I did part one of this. my interest is applied psychology and as such I choose the scenario on ptsd. part 2 now requires me using part one to further my usage of certain statistical approaches. I provided you with the instructions from part one and now part 2. as well as i uploaded my work from week 3 (part 1 paper) University of Phoenix Material Inferential Research and Statistics Project Part 1 Select one of the following scenarios based on your particular field of interest in psychology: Industrial/Organizational Psychology: oA few months ago, the upper management at a large corporation decided they wanted to make major changes in the organization. Leadership is concerned that employees may be resistant to the change, and they want to find out if there is a change management method that would help employees accept change more effectively and keep employee satisfaction high. Two methods they have considered are the ADKAR Framework and the Prosci Change Management Methodology. The company wants to implement a small change in two departments before they make any major organization changes and would like to test the methods. The corporation uses the Devine Company to measure employee satisfaction with an anonymous survey. Applied Psychology: oA large medical facility is experiencing too many missed appointments in its primary and specialty care clinics. The facility has noticed that not all patients respond well to reminder calls regarding follow-up appointments. Some patients do not answer calls and do not seem to respond to voice mail requesting they call the facility. The result is that many follow up appointments are missed. Management has read articles that people respond very well to text messages and would like to see which method provides the least amount of missed appointments. Missed appointments are tracked in the facility database on a monthly basis. General Psychology: oClinicians at a small clinic have been introduced to a new method to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in their clients for veterans. Research indicates that virtual reality (VR) is a highly effective treatment option for patients with PTSD. Currently, the clinic uses only cognitive processing therapy (CPT) with their patients suffering from PTSD. The clinicians would like to find out whether VR therapy has different results from CPT therapy. The measure used by the clinic to measure PTSD symptoms is the Combat Exposure Scale. Both therapies need to be applied for a minimum of 12 weeks to be effective. Write a 525- to 750-word paper that addresses the following for your chosen scenario: Clearly define the problem or issue you are addressing. Provide a brief background of any research you have found that might affect your research hypothesis. Create a research hypothesis based on the information provided in each scenario. You have been given a data set (Excel document) with two sets of interval data (just the numbers, as you must decide what they represent, such as method A results or method B results). This means you are going to test one thing against another, such as which method works best (step 1 of the steps to hypothesis testing). State the null and research hypotheses. Explain whether these hypotheses require a one-tailed test or two-tailed test, and explain your rationale. Describe the sample you will use. Sample size will be 30 for each group, which are provided in your data set. Explain what type of sampling you selected. Do you think you would also collect some descriptive data, such as gender, age, or shift? Why do you think it makes sense to collect descriptive data? Format your paper according to APA guidelines. Example You have a hypothesis that two drugs have different effects on lowering anxiety. You would have anxiety scores for drug A and anxiety scores for drug B (all after 4 weeks of treatment) to run inferential analysis for after 4 weeks. Null hypothesis is H0: drug A = drug B Research hypothesis is H1: drug A ≠ drug B Dependent variable: Anxiety score changed after treatment. Independent variable: drug treatment Because you did not state a direction in your hypotheses (better than or worse than), this will be a two-tailed test. You are looking for differences in either direction. You would set your alpha level of .05 and have a sample for each group of 30 people that were volunteers for the study. Part 2 Analyze the data from Part 1 using Microsoft® Excel® software. Write a 700- to 875-word paper that includes the following information: Describe what method you are using to compare groups. Copy and paste the output into a Microsoft® Word document, and also answer the following questions: oWhat is the significance level of the comparison? oWhat was the alpha level you identified in Week 3? oWhat was the means and variance for each variable? oWhat was the test statistic? oWhat was the critical value for both the one- and two-tailed test? oWas your test one-tailed or two-tailed? oWere you able to reject the null hypothesis? In other words, did you prove there was a difference? Talk about what these results mean in everyday language and in context to your chosen scenario. Make a recommendation based on the findings. Format your paper according to APA guidelines. Example of Output You Would Use to Answer These Questions t Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances Variable 1 Variable 2 Mean 4.875 8 Variance 5.267857143 18.28571429 Observations 8 8 Pooled variance 11.77678571 Hypothesized mean difference 0 df 14 t stat -1.821237697 P(T <= t) one-tail 0.045002328 t Critical one-tail 1.761310136 P(T <= t) two-tail 0.090004655 t Critical two-tail 2.144786688 Part 3 Create a 12- to 15-slide presentation using the information you gathered and submitted in Weeks 3 & 4. Include the following: Describe the problem, and provide some brief background about the situation. Explain the research hypothesis. Describe your sample and your sampling method. Explain the four steps of the research process you followed, and define the critical value and the test statistic your analysis provided. Provide the main finding of the study. What did you prove or fail to prove? Provide recommendations based on your findings. Format any citations in your presentation according to APA guidelines.

write 5 paragraph essay350 wordWas President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066, which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizens? Informative Rubric Focus on a strong central idea, a clear purpose, and an understanding of audience A unified structure, effective organization, and strong transitions A unique perspective with ideas and details to appeal to the audience , and precise, rich language that expresses ideas and engages the reader Rhythmic and flowing language, and varied sentences Mechanical and grammatical accuracy 6 Well-developed ideas using a wide variety of relevant supporting evidence and concrete details that are appropriate to the prompt, task, purpose, and audience A cohesive structure that is easy for the reader to follow, an engaging introduction, a strong conclusion, and strong, effective transitions Exceptional Exceptional Exceptional Writing that shows a distinct personality, a style that is very well matched to the topic, precise language with a variety of powerful and engaging words, and excellent use of specific words and academic vocabulary Extremely clear, natural, and flowing sentences, and strong variation in length and structure Exceptional Exceptional Few or no errors in grammar, mechanics, punctuation, and spelling Capable Adequately developed ideas with sufficient use of relevant supporting 4 evidence and details that are somewhat appropriate to the prompt, task, purpose, and audience Capable A generally cohesive structure with a clear introduction and conclusion and some use of transitions Capable Writing that shows limited personality, a style that is appropriate to the topic, interesting language with some variation of words, and adequate use of specific words and academic vocabulary Capable Easy-to-follow sentences with some variation in length and structure Capable Some errors in grammar, mechanics, punctuation, and spelling that do not significantly affect the writing Emerging Suggestion of a controlling idea; demonstration of minimal 2 understanding of the prompt, purpose, and audience; and completion of few parts of the task Emerging Little paragraph structure and cohesiveness, a poor introduction, a poor conclusion, and few transitions Emerging Writing that shows unclear and inconsistent personality, an inappropriate style, uninteresting language, no variation in word choice, and infrequent use of specific words and academic vocabulary Emerging Sentences that are too simple or incomplete, and choppy writing Emerging Consistent errors in grammar, mechanics, punctuation, and spelling that significantly interfere with the writing Weight Ideas 20% Organization 20% Voice and Word Choice 20% Sentence Fluency 20% Convention