Description
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Case Study
John, Lesa, and Trevor form a limited liability company. John contributes
60 percent of the capital, and Lesa and Trevor each contribute 20 percent.
Nothing is decided about how profits will be divided. John assumes that
he will be entitled to 60 percent of the profits, in accordance with his
contribution. Lesa and Trevor, however, assume that the profits will be
divided equally. A dispute over the profits arises, and ultimately a court
has to decide the issue.
What will be the result?
How could this dispute have been avoided in the first place?
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
200 words
Tags:
Law Case Study
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.
Running head: LAW CASE STUDY
1
Law case study
University
Student’s name
Course title
Professor’s name
Date
LAW CASE STUDY
2
John, Lesa, and Trevor form a limited liability company. John contributes 60
percent of the capital, and Lesa and Trevor each contribute 20 percent. Nothing is
decided about ...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
3 pages
Managerial Practices Executive Summary
Several organizational behavior concepts are associated with common managerial practices in the criminal justice system. O ...
Managerial Practices Executive Summary
Several organizational behavior concepts are associated with common managerial practices in the criminal justice system. One of the main factors is ...
6 pages
Criminal Justice 1
Question 1: Read Chapter 2 of your textbook and watch The Ethics of Virtue [Video] (Click: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v ...
Criminal Justice 1
Question 1: Read Chapter 2 of your textbook and watch The Ethics of Virtue [Video] (Click: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUrxAWyOqSo), paying close ...
4 pages
Associative Evidence
Under crime scene evidence, there are two types of evidence. The first type of evidence will focus on testimonial evidence ...
Associative Evidence
Under crime scene evidence, there are two types of evidence. The first type of evidence will focus on testimonial evidence, which revolves around a ...
HLS 450 CTU Online Community Communication Capabilities Goals and Problems Paper
Unit 3 - Individual Project Running head: Communications and Organization Challenges Deliverable Length: 3-5 page ...
HLS 450 CTU Online Community Communication Capabilities Goals and Problems Paper
Unit 3 - Individual Project Running head: Communications and Organization Challenges Deliverable Length: 3-5 pages Assignment Guidelines Create an essay based on community communication capabilities, goals, and problems. Create a real-world scenario of an all-hazards event such as a major fire, earthquake, or terrorist attack. On the Dallas Communityand the state of Texas The scenario will be of your own choosing and imaginative process, but it must be written as if it were being presented to a local city council. Include conclusions and recommendations for installation, maintenance, and operation of communications equipment. Address the human factor for communication breakdowns and requisite training for operators. What is the role of a public spokesperson? Explain. What qualifications should be required for a public spokesperson to assure accurate public information, minimize rumors, and provide instruction for evacuation and assistance before a predicted crisis, during an emergency, and after returning to a normal routine? Explain. What strategies must be implemented at the local level to enhance communication and eliminate corresponding equipment problems that may arise during a crisis situation? Explain. Be sure to reference all sources using APA format.
CJ 560 Southern New Hampshire University OJ Simpson Murder Trial Powerpoint
Prompt Choose a controversial court case (OJ Simpson Murder Trial) in which the judicial process created civil unrest and ...
CJ 560 Southern New Hampshire University OJ Simpson Murder Trial Powerpoint
Prompt Choose a controversial court case (OJ Simpson Murder Trial) in which the judicial process created civil unrest and discord or was otherwise the subject of national media scrutiny, and that aligns with your educational and professional interests in criminal justice. First, discuss the facts, the legal issues, the judicial proceedings, the procedural history, and the holding(s) of the court case. Next, identify and analyze the underlying cause(s) of the controversy related to the court case. Then explore whether the courts could have taken any alternative courses of direction that would have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively. Finally, conclude with your perspective on what this court case illustrates about the role of criminal justice professionals in the criminal justice system, along with the workings of courts and the judicial process more generally.
Remember that you are developing this presentation for your supervisor; your goal should be to demonstrate superior analysis and communication skills. As this is a self-sustaining presentation, you will need to include speaker notes or a transcript. Although not a requirement, producing an audio recording or a video recording with audio is highly recommended, as oral and visual presentation are key communication skills for criminal justice professionals.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction
A. Overview of Case: Provide a brief overview of your selected controversial court case in which the judicial process created civil unrest and discord or was otherwise the subject of national media scrutiny. In other words, describe the case as a whole, providing a broad sense of the context of the case.
B. Selection of Case: Explain how this case is relevant to you, as a criminal justice professional. In other words, why did you select this particular court case? What makes this case interesting to you professionally?
II. Background of the Case
A. Facts: Provide a clear, succinct, and accurate summary of the key facts of the case. For instance, on what date(s) did the crime occur? Who was involved? What weapon was used (if there was one)?
B. Timeline: Develop a clear, accurate timeline of your controversial court case that summarizes the decision of the court. Specifically, the timeline of your case should include: 1. The legal issues 2. The judicial proceedings 3. The procedural history 4. The holding(s)
C. Verdict: Defend, with evidence, your position on the court’s verdict. In other words, did the court issue the most appropriate verdict in the case? Why or why not? Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.
D. Type of Court: Explain where (local, state, or federal court) the case was tried, specifically including whether the case was tried in civil court as well as criminal court. Why was the case tried in civil court, or why was it not?
E. Similarities: Explain the similarities between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.
F. Differences: Explain the differences between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.
III. Causes of Controversy
A. Media Coverage: Assess the impact of media coverage of the case on the judicial process. For instance, how did the news media shape public perception of the case? How did this, in turn, affect the court proceedings? Or, how did the selection of photographs and videos used by the media impact public opinion and the judicial process?
B. Fairness: Assess the fairness of the administration of the judicial process in your case. In other words, how fair and equitable was the judicial process? Why did the judicial process cause such a controversy?
IV. Reaction to Controversy
A. Reaction Explanation: Explain the reaction by the criminal justice court system, the media, and local, state, or national politicians to the perceived equality of the judicial process, supporting your response with specific examples. For instance, were politicians acting in a way that caused bias? Did local media provide objective coverage of the case? Did national media demonstrate sufficient, in-depth knowledge of the facts?
B. Reaction Defense: Justify, with evidence, the appropriateness and effectiveness of the court system’s reaction to the controversy during the trial. Ensure that you communicate your justification clearly and effectively.
C. Alternatives Explanation: How could the court system have responded more appropriately and effectively to the controversy during and after the trial? In other words, what alternative courses of direction could the court system have taken? How could the judicial system have worked in a more fair and ethical way?
D. Alternatives Defense: Defend, with evidence, your conclusions about how the court system could have taken an alternative course of direction that might have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively. Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.
V. Conclusion
A. Professional Role: What does this court case illustrate about the role of criminal justice professionals and the operation of the criminal justice court system?
B. Systemic Reforms: Based on your analysis of the controversial court case, explain whether larger, systemic reforms of the criminal justice system and the criminal justice profession are necessary, and what such reforms may be. What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation must include speaker notes or a transcript. Audio and video are strongly encouraged because of the importance of communication in the criminal justice profession. Your presentation should have 12–15 slides, although this is a minimum requirement; depending on the controversial court case you select, you may need more slides to comprehensively analyze your court case. You should use current APA style guidelines for your citations and reference list.
I will include the two previous milestones that make up the bulk of this assignment for reference to the above elements that need to be addressed.
NPC Application of Rules and Cases to Determine Court Verdict Essay
Defendant was charged with the murder of his wife, even though neither the victim's body nor a murder weapon was ever reco ...
NPC Application of Rules and Cases to Determine Court Verdict Essay
Defendant was charged with the murder of his wife, even though neither the victim's body nor a murder weapon was ever recovered, and there were no witnesses to the crime. At trial, prosecution wants to introduce the following evidence:
1. A computer disk that had been found in defendant's desk. On that disk was a file named "murder," which appeared to be a 26-step guide to carrying out a murder.
2. A witness who will testify that defendant purchased a .25 caliber pistol 2 days before the victim disappeared.
3. A witness who will testify that defendant told him that the best way to kill someone else was to shoot him behind the ear.
4. A witness who will testify that defendant asked him how he could remove bloodstains from concrete.
5. A witness who will testify that defendant once told her that she should not "be surprised if 6 months down the road . . . you hear that Shirley is dead, . . . because I am going to kill her."
6. A witness who will testify that defendant told her that there might be bodies hidden in mine shafts in Pennsylvania, and that "if he wanted to get rid of [his wife], nobody would ever see her again."
Defense objects to this evidence, claiming that it is irrelevant and more prejudicial than probative.
Discuss defense’s objections. How do you think a judge would likely rule for each objection? Apply the following rules and cases to the fact pattern. Include your analysis, reasoning, and conclusions.
- FRE Rule 401
- FRE Rule 402
- FRE Rule 403
- Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997)
- People v. Collins, 68 Cal. 2d 319 (1968).
Similar Content
CUNYBCC Police Officers Who Died as A Result of The Jan 6th Insurrection Discussion
During and after the Jan. 06 attempt to over throw the American Government in Washington D.C., one police officer was kill...
American University Methodical Process of Investigating a Crime Scene Essay
Identify and discuss the steps for a methodical process of investigating a crime scene.Minimum of 300 words. APA format...
Remedies Australian Law - Compensation to Relatives
Remedies 71116
Major Research Assessment Part 2
__________________________________________________
Major Research Assess...
Boston College Module 2 Law Enforcement Agencies as Result of War on Terror Discussion
Book used; Chapter 3 The Criminal Justice System in its environment1. Identify the changes that have been imposed on law e...
SBU Human Rights International Law Article Analysis
Please
submit a 3-5 page analysis (as an attachment - either .docx or .pdf) of
the articles focused on the following q...
CUNY City College of New York Johnny Immigration Issues Bribery Memorandum
Johnny Trash, a punk rock star from Scotland wants to enter the United States for a tour. His musical ability is lacking b...
Strategic Planning Fully Edited
What Do You Think are the First Important Steps in Constructing a Database to be An important aspect to look at in develop...
Crmj 1010 Intro To Criminal Justice
Tasers are non-lethal weapons that police use in law enforcement practices, mainly to stop the confrontation. These weapon...
Initial Response And 4 Peer Response
The HSNIT did their part in the response for COVID-19, however, the same is not enough. Nevertheless, their efforts proved...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Dracula
by Bram Stoker
Daisy Miller
by Henry James
Alice in Wonderland
by Lewis Carroll
Homo Deus
by Yuval Noah Harari
The Kite Runner
by Khaled Hosseini
Broke Millennial: Stop Scraping by and Get Your Financial Life Together
by Erin Lowry
As I Lay Dying
by William Faulkner
Z for Zachariah
by Robert C. O’Brien
Shutter Island
by Dennis Lehane
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
3 pages
Managerial Practices Executive Summary
Several organizational behavior concepts are associated with common managerial practices in the criminal justice system. O ...
Managerial Practices Executive Summary
Several organizational behavior concepts are associated with common managerial practices in the criminal justice system. One of the main factors is ...
6 pages
Criminal Justice 1
Question 1: Read Chapter 2 of your textbook and watch The Ethics of Virtue [Video] (Click: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v ...
Criminal Justice 1
Question 1: Read Chapter 2 of your textbook and watch The Ethics of Virtue [Video] (Click: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUrxAWyOqSo), paying close ...
4 pages
Associative Evidence
Under crime scene evidence, there are two types of evidence. The first type of evidence will focus on testimonial evidence ...
Associative Evidence
Under crime scene evidence, there are two types of evidence. The first type of evidence will focus on testimonial evidence, which revolves around a ...
HLS 450 CTU Online Community Communication Capabilities Goals and Problems Paper
Unit 3 - Individual Project Running head: Communications and Organization Challenges Deliverable Length: 3-5 page ...
HLS 450 CTU Online Community Communication Capabilities Goals and Problems Paper
Unit 3 - Individual Project Running head: Communications and Organization Challenges Deliverable Length: 3-5 pages Assignment Guidelines Create an essay based on community communication capabilities, goals, and problems. Create a real-world scenario of an all-hazards event such as a major fire, earthquake, or terrorist attack. On the Dallas Communityand the state of Texas The scenario will be of your own choosing and imaginative process, but it must be written as if it were being presented to a local city council. Include conclusions and recommendations for installation, maintenance, and operation of communications equipment. Address the human factor for communication breakdowns and requisite training for operators. What is the role of a public spokesperson? Explain. What qualifications should be required for a public spokesperson to assure accurate public information, minimize rumors, and provide instruction for evacuation and assistance before a predicted crisis, during an emergency, and after returning to a normal routine? Explain. What strategies must be implemented at the local level to enhance communication and eliminate corresponding equipment problems that may arise during a crisis situation? Explain. Be sure to reference all sources using APA format.
CJ 560 Southern New Hampshire University OJ Simpson Murder Trial Powerpoint
Prompt Choose a controversial court case (OJ Simpson Murder Trial) in which the judicial process created civil unrest and ...
CJ 560 Southern New Hampshire University OJ Simpson Murder Trial Powerpoint
Prompt Choose a controversial court case (OJ Simpson Murder Trial) in which the judicial process created civil unrest and discord or was otherwise the subject of national media scrutiny, and that aligns with your educational and professional interests in criminal justice. First, discuss the facts, the legal issues, the judicial proceedings, the procedural history, and the holding(s) of the court case. Next, identify and analyze the underlying cause(s) of the controversy related to the court case. Then explore whether the courts could have taken any alternative courses of direction that would have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively. Finally, conclude with your perspective on what this court case illustrates about the role of criminal justice professionals in the criminal justice system, along with the workings of courts and the judicial process more generally.
Remember that you are developing this presentation for your supervisor; your goal should be to demonstrate superior analysis and communication skills. As this is a self-sustaining presentation, you will need to include speaker notes or a transcript. Although not a requirement, producing an audio recording or a video recording with audio is highly recommended, as oral and visual presentation are key communication skills for criminal justice professionals.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction
A. Overview of Case: Provide a brief overview of your selected controversial court case in which the judicial process created civil unrest and discord or was otherwise the subject of national media scrutiny. In other words, describe the case as a whole, providing a broad sense of the context of the case.
B. Selection of Case: Explain how this case is relevant to you, as a criminal justice professional. In other words, why did you select this particular court case? What makes this case interesting to you professionally?
II. Background of the Case
A. Facts: Provide a clear, succinct, and accurate summary of the key facts of the case. For instance, on what date(s) did the crime occur? Who was involved? What weapon was used (if there was one)?
B. Timeline: Develop a clear, accurate timeline of your controversial court case that summarizes the decision of the court. Specifically, the timeline of your case should include: 1. The legal issues 2. The judicial proceedings 3. The procedural history 4. The holding(s)
C. Verdict: Defend, with evidence, your position on the court’s verdict. In other words, did the court issue the most appropriate verdict in the case? Why or why not? Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.
D. Type of Court: Explain where (local, state, or federal court) the case was tried, specifically including whether the case was tried in civil court as well as criminal court. Why was the case tried in civil court, or why was it not?
E. Similarities: Explain the similarities between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.
F. Differences: Explain the differences between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.
III. Causes of Controversy
A. Media Coverage: Assess the impact of media coverage of the case on the judicial process. For instance, how did the news media shape public perception of the case? How did this, in turn, affect the court proceedings? Or, how did the selection of photographs and videos used by the media impact public opinion and the judicial process?
B. Fairness: Assess the fairness of the administration of the judicial process in your case. In other words, how fair and equitable was the judicial process? Why did the judicial process cause such a controversy?
IV. Reaction to Controversy
A. Reaction Explanation: Explain the reaction by the criminal justice court system, the media, and local, state, or national politicians to the perceived equality of the judicial process, supporting your response with specific examples. For instance, were politicians acting in a way that caused bias? Did local media provide objective coverage of the case? Did national media demonstrate sufficient, in-depth knowledge of the facts?
B. Reaction Defense: Justify, with evidence, the appropriateness and effectiveness of the court system’s reaction to the controversy during the trial. Ensure that you communicate your justification clearly and effectively.
C. Alternatives Explanation: How could the court system have responded more appropriately and effectively to the controversy during and after the trial? In other words, what alternative courses of direction could the court system have taken? How could the judicial system have worked in a more fair and ethical way?
D. Alternatives Defense: Defend, with evidence, your conclusions about how the court system could have taken an alternative course of direction that might have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively. Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.
V. Conclusion
A. Professional Role: What does this court case illustrate about the role of criminal justice professionals and the operation of the criminal justice court system?
B. Systemic Reforms: Based on your analysis of the controversial court case, explain whether larger, systemic reforms of the criminal justice system and the criminal justice profession are necessary, and what such reforms may be. What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation must include speaker notes or a transcript. Audio and video are strongly encouraged because of the importance of communication in the criminal justice profession. Your presentation should have 12–15 slides, although this is a minimum requirement; depending on the controversial court case you select, you may need more slides to comprehensively analyze your court case. You should use current APA style guidelines for your citations and reference list.
I will include the two previous milestones that make up the bulk of this assignment for reference to the above elements that need to be addressed.
NPC Application of Rules and Cases to Determine Court Verdict Essay
Defendant was charged with the murder of his wife, even though neither the victim's body nor a murder weapon was ever reco ...
NPC Application of Rules and Cases to Determine Court Verdict Essay
Defendant was charged with the murder of his wife, even though neither the victim's body nor a murder weapon was ever recovered, and there were no witnesses to the crime. At trial, prosecution wants to introduce the following evidence:
1. A computer disk that had been found in defendant's desk. On that disk was a file named "murder," which appeared to be a 26-step guide to carrying out a murder.
2. A witness who will testify that defendant purchased a .25 caliber pistol 2 days before the victim disappeared.
3. A witness who will testify that defendant told him that the best way to kill someone else was to shoot him behind the ear.
4. A witness who will testify that defendant asked him how he could remove bloodstains from concrete.
5. A witness who will testify that defendant once told her that she should not "be surprised if 6 months down the road . . . you hear that Shirley is dead, . . . because I am going to kill her."
6. A witness who will testify that defendant told her that there might be bodies hidden in mine shafts in Pennsylvania, and that "if he wanted to get rid of [his wife], nobody would ever see her again."
Defense objects to this evidence, claiming that it is irrelevant and more prejudicial than probative.
Discuss defense’s objections. How do you think a judge would likely rule for each objection? Apply the following rules and cases to the fact pattern. Include your analysis, reasoning, and conclusions.
- FRE Rule 401
- FRE Rule 402
- FRE Rule 403
- Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997)
- People v. Collins, 68 Cal. 2d 319 (1968).
Earn money selling
your Study Documents