Chamberlain College of Nursing NR392 Quality Improvement in Nursing Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines and Grading Rubric PURPOSE To apply lessons in quality improvement in nursing to a real world nursing issue. This Course Project will use the Six Sigma DMAIC process. COURSE OUTCOMES The Course Project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO 1: Identify the role of the BSN nurse in the quality improvement process as a member of the collaborative interprofessional team (PO#2 & 7) CO 2: Discuss effective processes and strategies to improve quality in nursing (PO#2 & 8) POINTS The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 300 points of this total. DUE DATE Submit your completed NR392 Milestone 3 to its Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 6. REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES 1. Carefully review this Milestone 3 Guidelines document including the rubric, as well as the Milestone 3 Template. 2. Download the Milestone 3 Template. Save it to your computer in Microsoft Word 2010 (or later) as a .docx file with the file name: Your Last Name NR392 Milestone 3.docx. 3. Milestone 3 is a continuation of and builds upon Milestones 1 and 2. See Rubric in this Guidelines document for details about requirements including 3 interventions and evaluation of each. 4. A peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (not a website) that is appropriate to the nursing care issue must be obtained from CINAHL via the Chamberlain Online Library and must be available in full text. Use APA format to cite and reference this article. You will write a short summary of this article. 5. Carefully review the assigned areas for Milestone 3 and type directly on your saved Milestone 3 Template. 6. Submit your completed Milestone 3 Template to the Dropbox by Sunday at end of Week 6. NR392 Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines.docx 11/18/2016 CJM 1 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR392 Quality Improvement in Nursing GRADING CRITERIA Category Brief Statement of Nursing Care Issue I: Interventions (3) to Improve Quality I: Professional Article to Support Interventions C: Control/ Evaluation Points 15 % 5% 120 (40 points each) 40% 75 (25 points reference and citation; 50 points summary) 90 (30 points each) 25% 300 100% Total 30% Description: See Milestone 3 Rubric for Details Clearly and briefly state the nursing care issue that is the topic for the course project. List three (3) detailed appropriate interventions designed to improve the quality of your selected nursing care issue. At least one intervention must be supported by information from the professional article you selected. An APA citation must be included with that intervention. Provide a reference in APA format for one (1) peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article retrieved in full text from CINAHL. Provide a citation in APA format with the intervention in the above category that is supported by that article. Write a brief summary of the article using 80-100 words. Explain detailed evaluation plans for each of the three interventions listed to identify how you would determine if quality is improved by each intervention. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria A (100%) Exceptional B (88%) Exceeds C (80%) Meets Brief Statement of Nursing Care Issue 15 points Outstanding or highest level of performance Clearly and briefly states the nursing care issue that is the topic for the course project. 15 points ☐ Very good or high level of performance Statement of the nursing care issue is mostly clear and mostly brief. 13 points ☐ Competent or satisfactory level of performance Clarity and/or brevity are only fair for the statement of the nursing care issue. 12 points ☐ Intervention #1 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent. Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue. 40 points ☐ Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue. 35 points ☐ Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair. 32 points ☐ I: Intervention #1 to Improve Quality 40 points NR392 Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines.docx NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance Clarity and brevity are poor. May or may not state the same topic approved from previous milestones. 6 points ☐ Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor. 15 points ☐ 11/18/2016 CJM F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance Did not state the nursing care issue. 0 points ☐ Did not submit intervention. 0 points ☐ 2 Chamberlain College of Nursing I: Intervention #2 to Improve Quality 40 points I: Intervention #3 to Improve Quality 40 points I: Professional Article to Support Interventions 25 points Summary 50 points NR392 Quality Improvement in Nursing Intervention #2 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent. Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue. 40 points ☐ Intervention #3 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent. Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue. 40 points ☐ Reference and citation for very appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in excellent APA format. 25 points ☐ Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue. 35 points ☐ Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue. 35 points ☐ Reference and citation for mostly appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in good APA format. 22 points ☐ Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair. 32 points ☐ Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor. 15 points ☐ Did not submit intervention. 0 points ☐ Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair. 32 points ☐ Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor. 15 points ☐ Did not submit intervention. 0 points ☐ Reference and citation for somewhat appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in fair APA format. 20 points each 20 points ☐ Did not submit an article reference, citation, or summary. 0 points ☐ Summary is very clear and thorough in 80100 words. 50 points ☐ Summary is mostly clear and thorough in 80100 words. 44 points ☐ Summary is fairly clear and thorough in 80100 words. 40 points ☐ Article is not appropriate to the nursing issue, not peerreviewed, OR not available in CINAHL in full text. OR reference and citation use poor APA format. OR may not submit one item (reference or citation). 10 points ☐ Summary is unclear and/or not thorough. 19 points ☐ NR392 Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines.docx 11/18/2016 CJM Did not submit a summary. 0 points ☐ 3 Chamberlain College of Nursing C: Control/ Evaluation #1 30 points C: Control/ Evaluation #2 30 points C: Control/ Evaluation #3 30 points For #1, explains very appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 30 points ☐ For #2, explains very appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 30 points ☐ For #3, explains very appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 30 points ☐ NR392 Quality Improvement in Nursing Explains mostly Explains fairly appropriate appropriate evaluation plan. evaluation plan. Evaluation plan Evaluation plan has good depth has fair depth and detail and detail regarding how regarding how you would you would determine if determine if quality improved quality improved by that by that intervention. intervention. 26 points ☐ 24 points ☐ Explains mostly Explains fairly appropriate appropriate evaluation plan. evaluation plan. Evaluation plan Evaluation plan has good depth has fair depth and detail and detail regarding how regarding how you would you would determine if determine if quality improved quality improved by that by that intervention. intervention. 26 points ☐ 24 points ☐ Explains mostly Explains fairly appropriate appropriate evaluation plan. evaluation plan. Evaluation plan Evaluation plan has good depth has fair depth and detail and detail regarding how regarding how you would you would determine if determine if quality improved quality improved by that by that intervention. intervention. 26 points ☐ 24 points ☐ Total Points Possible= 300 NR392 Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines.docx Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved. 11 points ☐ No evaluation plan provided. 0 points ☐ Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved. 11 points ☐ No evaluation plan provided. 0 points ☐ Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved. 11 points ☐ No evaluation plan provided. 0 points ☐ 11/18/2016 CJM 4 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR392 Quality Improvement in Nursing Course Project Milestone 3 Template Directions: Prior to completing this template, carefully review Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines paying particular attention to how to name the document and all rubric requirements. After saving the document to your computer, type your answers directly on this template and save again. This assignment is due by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time. Your Name: __________________________ Assignment Criteria Answers: NOTE: See Milestone 3 Rubric for details required in each area. Brief Statement of Nursing Care Issue 15 points Improve: Interventions (3) to Improve Quality 120 points Intervention #1: Intervention #2: (40 points each for 3 interventions) Intervention #3: Improve: Professional Article to Support Interventions Citation must be included with appropriate intervention above. Do NOT type in this box. 75 points Article Summary: Reference: (25 points reference and citation; 50 points summary) Control: Control/ Evaluation Evaluation for Intervention #1: 90 points Evaluation for Intervention #2: (30 points each for 3 evaluations) Evaluation for Intervention #3: NR392 Course Project Milestone 3 Template.docx 11/18/2016 CJM 1 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR392 Course Project Milestone 3 Template.docx NR392 Quality Improvement in Nursing 11/18/2016 CJM 2
Purchase answer to see full attachment