Ericsson & Kintsch regarding their overlapping methods, psychology homework help

User Generated

Qrynar

Humanities

Description

Please answer the discussion question in at least 250 words. The answer must be in APA format and included at least one scholarly/peer reviewed reference.

1. Compare Cui et al., Kelley & Lavie, and Ericsson & Kintsch regarding their overlapping methods. Design an experimental approach to further verify the Ericsson-Kintsch argument for the existence of long-term working memory (heretofore thought only to hold information for a matter of a few seconds) and justify the methodology(ies) you choose.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: METHODS EMPLOYED IN LONG-TERM MEMORY

Methods Employed in Long-term Memory
Name
Institution

1

METHODS EMPLOYED IN LONG-TERM MEMORY

2

Methods Employed in Long-term Memory
Introduction
Ideally, long-term memory was believed to hold information for a few seconds. The
activation of contextual information was, therefore, gained through previously read the
message and used to make sense of what is currently known as long-term memory. Typically,
Ericsson and Kintsch are termed as the best methods in testing long-term memory.
Problem-solving, decision-making and challenging activities require a lot of
information. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995) challenged assumptions invented by long
term working method criteria. LTM advocated for working memory which referred to
simultaneous and temporary storage and processing of information. The assumptions based
on LTM method assumed by a century of laboratory research on memory many researchers
have concluded that LTM can meet neither t...


Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags