Assignment 3: Translate the Evidence into Practice (25 points)undefinedundefinedThe next steps in the evidence-based practice (EBP) process includes implementing and translating the intervention chosen in the PICOT question (Week 1) into the clinical setting. Pilot projects are often used before implementing a change into an entire organization. Discuss the following questions related to implementing the chosen PICOT intervention as if a pilot test project were being facilitated by the masters prepared nurse: undefinedAssignment Criteria:undefinedBriefly explain the problem and the PICOT question and the interventionDescribe the pilot project for the chosen intervention and include:Describe the stakeholders and their roles in the pilot project.Propose two (2) strategies that would promote engagement of the stakeholders in the project.Discuss a specific practice guideline that supports the intervention.Identify major organizational resources needed for the pilot project.Discuss how the outcome of the intervention will be measured.The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 5 to 6 pages excluding the title and reference page.Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used. Include a minimum of four (4) professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations). Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the originality report, and make any needed changes.undefineda.Explain the who, what, where, when and how of the pilot projectundefinedb.Describe a specific model or framework of change that will be used to facilitate the implementation of the intervention.undefinedAssignment 3: Translate the Evidence into Practice (25 points)undefinedundefined Assignment Criteria 10 points 9 points 7 points 0 points All topics/criteria addressed and all questions fully answered. All topics/criteria addressed and most questions fully answered. All topics/criteria addressed and most questions partially answered. One or more topics/criteria not addressed or completely answered. Quality/Accuracy of Information 9 points 8 points 4 points 0 points Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples. Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given. Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria. Organization 4 points 2 points .50 points 0 points Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. There is an attempt at organization but errors exist. No levels of heading. The information or overall structure appears disorganized. Sources 2 points 1 points .50 points 0 points All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source. The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe or a classic/historical source. Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. Earned Points Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar. Final Total WEEK TOPICAL OUTLINE ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS Week 5 Leadership and EBP Leadership strategies for EBPTranslation of evidence into practiceEvidenced-based leadershipTransformational evidence and innovation Models for sustainability of EBPEvidence-Informed Healthcare Policy (EIHP) Readings: Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt: Chapters 12 and 19 Week 5 Content: Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 5 Journal Article(s): Fleiszer, A., Semenic, S., Ritchie, J., & Denis, J. (2016). Nursing unit leaders’ influence on the long-term sustainability of evidence-based practice improvements. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(3), 309-318. Melnyk, B.M. (2016). Culture eats strategy every time: What works in building and sustaining an evidence-based practice structure in healthcare systems.Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 99-101. h Ortiz, M. (2019). Transitional care: Nursing knowledge and policy implications. Nursing Science Quarterly, 32(1), 73-77. Assignment 3: Translate the Evidence into Practice (25 points) Review the instructions and grading rubric that follow this grid Submit paper to Turnitin Make any revisions necessary based on the Originality ReportSubmit by the posted due date

 describe how you would handle the following situations with different problem solving skills and conflict resolution: Mentor backing out at last minute Mentor wanting to change agreed upon project for Capstone  Dealing with difficult people/situations Natural disaster or other event that disrupts your ability to complete your Capstone.