Part 1Arthur Andersen LLP was the auditor for Enron, WorldCom, Waste Management and other companies that committed fraud. Andersen was forced to shut its doors forever after a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against the firm charged that it had obstructed justice and lied to the government in the Enron case. One thing Andersen had done was to shred documents related to its audit of Enron before the government could get its hands on them. Some in the profession thought the government had gone too far given the facts and mediating circumstances including top management’s deception; others believed the punishment was unjustified because most accounting firms got caught up in similar situations during the late 1990s and early 2000s (pre-Sarbanes-Oxley). What do you believe? Use ethical reasoning to support your answer. Incorporate concepts from this week’s lecture in your post. Your main post should be at least 250 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.Part 2Interpretation 102-4 of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct that was discussed in Chapter 1 provides that a CPA should not knowingly misrepresent facts or subordinate her judgment when performing professional services. Explain how Rest’s model of moral development influences the steps a CPA should take to avoid subordinating professional judgment.Incorporate concepts from this week’s lecture in your post. Your main post should be at least 250 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.