Harvard University Arbitration versus Mediation Discussion

User Generated

Eboregznevnfv

Writing

Harvard University

Description

Unformatted Attachment Preview

A form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is known as arbitration. This means to resolve civil disputes between two parties without leading to lawsuits. In other words, it is a method of resolving legal disputes that do not lead to the use of the judicial system. There are two types of arbitration. There is nonbinding. When it comes to binding arbitration, both parties agree to accept the arbiter's resolution. Whatever the decision may be neither party, if unhappy with the result, can go to court. Nonbinding arbitration means either party can sue if unhappy with the resolution. The goal is for the arbitrator to be viewed as objective. They are also to appear neutral. They are chosen to hear the facts of the disagreement between the two parties and make them feel their interests have been represented. Then they are dedicated to making a final decision. Mediation has the help of a trained mediator. This is a confidential and informal way for people to come to an agreement about a disagreement. The sole purpose of mediation is to minimize the harm of any disagreement and to prevent the areas of dispute that may get in the way of a mutually agreed outcome or compromise. The mediator acts as a third party and is neutral. They facilitate discussions and do not decide who is right or wrong. Nor do they issue a decision, In other words, they assist disputing parties with resolving conflict. They do this through the use of negotiation techniques and specialized communication. Some benefits of mediation include control, cost, mutuality, support, compliance, and confidentiality. A few things arbitration and mediation have in common are they both are a form of ADR, they are both confidential, they are both unregulated, and they both have a third party who is neutral. The third party on both sides oversees the process and have a goal to try to help all participants to find common ground during a disagreement. Another similarity is that they both can be used to find a solution, between two parties that have a disagreement, without a trial. This is form is also known as traditional litigation. Some differences between the two are mediation is a nonbinding process and can be used in disputes with family members, business partners, or neighbors. When handling these situations, they can help lead the conversation in an appropriate manner in order to come up with a solution. There is a chance for mediation to conclude without a settlement. Although, arbitration guarantees a resolution of the dispute. Unlike mediation, arbitration can be used in complex disputes. This is where parties want another person to find a fair solution. At the same time, they would like to avoid the formality, time, and expense that is required for a trial. There once was this mother that had a child with an illness. Every time she would come into the office, she would accuse her child's doctor of withholding potential pertinent information from her that could possibly have helped her child become healthier. She accused him of not talking openly with her and attempting to mislead them. She decided she was going to attempt to sue her child's doctor for ineffective communication. An ADR is definitely appropriate for the situation. They could start with mediation for the simple fact it would not be aggressive. Instead, it would be coached and have an option approach. This approach could meet the needs of both the mother and the provider with the additional benefit of reducing costs. This route would also give the mother, child, and doctor a chance for encouraging disclosure and extending patient safety. Now, seems how there is a slight chance the mother does not want to come to an agreement, then this would lead straight into arbitration. Most likely, this would be a binding case. If the mother still disagreed from there, then this case would make it all the way to litigation.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

MEDICAL LAW

1

Arbitration versus Mediation

Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor
Course Title
Date

(Total Words:738)

MEDICAL LAW

2
Arbitration versus Mediation

Arbitration Generalities
Arbitration is a type of alternative dispute resolution (the acronym being ADR). This refers
to the process of resolving civil disagreements among two or more parties avoiding litigation. In
other terms, this is a way of settling legal conflicts without going to the court system. Arbitration
can be divided into two categories. The two parties simply agree with the arbiter's decision when
it leads to binding arbitration. Regardless of the ruling, neither side has the option of going to the
courtroom if they are dissatisfied with the outcome. If either side is displeased with the outcome,
nonbinding arbitration allows them to sue. The purpose is for the arbiter to be seen as impartial.
They're also supposed to be unobtrusive. They are appointed to listen to the facts of both sides'
disputes and ensure that their rights are upheld. After that, they devote themselves to reaching a
final selection (Wiradisuria et al., 2020).
Mediation Generalities
Mediation is conducted with the assistance of a skilled mediator. It is a private and
unofficial approach for individuals to resolve a problem. Mediation's main objective is to reduce
the danger posed by any conflict and also to avoid situations of conflict from interfering with a
mutually beneficial solution or an agreement. The mediator serves as an impartial third party.
They stimulate debates rather than deciding who is correct or incorrect. They also do not make a
decision; rather, they help conflicting parties in settling the disagreement. They accomplish it by
employing negotiating tactics and special language. Regulation, price, reciprocity, assistance,
conformity, and secrecy are some of the advantages of mediation.
Similarities

MEDICAL LAW

3

Mediation and arbitration share a few similarities: these two seem to be forms of
alternative dispute resolution, and they both involve a neutral intermediary. A third person
oversees the procedure along with both parties, who has the purpose of assisting all parties in
reaching a consensus during a conflict. An additional resemblance is also that these two may
both be utilized to reach an agreement among two disputing sides without the need for a trial.
Classical litigation is another name for this type of case (Morreim, 2014). Mediation is a
technique that may be utilized in disagreements involving relatives, business associates, and even
neighbors, among o...

Similar Content

Related Tags