Internal Selection Factors

Feb 17th, 2015
DreamIt
Category:
Business & Finance
Price: $10 USD

Question description

  • Choose three (3) internal selection factors that you believe would be most reliable for promoting employees within an organization. Next, describe two (2) reasons why an individual should consider these three (3) factors when promoting employees within an organization. Justify your response.
  • Based on the case study, determine what you believe are the three (3) primary weaknesses in BioGlass Inc’s promotion policy. Next, describe two (2) solutions to address the identified weaknesses. Then, provide one (1) method for preventing similar problems in the future. Support your rationale with specific examples of such strategies.

Changing a Promotion System

Bioglass, Inc. specializes in sales of a wide array of glass products. One area of the company, the commercial sales division (CSD), specializes in selling high- tech mirrors and microscope and photographic lenses. Sales associates in CSD are responsible for selling the glass products to corporate clients. In CSD there are four levels of sales associates, ranging in pay from $ 28,000 to $ 76,000 per year. There are also four levels of managerial positions in CSD; those positions range in pay from $ 76,000 to $ 110,000 per year (that’s what the division president makes).

Tom Caldwell has been a very effective sales associate. He has consistently demonstrated good sales techniques in his 17 years with Bioglass and has a large and loyal client base. Over the years, Tom has risen from the lowest level of sales associate to the highest. He has proved himself successful at each stage. An entry- (first-) level management position in CSD opened up last year, and Tom was a natural candidate. Although several other candidates were given. However, once in the position, Tom had a great deal of difficulty being a manager. He was not accustomed to delegating and rarely provided feedback or guidance to the people he supervised. Although he set goals for himself, he never set performance goals for his workers.

Morale in Tom’s group was low, and group performance suffered. The company felt that demoting Tom back to sales would be disastrous for him and present the wrong image to other employees; firing such a loyal employee was considered unacceptable. Therefore, Bioglass decided to keep Tom where he was but never promote him again. It was also considering enrolling Tom in some expensive managerial development programs to enhance his management skills. Consideration, Tom was the clear choice for the position.

Meanwhile, Tom’s replacement, although successful at the lower three levels of sales associate positions, was having a great deal of difficulty with the large corporate contracts that the highest- level sales associates must service. Two of Tom’s biggest clients had recently left Bioglass for a competitor. CSD was con-fused about how such a disastrous situation had developed when they seemed to make all the right decisions.

The answer to each question has to be 125 words or more plus reference(s).

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: University of Virginia
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

5 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
ashleyisgod
Nov 27th, 2016
" Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back! "
Molly_Moon
Nov 5th, 2016
" AMAZING as always! "
Hemapathy
Oct 13th, 2016
" all I can say is wow very fast work, great work thanks "
BlueOcean
Sep 30th, 2016
" Awesome! Exactly what I wanted. "
kevin12622
Sep 21st, 2016
" Goes above and beyond expectations ! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1821 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors