Description
Option 2: Explaining Vision or Hearing to Kids
- For this option, pretend that a 6-year-old asks you "How do we see? " or "How do we hear?"
- Find a way a creative way to answer one of these questions. You can design a handout, children's book, a coloring book, a brochure, a video, or power point presentation- anything that can explain to a 6-year old how that sense works. If you have another idea, check with your instructor. Your target audience is children so make sure your explanations are simple but you still use the scientific terminology. BE CREATIVE!
If you choose vision, you will need to include the following: light waves, pupil, iris, lens, retina, rods and cones, optic nerve and then can stop your explanation at the visual cortex. You can get extra points on this assignment by also explaining feature detectors and parallel processing.
If you choose hearing, you will need to include the following: sound waves, eardrum, middle ear, cochlear, hair cells, auditory nerve and can stop your explanation at the auditory cortex. You can get extra points on this assignment by also explaining deafness.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Hearing to Kids
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Introduction
✓ Our ears receive sounds from our surroundings (Ken, 2017).
✓ For example a friend’s whispers into our ears
✓ The ears change the sounds into an easy form
✓ This helps the brain understand the sounds
✓ The brain thinks about the sounds
✓ The brain makes us respond accordingly
✓ Maybe laugh if the whisper is funny
Sound
Vibrations that travel through matter e.g. air. (Ken, 2017)
Vibrating objects causes particles to move in the air
The particles collide as they move around
More collision produces a wave of sound
Speed and strength of collisions influences sound
The ears perceive this sound
Ears don’t perceive sound from far objects
Parts of the Ear
A person has two ears which helps one determine the sound direction
(University of Texas Health Science Center,2017)
The ear is made up of three major parts:
1. Outer ear (auricle, ear canal, eardrum)
2. Middle ear (hammer, anvil, stirrups)
3. Inner ear (cochlear)
To function each major part has minor parts(Gupta, 2014)
1. Outer Ear: Auricle (Pinna)
The auricle is also known as pinna
It is the outermost part of the ear
It protrudes from the surface of the head
This is the part that you can see and touch
Cont.
The part people pierce and put on earrings
Earrings do not affect how it collects sounds
...
Completion Status:
100%
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Study Help
Stuck on a study question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Module 4: Life Span Social Work Discussion Board (15 points):
This discussion board relates to this week's learning objective: Examining Child welfare policies and social worker roles. ...
Module 4: Life Span Social Work Discussion Board (15 points):
This discussion board relates to this week's learning objective: Examining Child welfare policies and social worker roles. Identify older adult development in societal context. Discuss skills used in gerontology, school, and child social work.The purpose of this discussion board is to help you evaluate how a client's developmental stage impacts their roles, expectations, and attitudes. Additionally, you will become more familiar with how society regards people in certain life stages and places expectations on them. You will also begin to identify skills, values, and roles that social workers play across the life-span. You can reach learning objectives by reading the case study you are assigned (found in the File Exchange within your group) and providing a thoughtful response that includes critical thinking. You will be expected to apply course concepts to your client's case.Directions:Create a new thread and in the subject line have your name and the title. Posts should be no less than 300 words and no more than 500 words. Address the following questions in your response:Based on your client’s biological age, what stage of human development are they in? How is your client's human developmental stage relevant to the case? What unique ethical concerns arise during your client's stage, and how would you address them? (Hint: Ch7 Talks about birth - 18 CH 8 Talks about 65+ See the Developmental Stages Power Point in the module for additional information.)What are two social welfare policies (Macro Social Work) that your textbook mentioned that you think could help your client based on their Human Developmental Stage and their presenting problems and needs? Why did you select these two programs? (Consult and use your course textbook for specific social policies/programs. Hint: Ch 7, 8, and 11 have some specific policies, as does the rest of the textbook.)What kinds of attitudes does the public display toward people who are in the same human developmental stage as your client? What are the expectations does society have for people in that human development stage?What is your role as a social worker based on your client’s human developmental stage? How could you help your client navigate the attitudes and expectations they face from society?What is one question that you have about your case study/client and its relation to this week’s module materialPlease ensure that you respond to at least one peer in addition to your own post! Peer responses are expected to be a minimum of 100 words. Be sure to include critical thinking and thoughtful feedback in your response to ensure you earn the full amount of points in your post.
IPSY 6551 Walden University Week 6 Validity Measure Outline Paper
Validity measures the usefulness of a test for specific purposes. For instance, tests of depression, such as the Beck Depr ...
IPSY 6551 Walden University Week 6 Validity Measure Outline Paper
Validity measures the usefulness of a test for specific purposes. For instance, tests of depression, such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), correlate well with clinician assessments of depression, so they can be considered valid measures of depression. On the other hand, the BDI does not predict job performance well, so it would be invalid for that purpose. Types of validity include criterion-related, content, face, and construct validity. Criterion-related validity looks at the correlation between tests scores and a criterion that the test scores could be expected to predict. For instance, SAT scores for high school seniors could be expected to correlate with their first-year college GPA. Content validity generally depends on expert opinion and looks at whether the test adequately samples the content of interest. A math test for high school students should sample the types of math problems that are found in high school math textbooks and should cover the domains that high school math teachers say are important. Face validity is important but is not validity in the technical sense. A test has face validity if it appears to measure what it purportedly measures. For instance, a math test for truck drivers should ask questions about gas mileage and load weight. If it contained questions about cake recipe proportions, it would lack face validity. Construct validity is usually accumulated over time and represents the accumulation of many validity studies. It indicates whether the test appropriately measures a theoretical construct.For this Assignment, you will examine different validity concepts and approaches. You also will consider which validity approaches you would use for your psychological measure and why.To prepare for this Discussion:Review the Learning Resources about the various approaches that can be used to demonstrate the validity of a psychological measure.Pay particular attention to the concept of construct validity and the various ways the Learning Resources address this idea.Consider the construct you are going to measure and whether you would focus on face validity. Also, think of a couple of ways you can demonstrate construct validity for your measure. Identify any additional validity approaches you would use for your measure. By Day 7Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:Summarize the different approaches for evaluating the validity of an assessment or measure. In your summary, include a definition and explanation of the following validity concepts: face validity, construct validity and the various ways to demonstrate construct validity (e.g., correlations with criterion measures, confirmatory factor analysis, etc.), and criterion-related or predictive validity.Describe which validity approaches you would use for your measure and explain why. Be specific.Note: Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.ResourcesCarmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979).Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412985642Furr, R. (2011). Evaluating psychometric properties: validity. In Furr, R. The Sage Library of Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology (pp. 52-66). London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446287866Grimm, K. J., & Widaman, K. F. (2012). Construct validity. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics. (pp. 621–642). American Psychological Association. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/136...Samuel, M. (1995). Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences From Personsʼ Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry Into Score Meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.Spector, P. E. (1992). Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences:Summated rating scale construction. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412986038
development, psychology homework help
Do you believe all children progress through the four stages of intellectual development as posed by Piaget? Why or why no ...
development, psychology homework help
Do you believe all children progress through the four stages of intellectual development as posed by Piaget? Why or why not? Provide specific examples.for reference chap 9: https://openstaxcollege.org/files/textbook_version/hi_res_pdf/30/Psychology-OP.pdfno specific word limit
I have an assignment to read and discuss CHAPTER 10 of my class text book
The assignment must consist of details drawn straight from the textbook.
My professor said:
"Read documents #61, 62, ...
I have an assignment to read and discuss CHAPTER 10 of my class text book
The assignment must consist of details drawn straight from the textbook.
My professor said:
"Read documents #61, 62, 63, 64, and 65 of Voices of Freedom (VOF) and then post an answer to the following question. After reading the documents, how would you describe what democracy in America means during the first half of the 19th century?
Please discuss at least THREE documents in your post."
California State University Fresno Mills Concept of The Power Elite Discussion
Provide answers to all of the following questions (20 points each):Explain the following quotation: “the culture industr ...
California State University Fresno Mills Concept of The Power Elite Discussion
Provide answers to all of the following questions (20 points each):Explain the following quotation: “the culture industry endlessly cheats its consumers out of what it endlessly promises…” Describe Mill’s concept of the Power Elite. Do you think Mill’s analysis is still relevant today? Provide evidence for your answer.Define rational choice theory and explain the similarities and differences it shares with exchange theory.Discuss and differentiate between Hochschild’s emotion work and emotional labor. What does Smith mean by “governing consciousness” and “locally situated consciousness”? How does she characterize the relation between the two? Do you think such a relation can be altered or transformed? If so, how? If not, why?
ENG 111 Howard University The Impending Disaster in Fracking Essay
Section 1 Assignment: Sentence Outline for Argument Research Essay Purpose After completing your framed thesis/topic se ...
ENG 111 Howard University The Impending Disaster in Fracking Essay
Section 1 Assignment: Sentence Outline for Argument Research Essay Purpose After completing your framed thesis/topic sentence outline, you will develop your outline into a full sentence outline that includes the supporting ideas. This assignment requires you to organize your thesis and supporting evidence to write a 3-4 page essay (plus a separate works cited page) on fracking or offshore drilling. Writing a thesis and sentence outline enables you to clarify and organize your thoughts, strengthen the structure of your argument, and cite your sources. This assignment also requires you to organize your sources into a proper MLA formatted works cited page. For a review of MLA formatting, integration of sources, and MLA documentation, return to the videos for MLA Basics in Student Resources in the main menu. Directions Open this Outline Template for Research Argument Essay and use it as a template to create your sentence outline for your research paper on fracking or offshore drilling. (Remove direction sentences as you complete your sentence outline.) Review the thesis statement you created for the Annotated Bibliography assignment. Refine your thesis statement as needed. Make sure it includes your topic, a clear key argument (claim) and 2-4 focused main ideas that prove the argument. Using your thesis create a topic sentence for each main idea in your thesis. This creates unity (Links to an external site.) in your outline. Once you have unity between your thesis and topic sentences, develop each topic sentence idea using adequate supporting evidence from your research and explanation/analysis from your own thinking. Make sure your quotes are integrated as modeled in the quote sandwich (Links to an external site.). Remember, if you have a great deal to say about one main idea in your thesis, you might consider developing more than one paragraph for this main idea when you write your essay. So pay attention to the amount of evidence you have for each main idea as you develop your outline. Your outline and your essay should include in text citations to document evidence from all FIVE sources you used in your annotated bibliography. (You may use more sources if you like.) Finally, create a Works Cited (Links to an external site.) page based on the sources you researched and annotated. Your works cited must have the five required sources from your Annotated Bibliography, but without the annotations. (Note: if you use more sources, remember to include them in the works cited.) For the citations check punctuation marks, italics, and spacing in the MLA format. Each error will impact your grade. Refer to the MLA 8 Rules and Understanding Plagiarism materials in Student Resources or to the Purdue OWL's MLA Citation Guide (Links to an external site.) to determine proper citation style for your sources. Section 2 First Draft of Argument Research Essay to Turnitin Purpose Now that you have completed your full sentence outline and have received feedback on that outline, you will write the first draft of your Argument Research Essay on fracking or offshore drilling. Writing a fully developed essay that incorporates research and clear organization prepares you to write successful college essays. Your essay must follow MLA formatting rules. For a review of MLA formatting, integration of sources, and MLA documentation, return to the videos for MLA Basics in Student Resources in the main menu. You will need submit your first draft essay here. This submission link will use Turnitin, a plagiarism-detection tool, to check your essay against a database of other works. Analyzing the Turnitin report will help you ensure that your research is properly integrated into your writing and properly cited. Directions Thoroughly read the feedback you received for your essay outline. Revise your outline as needed. (Note: You do not need to resubmit the outline. Revising your outline will help you write your essay.) Develop an effective 3-4 page Argument Research Essay on fracking or offshore drilling using your revised outline. Include a strong introduction (Links to an external site.) for your essay as well as a strong conclusion (Links to an external site.). Make sure your essay is in MLA format (Links to an external site.) and uses proper in-text citations (Links to an external site.) Include proper source citations listed in a separate Works Cited (Links to an external site.) after the 3-4 pages of text. Submit the first draft of your Argument Research Essay as a file upload. Come back to the link and check for the Turnitin report. (You may need to wait about 20-30 minutes for the report.) Review the Turnitin report and focus on the highlighted parts. Consider these points as you review the report. Is the highlighted part a direct quote? Did I use quotation marks? Is the highlighted part my own wording of borrowed information? Did I paraphrase enough so that it sounds like me? (If the highlighted part is more than 90% match, you should work on paraphrasing and ensure that the source idea has proper in text citations.) Citations in the works cited may be highlighted. Don't worry about that. Use the Turnitin report to revise your essay. NOTE: Turnitin is a plagiarism checker. Use it to help you with your paraphrases, quotations, and citations within your paper. You are encouraged to read about interpreting similarity scores in Turnitin (Links to an external site.)to better understand your Turnitin results. Section 3 Self-Review of Argument Research Essay First Draft Purpose For this activity you will complete a self-review of the first draft of your Argument Research Essay, using the Self-Review Essay Evaluation Checklist linked below. After you review your paper, you will use the feedback to revise your essay for the final draft. Evaluating your essay will sharpen your analytic and writing skills. This evaluation process will help you dissect a piece of writing, understand assignment expectations, and broaden your perspective on your writing. Note:You must complete the previous assignment "Submit First Draft of Argument Research Essay to Turnitin" before completing this self-review assignment. Directions Check your essay against the Self Review Essay Evaluation Checklist. Provide thoughtful, constructive feedback about your Argument Research Essay on the checklist. Point out what parts needs improvement and also what aspects of the essay have been done well. Section 4 Final Draft of Argument Research Essay Purpose Writing a fully developed essay, incorporating research and clear organization, prepares you to write successful college essays. Your essay must follow MLA format. For a review of MLA formatting, integration of sources, and MLA documentation, return to the videos for MLA Basics in Student Resources in the main menu. Directions Use feedback from your self-review and your Turnitin report to revise your paper one final time, paying close attention to clarity and fluency of ideas and editing and proofreading for correct grammar, mechanics, spelling, and MLA format. Submit the final draft of your essay on fracking or offshore drilling as a docx file. Grading This assignment is worth 150 points.Your essay will be graded using the Essay Grading Rubric, focusing on the elements found in the Essay Evaluation Checklist. Rubric Essay Grading Rubric (150 points) Essay Grading Rubric (150 points) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMLA Formatting (MLA Heading, Title, and Paging) 7.5 to >5.36 pts Very Good (A) Paper is properly formatted according to MLA requirements 5.36 to >4.29 pts Good (B-C) One MLA formatting requirement is not done correctly 4.29 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) More than one MLA requirement is not done correctly 7.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus (Thesis) 22.5 to >20.36 pts Very Good (A) Thesis is clear, fully developed, insightful and effectively responds to prompt 20.36 to >15.0 pts Good (B-C) Has a thesis that responds to the prompt, but it is vague or not fully developed 15.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Thesis does not respond to the prompt, is too general to provide a focus for the essay, or doesn’t exist 22.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization (Topic sentences) 22.5 to >20.36 pts Very Good (A) Topic sentences are clearly written, fluent, and aligned with the main ideas related to the thesis, and those main ideas are presented in a logical order 20.36 to >15.0 pts Good (B-C) Topic sentences lack clarity and/or fluency, but are aligned with thesis and logically ordered 15.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Topic sentences are vague or non-existent 22.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Ideas 37.5 to >33.75 pts Very Good (A) Evidence and explanations are relevant, fluent and adequately support topic sentences 33.75 to >26.25 pts Good (B-C) Evidence and explanations are relevant but need further development 26.25 to >0 pts Needs Improvment (D-F) Evidence and explanations are not all relevant or adequate 37.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction 7.5 to >5.36 pts Very Good (A) Introduction grabs the reader and expresses ideas that lead into the thesis 5.36 to >4.29 pts Good (B-C) Introduction expresses ideas that lead into the thesis, but it lacks development 4.29 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Introduction is missing or lacks adequate development 7.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 7.5 to >5.36 pts Very Good (A) Conclusion restates thesis idea and sums up body of essay, leaving the reader with a reflective thought 5.36 to >4.29 pts Good (B-C) Conclusion restates the thesis and sums up the body of the essay 4.29 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Conclusion is missing or lacks adequate development to bring the essay to a close 7.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn-text Citations 15.0 to >13.5 pts Very Good Source ideas are properly cited within the text of the essay according to MLA rules 13.5 to >10.5 pts Good (B-C) Source ideas are evident, but have errors in MLA rules 10.5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Source ideas are not cited 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWorks Cited 15.0 to >13.5 pts Very Good (A) Sources are properly listed in a Works Cited, following MLA formatting rules 13.5 to >10.5 pts Good (B-C) Sources are listed, but some errors in formatting evident 10.5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Sources improperly listed or Works Cited is missing 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Mechanics 15.0 to >13.5 pts Very Good (A) Writing has no major errors in sentence structure, spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation and indentation 13.5 to >10.5 pts Good (B-C) Writing has 1-3 major errors that interfere with clarity and fluency of ideas 10.5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Writing has more than 3 major errors and/or is difficult to read 15.0 pts Total Points: 150.0 Section 5 Instructions Purpose demonstrate your understanding of good composition writing at the college level. Directions The final part Write a reflective essay about the writing process you experienced as you wrote the Unit 4 Argument Research Essay on oil/gas extraction. That process included the following steps: exploring a topic through online discussion: identifying a topic; writing a tentative thesis; completing an annotated bibliography; writing a permanent thesis; writing a topic sentence outline; developing the sentence outline; integrating source ideas; citing source ideas within the text of the writing; creating a works cited; writing the first draft essay; submitting the first draft through Safe Assign; completing a peer or self review of the first draft essay; writing the final draft essay In your essay, identify 3 lessons you learned about the academic research process. Your essay should include the elements of an essay and should be well supported with specific examples and analysis of your experience.
Similar Content
Modern Psychology and the Criminal Justice System
What do you think drives the uncertainty between the professions of psychology and criminal justice? What impact do you th...
CI 5033 ACE Creating Safe and Supportive Classroom Reflection
For this model’s assignment, you will complete a self-assessment of your competencies, activities, and compliance with s...
Module 5 Native Americans on TV and Social Media Discussion
a) The author who wrote about the term/phrase/concept. (You only have to cite ONE author for each concept, but you can def...
Exploring My Digital Footprint, sociology homework help
Exploring My Digital FootprintFor the Unit III Assignment you will be answering a series of response questions applying co...
ENG 1102 Troy University The Things They Carried Story Paper
This week, after reading Tim O'Brien's classic war story "The Things They Carried," post responses and discussions two que...
Write at least two to three paragraphs
Write at least two to three paragraphs (6-8 sentences each) to answer the following question:Within the society that Jane ...
Reevaluation Process In Special Education
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) seeks to ensure that children that have disabilities are able to ga...
Photography 20revised 20copy
Bazin states that photographic images, paintings, and sculptures have one thing in common – preservation. These he liken...
Geography
Overall, the history of a given society based on religion, empire, the military, and people's groups influences modern soc...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Cry the Beloved Country
by Alan Paton
The Outsiders
by S.E. Hinton
No Exit
by Taylor Adams
Night
by Elie Wiesel
Jane Eyre
by Charlotte Brontë
2001 A Space Odyssey
by Arthur Clarke
Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone
by J. K. Rowling
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
by Stephen R. Covey
The Grapes of Wrath
by John Steinbeck
Get 24/7
Study help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Module 4: Life Span Social Work Discussion Board (15 points):
This discussion board relates to this week's learning objective: Examining Child welfare policies and social worker roles. ...
Module 4: Life Span Social Work Discussion Board (15 points):
This discussion board relates to this week's learning objective: Examining Child welfare policies and social worker roles. Identify older adult development in societal context. Discuss skills used in gerontology, school, and child social work.The purpose of this discussion board is to help you evaluate how a client's developmental stage impacts their roles, expectations, and attitudes. Additionally, you will become more familiar with how society regards people in certain life stages and places expectations on them. You will also begin to identify skills, values, and roles that social workers play across the life-span. You can reach learning objectives by reading the case study you are assigned (found in the File Exchange within your group) and providing a thoughtful response that includes critical thinking. You will be expected to apply course concepts to your client's case.Directions:Create a new thread and in the subject line have your name and the title. Posts should be no less than 300 words and no more than 500 words. Address the following questions in your response:Based on your client’s biological age, what stage of human development are they in? How is your client's human developmental stage relevant to the case? What unique ethical concerns arise during your client's stage, and how would you address them? (Hint: Ch7 Talks about birth - 18 CH 8 Talks about 65+ See the Developmental Stages Power Point in the module for additional information.)What are two social welfare policies (Macro Social Work) that your textbook mentioned that you think could help your client based on their Human Developmental Stage and their presenting problems and needs? Why did you select these two programs? (Consult and use your course textbook for specific social policies/programs. Hint: Ch 7, 8, and 11 have some specific policies, as does the rest of the textbook.)What kinds of attitudes does the public display toward people who are in the same human developmental stage as your client? What are the expectations does society have for people in that human development stage?What is your role as a social worker based on your client’s human developmental stage? How could you help your client navigate the attitudes and expectations they face from society?What is one question that you have about your case study/client and its relation to this week’s module materialPlease ensure that you respond to at least one peer in addition to your own post! Peer responses are expected to be a minimum of 100 words. Be sure to include critical thinking and thoughtful feedback in your response to ensure you earn the full amount of points in your post.
IPSY 6551 Walden University Week 6 Validity Measure Outline Paper
Validity measures the usefulness of a test for specific purposes. For instance, tests of depression, such as the Beck Depr ...
IPSY 6551 Walden University Week 6 Validity Measure Outline Paper
Validity measures the usefulness of a test for specific purposes. For instance, tests of depression, such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), correlate well with clinician assessments of depression, so they can be considered valid measures of depression. On the other hand, the BDI does not predict job performance well, so it would be invalid for that purpose. Types of validity include criterion-related, content, face, and construct validity. Criterion-related validity looks at the correlation between tests scores and a criterion that the test scores could be expected to predict. For instance, SAT scores for high school seniors could be expected to correlate with their first-year college GPA. Content validity generally depends on expert opinion and looks at whether the test adequately samples the content of interest. A math test for high school students should sample the types of math problems that are found in high school math textbooks and should cover the domains that high school math teachers say are important. Face validity is important but is not validity in the technical sense. A test has face validity if it appears to measure what it purportedly measures. For instance, a math test for truck drivers should ask questions about gas mileage and load weight. If it contained questions about cake recipe proportions, it would lack face validity. Construct validity is usually accumulated over time and represents the accumulation of many validity studies. It indicates whether the test appropriately measures a theoretical construct.For this Assignment, you will examine different validity concepts and approaches. You also will consider which validity approaches you would use for your psychological measure and why.To prepare for this Discussion:Review the Learning Resources about the various approaches that can be used to demonstrate the validity of a psychological measure.Pay particular attention to the concept of construct validity and the various ways the Learning Resources address this idea.Consider the construct you are going to measure and whether you would focus on face validity. Also, think of a couple of ways you can demonstrate construct validity for your measure. Identify any additional validity approaches you would use for your measure. By Day 7Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:Summarize the different approaches for evaluating the validity of an assessment or measure. In your summary, include a definition and explanation of the following validity concepts: face validity, construct validity and the various ways to demonstrate construct validity (e.g., correlations with criterion measures, confirmatory factor analysis, etc.), and criterion-related or predictive validity.Describe which validity approaches you would use for your measure and explain why. Be specific.Note: Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.ResourcesCarmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979).Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412985642Furr, R. (2011). Evaluating psychometric properties: validity. In Furr, R. The Sage Library of Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology (pp. 52-66). London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446287866Grimm, K. J., & Widaman, K. F. (2012). Construct validity. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics. (pp. 621–642). American Psychological Association. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/136...Samuel, M. (1995). Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences From Personsʼ Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry Into Score Meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.Spector, P. E. (1992). Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences:Summated rating scale construction. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412986038
development, psychology homework help
Do you believe all children progress through the four stages of intellectual development as posed by Piaget? Why or why no ...
development, psychology homework help
Do you believe all children progress through the four stages of intellectual development as posed by Piaget? Why or why not? Provide specific examples.for reference chap 9: https://openstaxcollege.org/files/textbook_version/hi_res_pdf/30/Psychology-OP.pdfno specific word limit
I have an assignment to read and discuss CHAPTER 10 of my class text book
The assignment must consist of details drawn straight from the textbook.
My professor said:
"Read documents #61, 62, ...
I have an assignment to read and discuss CHAPTER 10 of my class text book
The assignment must consist of details drawn straight from the textbook.
My professor said:
"Read documents #61, 62, 63, 64, and 65 of Voices of Freedom (VOF) and then post an answer to the following question. After reading the documents, how would you describe what democracy in America means during the first half of the 19th century?
Please discuss at least THREE documents in your post."
California State University Fresno Mills Concept of The Power Elite Discussion
Provide answers to all of the following questions (20 points each):Explain the following quotation: “the culture industr ...
California State University Fresno Mills Concept of The Power Elite Discussion
Provide answers to all of the following questions (20 points each):Explain the following quotation: “the culture industry endlessly cheats its consumers out of what it endlessly promises…” Describe Mill’s concept of the Power Elite. Do you think Mill’s analysis is still relevant today? Provide evidence for your answer.Define rational choice theory and explain the similarities and differences it shares with exchange theory.Discuss and differentiate between Hochschild’s emotion work and emotional labor. What does Smith mean by “governing consciousness” and “locally situated consciousness”? How does she characterize the relation between the two? Do you think such a relation can be altered or transformed? If so, how? If not, why?
ENG 111 Howard University The Impending Disaster in Fracking Essay
Section 1 Assignment: Sentence Outline for Argument Research Essay Purpose After completing your framed thesis/topic se ...
ENG 111 Howard University The Impending Disaster in Fracking Essay
Section 1 Assignment: Sentence Outline for Argument Research Essay Purpose After completing your framed thesis/topic sentence outline, you will develop your outline into a full sentence outline that includes the supporting ideas. This assignment requires you to organize your thesis and supporting evidence to write a 3-4 page essay (plus a separate works cited page) on fracking or offshore drilling. Writing a thesis and sentence outline enables you to clarify and organize your thoughts, strengthen the structure of your argument, and cite your sources. This assignment also requires you to organize your sources into a proper MLA formatted works cited page. For a review of MLA formatting, integration of sources, and MLA documentation, return to the videos for MLA Basics in Student Resources in the main menu. Directions Open this Outline Template for Research Argument Essay and use it as a template to create your sentence outline for your research paper on fracking or offshore drilling. (Remove direction sentences as you complete your sentence outline.) Review the thesis statement you created for the Annotated Bibliography assignment. Refine your thesis statement as needed. Make sure it includes your topic, a clear key argument (claim) and 2-4 focused main ideas that prove the argument. Using your thesis create a topic sentence for each main idea in your thesis. This creates unity (Links to an external site.) in your outline. Once you have unity between your thesis and topic sentences, develop each topic sentence idea using adequate supporting evidence from your research and explanation/analysis from your own thinking. Make sure your quotes are integrated as modeled in the quote sandwich (Links to an external site.). Remember, if you have a great deal to say about one main idea in your thesis, you might consider developing more than one paragraph for this main idea when you write your essay. So pay attention to the amount of evidence you have for each main idea as you develop your outline. Your outline and your essay should include in text citations to document evidence from all FIVE sources you used in your annotated bibliography. (You may use more sources if you like.) Finally, create a Works Cited (Links to an external site.) page based on the sources you researched and annotated. Your works cited must have the five required sources from your Annotated Bibliography, but without the annotations. (Note: if you use more sources, remember to include them in the works cited.) For the citations check punctuation marks, italics, and spacing in the MLA format. Each error will impact your grade. Refer to the MLA 8 Rules and Understanding Plagiarism materials in Student Resources or to the Purdue OWL's MLA Citation Guide (Links to an external site.) to determine proper citation style for your sources. Section 2 First Draft of Argument Research Essay to Turnitin Purpose Now that you have completed your full sentence outline and have received feedback on that outline, you will write the first draft of your Argument Research Essay on fracking or offshore drilling. Writing a fully developed essay that incorporates research and clear organization prepares you to write successful college essays. Your essay must follow MLA formatting rules. For a review of MLA formatting, integration of sources, and MLA documentation, return to the videos for MLA Basics in Student Resources in the main menu. You will need submit your first draft essay here. This submission link will use Turnitin, a plagiarism-detection tool, to check your essay against a database of other works. Analyzing the Turnitin report will help you ensure that your research is properly integrated into your writing and properly cited. Directions Thoroughly read the feedback you received for your essay outline. Revise your outline as needed. (Note: You do not need to resubmit the outline. Revising your outline will help you write your essay.) Develop an effective 3-4 page Argument Research Essay on fracking or offshore drilling using your revised outline. Include a strong introduction (Links to an external site.) for your essay as well as a strong conclusion (Links to an external site.). Make sure your essay is in MLA format (Links to an external site.) and uses proper in-text citations (Links to an external site.) Include proper source citations listed in a separate Works Cited (Links to an external site.) after the 3-4 pages of text. Submit the first draft of your Argument Research Essay as a file upload. Come back to the link and check for the Turnitin report. (You may need to wait about 20-30 minutes for the report.) Review the Turnitin report and focus on the highlighted parts. Consider these points as you review the report. Is the highlighted part a direct quote? Did I use quotation marks? Is the highlighted part my own wording of borrowed information? Did I paraphrase enough so that it sounds like me? (If the highlighted part is more than 90% match, you should work on paraphrasing and ensure that the source idea has proper in text citations.) Citations in the works cited may be highlighted. Don't worry about that. Use the Turnitin report to revise your essay. NOTE: Turnitin is a plagiarism checker. Use it to help you with your paraphrases, quotations, and citations within your paper. You are encouraged to read about interpreting similarity scores in Turnitin (Links to an external site.)to better understand your Turnitin results. Section 3 Self-Review of Argument Research Essay First Draft Purpose For this activity you will complete a self-review of the first draft of your Argument Research Essay, using the Self-Review Essay Evaluation Checklist linked below. After you review your paper, you will use the feedback to revise your essay for the final draft. Evaluating your essay will sharpen your analytic and writing skills. This evaluation process will help you dissect a piece of writing, understand assignment expectations, and broaden your perspective on your writing. Note:You must complete the previous assignment "Submit First Draft of Argument Research Essay to Turnitin" before completing this self-review assignment. Directions Check your essay against the Self Review Essay Evaluation Checklist. Provide thoughtful, constructive feedback about your Argument Research Essay on the checklist. Point out what parts needs improvement and also what aspects of the essay have been done well. Section 4 Final Draft of Argument Research Essay Purpose Writing a fully developed essay, incorporating research and clear organization, prepares you to write successful college essays. Your essay must follow MLA format. For a review of MLA formatting, integration of sources, and MLA documentation, return to the videos for MLA Basics in Student Resources in the main menu. Directions Use feedback from your self-review and your Turnitin report to revise your paper one final time, paying close attention to clarity and fluency of ideas and editing and proofreading for correct grammar, mechanics, spelling, and MLA format. Submit the final draft of your essay on fracking or offshore drilling as a docx file. Grading This assignment is worth 150 points.Your essay will be graded using the Essay Grading Rubric, focusing on the elements found in the Essay Evaluation Checklist. Rubric Essay Grading Rubric (150 points) Essay Grading Rubric (150 points) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMLA Formatting (MLA Heading, Title, and Paging) 7.5 to >5.36 pts Very Good (A) Paper is properly formatted according to MLA requirements 5.36 to >4.29 pts Good (B-C) One MLA formatting requirement is not done correctly 4.29 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) More than one MLA requirement is not done correctly 7.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus (Thesis) 22.5 to >20.36 pts Very Good (A) Thesis is clear, fully developed, insightful and effectively responds to prompt 20.36 to >15.0 pts Good (B-C) Has a thesis that responds to the prompt, but it is vague or not fully developed 15.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Thesis does not respond to the prompt, is too general to provide a focus for the essay, or doesn’t exist 22.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization (Topic sentences) 22.5 to >20.36 pts Very Good (A) Topic sentences are clearly written, fluent, and aligned with the main ideas related to the thesis, and those main ideas are presented in a logical order 20.36 to >15.0 pts Good (B-C) Topic sentences lack clarity and/or fluency, but are aligned with thesis and logically ordered 15.0 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Topic sentences are vague or non-existent 22.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Ideas 37.5 to >33.75 pts Very Good (A) Evidence and explanations are relevant, fluent and adequately support topic sentences 33.75 to >26.25 pts Good (B-C) Evidence and explanations are relevant but need further development 26.25 to >0 pts Needs Improvment (D-F) Evidence and explanations are not all relevant or adequate 37.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction 7.5 to >5.36 pts Very Good (A) Introduction grabs the reader and expresses ideas that lead into the thesis 5.36 to >4.29 pts Good (B-C) Introduction expresses ideas that lead into the thesis, but it lacks development 4.29 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Introduction is missing or lacks adequate development 7.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 7.5 to >5.36 pts Very Good (A) Conclusion restates thesis idea and sums up body of essay, leaving the reader with a reflective thought 5.36 to >4.29 pts Good (B-C) Conclusion restates the thesis and sums up the body of the essay 4.29 to >0 pts Needs Improvement (D-F) Conclusion is missing or lacks adequate development to bring the essay to a close 7.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn-text Citations 15.0 to >13.5 pts Very Good Source ideas are properly cited within the text of the essay according to MLA rules 13.5 to >10.5 pts Good (B-C) Source ideas are evident, but have errors in MLA rules 10.5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Source ideas are not cited 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWorks Cited 15.0 to >13.5 pts Very Good (A) Sources are properly listed in a Works Cited, following MLA formatting rules 13.5 to >10.5 pts Good (B-C) Sources are listed, but some errors in formatting evident 10.5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Sources improperly listed or Works Cited is missing 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Mechanics 15.0 to >13.5 pts Very Good (A) Writing has no major errors in sentence structure, spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation and indentation 13.5 to >10.5 pts Good (B-C) Writing has 1-3 major errors that interfere with clarity and fluency of ideas 10.5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Writing has more than 3 major errors and/or is difficult to read 15.0 pts Total Points: 150.0 Section 5 Instructions Purpose demonstrate your understanding of good composition writing at the college level. Directions The final part Write a reflective essay about the writing process you experienced as you wrote the Unit 4 Argument Research Essay on oil/gas extraction. That process included the following steps: exploring a topic through online discussion: identifying a topic; writing a tentative thesis; completing an annotated bibliography; writing a permanent thesis; writing a topic sentence outline; developing the sentence outline; integrating source ideas; citing source ideas within the text of the writing; creating a works cited; writing the first draft essay; submitting the first draft through Safe Assign; completing a peer or self review of the first draft essay; writing the final draft essay In your essay, identify 3 lessons you learned about the academic research process. Your essay should include the elements of an essay and should be well supported with specific examples and analysis of your experience.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents
