Cognitive Reflection:What did I think about this experience?Reflection on Application:How might I bring this learning with me in the future – future application (in additional courses, in your work, in your careers, etc.)?Reflection on Learning:What have I learned from this experience?Affective Reflection:How did I feel about this situation?You are encouraged to incorporate the following suggestion in your paper. Do not feellimited to this suggestion but try to address it in some manner.Reflective Journal Framework1. What I have experienced in class (readings, class discussionsand online discussions in BlackBoard, as well as course experiences)?2. What do I think and feel about the readings, discussions, etc.?3. What have I learned from the readings class discussion, etc.?4. How can I use this learning in the future?Note: Each Personal Reflection Paper is to include a section on “Asking the RightQuestions.” Asking the right questions is the key to being a moral professional – not simplyseeking to find “the right” answers; therefore:What are the 5-10 key questions moral professionals should ask of themselves, of others,and about their environments? (This section is the final part of your Final ReflectivePaper.)Reflective paper length: 6-8 pages

Based on the course resources, Virtual Crash Lab evidence collection, your personal research, etc., on the topic of the field investigation you are completing this week, post and discuss with peers one example artifact you will or are considering incorporating into your final portfolio, which demonstrates evidence of your critical thought, acumen, and application on the topics.The intent of this collegial dialogue goes beyond faculty feedback and vectors, to gaining and sharing other perspectives on higher order learning objectives specific to the four subject-specific investigative techniques and applications. Human Factors, Survival Factors, Aircraft Structures, and Aircraft Systems. You have the flexibility to select each of these topics in any order, at the outset of each week, and you have four weeks to complete the four subject areas. Regardless of whether your exploration this week is specific to human factors, survivability, systems or structures, the overarching objectives is to demonstrate achievement of two primary aspects of the specific topic you cover each week: subject-specific investigative tools and techniques and the influence of accident investigation findings and recommendations specific to the topic you explored this week, on aviation safety. As you post your exemplar, note that your peers will be posting on and discussing any of the four topic areas this week, depending on the order of topics they chose in Part II, but that they too are focusing on investigative tools and techniques and the influence to aviation safety, for their specific topic. This gives each of you the opportunity to be exposed to varying perspectives and artifact examples, on all four subject areas, every week. APA format 500 words

q Details about the reference list in terms of minimum number of required references and reference style (6) (APA, Harvard...etc.)q Quotations must be cited to its resources.q The paper styles (format of the paper (like introduction, main body and conclusion), consistency of the work, font size and type, page number, spacing, alignment). Use Times New Roman, 12 font size, 1.5 line space and adjusted text.q Specify the required word count.q The student must check the spelling and grammar mistakes before submitting the assignment.q Up to 20% of the total grade will be deducted for providing a poor structure of assignment. Structure includes these elements paper style, free of spelling and grammar mistakes, referencing and word count.avoid palagrismeRequired Text(s)Graham, D., Manikas, I., & Folinas, D. K. (2013). E-logistics and e-supply chain management: Applications for evolving businesses. Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference. ISBN#: 9781466639140 (print), 9781466639157 (e-text).