AU Psychological Health in the Military Essay

User Generated

Frnagreery

Writing

ashford university

Description

Assignment Overview:

A well-written literature review reflects sufficient depth, identifying and discussing all sides of the issues covered, including conflicts, controversies, and disagreements in the field.  In addition to literature from academic journal articles, your literature review should also include information from respected professional publications and from reputable institutional, organizational, and governmental agency sources.

Begin this week’s assignment by reviewing all the sources you have identified on your topic and research question.  Build on the literature-review outline you wrote in Week Five to compose a literature review that provides your reader with an in-depth overview of the literature in your topic area.  Include background information on the topic, and offer justification for proposed research activities intended to expand or enhance understanding of the topic.  Reflect on the qualities of a sound literature review that you discussed in your Week Five Weekly Discussion to critique your own literature review.  Ensure that your literature review meets the requirements of being sound, well conceptualized, and well written.

Written Assignment Instructions:

Use the literature-review outline you prepared in Week Five to write a literature review of at least 2,500 words (not including title, abstract, and reference pages) that supports the topic and the research study you have proposed. Take into consideration your instructor’s feedback on your literature-review outline as you begin this assignment. In your literature review, make sure to:

Group information sources together according to their theme or point of view; start with general ideas and progress to specific conclusions, providing logical transitions between one theme and another.

Synthesize and summarize information across sources, don’t merely report on one source after another in a serial fashion.

Identify trends and patterns across the sources, as well as similarities and differences in the findings or conclusions of the sources; note inconsistencies in the studies you found.

Point out studies that are of notable importance or relevance to the understanding of your topic.

Identify study methodologies, populations included in research studies, and strengths and weaknesses of various sources.

  • Discuss how the literature addresses your research topic and how it supports the need for a study that would answer your research question.
  • Focus the review on sources that are relevant and directly related to your topic of interest and avoid sources that are only peripherally related to your topic.
  • Use contemporary sources (those published within the past 5 to 10 years), and include older sources when those sources are necessary to develop an understanding of the topic; identify seminal or foundational studies as such.
  • Make clear and concise conclusions about the topic and the relevance of a study to answer your research question, based on the content of the literature review.


Unformatted Attachment Preview

1 Literature Review Outline: Psychological Health in the Military Sean Powell University of Arizona Global Campus Dr. Jennifer Newmann RES7110: Scholarly Argument II 10/25/21 2 Literature Review Outline: Psychological Health in Military I. General overview of the topic Mental health is a significant issue in the military. Military officers, especially those directly involved in the battlefield, are exposed to environments that have adverse psychological impacts on them. Many studies have been done and are still being conducted to find out the most common causes of psychological challenges among military officers and the most suitable interventions to address them. This literature review examines the whole issue of psychological health among military officers. II. Key points to be covered There are several areas and themes that need to be covered in this literature review. Some of them include the current state of psychological health among military officers. Looking at this area will make it possible to understand the magnitude of the prevalence of psychological health issues among military officers. Another area is the causes of mental, psychological health issues among military officers. The literature review also examines its impacts, prevention, management, and possible policy interventions to address the challenge. III. Importance of the study This study is important because it will be critical in improving the health conditions of military officers. The mental health of military officers is critical in their performance. It is important to note that it is almost impossible for the military of a county to be effective in delivering its mandate when the officers are in a poor state of mental health. Thus, it is vital to explore and find a mechanism that may be used to improve the mental health of the officers. 3 IV. Themes a. Prevalence of psychological health among military officers • Stevelink et al. (2015), in their study, find that there are several mental health challenges that affect military officers, both in service and those who have departed. The study found that some of the most common psychological health issues include “PTSD (range 2-59%), anxiety (range 16.1-35.5%), depression (range 9.7-46.4%), and psychological distress (range 13.4-36%).” • Trautmann et al. (2017) have analyzed some of the most common psychological health issues among German military personnel. These include elevated rates of panic, post-traumatic stress disorder, and alcohol dependence. • Thomas et al. (2010), in their study, find that post-traumatic stress disorder and depression with functional impairment is witnessed among between 8% and 14% of military personnel. • Schmitz et al. (2012) evaluate the prevalence of psychological health issues among military personnel who were deployed in Iraq. The study finds that the most common psychiatric disorders were anxiety disorders, including PTSD, AT 31%, followed by adjustment disorders at 27%, and mood disorders at 25%. b. Causes of psychological disorders among military officers • Denning et al. (2014) mention that deployment-related stressors such as problems with leadership, problems back at home, and combat exposure contribute to psychological disorders among military officers. 4 • Xue et al. (2015) have analyzed risk factors for psychological disorders among military officers. Some of the risk factors that they have mentioned include the prior experience of psychological disorders, gender, and education levels, among others. • Charrys (2021) says that the leadership of military organizations plays an important role in the development of psychological disorders among military officers. c. Impacts of psychological disorders among military officers • Gog et al. (2018) indicate that a high prevalence of mental health challenges among military officers adversely affects deployment decision-making. • Shrestha et al. (2018) indicate that a high prevalence of mental health challenges among the military personnel discourages many people from joining the military while at the same time making many people drop out from service. • Williamson et al. (2019) indicate that psychological disorders among military officers lead to the development of stigma, which may, in turn, affect the standing of these people in society. d. Prevention of psychological disorders among the military officer • Acosta et al. (2014) says that addressing stigma against military officers with psychological disorders is critical in addressing the challenge • Liberman (2018) says that waiting to initiate treatment to the officers who already have psychological disorders is too little too late and 5 needs to be avoided. Instead, there is a need to adopt preventive interventions. • Wesemann et al. (2016) say that training military officers to change their attitude is key to addressing mental illness among them. e. Policy interventions • American Public Health Association. (2014) says that there is a need to remove barriers against access to healthcare among military officers and veterans • Harms et al. (2013) suggest the development of sustainable programs to detect and prevent mental health complications among military officers. V. Gaps a. Studies are not consistent on the exact prevalence of psychological disorders among military personnel. b. Studies present varying approaches that may be used to address mental health issues among military officers, both serving and retired. 6 References Acosta, J. D., Becker, A., Cerully, J. L., Fisher, M. P., Martin, L. T., Vardavas, R., ... & Schell, T. L. (2014). Mental health stigma in the military. RAND NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INST SANTA MONICA CA. American Public Health Association. (2014). Removing barriers to mental health services for veterans. Policy, 201411. Bøg, M., Filges, T., & Jørgensen, A. M. K. (2018). Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1-127. Charrys, M.A. (2021). The Effects of Military Leadership and its Implication on Mental Health Stigma and Treatment Seeking Behaviors of Veterans in Garrison and Noncombat Deployment Environments. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1569&context=diss Denning, L. A., Meisnere, M., & Warner, K. E. (Eds.). (2014). Preventing psychological disorders in service members and their families: An assessment of programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Harms, P. D., Krasikova, D. V., Vanhove, A. J., Herian, M. N., & Lester, P. B. (2013). Stress and emotional well-being in military organizations. In The role of emotion and emotion regulation in job stress and well-being. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Lieberman, J. A. (2018). Solving the mystery of military mental health: A call to action. Psychiatric Times, 35(12), 1-3. 7 Schmitz, K. J., Schmied, E. A., Webb-Murphy, J. A., Hammer, P. S., Larson, G. E., Conway, T. L., ... & Johnson, D. C. (2012). Psychiatric diagnoses and treatment of US military personnel while deployed to Iraq. Military medicine, 177(4), 380-389. Shrestha, A., Cornum, B. R., Vie, L. L., Scheier, L. M., Lester, M. P. B., & Seligman, M. E. (2018). Protective effects of psychological strengths against psychiatric disorders among soldiers. Military medicine, 183(suppl_1), 386-395. Stevelink, S. A. M., Malcolm, E. M., Mason, C., Jenkins, S., Sundin, J., & Fear, N. T. (2015). The prevalence of mental health disorders in (ex-) military personnel with a physical impairment: a systematic review. Occupational and environmental medicine, 72(4), 243-251. Thomas, J. L., Wilk, J. E., Riviere, L. A., McGurk, D., Castro, C. A., & Hoge, C. W. (2010). Prevalence of mental health problems and functional impairment among active component and National Guard soldiers 3 and 12 months following combat in Iraq. Archives of general psychiatry, 67(6), 614-623. Trautmann, S., Goodwin, L., Höfler, M., Jacobi, F., Strehle, J., Zimmermann, P., & Wittchen, H. U. (2017). Prevalence and severity of mental disorders in military personnel: a standardised comparison with civilians. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 26(2), 199-208. Wesemann, U., Kowalski, J., Zimmermann, P., Rau, H., Muschner, P., Lorenz, S., & Willmund, D. (2016). From Hero to Pro–Change in attitude towards mental illness in deployed soldiers using the preventive computer program CHARLY. Wehrmedizinische Monatsschrift, 60(1), 2-7. 8 Williamson, V., Greenberg, N., & Stevelink, S. A. (2019). Perceived stigma and barriers to care in UK Armed Forces personnel and veterans with and without probable mental disorders. BMC psychology, 7(1), 1-7. Xue, C., Ge, Y., Tang, B., Liu, Y., Kang, P., Wang, M., & Zhang, L. (2015). A meta-analysis of risk factors for combat-related PTSD among military personnel and veterans. PloS one, 10(3), e0120270.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Please view explanation and answer below.

1

Literature Review: Psychological Health in the Military

Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date

2
Background Information on the Topic
Mental health is a significant issue in the military. Military officers, especially those
directly involved in the battlefield, are exposed to environments with adverse psychological
impacts. Many studies have been done and are still being conducted to find out the most
common causes of psychological challenges among military officers and the most suitable
interventions to address them. This literature review examines the whole issue of psychological
health among military officers. Some several areas and themes need to be covered in this
literature review. Some of them include the current state of psychological health among military
officers. Looking at this area will make it possible to understand the magnitude of the prevalence
of psychological health issues among military officers. Another area is the causes of mental,
psychological health issues among military officers. The literature review also examines its
impacts, prevention, management, and possible policy interventions to address the challenge.
This study is important because it will be critical in improving the health conditions of military
officers. The mental health of military officers is critical in their performance. It is important to
note that it is almost impossible for the military of a county to be effective in delivering its
mandate when the officers are in a poor state of mental health. Thus, it is vital to explore and
find a mechanism that may be used to improve the mental health of the officers.
Literature Review
Prevalence of Psychological Health Issues in the Military
Most people place immense value on their physical well-being while paying little
attention to their mental health. Such an aspect has enabled the number of people walking around
with undiagnosed and untreated psychological issues to grow in society. According to
Trautmann et al. (2017), this phenomenon is also localized within the military, where mental

3
health is not given immense value compared to military personnel's physical health. Trautmann
et al. (2017) further add that such ignorance has resulted in the rate of mental disorders within
the United States and United Kingdom's military exceeding those recorded within the civilian
population. In line with this, Trautmann et al. (2017) conducted a study evaluating the
prevalence of psychological disorders within the German military. Military personnel are
normally at a higher risk of suffering from mental illnesses, primarily due to the nature of the
duties and responsibilities they undertake. From the study, Trautmann et al. (2017) ascertained
that some of the prevalent psychological disorders affecting military personnel include rates of
panic, post-traumatic stress disorder, and alcohol dependence.
Thomas et al. (2010) agree with the assertion made by Trautmann et al. (2017) on the risk
associated with the emergence of mental disorders within the military. According to Thomas et
al. (2010), repeated exposure to combat in Iraq and Afghanistan has resulted in numerous
military personnel suffering from post-deployment psychological disorders such as depression
and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As such, Thomas et al. (2010) conducted a study
aimed at establishing the prevalence rates of depression and PTSD, the comorbidity of
aggressive conduct or alcohol abuse with these disorders, and compare rates between Active
Component and National Guard soldiers at the 3- and 12-month time points after being deployed
to Iraq. Thomas et al. (2010) established that post-traumatic stress disorder and depression with
functional impairment are witnessed among between 8% and 14% of military personnel.
Schmitz et al.'s (2012) study also looked at the prevalence of psychological health issues
among military personnel deployed in Iraq. Schmitz et al. (2012) agree with Thomas et al. (2010)
and Trautmann et al. (2017) that military officers have a higher risk for mental health issues.
Thomas et al.'s (2010) study focused on the psychological well-being of American military

4
officers deployed between January 2006 and January 2007. From the study, Thomas et al. (2010)...


Anonymous
I was struggling with this subject, and this helped me a ton!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags