A 2-3 pages review of research paper, sociology homework help

User Generated

novtnvyllllll

Humanities

Description

Hi,

the requirement of the paper is in the upload file.

Thank you.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Instructions: Review of Research Paper (30 possible points) Purpose: The first purpose of this assignment is to further your knowledge about using library resources to find and gather scholarly research information. The second purpose is to help you begin to learn how to integrate new research with already established concepts that are found in the textbook. Textbook: Crandell, TL, Crandell, CH, & VanderZanden, JW (2010). Human Development (10th Ed.). New York, NY: Mc-Graw Hill. The book's cover is blue and green and has a picture of a family on the Front. Assignment: Please locate one article from a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that is related to a topic found in the textbook. This article must be either quantitative or qualitative, meaning that the authors conducted an experiment, survey, or interview, and came to a conclusion based upon the results of the data analysis. Also, a mixed method article, which involves aspects of both qualitative and quantitative research, is acceptable. The article must have been published in a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal between the years of 2000-2017. What to Include: Read the article and write a review that includes the following sections: Summary of the Article (1/3 of your paper): Tell me about the key points of the research (background, methods, results, and discussion sections). In other words: What was the main idea of the article? Why did the researchers perform the study? What were the hypotheses? Who were the participants? What methods were used? Did the results support the hypotheses? From the discussion section, what future studies or practices are needed? (Remember to cite the article in several places) Connection to the Course (1/3 of your paper): Refer to one topic/concept in the textbook and discuss how your article relates to the material in the text. Thoroughly explain the topic in the book (with citations). Do not assume that I will know what you are talking about. Does your article support what is in the textbook? How do the results contribute to what is in the book? Conclusion (1/3 of your paper): State your opinion of the article. Did you enjoy reading it? What scientific methods were used, and were they appropriate for the hypotheses? Why did you choose this article? Will this information help you in your field of study or career? We strongly encourage you to use and refer to the rubric as you write the paper. This is what we will be using to grade the paper. Formatting Specifics: Please include your name at the top of your paper (no title page needed). Papers should be typed in size 12 Times New Roman font, have 1 inch margins, be double-spaced, and 2-3 pages in length. Your paper should exhibit appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. You must use in-text citations and include a reference page. For citations and references, you should follow standard APA format. If you are unfamiliar with APA style formatting, please review the resources on our D2L site, and/or the OWL at Purdue. Also, please submit a PDF copy of your article that you reviewed. There will be point deductions if these components are missing in the final paper. If needed, please visit the Writing Center on campus for additional assistance. Journals: Below is a table listing acceptable journals that can be found online through the library.There are many other acceptable journals that are not included in the list. If you find an article in a different journal and want to make sure that journal is acceptable. The use of articles from medical journals will only be accepted from students in healthrelated majors (e.g., pre-med or pre-nursing). If your major is not health-related, DO NOT use an article from a medical journal because you will likely have difficulty analyzing it in a way that makes sense for this course. (My major Is EC) ACCEPTABLE journals (developmentally-focused professional journals): Child Development Journal of Family Psychology Journal of Youth and Adolescence Human Development Infant Behavior and Development Developmental Psychology Journal of Adolescent Health Journal of Marriage and Family Family Relations Journal of Infant Mental Health Psychology and Aging Research on Aging Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Community Mental Health Journal Journal of Child and Family Studies Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry International Journal of Aging and Human Development Journal of Pediatric Psychology Journal of Divorce and Remarriage Journal of Adolescent Research The Gerontologist Journal of Applied Developmental Sciences Family Process Journal of Applied Gerontology Some suggestions about choosing an article form an acceptable professional journal: Selecting the right (for you) article is very important: A good strategy is to start by deciding which human developmental stage interests you the most (e.g., infancy, childhood, adolescence, early adulthood, middle adulthood or aging). The topics of childbirth and death and dying are, of course, also possibilities. Choose special issues or topics discussed in that stage which are of potential interest to you. After you decide on your topic, it will be easier for you to choose the article when you browse through the journals. Remember that we will inevitably be more interested in reading your paper if you are reasonably interested in, even somewhat passionate about, writing it! Before you start writing, go back to the chapters in the textbook to read through the relevant text material that relates to the topic chosen. This step helps you to develop a better understanding of the article and will help you in the second section of your paper, which is the connection to the course. It is of course entirely possible to do an excellent paper on a developmental stage/issue occurring at the end of the course (e.g. aging, adulthood, death/dying) by reading in advance of the scheduled class session. Summary (10 points possible) Connection (10 points possible) Conclusion/Opinion (5 points possible) Grammar (3 points possible) 8-10 points Student describes the main points of the article including the background, methods, results, and discussion sections. Student correctly determined main hypothesis(es) of the article. 8-10 points Student clearly described a strong connection between the article and a topic/concept in the textbook. Topic was thoroughly explained in terms of similarities and differences and whether the article supports or contributes to the topic in the text. 4-5 points Student clearly concluded the previous discussion by describing his/her opinion of the article and provided all of the following critique points: the methodology, selection of the article, and whether the article would be helpful in the student’s field of study. 3 points Student provided all of the following: 12 Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins, double-spaced, 2-3 pages in length, appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation, name at the top of the paper. 5-7 points Student described only 3 of the main sections of the article. Unclear discussion of the hypothesis(es). 0-4 points Student only described 1 or 2 sections of the article. No discussion of the hypothesis(es). 5-7 points Student described a loose connection between the article and a topic/concept in the textbook. Topic was briefly discussed in terms of similarities and differences and whether the article supports or contributes to the topic in the text. 0-4 points Student described a loose connection between the article and a topic/concept in the textbook. Topic not clearly connected to text and little discussion was provided about the connection. 2-3 points Student concluded the previous discussion by briefly discussing his/her opinion of the article and described only 2 critique points. 0-1 point Student concluded the previous discussion by briefly discussing his/her opinion of the article and described only 1 critique point. 2 points Student followed 7/8 of the following: 12 Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins, double-spaced, 2-3 pages in length, appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation, name at the top of the paper. 0-1 point Student followed 56/8 of the following: 12 Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins, doublespaced, 2-3 pages in length, appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation, name at the top of the paper. APA Style (2 points possible) 2 points Correct in-text citations were used throughout the paper, and references were listed correctly at the end of the paper. 1 point In-text citations were used throughout the paper, and references were at the end of the paper, but there were some errors with both. 0 points Student provided no in-text citations, or all in-text citations were not correct. Student also provided no reference list, or the reference list was not formatted correctly.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

find the attached work ..Let me know in case of any query .. Good Luck

Running head: REVIEW ON CHILD DEVELOPMENT

Review on Child Development
Student’s name:
Professor’s name
Institution
Course:
Date

1

REVIEW ON CHILD DEVELOPMENT

2

Review on Child Development
Background
The study examined the importance of using a group-oriented approach to assessing the
course quality of early infant education and care. The question of the examination was how
group processes impact the aspect of classroom superiority and if it forecasts the children's
cooperative play in earlier childhood education and care (ECEC) in the Netherlands. In the
course of the research, thirty-seven teachers and one hundred and twenty pupils between the age
two-to-four years were examined using the class evaluation system plus an addition two new
measures. The support of teachers in group processes was positive concerning class domains,
and teachers helped in developing the cooperative play of the children. The outcomes of the
study suggest that ECEC can be enriched by working towards adding group-oriented gauges of
classroom quality. The major aim of conducting the study is to find the possible worth added to a
group-oriented viewpoint to the already existing quality assessment tools for early childhood
education and care. The examination also researches ...


Anonymous
I was having a hard time with this subject, and this was a great help.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags