Chapter 35 presented a case study on ERM at Malaysia’s Media company Astro. The focus of this case study is to convey how ERM can be used to assess portfolio performance.   Summarize what you learned from the chapter.  https://books.google.com/books?id=LOHhBQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Papers and documents have been written. I need to incorporate the feedback and apply it to the papers written.. Attached is the directions and files are also in the document. If needed I can send them separate.I ONLY GET ONE CHANCE TO FIX THIS, SO IF THERE IS ANY OTHER MISTAKES YOU SEE, PLEASE HELP ME OUT! THANKS!!You will proceed through the steps as you define the statement of work and service-level agreement, perform a technical lab assignment, and prepare a lab report. You will submit all of these items to executive management in the final step. Feedback for Project 3: Draft Statement of Work (SOW) Submission Feedback: Your SOW draft is really well written. I am kicking it back because of the Vendor's Solution section. Although you are using Amazon as the end solution, you are the vendor not Amazon. What I mean by that is you can say that the Vendors Solution is AWS E2, but not Amazon will be innovative and create new services for it's customers. Ballot is your customer, Amazon created the technology that you use for Ballot, so you ultimately (for example) are the one that has to innovate a solution. Update: Pages 4/5 still contain language that points at Amazon being the vendor, not your company. Feedback for Project 3: Draft Service-Level Agreement Submission Feedback The service request is not fully developed. You only mentioned the high priority and change request. Does that imply that medium and low priority issues will be ignored?Under customer responsibilities, you only list 2 items. Does ballot have the responsibility to do more than report and pay? Are they not responsible for how the use the system as well? (hint)Also (hint) there are more than 2 stakeholders with this project. Top of Form Bottom of Form Project 3: Final SOW, SLA, and Lab Report feedback: Feedback for Project 3: Final Report Does Not Meet Project Requirements Good work thus far. The other parts of the project are missing from this submission, the SOW and SLA. Also, if you notice the rubric adds two additional items as a requirement for this submission that were not included. All parts of the project steps are part of the final portion, with something additional that requires work.

A Template has been provided and make sure to go follow the sample on the first page. I have also included a PowerPoint slide to that reviews the topics and a link.Using the security controls reviewed (STIG documents, the OWASP-10, and CIS Benchmarks), select ten (10) security controls from at least two different security control frameworks (STIG/OWASP/CIS). Perform an assessment of their compliance and make as much progress as is practical to implement the control, recognizing that many of the follow-on steps are beyond the scope of our environments; in these cases, make sure to describe what you did to evaluate, what you did to mitigate, and what would still require action to fully comply. Include screen shots .Use the Security Controls Synopsis template for each control. Each control should get 1 or 2 pages of attention, resulting in a single document that contains all ten security controls, using the template as a guide (likely 10-20 pages in total length). You can choose to use a real-world system or a pet project as the target so long as it is applicable to the type of security controls we’re focusing on within Data & Application Security. Do not include work done as part of your job,Do not include repeats (same topic from two control frameworks),Don’t use a control that is “Not Applicable”. Treat this as a work deliverable: use critical thinking and check your writing/spelling for completeness.