Description
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.
1
Evaluation of the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan: Mental Health
Assessment1_2
NURS-FPX4050
December 9, 2021
2
Evaluation of the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan: Mental Health
In evaluating the mental healthcare coordination plan, factors that influence the
healthcare well-being account to respond to the mental health needs. Therefore, the
evaluation seeks to establish the appropriateness of the developed plan within which the
involved stakeholders in care coordination take a comprehensive approach to maintain and
improve mental health. As a result, the plan evaluation's primary aspects will involve
examining the mental health needs, determining the availability of the required resources and
assets to implement the plan, assessing the plan implementation strategy, and establishing the
responsibility for particular results.
Appropriateness of the Provided Mental Health Services
Whether mental healthcare is necessary or not is a cornerstone of the developed care
coordination plan. The necessity of the plan's suitability forms the base for executing all
strategies for successful plan implementation. Therefore, this plan will play a significant role
in community health improvement. Critical to this care coordination plan includes plan
performance monitoring activities to ensure the appropriate and relevant steps are in the
hands of responsible plan stakeholders (Samartzis & Talias, 2020). The plan's actions bear
the intended impact on mental health in the community.
Furthermore, specific circumstances justify the suitability of the mental health care
coordination plan. These circumstances involve unique health issues, socio-political
perspectives on community mental health well-being, community-based resources and
capabilities, and competing needs for a healthy community. The plan's committee cannot
prescribe or hint at the actions to be undertaken by the community for addressing the issue of
revealing the responsible person for the plan. However, it is aware that the community should
address the mental health issue and provide a systematic approach for health improvement
3
(Samartzis & Talias, 2020). This approach enhances the performance of the plan monitoring
tools in achieving the set goals.
Evaluating the Analysis of the Issue, Needs, and Linked Best Practices
The plan should consider obstacles leading to a lack of access to high-quality mental
health services. Barriers for consideration include stigma, fragmented service delivery
models, staff shortage, and lack of research capacity for plan implementation and policy
change create mental health treatment gap. If the care coordination plan does not address
these obstacles by proposing the appropriate remedies, it may be ineffective in addressing the
problem. The responsible committee steering the care plan should opt for a community health
improvement process (CHIP) as a cornerstone for accountable community collaboration in
monitoring mental health issues.
A CHIP should get incorporated into the plan to boost the developm...
