3.5 Points
3 Points
0-2 Points
5
A sophisticated
introduction sets
the stage for the
paper.
A well-written
introduction sets
the stage for the
paper.
The introduction
adequately sets
the stage for the
paper.
The introduction
does not
adequately set
the stage for the
paper.
No
introduction
included.
18-20 Points
16-17 Points
14-15 Points
12-13 Points
0-11 Points
Description of
framework is
clear and
thorough and
demonstrates
sophisticated
understanding of
course concepts.
Description of
framework is
clear and
complete and
demonstrates
good
understanding
of course
concepts.
Description of
framework
includes the main
points, and
demonstrates
adequate
understanding of
course concepts.
Description of
framework may
be incomplete,
and/or may not
demonstrate
adequate
understanding
of course
concepts.
Description of
framework is
not included
or little is
presented.
27-30 Points
24-26 Points
21-23 Points
18-20 Points
0-17 Points
Sophisticated
description
covers purpose,
scope,
principles, types
of structures
used, as
appropriate to
the selected
framework.
Clear and
complete
description
covers purpose,
scope,
principles, types
of structures
used, as
appropriate to
the selected
framework.
Description
adequately covers
purpose, scope,
principles, and
types of
structures, as
appropriate to the
selected
framework.
Description may
not adequately
cover purpose,
scope,
principles,
and/or types of
structures, as
appropriate to
the selected
framework.
Little or no
coverage of
these areas is
provided.
11-12 Points
9-10 Points
7-8 Points
6 Points
0-5 Points
Strengths and
Weaknesses
identified are
clear,
compelling, and
Strengths and
Weaknesses
identified are
clear, and are
directly related
Description of
strengths and
weaknesses are
related to the
framework;
Description of
strengths and
weaknesses may
not be clear,
may not be
Few or no
strengths or
weaknesses
identified and
explained.
03/15/2019
20
30
12
Criteria
Examples of
Use
External
Research
90-100%
Far Above
Standards
80-89%
Above
Standards
70-79%
60-69%
Meets Standards Below
Standards
directly related
to the
framework,
demonstrating a
sophisticated
understanding of
course concepts,
analysis, critical
thinking, and
synthesis.
to the
framework,
demonstrating a
good
understanding
of course
concepts,
analysis, critical
thinking, and
synthesis.
demonstrate
adequate
understanding of
course concepts,
analysis, and
critical thinking.
directly related
to the
framework;
and/or may not
demonstrate
adequate
understanding
of course
concepts,
analysis, and
critical thinking.
11-12 Points
9-10 Points
7-8 Points
More than two
examples of
organizations
that have used
the framework
are identified
and clearly
pertinent points
are included in
the discussion,
using
sophisticated
writing.
More than two
examples of
organizations
that have used
the framework
are identified
and pertinent
points are
included in the
discussion,
using clear
writing.
9-11 Points
More than three
scholarly sources
other than the
class resources
are incorporated
and used
effectively,
contextualized,
appropriately
researched and
supported, and
synthesized with
original
arguments.
Sources used
are credible,
relevant, and
timely. Proper
APA style is used
for citations and
references.
03/15/2019
< 60%
Well Below
Standards
Possible
Points
6 Points
0-5 Points
12
Two examples of
organizations that
have used the
framework are
identified and their
use of the
framework is
adequately
discussed.
Two or fewer
examples of
organizations
are identified
and/or their use
of the
framework may
not be
adequately
discussed.
No examples
of use of the
framework
are identified
or minimal
effort is
demonstrated.
8 Points
7 Points
6 Points
0-5 Points
More than three
scholarly
sources other
than the class
resources are
incorporated
and used
effectively,
appropriately
researched and
supported, and
support original
arguments.
Sources used
are credible,
relevant, and
timely. Proper
APA style is
used for
citations and
references.
Three scholarly
sources other than
the class resources
are properly
incorporated and
used. Uses APA
format for
references and
citations.
Three or fewer
sources other
than the class
resources may
be used; may
not be scholarly
sources; may
not be properly
incorporated or
used to support
arguments; may
rely too heavily
on the reporting
of external
sources, and/or
are not effective
or appropriate;
and/or are not
credible,
relevant, or
No external
research is
incorporated
or reference
listed is not
cited within
text.
11
Criteria
90-100%
Far Above
Standards
80-89%
Above
Standards
70-79%
60-69%
Meets Standards Below
Standards
< 60%
Well Below
Standards
Possible
Points
5
timely. May not
use APA format.
5 Points
Conclusion
Format
4 Points
3.5 Points
3 Points
0-2 Points
Conclusion is
effective and
relevant.
Demonstrates
analysis and
critical thinking.
Conclusion is
provided and is
relevant.
Conclusion is
somewhat
effective and/or
relevant.
No conclusion
provided, or
minimal effort
demonstrated.
9-10 Points
8 Points
7 Points
6 Points
0-5 Points
Paper reflects
Paper reflects
effective
organization;
follows
instructions
provided; is
written in third
person; has few
errors in
sentence
structure,
grammar, and
spelling;
double-spaced,
and presented
in a
professional
format.
Paper has some
organization; may
have some errors
in sentence
structure,
grammar and
spelling. Is double
spaced and
written in third
person.
Paper is not well
organized,
and/or contains
several
grammar
and/or spelling
errors; and/or is
not doublespaced and
written in third
person.
Paper is
extremely
poorly
written, has
many
grammar
and/or
spelling
errors, or
does not
convey the
information.
Conclusion is
convincing,
effective and
relevant.
Demonstrates
sophisticated
analysis and
critical thinking.
effective
organization and
sophisticated
writing; follows
instructions
provided; is
written in third
person; uses
correct
structure,
grammar, and
spelling; doublespaced and
presented in a
professional
format using
Word.
TOTAL
Points
Possible
03/15/2019
5
100
Purchase answer to see full
attachment