Review Figure 1.6 from Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V., mixed method research help

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jun 13th, 2017
account_balance_wallet $5

Question description

Review Figure 1.6 from Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. (“Application of the Socio-Economic Framework for Describing the Mixed Methods Research Process, Content Considerations and Contents for a Mixed Methods Study in Your Area of Interest”). Page 28.

Select two of the studies that you found to analyze further.

  • Complete Figure 1.6 for each of the two studies you decided to analyze. Note that you should submit two separate documents to complete this task, i.e., one for each of the studies.
  • Select one of the two studies for a deeper analysis, submitting a 2- to 3-page paper that responds to each of the following review questions:
    • What is the rationale for the study? (problem, purpose)
    • What research questions did the author intend to address?
    • What underlying assumptions, biases or points of view can you identify? Are they “taken into account” (made explicit)?
    • What did the researchers do? How did they use timing or integration across the quantitative and qualitative elements?
    • Does the methodology make sense as a way of answering the research question(s)? Why is MMR important in this study?
    • What did the researchers find?
    • Are the conclusions credible? Did the author support claims with evidence?
    • What was “missed”? What holes are there?
    • Was there anything in the article you did not understand? If so, what was it?
    • What questions are left (according to the author and according to you)?
    • What audience might find this study valuable?
    • Would you recommend this study to MMR colleagues? Why or why not?

Tutor Answer

ANNEPROFESSOR
School: Duke University

Attached.

ADAPTED FRAMEWORK FROM PLANO CLARK & IVANKOVA
Fill out this Text block

Fill out this Text block

qualitative data phase

quantitative data collection

connecting quantitative
and qualitative data
phases

INTERGRATION OFQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESULTS

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

INTERGRATION

INTERGRATION

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE
RESULTS

Attached.

ADAPTED FRAMEWORK FROM PLANO CLARK & IVANKOVA
Fill out this Text block

Fill out this Text block

PRAGMATISM

PARADIGMS

CONCEPTUAL
ORIENTATION OF
THEORETICAL,
SOCIOPOLITICAL
AND
PHILOSOPHICAL

INTERGRATION OF MIXED METHODS

PRAXIS

POLITICS

METHODS AND
METHODOLOGY
ISSUES

PROFICIENCY

MIXED METHODS
RESEARCH
CONTEMPOLARY
APPLICATIONS

Attached.

Running Head: MIXED METHOD RESEARCH

Mixed Method Research
Institutional Affiliation
Date

1

MIXED METHOD RESEARCH

2

MIXED METHOD RESEARCH
Mixed method research is a method that’s used in conducting research that involves the
collection, integration and the analyzing quantitative and qualitative research. The integration of
quantitative involves the use of experiments and surveys while the qualitative research involves
focusing more on groups and interviews (Dahlberg, Wittink, 2010)


What is the rationale for the study? (Problem, purpose)

The purpose of this study is to ensure that satisfactory answers are provided to the questions
where different categories are derived from and the way that the different system categories get
developed. The mixed method research provides an enormous potential that is meant for
generating different ways that are new and appropriate in the understanding of the different
complexities and distinguished contexts of social experiences that are appropriate in enabling the
different capacities that provide a social explanation and generalization (Dahlberg, Wittink,
2010)
The purpose of this study is meant in developing the constructivist’s epistemologies th...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
The best tutor out there!!!!

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors