Unit 2.1 DB: Research Article Please research an area of professional and/or academic interest and provide a current quantitative or qualitative research article (i.e., within the last 7-10 years) to address the 5 basic components of a literature review as outlined in Pyrczak. Please be sure to share the link to the academic article in your posting. Please be sure your response includes: 1) an introduction to the problem area, 2) establishes the importance for the research, 3) provides an overview of the relevant literature, 4) discusses how the current study will advance knowledge in this area, and 5) describe the researcher’s specific research questions, purposes, and hypotheses.    Unit 2.2 DB: Analyzing Literature Using the same research article for the 2.1 discussion board question, please analyze the literature using the 8 questions posed by Pyrczak in Chapter 5. Please be sure to share the link to the academic article again in your posting. Please be detailed in your discussion (i.e., do not list your answers), and highlight how this information would be beneficial to your current (future) line of work in the counseling and human services field. Unit 2.3 DB: Terminology Using the methodology section from the same research article used for DB 2.1 & 2.2, please define the following terminology: population, sample size, and generalizability of the sample. Once you have done so, please explain the importance of being able to distinguish between these terms when critiquing research. Provide an example of extrapolating generalizability (or lack of) from your article to a similar environment within the counseling and human services field. Readings and ResourcesTextbook: Pyrczak, F. & Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. (2019). Evaluating research in academic journals: A practical guide to realistic evaluation (7th ed.). Pyrczak Publishing. Chapter 5: A Closer Look at Evaluating Literature Reviews Pan, M.L. (2015). Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Pyrczak Publishing. Chapter 1: Intro to Qualitative & Quantitative Reviews Chapter 3: Searching for Literature and Professional Journals Chapter 4: Retrieving and Evaluating Information from the Web Supplemental Resources: This article provides ten simple rules for writing a literature review. Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput Biol, 9(7). This article looks at how research uses sampling strategies and methods. Banerjee, A., & Chaudhury, S. (2010). Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial psychiatry journal, 19(1), 60. This video provides an overview of a literature review and what is needed to write one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ny_EUJXHHs

Hello again! This is my homework and since I am not excelling in Philosophy, I would like to ask whether my argument against Death Penalty is in favor with Utilitarianism. If not, please I would like you to review and rewrite my answer. Thank you. Here are the instructions: Please produce about 250-350 word (double spaced) paper arguing against the above argument and the death penalty. Please appeal primarily to Kant’s or/and Utilitarian claims to support your points. Please argue against this argument and the death penalty regardless of what you really think about the death penalty. Please do not offer any support for the death penalty. The aim of this assignment is to practice how to use Kant’s and Utilitarian principles. If you argue against the argument below and the death penalty without any appeal to Kant’s and Utilitarian principles, you will not get a full credit for your work. Do not write any introduction. Write straight to the point. Pro Death Penalty Argument (Retentionist Argument): Premise 1) If we keep the death penalty, we run the risk of needlessly eradicating thelives of convicted murderers who might have been reformable (correctable). Premise 2) If we abolish the death penalty we run the risk of some innocent people becoming future victims of the murderers (for example, the prison guards). Premise 3) Whether we choose to keep the death penalty or abolish it, there is a risk that some human lives will be needlessly lost. Premise 4) We have no right to risk (endanger) lives of the innocent people. Conclusion 5) Therefore, it is our moral obligation to retain (keep) the death penalty.