HR006: Leadership, Systems Thinking, and Change Management: Evaluate principles of effective leadership,
systems thinking, and change management to address healthcare transformation, innovation, and accountability.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
Part 1: Organizational Leadership Evaluation Report
Learning
Objective 1.1:
Describe
leadership traits
exhibited by
leadership at a
specific
organization that
promote success in
effecting change in
an organization.
Report does not identify or identifies
fewer than two leadership traits for
at least two members
of the leadership team or identifies
traits for fewer than two members of
the team.
Examples of how these traits
promote success in change
management are not relevant or not
discussed.
Report is not supported by
academic/professional resources or
the resources are not relevant.
Learning
Objective 1.2:
Report does not identify or identifies
fewer than two leadership traits and
factors that promote a culture of
Evaluate leadership creativity and innovation in the
traits and factors
workplace.
that promote a
culture for creativity Report is incomplete and/or unclear.
and innovation
© 2020 Walden University
Report describes two
leadership traits for at
least two members of the
leadership team.
Specific examples of how
identified traits promote
success in effecting change
are discussed.
Report is supported by
relevant
academic/professional
resources.
Report identifies two
leadership traits and factors
that promote a culture of
creativity and innovation in
the workplace.
Report demonstrates the
same level of achievement
as “Meets,” plus the
following:
Report explains how
these traits can catalyze
change in the workplace
by using examples of why
these traits are successful
based on evidence from
literature or other
organization case studies.
Report demonstrates the
same level of achievement
as “Meets,” plus the
following:
Report describes
leadership traits and
factors used successfully
1
Rubric Criteria
within a specific
organization.
Learning
Objective 1.3:
Recommend
specific strategies
the leadership
could apply for
working
successfully with
teams and effecting
change within the
organization.
Needs Improvement
Report is not supported by
academic/professional resources or
the resources are not relevant.
Report does not describe,
insufficiently describes, inaccurately
describes, does not clearly describe
or describes fewer than two
examples of how leadership traits
that foster innovation might differ
from those of classical leadership
styles.
Report is not supported by
academic/professional resources or
the resources are not relevant.
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Part 2: Change Management Proposal
Learning
Proposal does not describe, vaguely
Objective 2.1:
describes, or insufficiently describes
the organization, its change and/or
Describe an
factors driving the change are not
organization and
described in complete or sufficient
the change taking
detail.
© 2020 Walden University
Meets Expectations
Report explains why these
traits and factors might foster
innovation.
Report is supported by
relevant academic resources.
Report provides two
examples of how leadership
traits that foster innovation
might differ from those of
classical leadership styles.
Report provides a rationale
for selecting these examples.
Report is supported by
relevant academic resources.
Exceeds Expectations
in other organizations or
supported in literature.
Report demonstrates the
same level of achievement
as “Meets,” plus the
following:
Report provides a brief
response to this question:
Do organizations need to
be more creative and
innovative today than in
the past?
Rationale is provided for
the response.
Meets Expectations
Proposal clearly identifies the
organization including the
size, mission, and location.
Response clearly describes
the change taking place in the
organization and an
Exceeds Expectations
Proposal demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
2
place within the
organization
Learning
Objective 2.2:
Summarize
resistance to an
organizational
change within a
specific
organization.
Learning
Objective 2.3:
Apply an
appropriate change
management
theory or model to
a specific change
within an
organization.
explanation of the factors
driving the change.
Proposal does not summarize,
insufficiently summarizes, or does
not clearly summarize resistance
that might be expected.
Proposal summarizes the
critical analysis of the reason
for the resistance.
Proposal does not describe or
insufficiently and/or inaccurately
describes why a change
management theory or model would
be appropriate for this organizational
change.
Recommendations are vague,
inaccurate, or incomplete.
Proposal is not supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
© 2020 Walden University
Proposal clearly and
summarizes the resistance
that might be expected
reflects in-depth analysis.
Proposal identifies the
change management theory
or model that would be
appropriately applied to the
organizational change.
Proposal explains why this
theory or model was chosen
for the change and the
benefits that are expected.
Proposal includes a
description of the
organizational culture or
community factors as they
relate to size, mission, and
location.
Proposal demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Proposal summarizes a
change experienced
previously in the
workplace that resulted in
resistance and discontent.
Proposal summarizes how
the resistance was
eventually resolved.
Proposal demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Proposal identifies an
additional change
management model and
briefly explains why it
would be less appropriate
for this organizational
change.
3
Learning
Objective 2.4:
Apply systems
thinking to assess
the impact of
change on an
organization.
Proposal does not describe,
insufficiently describes, unclearly
describes, or inaccurately describes
the impact of the change throughout
the organization.
Proposal is not supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Proposal is supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Applying systems thinking,
the proposal describes the
impact of change expected
throughout the organization.
Proposal demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Proposal describes how other
aspects of the organization
might be led to embrace the
change.
Proposal briefly explains
the benefit of a systemsthinking approach to
organizational change.
Proposal is supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Learning
Objective 2.5:
Recommend
strategies and
innovations that
could be
implemented to
effect
organizational
change.
© 2020 Walden University
Proposal does not recommend or
recommends fewer than two
strategies and one innovation.
Proposal recommendations are
unclear and/or do not include a
rationale for the selection.
Proposal is not supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Proposal recommends at
least two strategies and one
innovation that could be
implemented to effect
organizational change.
Proposal recommendations
are clearly explained,
including a rationale for the
selection.
Proposal is supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Proposal demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Two or more innovations
are presented.
Examples from other
relevant organizations’
experiences are included
in the analysis.
4
Learning
Objective 2.6:
Explain the role of
communication in a
change
management plan.
Learning
Objective 2.7:
Recommend
strategies for
motivating
stakeholders to
accept, embrace,
sustain, and be
accountable for
organizational
change.
Learning
Objective 2.8:
Recommend
strategies for
sustaining an
organizational
change.
© 2020 Walden University
Proposal does not explain,
insufficiently explains, inaccurately
explains, or unclearly explains the
role of communication in a change
management plan.
Proposal is not supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Proposal does not recommend or
recommends fewer than three
strategies for motivating
stakeholders to accept, embrace,
sustain, and be accountable for the
organizational change.
Proposal is incomplete and/or
unclear.
Proposal is not supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Proposal does not recommend or
recommends fewer than two
strategies for sustaining
organizational change.
Strategies are unclear and/or
insufficiently addressed.
Proposal explains the role
that communication will play
in the change management
plan.
Proposal demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Proposal briefly describes
two problems that might
arise due to lack of
appropriate
communication.
Proposal demonstrates
Proposal recommends at
the same level of
least three strategies for
achievement as “Meets,”
motivating stakeholders to
accept, embrace, sustain, and plus the following:
be accountable for the
Proposal describes an
organizational change.
example of an
organizational change that
Rationale is provided for
was generally well
selection of these strategies.
accepted, embraced, and
sustained. Response
describes to what this
Proposal is supported by
acceptance and
relevant academic and/or
accountability was
professional resources.
attributed.
Proposal demonstrates
Proposal provides a
the same level of
recommendation of at least
achievement as “Meets,”
two strategies for sustaining
plus the following:
the organizational change.
Proposal is supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Proposal explains why these
strategies will be successful
for this change in the
Proposal describes one
reason why an
5
Proposal is not supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
Learning
Objective 2.9:
Recommend ways
to measure
success of
organizational
change.
© 2020 Walden University
Proposal does not discuss or does
not discuss in sufficient detail at
least three measures of success.
Response does not discuss or
discusses limitedly how measures of
success are related to
transformational change.
Proposal is not supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
organization.
Proposal is supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional
resources.
Proposal clearly explains
three measures of success
and how they are related to
transformational change.
Proposal is supported by
relevant academic and/or
professional resources.
organizational change
might not be sustained.
Proposal demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Proposal explains more
than three measures of
success related to
specific aspects of
transformational change
using supporting
evidence
from industry.
6
Overview
In this Work Product Assessment, you will apply concepts of
leadership, systems thinking, and change management to an actual
change process within an organization known to you. This change
could be in response to a challenge in the marketplace, or it could be
a critical project. You will develop an Organizational Leadership
Development Report, analyzing leadership strengths and potential
gaps, and a Change Management Proposal for initiating this change
and evaluating success.
To complete this Assessment:
•
•
•
Download the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist to use as
a guide when completing your Assessment. Responses that do
not meet the expectations of scholarly writing will be returned
without scoring. Properly formatted APA citations and references
must be provided, where appropriate.
Be sure to use scholarly academic resources as specified in the
rubric. This means using Walden Library databases to obtain peer
reviewed articles. Additionally, .gov (government expert sources)
are a quality resource option. Note: Internet and .com sources do
not meet this requirement. Contact your coach or SME for
guidance on using Library Databases.
Carefully review the rubric for the Assessment as part of your
preparation to complete your Assessment work.
Instructions
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This
is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission
and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master
the Competency. Many students find that understanding the
requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them
direct their focus and use their time most productively.
Access the following to complete this Assessment:
•
Use the APA course paper template available here.
Rubric
This Assessment requires submission of one (1) document that
includes both parts of the assessment. Save your document
as HR006_firstinitial_lastname (for example, HR006_J_Smith).
You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft
Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload
your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top
navigation menu.
You will prepare an organizational leadership development report
and change management proposal that plans the implementation
of organizational change.
This assessment has two-parts. Click each of the items below to
complete this assessment.
Part I: Organizational Leadership Evaluation Report
•
•
•
To begin this Assessment, select a healthcare organization with
which you are very familiar and where you have access to
information necessary to complete the Assessment. Identify a
specific change that is being implemented now or one that has
been recently implemented (within the year).
Because effective leadership is critical to successfully planning
and managing organizational change, you will conduct a
confidential evaluation and analysis of specific leadership traits
and factors that leaders implementing the change possess and
use. Effective leadership involves collaborating with individuals
but also participating in and facilitating teams. Thus, assessment
of team skills needs to be a part of your evaluation and analysis.
Create an Organizational Leadership Evaluation Report by
adapting a template you find through online research, one you
have created on your own, or one provided through your
organization. (Be sure to remove any branding that might identify
your organization.) Your Organizational Evaluation Report should
include the following:
o Observations of the leadership team implementing the
change in your chosen organization and an analysis of their
actions and behaviors for leadership traits that promote
o
o
success in effecting change in the organization. List these
traits and explain your analysis process.
Evaluation of leadership traits that could promote a culture
for creativity and innovation in the workplace. Discuss
whether these traits are exhibited by any of the leaders
implementing the change in your chosen organization.
Explain how you assessed ability to be creative and
innovative. Compare how these traits differ from and/or the
same as those of classical leadership styles.
Recommendations for specific strategies the leaders could
apply for working successfully with teams and effecting
change within the organization.
Part II: Change Management Proposal
•
•
The ability to manage and adapt to change is essential in
healthcare organizations. Whether internally or externally
prompted, the implementation of changes in the workplace
environment has become commonplace. Because change, even
changes that are perceived as positive, is almost always
unsettling, it is crucial that administrators and managers
understand the change process and plan carefully for its
implementation. Innovative approaches to change management
related to your chosen project might help you see possibilities
that may not have been evident before. A Change Management
Proposal will serve as the guide for effective execution of strategic
change.
Create a Change Management Proposal in the format of your
choice, e.g., slide presentation or Word document (including
graphs or charts) as follows:
o Describe the specific organization including size, mission,
location and the change that is taking place (or is scheduled
to take place) in the organization
o Given the parameters of the change, describe the resistance
you might expect, and why.
o Evaluate change management theories and models and
select one to apply to the change occurring in the
organization. Provide rationale for why you selected this
theory or model.
o
o
o
o
o
o
Apply systems thinking to address the impact of the change
throughout the organization.
Recommend strategies and innovations that could be
implemented to effect the organizational change and
provide rationale for the recommendations.
Explain the role that communication will play in your plan.
Analyze how communication could be used to handle
concerns and doubts of stakeholders.
Recommend strategies you will use to motivate
stakeholders and prepare them to accept, embrace, and
sustain the change.
Recommend strategies for sustaining an organizational
change and explain why they would be successful.
Recommend ways to measure the success of the
organizational change and when transformational change
has occurred.
PART III
Reflect on experiences you have had involving organizational change
and why it was made. Consider the strategies the organization applied
to offset concerns and encourage acceptance of the change and
whether they were successful. Then, think about why the strategies
were successful or not successful. Finally, think about a strategy you
would apply in that situation to manage change more successfully and
why you think the strategy you recommend would be effective.
Give a brief description of the experience you had with organizational
change. Describe the strategies the organization applied to offset
concerns and encourage acceptance of the change and whether they
were successful. Then, explain why the strategies were successful or not
successful. Finally, describe a strategy you would apply in that situation
to manage change more successfully and why you think the strategy
you recommended would be effective.
Running head: ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
1
Organizational Leadership Evaluation Report
AKINDEJI BABATUNDE
WALDEN UNIVERSITY
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
2
Part I
The selected organization is Mayo Clinic, and the change implemented is the electronic
health record. An electronic health record is a computer-based form of recording or documenting
used in healthcare for storing different patient records. The record is also used to make an instant
real-time availability of patient information secure.
Observations of Leadership Team implementing the Change in Mayo Clinic
The leadership team makes multiple observations at Mayo Clinic. The implementation
process for EHRs involved multiple steps. First, it began with turning the current paper records to
electronic form, although keeping paper for reviewing in the transition.
The second observation was that training and motivating the staff on utilizing EHR was
tough as the staff was implementing new system changes, which comes with multiple resistance.
The leaders trained the staff and the employees using training templates, and in this case, clinicians
utilized the template for patients before they switched to the official uses. Every staff member was
aware of their part before the clinic switched.
The third observation was the major advantages that EHRs brought to the clinic. The EHRs
centralized the patient data in one central place (Archer, 2008). For instance, the user could view
s refractive surgery of the patient's preoperative refraction for every follow-up visit. The patient
case is visualized, and progress tracked with no flipping their papers. Further, EHRs saved the
staff time and money to retrieve the papers.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
3
The actions and behaviors for Leadership Traits
Some of the traits that promote implementing EHR at Mayo Clinic include being confident
and strategically intuitive. Implementing change is not easy as it comes with a lot of resistance.
The leaders need to know how to handle the resistance and ensure the systems go on successfully.
The systems include a high form of investment. The leaders at Mayo Clinic expressed
knowledgeable traits because they ensured that the staff members accepted the change.
Leadership Traits
A rewarding trait that rewards the teams that engage in creativity and innovation within the
whole workplace. When leaders have the chance to reward the people, they become creative and
bring their ideas on board. The second trait is an educative trait where there are sessions where
members learn, research, and engage the people to discover different ways. Multiple ways include
setting up a separate room for research in the company. The other part is a celebrating culture
where the members celebrate the others that identify the best ways to aid the company.
Recommendations for Specific strategies leaders. Could apply to work successfully with
teams and effect Change.
The leaders should test the programs thoroughly before official work. Testing offers the
opportunity to determine issues and address their concerns (Berner, 2016). The process aids work
on the errors and learning to avoid issues when officially launched.
The leaders should also train new workflow management. For the success of the HER
systems, the staff should not just be trained on levels of the system but concentrate on the results
one is trying to attain. New workflows are also supposed to be supported by energy.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
4
Part II: Change Management Proposal.
Mayo Clinic.
Mayo Clinic is a nonprofit firm dedicated to clinical practices, research, and education,
offering experts the care of the whole being to every individual who requires healing. The
headquarters of this clinic is situated in Rochester, Minnesota, the United States, and its other main
campuses are in Jacksonville, Florida, Scottsdale, Phoenix, and Arizona. This clinic is so huge
giving its capability to employ 63,000 people, comprising scientists and physicians above 4,500
and the associated health staff, as of 2020. The mission of Mayo Clinic is to inspire hope and
contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through combined
clinical practices, research, and education (Leonard, 2019). In this organization, there was some
change scheduled to take place, and it was completed; the change was to digitalize paper records,
and it was done through the installation of Epic electronic health record (Madson, 2018). This
change to electronic record system is necessitated to ensure staff ease workflow, records
management and efficient access to patients' health records since all the information is found on
the computers.
Parameters of Change and resistance that might occur
Steve Peters, the M.D. and the co-chair of this initiative of the installation Epic electronic
health record, said that the moment they have just a single integrated system, their core mission of
putting patients' needs first would be enhanced. This system would enable patients plus the
caregivers to get all the data that they require from one system and share the info more effectively;
checking in patients will also be very easy as it will be done electronically, and the patients will
get one consolidated billing statement (Madson, Mayo Clinic completes installation of Epic
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
5
electronic health record, 2018). There are probable resistances to adopting and implementing this
Epic electronic health record (Jaillah Mae Gesulga, 2017). The first barrier is the people resource
where the people themselves can refuse to adopt the new system, which may also be due to a lack
of skills. Procedure resource is another barrier; this is the worry for return on investment and the
lack of policy and administrative support. The firm might fail to support implementing the new
system because of financial reasons. This will require training the concerned individuals who need
money and installing the system itself also needs money.
Roger’s Five Stage Change Theory
Roger's Five-Stage Change Theory would apply to this type of Change at Mayo Clinic.
This is a five-step theory, with the first step explaining why the change is to take place, the way it
will happen, and the individuals involved. The second stage of the model encourages the workers
to embrace the change based on the vital data provided. The next step of the theory is to decide
whether to finally accept the change through the analysis of information and implementation of
the pilot study of the new procedures caused by the alteration. The fourth step is the
implementation of the change on the basis that it is more permanent, and the final stage is the
confirmation of the adoption of the change by the responsible workers and those affected by the
alteration (Sahin, 2006). I chose this model because to install the Epic electronic health record
system at Mayo Clinic, the employees must be told what the system is all about and encouraged
to embrace the change. After that, a decision will have to be made, and the system will be
implemented. After the implementation, the system will have to be confirmed if it is working as
expected.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
6
Strategies and innovations that could be used to implement Epic electronic health
records.
Different strategies can effectively develop and improve an Epic electronic health record.
The strategies include the following: Aligning the electronic health record systems with the
administrative and clinical procedures, creating a Web-based interface for these systems, and
creating an incorporated IT architecture that can support Epic electronic health record system.
And, the innovations include the secure sharing of electronic info with patients and other
employees, assisting the clinicians in diagnosing the patients more effectively, reducing medical
faults and giving safer care, and encouraging interaction and communication.
The role of communication
Communication is an essential factor in every firm. When implementing a system,
communication guarantees the least risks and extreme success. To ensure that the system is
effective, the executive in charge ought to make sure that he communicates effectively hence
effective completion. Communication can be used to handle the concerns and worries of different
stakeholders by always being prepared to listen and respond. The response should give timely,
credible information that ensures that the stakeholder is informed (Zemke, 2020). Effective
communication is vital as it assesses new opportunities and offers clarities to the stakeholders on
the future. It also helps the firm to build some meaningful associations with the stakeholders.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
7
Strategies used to motivate stakeholders.
Stakeholders can be motivated in the following ways; knowing them appropriately,
communicating to ensure that they are informed, tailoring your information to ensure that the needs
of the target person are met, being specific, planning, and even opening up to build that trust.
Part III
The experience from the organizational change was that there were resistances that
followed the change as people did not want it to be implemented. The people were afraid that the
implementation of automation in the company could bring job losses to the employees. In this
event, the organization used the training to encourage us to see the positives of the change. The
strategies were successful because the people changed their minds after realizing that they would
not lose their jobs, but instead, they would benefit as the program was to take the job to the next
level. The strategy I would apply to manage such situations is using the inspiring approach to
inspire the members to have a favorable consideration of the change. The process would be
successful because the members would be encouraged and consider the advantages of the change.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
8
References
Archer. (2008). Strategies for Successful EHR Implementation. Retrieved from
https://crstodayeurope.com/articles/2015-jun/strategies-for-successful-ehrimplementation/
Berner. (2016). Ten strategies for successful EHR implementations. Retrieved from
https://www.allscripts.com/2016/05/10-strategies-for-successful-ehr-implementations/
Jaillah Mae Gesulga, A. B. (2017). Retrieved from Barriers to electronic health record system
implementation and information resources :
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050917329563
Leonard, V. (2019). Mayo Clinic. Retrieved from https://slideplayer.com/slide/12650039/
Madson, R. (2018, October 8). Retrieved from Mayo Clinic completes installation of Epic
electronic health record: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-cliniccompletes-installation-of-epic-electronic-health-record/
Madson, R. (2018, October 8). Retrieved from Mayo Clinic completes installation of Epic
electronic health record: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-cliniccompletes-installation-of-epic-electronic-health-record/
Sahin, I. (2006, April). Retrieved from DETAILED REVIEW OF ROGERS’ DIFFUSION OF
INNOVATIONS THEORY: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501453.pdf
Zemke, A. (2020, June 13). Role of strategic communication in Crisis Management and Business
Continuity. Retrieved from https://beehivepr.biz/strategic-communication-in-crisis/
Purchase answer to see full
attachment