Description
convince an audience2.rhetorical tool used to strengthen an argument3.logical errors that occur unintentionally4.bending of the facts to suit one’s case
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
the correct answer is 3.logical errors that occur unintentionally
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Lobbying....
The term “lobbying” is a broad concept that refers to persuading people who possess the decision-making power in a spe ...
Lobbying....
The term “lobbying” is a broad concept that refers to persuading people who possess the decision-making power in a specific circumstance to take ...
Research paper
Paper is to be written on the domestic terrorist group KKK (Ku Klux Klan)The term paper consists of two parts. Part 1 - se ...
Research paper
Paper is to be written on the domestic terrorist group KKK (Ku Klux Klan)The term paper consists of two parts. Part 1 - select a domestic or international terrorist organization that threatens the U.S. homeland and complete a profile of that organization. The group profile should be approximately 50 percent of the final paper and must include a discussion of the group's ideology, targeting, tactics, capability, and overall goals, analysis of attacks, and any statements or propaganda released by the group. Make sure you have enough information on the group to address all these factors and how it affects the US homeland.A foreign terrorist group for this project must be on the official list of foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs) maintained by the U.S. Department of State. In the case of domestic terrorist groups, there is no sanctioned list from which to choose, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has made significant arrests from several groups that would fit the description of a domestic terrorist group. The FBI also names many other groups in congressional testimony. Materials presented in the first module, as well as recent news and congressional testimony, are good sources of information on how to identify domestic groups for this project.Part 2 - use the group profile to conduct an analysis of one or more U.S. homeland security policies studied in module 2, to assess the ability of the policy or policies to counter the threat posed by the group profiled. This analysis should begin with an introduction and explanation of the policy, followed by an analysis addressing the breadth of the information(from part 1) gathered on that terrorist group. The policy you analyze should be consistent with the group; for example, if you choose a domestic terrorist group, it would be improper to analyze the Secure Border Initiative and its ability to counter a domestic threat, because the members of the group are already within the nation's borders. If you find the policy deficient, make specific recommendations for policy change to counter the threat. If you deem the policy sufficient to counter the threat, explain the rationale for your conclusion.Your finished project, including both elements of the paper, should be approximately 12 to 14 double-spaced pages, not including the cover or reference pages but including the abstract, submitted as one document. Make sure you present an introduction and a conclusion tying together both aspects of the paper. Follow the guidelines in either Course Content or in the conference. You must post your selection in this conference. The paper is due at the end of week 8 and must be submitted in your Assignments folder. Review the late policy above. The paper will not be accepted late.
RUS 2101 UO Russian History Russian Names Origins & the Bronze Horseman Discussion
1. What “Akakievich” part of Bashmachkin’s full name is and what does it mean?5%2. Provide and explain similar parts ...
RUS 2101 UO Russian History Russian Names Origins & the Bronze Horseman Discussion
1. What “Akakievich” part of Bashmachkin’s full name is and what does it mean?5%2. Provide and explain similar parts of the full names of Dostoevsky, Gogol, Karamzin, and Pushkin?5%3. Which specific real historical event may Pushkin be describing in details in the Bronze Horseman and, if so, what was the precise date of this event? (You’ll probably have to do some research.)5%4. What can you say about Eugene’s occupation and social position?Justify your answer briefly.5%5. Who had a higher rank: Bashmachkin or Kovalev?Explain your answer briefly.5%Part III.25%Comment on one of the two well-known Russian proverb (below).Alternatively, try to answer the question: why were you asked to read “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity” by Carlo M Cipolla for this course: https://web.archive.org/web/20130216132858/http://...Discuss briefly whether (and how) the idea(s) (or some of them) may be connected to some of the problems that we have discussed in our course.If you wish, you can (but don’t have to) refer to two (or even all three) suggested elements while answering in depth about one of them. Your essay should be of about 250-300 words (1 pages long; Times New Ronan 12, double interval). Faites des commentaires sur l'un des deux proverbes russes bien connus (ci-dessous).Sinon, essayez de répondre à la question: pourquoi vous a-t-on demandé de lire « The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity » (Les lois fondamentales de la stupidité humaine) de Carlo M Cipolla pour ce cours: https://web.archive.org/web/20130216132858/http://...Discutez brièvement si (et comment) l'idée (ou les idées) (ou certaines d'entre elles) peuvent être liées à certains des problèmes dont nous avons discuté dans notre cours.Si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez (mais vous n’êtes pas obligé) faire référence à deux (voire aux trois) éléments suggérés tout en répondant en détail à l’un d’entre eux.Le volume de votre aperçu doit être d'environ 250-300 mots (1 pages, Times New Ronan 12, en double intervalle).1. «Услужливый дурак опаснее врага» (“Usluzhlivyi dukar opasnee vraga.”)An obliging fool is more dangerous than an enemy // Helpful fool is more dangerous than an enemy.Un imbécile obligeant est plus dangereux que l'ennemi // Un imbécile de bonne volonté est plus dangereux que l'ennemi // Un imbécile utile est plus dangereux que l'ennemi.2. «Заставь дурака Богу молиться – он лоб расшибёт» (“Zastav’ duraka Bogu molit’sia – on lob rasshibёt”)Make a fool bow and he will be sure to knock his head.Faire un fou prier Dieu - il se cassera le front.3. “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity” by Carlo M Cipolla: https://web.archive.org/web/20130216132858/http://...
4 pages
1 A Discussion Sharing Personal Information
Sometimes it is better for social workers to engage in self-disclosure to make clients feel more comfortable and open up a ...
1 A Discussion Sharing Personal Information
Sometimes it is better for social workers to engage in self-disclosure to make clients feel more comfortable and open up about issues that concerns ...
University of South Florida Eyewitness Reliability Debate Paper
Eyewitness Reliability Debate
Learning Objective 3b and 5c
The purpose of this discussion is to ponder the dynamics of rec ...
University of South Florida Eyewitness Reliability Debate Paper
Eyewitness Reliability Debate
Learning Objective 3b and 5c
The purpose of this discussion is to ponder the dynamics of reconstructed memory and eyewitness accounts, including their potential accuracy and/or inaccuracy.
Step 1: Read the following scenario based on the case of Francisco Carrillo:
The witnesses were standing near the curb on Lugo Avenue well after sunset.
Jan. 18, 1991, when Donald Sarpy walked out of his home to talk to his son. A car cruised down the residential street and then made a second pass. A passenger leaned out the window and fired several gun shots. Sarpy, 41, was struck in the chest.
The victim had no connection to any gang, but the area had seen tit-for-tat shootings between a predominantly African American gang, the Neighborhood Crips, and a mostly Latino gang, Young Crowd. That night, Scott Turner, a Neighborhood Crips member and one of the boys standing on the sidewalk, identified a photograph of Carrillo as that of the shooter.
After his arrest, Carrillo, then 16, denied any involvement in the shooting, telling detectives he was home watching television the night of the killing. He had grown up in Lynwood but moved to Maywood more than a year earlier to live with his father. Carrillo admitted he was a Young Crowd member but said he had not recently associated with the gang.
The other boys were not asked to review a photo lineup of Carrillo until six months after the shooting. Deputy District Attorney Mary Ann Escalante, who prosecuted Carrillo, described the sheriff’s investigation as “shoddy at best” when she testified.
With varying degrees of certainty, the boys selected Carrillo’s photograph.
Source: https://innocenceproject.org/california-exoneree-f...
Step 2: Based on the textbook readings about memory and/or other credible sources you find, explain in at least *one* paragraph why or why not Carrillo should have been convicted based on eyewitness accounts alone. Include at least *two* relevant concepts from the assignment readings in your response.
Step 3: This next part can be challenging. In at least *one* paragraph, present the opposite side of your opinion in Step 2. In your explanation, integrate at least *two* relevant concepts from the assigned readings.
In other words, if you believe Carrillo should have been convicted based on eyewitness testimony alone, in Step 3, explain why he should not have been. If you believed he should not have been convicted based on eyewitness testimony alone, then explain why he should have been.
South University Online the Artichoke Version of The Self Paper
The Artichoke Version of the Self
Write a 2–3-page paper explaining the artichoke idea of the self. Remember to explain ...
South University Online the Artichoke Version of The Self Paper
The Artichoke Version of the Self
Write a 2–3-page paper explaining the artichoke idea of the self. Remember to explain specific theories with supporting citations from the textbook and online lectures. As you develop your response, you might find some of the following questions to be relevant:
What is the existential idea of the self?
What do you make of the feminist, existential, and non-Western critiques of/alternatives to the essentialist/avocado self? Are there any problems with the idea that human beings are fundamentally rational creatures?
Similar Content
Waldorf University Invisible Users by Jenna Burrell Book Analysis Paper
Midterm Essay (minimum 1500 words)Link to the book is in the attached fileInvisible Users by Jenna Burrell5 points each fo...
University of Maryland College Week 6 Women Beauty Practices Discussion
Please read the course materials for week 6
and then participate in this discussion. Week Six opens out the "modern
era"...
Psychological Movie Review The Silence of the Lambs
MOVIE CHOSEN: The Silence of the LambsPsychological Movie Review (25 points) Films often contain characters that exhibi...
Cognitive Neuroscience - 15 minute quiz with 15 questions
You MAY use your notes as you take this quiz, but you WILL NOT have enough time to do well on the quiz if you do not alrea...
Need help to Make a hook for one of the parts in a topic sentence.
A hook can be at least 1 or more sentences in your topic sentence. Hook your reader in by making a sentence about refugees...
GCU Texas and Missisippi State History Research Project Paper
State- Mississippi (live in Lexington, MS)
United States educational law requires that elementary or junior high student...
Factorial Analysis
Discuss which analysis of variance should be applied when an experiment has more than one Analysis of variance compares th...
Docx.
I am planning to complete a commercial type of project for this assignment. Neutral type of audience is the most appealing...
Greek Philosophers
Thales a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher from Miletus in Asia Minor, and one of the Seven Sages of Greece. Many, most notab...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Fear - Trump in the White House
by Bob Woodward
The Trial
by Franz Kafka
The Great Gatsby
by Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald
Unf*ck Yourself
by Gary John Bishop
Jane Eyre
by Charlotte Brontë
The Road
by Cormac McCarthy
The Age of Innocence
by Edith Wharton
Notes from Underground
by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Crippled America
by Donald J Trump
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Lobbying....
The term “lobbying” is a broad concept that refers to persuading people who possess the decision-making power in a spe ...
Lobbying....
The term “lobbying” is a broad concept that refers to persuading people who possess the decision-making power in a specific circumstance to take ...
Research paper
Paper is to be written on the domestic terrorist group KKK (Ku Klux Klan)The term paper consists of two parts. Part 1 - se ...
Research paper
Paper is to be written on the domestic terrorist group KKK (Ku Klux Klan)The term paper consists of two parts. Part 1 - select a domestic or international terrorist organization that threatens the U.S. homeland and complete a profile of that organization. The group profile should be approximately 50 percent of the final paper and must include a discussion of the group's ideology, targeting, tactics, capability, and overall goals, analysis of attacks, and any statements or propaganda released by the group. Make sure you have enough information on the group to address all these factors and how it affects the US homeland.A foreign terrorist group for this project must be on the official list of foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs) maintained by the U.S. Department of State. In the case of domestic terrorist groups, there is no sanctioned list from which to choose, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has made significant arrests from several groups that would fit the description of a domestic terrorist group. The FBI also names many other groups in congressional testimony. Materials presented in the first module, as well as recent news and congressional testimony, are good sources of information on how to identify domestic groups for this project.Part 2 - use the group profile to conduct an analysis of one or more U.S. homeland security policies studied in module 2, to assess the ability of the policy or policies to counter the threat posed by the group profiled. This analysis should begin with an introduction and explanation of the policy, followed by an analysis addressing the breadth of the information(from part 1) gathered on that terrorist group. The policy you analyze should be consistent with the group; for example, if you choose a domestic terrorist group, it would be improper to analyze the Secure Border Initiative and its ability to counter a domestic threat, because the members of the group are already within the nation's borders. If you find the policy deficient, make specific recommendations for policy change to counter the threat. If you deem the policy sufficient to counter the threat, explain the rationale for your conclusion.Your finished project, including both elements of the paper, should be approximately 12 to 14 double-spaced pages, not including the cover or reference pages but including the abstract, submitted as one document. Make sure you present an introduction and a conclusion tying together both aspects of the paper. Follow the guidelines in either Course Content or in the conference. You must post your selection in this conference. The paper is due at the end of week 8 and must be submitted in your Assignments folder. Review the late policy above. The paper will not be accepted late.
RUS 2101 UO Russian History Russian Names Origins & the Bronze Horseman Discussion
1. What “Akakievich” part of Bashmachkin’s full name is and what does it mean?5%2. Provide and explain similar parts ...
RUS 2101 UO Russian History Russian Names Origins & the Bronze Horseman Discussion
1. What “Akakievich” part of Bashmachkin’s full name is and what does it mean?5%2. Provide and explain similar parts of the full names of Dostoevsky, Gogol, Karamzin, and Pushkin?5%3. Which specific real historical event may Pushkin be describing in details in the Bronze Horseman and, if so, what was the precise date of this event? (You’ll probably have to do some research.)5%4. What can you say about Eugene’s occupation and social position?Justify your answer briefly.5%5. Who had a higher rank: Bashmachkin or Kovalev?Explain your answer briefly.5%Part III.25%Comment on one of the two well-known Russian proverb (below).Alternatively, try to answer the question: why were you asked to read “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity” by Carlo M Cipolla for this course: https://web.archive.org/web/20130216132858/http://...Discuss briefly whether (and how) the idea(s) (or some of them) may be connected to some of the problems that we have discussed in our course.If you wish, you can (but don’t have to) refer to two (or even all three) suggested elements while answering in depth about one of them. Your essay should be of about 250-300 words (1 pages long; Times New Ronan 12, double interval). Faites des commentaires sur l'un des deux proverbes russes bien connus (ci-dessous).Sinon, essayez de répondre à la question: pourquoi vous a-t-on demandé de lire « The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity » (Les lois fondamentales de la stupidité humaine) de Carlo M Cipolla pour ce cours: https://web.archive.org/web/20130216132858/http://...Discutez brièvement si (et comment) l'idée (ou les idées) (ou certaines d'entre elles) peuvent être liées à certains des problèmes dont nous avons discuté dans notre cours.Si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez (mais vous n’êtes pas obligé) faire référence à deux (voire aux trois) éléments suggérés tout en répondant en détail à l’un d’entre eux.Le volume de votre aperçu doit être d'environ 250-300 mots (1 pages, Times New Ronan 12, en double intervalle).1. «Услужливый дурак опаснее врага» (“Usluzhlivyi dukar opasnee vraga.”)An obliging fool is more dangerous than an enemy // Helpful fool is more dangerous than an enemy.Un imbécile obligeant est plus dangereux que l'ennemi // Un imbécile de bonne volonté est plus dangereux que l'ennemi // Un imbécile utile est plus dangereux que l'ennemi.2. «Заставь дурака Богу молиться – он лоб расшибёт» (“Zastav’ duraka Bogu molit’sia – on lob rasshibёt”)Make a fool bow and he will be sure to knock his head.Faire un fou prier Dieu - il se cassera le front.3. “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity” by Carlo M Cipolla: https://web.archive.org/web/20130216132858/http://...
4 pages
1 A Discussion Sharing Personal Information
Sometimes it is better for social workers to engage in self-disclosure to make clients feel more comfortable and open up a ...
1 A Discussion Sharing Personal Information
Sometimes it is better for social workers to engage in self-disclosure to make clients feel more comfortable and open up about issues that concerns ...
University of South Florida Eyewitness Reliability Debate Paper
Eyewitness Reliability Debate
Learning Objective 3b and 5c
The purpose of this discussion is to ponder the dynamics of rec ...
University of South Florida Eyewitness Reliability Debate Paper
Eyewitness Reliability Debate
Learning Objective 3b and 5c
The purpose of this discussion is to ponder the dynamics of reconstructed memory and eyewitness accounts, including their potential accuracy and/or inaccuracy.
Step 1: Read the following scenario based on the case of Francisco Carrillo:
The witnesses were standing near the curb on Lugo Avenue well after sunset.
Jan. 18, 1991, when Donald Sarpy walked out of his home to talk to his son. A car cruised down the residential street and then made a second pass. A passenger leaned out the window and fired several gun shots. Sarpy, 41, was struck in the chest.
The victim had no connection to any gang, but the area had seen tit-for-tat shootings between a predominantly African American gang, the Neighborhood Crips, and a mostly Latino gang, Young Crowd. That night, Scott Turner, a Neighborhood Crips member and one of the boys standing on the sidewalk, identified a photograph of Carrillo as that of the shooter.
After his arrest, Carrillo, then 16, denied any involvement in the shooting, telling detectives he was home watching television the night of the killing. He had grown up in Lynwood but moved to Maywood more than a year earlier to live with his father. Carrillo admitted he was a Young Crowd member but said he had not recently associated with the gang.
The other boys were not asked to review a photo lineup of Carrillo until six months after the shooting. Deputy District Attorney Mary Ann Escalante, who prosecuted Carrillo, described the sheriff’s investigation as “shoddy at best” when she testified.
With varying degrees of certainty, the boys selected Carrillo’s photograph.
Source: https://innocenceproject.org/california-exoneree-f...
Step 2: Based on the textbook readings about memory and/or other credible sources you find, explain in at least *one* paragraph why or why not Carrillo should have been convicted based on eyewitness accounts alone. Include at least *two* relevant concepts from the assignment readings in your response.
Step 3: This next part can be challenging. In at least *one* paragraph, present the opposite side of your opinion in Step 2. In your explanation, integrate at least *two* relevant concepts from the assigned readings.
In other words, if you believe Carrillo should have been convicted based on eyewitness testimony alone, in Step 3, explain why he should not have been. If you believed he should not have been convicted based on eyewitness testimony alone, then explain why he should have been.
South University Online the Artichoke Version of The Self Paper
The Artichoke Version of the Self
Write a 2–3-page paper explaining the artichoke idea of the self. Remember to explain ...
South University Online the Artichoke Version of The Self Paper
The Artichoke Version of the Self
Write a 2–3-page paper explaining the artichoke idea of the self. Remember to explain specific theories with supporting citations from the textbook and online lectures. As you develop your response, you might find some of the following questions to be relevant:
What is the existential idea of the self?
What do you make of the feminist, existential, and non-Western critiques of/alternatives to the essentialist/avocado self? Are there any problems with the idea that human beings are fundamentally rational creatures?
Earn money selling
your Study Documents