UTRGV Humanity Culture and Society Theorists Perspectives Essay

User Generated

vqqvv5

Humanities

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

Description

You will select your  favorite 5 theorists from 5 different paradigms/schools of thought that  we have covered during the semester (from weeks 4-14, chapters 4-15  excluding chapter 11) and compare/contrast their perspectives on some of  the big questions about humanity: culture and society, human diversity  and human universals, cultural stability and cultural change, structure  and agency, and the relationship between the individual and the group  (society). You can organize it as an anthropologist doing PO with the  group would do by describing the conversation between anthropologists  who are explaining/defending/arguing with each other about their ideas  and theories. The setting is up to you. They may be in a bar relaxing  after a long day of teaching or in a more formal context like a panel at  a conference. You can make it as entertaining as you want. Your essay  must make it clear that you understand their perspectives and how they  compare with those of their colleagues. Proofread final submission.  Final exam essay will be ~5 typed pages. ISafeAssign will be used.

Theorists : 

1. Gmelch

2. Kaufman

3. Chcker

4. Menand 

5. Fleuriet  

Explanation & Answer:
5 pages
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

Theorists’ Perspectives - Outline
I.

Kaufman
A. As the director at the imagination institute, Kaufman would share his theory on
personal intelligence during his conversation.
B. Furthermore, Kaufman would have said that creativity is an essential aspect and is
closely connected to desire.

II.

Gmelch
A. On the other hand, as a cultural anthropologist, Gmelch would have suggested that
anthropological knowledge represents the key component of contemporary
humanitarian learning.
B. Gmelch would further outline that one of the strengths of his theory is utilizing
examples from his personal experience.

III.

Menand
A. However, Menand would have recommended that there are only 3 theories of learning.

IV.

Fleuriet
A. On the other hand, Fleuriet would have perceived that the duty of anthropology
professors should be to guide learners in their critical thinking so that they can
identify the things humanity should embrace.
B. In graduate teaching, Fleuriet would have recommended that anthropology professors
should embrace an assortment of learning opportunities.

V.

Checker

A. Checker would have begun introducing her audience to her theory by investigating
the way groups from diverse economic as well as racial backgrounds work so that
they can create productive activist coalitions.
B. Besides, Checker would have revealed that race should be used to unite society
members and share experiences.


1

Theorists’ Perspectives

Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date

2
Theorists’ Perspectives
Kaufman
As the director at the imagination institute, Kaufman would share his theory on personal
intelligence during his conversation. He would begin by defining the theory as the interaction
between ability and engagement in purist of individual objectives. He would then pay attention
to covering intelligence at the personal level, taking into account things like individual growth,
their surroundings, imaginations, values, and desires. Kaufman would also consider that
creativity and desire are essential elements in the context of increasing personal intelligence. By
exposing learners to freedom so that they can delve into a subject matter deeply, Kaufman would
have perceived that learners would have developed a desire for a subject (Gray, 2021). That is,
by introducing them to new expe...


Anonymous
Just what I was looking for! Super helpful.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags