Rhetorical Analysis of FIRE, english assignment help


Question Description

I have attached the prompt. be sure to visit theFIRE.org

Unformatted Attachment Preview

English 1302 www.thefire.org Essay #1: Rhetorical Analysis of FIRE For your first essay assignment, you are asked to write a rhetorical analysis of FIRE. Okay, so you are not analyzing the flammable substance we refer to by that name like you might do in a chemistry class! Rather, “FIRE” in this case refers to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, and you are specifically conducting a rhetorical analysis of this non-profit, bi-partisan organization’s WEBSITE. So, the first thing you’ll need to understand is what exactly it means to write a rhetorical analysis. In the first formal essay folder, where you found this prompt, open the folder entitled “What is Rhetorical Analysis?” and you’ll see a link there titled “How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis”. I have also pasted it below: http://thinktank.arizona.edu/sites/thinktank.arizona.edu/files/writing-center-handouts/rhetorical%20analysis.pdf Read through the document closely, as it does a good job of explaining this unique form of essay-writing. Generally speaking, this kind of writing can be summarized by saying it produces essays that are focused more on “HOW” something is written and presented than WHAT something is specifically saying. With that said, however, one shouldn’t get the impression that what is being said is unimportant. By no means is that the case! It simply means that particular attention is devoted to those qualities that make a work appeal to audiences. Therefore, a rhetorical analysis can be applied to lots of different works—from essays to images to advertisements and even to websites. The latter of these is what you are asked to do in this first essay assignment, as you will be conducting a THOROUGH rhetorical analysis of an entire website! This means the home page and all of the various links, along with content within those links, throughout the FIRE website. You will first want to spend time initially understanding the mission and purpose of the organization and what they hope to accomplish. You’ll want to explore the many court cases they have available to view, news stories, videos, links, and “campus rights” resources available to an audience of both students and faculty at colleges and universities. As you analyze the rhetoric in all of these areas, it is also important to consider the mission of FIRE in light of the larger, longstanding historical mission of all institutions of higher education until very recently. Consider what college students have always expected to encounter in an atmosphere designed to expand adults’ minds (not children) and broaden their perspectives of the world—which, by default, automatically means exposure to ideas that are bound to be “offensive” to every student or faculty member at some point! The solution many colleges and universities have sought to install is the ambitious, yet highly unrealistic and entirely incompatible with the principles of higher education, goal of attempting to eliminate offense at every level. They have established thorough and detailed “speech codes” that outline what can and cannot be said; they have designated “free speech zones” on remote parts of their campuses for any ideas deemed “disagreeable” to others (for very restricted amounts of time). They have redefined what were once considered mere disagreements between people as “micro-aggressions” perpetrated by some towards others—ideas considered equally as dangerous as acts of violence (obviously defined by folks who have never experienced actual human violence), and some institutions in the country have recently attempted to establish “safe zones” whereby those who reside within such “zones” are assured of not having their feelings hurt by anyone in any way, which is very utopian. Your rhetorical analysis of the FIRE website need not be in the spirit of agreement with this bi-partisan organization (although most students do agree with them); you may find yourself in disagreement entirely with FIRE’s commitment to promote and protect free speech on college campuses because you believe the risks outweigh the benefits of free speech—and that’s perfectly okay! Anyhow, this is not an argument paper. As stated earlier in this handout, rhetorical analysis essays are first and foremost about (objectively) discussing HOW something is written/presented in light of stated goals and objectives by the authors—not expressing agreement or disagreement with WHAT is said in the rhetoric. Therefore, the assessment of their effectiveness is not dependent upon your agreement or disagreement with them. It is dependent entirely upon how effectively their rhetoric (everything on their website) helps them accomplish their goals. Finally, this is also not a research paper. No outside sources are expected in this assignment beyond the FIRE website. Now, with that said, there should be no shortage of concrete and specific examples throughout your essay—examples that come from of all of the various nooks and crannies throughout the site! The Basics: 1. 4+ Pages (essays of less than four full pages will receive deductions) 2. MLA Format 3. Evidence of the Writing Process (prewriting, rough draft, revision, editing) Suggestion: I would highly recommend starting your investigation of the site by watching two videos from the co-founders of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education: Alan Kors and Harvey Silverglate (called “The Founders Series” in their video archives). A word about MLA in this specific paper… You need not worry about citing references to the various FIRE resources, since the entire focus of the assignment is to investigate and analyze the FIRE website (it is clear what source material you are addressing). Just be sure to make it abundantly clear in your introduction that you are indeed analyzing the FIRE website—as any focused paper should! ...

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors