Chamberlain Univeristy Teaching Intervention Essay

User Generated

Oynmvnaznu83

Writing

Chamberlain Univeristy

Description

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for the student to identify at least 10 research articles related to the teaching intervention or practice change he or she has identified for the capstone project Review of Literature assignment in Week 3. Each appropriate article will be awarded 5 points.

All of the articles must be a description of an original research study on the student’s chosen educational intervention, not on the educational issue. Case studies, reviews of the literature, theory papers, or “how to” articles will not suffice because, for the purpose of this assignment, they are not considered to be research. Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses should not be used since they focus on a collection of studies and are not descriptions of one original study. Qualitative studies, except for case studies, will be approved as well as quantitative studies.

The student will develop an APA-formatted reference list on his or her educational intervention using the Week 2 Reference List Assignment template located in the Reference List Assignment module.

The NR621 faculty member will review the list for appropriateness of each article. If the instructor rejects any articles on the reference list, the student must replace those articles with appropriate studies before submitting the Review of Literature assignment in Week 3. The student will receive 3 points for correct replacements.

Requirements

This assignment requires you to

  • Conduct a review of the research related to your teaching intervention or practice change.
  • Identify at least 10 research articles related to your teaching intervention or practice change, published in the last five years.
  • Select articles for the reference list, excluding case studies, reviews of the literature, theory papers, “how to” articles, systematic reviews of research, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Various published documents will clue you into whether you have one of these in the title and/or abstract.
  • Place your references in column 2 of the Week 2 Reference List Assignment template along with the permalink or other URL that takes you to the original article. The instructor uses this permalink to examine your articles for suitability.
  • After receiving feedback from your course instructor, submit any replacements in the fifth column of the template, along to the URL to the original article.
  • Submit the revised Reference List Assignment template to the gradebook by Friday of Week 3, 11:59 p.m. MT to receive partial credit.
  • Notify your instructor by email that you have revised your list. This helps your instructor provide timely feedback.

DEVELOPING THE ASSIGNMENT

Construct an alphabetized APA-formatted reference list using the Week 3 Reference List Assignment template and submit it to “Assignments.” A title page is not needed. Consult with your course instructor to develop replacement articles if needed.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Reference Assignment Use this form to identify your references. Place the reference in the second column labelled “Assignment Criteria”. Important: your articles need to be research on your intervention, not your educational issue. PICOT Question: With the rise in remote learning for nursing schools, will nursing students who utilize online interactive learning modules with virtual lectures compared to virtual lecture alone, increase nursing student test scores over 12 weeks ? Article Assignment Criteria Satisf Unsatis actory factory An original published study reference is submitted for 5 0 the following. points points (X) Insert article in APA 7 format in each section below. You do not need to worry about hanging indents for the references. • Be sure you provide the URL to the exact article so it can be retrieved. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Remediation Suggests a replacement before submitting the Week 3 assignment. 3 points Only complete if needed after assignment is graded Totals Chamberlain College of Nursing NR621 Concluding Graduate Experience NEd1 Week 2 Reference List Guidelines & Scoring Rubric Purpose The purpose of this assignment is for the student to identify at least 10 research articles related to the teaching intervention or practice change he or she has identified for the education practicum project Review of Literature assignment in Week 3. Each appropriate article will be awarded 5 points. All of the articles must be a description of an original research study on the student’s chosen educational intervention, not on the educational issue. Case studies, reviews of the literature, theory papers, or “how to” articles will not suffice because, for the purpose of this assignment, they are not considered to be research. Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses should not be used since they focus on a collection of studies and are not descriptions of one original study. Qualitative studies, except for case studies, will be approved as well as quantitative studies. The student will develop an APA-formatted reference list on his or her educational intervention using the Week 2 Reference List Assignment template located in the Reference List Assignment module. The NR621 faculty member will review the list for appropriateness of each article. If the instructor rejects any articles on the reference list, the student must replace those articles with appropriate studies before submitting the Review of Literature assignment in Week 3. The student will receive 3 points for correct replacements. Course Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to: CO 1 - Provide high quality, safe, patient-centered care grounded in holistic health (holistic health & patient-centered care) CO2 - Create a caring environment for achieving quality health outcomes (care-focused) CO3 Engage in lifelong personal and professional growth through reflective practice and appreciation of cultural diversity CO4 - Integrate professional values through scholarship and service in health care. (professional identity) CO5 - Advocate for positive health outcomes through compassionate, evidence-based, collaborative advanced nursing practice. (extraordinary nursing) Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 2; replacement references are due Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT. NR621 Week 2 Reference List rev. 1.28.19 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR621 Concluding Graduate Experience NEd1 Total Points Possible: 50 REQUIREMENTS: This assignment requires you to 1. Conduct a review of the research related to your teaching intervention or practice change. 2. Identify at least 10 research articles related to your teaching intervention or practice change, published in the last five years. 3. Select articles for the reference list, excluding case studies, reviews of the literature, theory papers, “how to” articles, systematic reviews of research, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Various published documents will clue you into whether you have one of these in the title and/or abstract. 4. Place your references in column 2 of the Week 2 Reference List Assignment template along with the permalink or other URL that takes you to the original article. The instructor uses this permalink to examine your articles for suitability. 5. After receiving feedback from your course instructor, submit any replacements in the fifth column of the template, along to the URL to the original article. 6. Submit the revised Reference List Assignment template to the gradebook by Friday of Week 3, 11:59 p.m. MT to receive partial credit. 7. Notify your instructor by email that you have revised your list. This helps your instructor provide timely feedback. DEVELOPING THE ASSIGNMENT Construct an alphabetized APA-formatted reference list using the Week 3 Reference List Assignment template and submit it to “Assignments.” A title page is not needed. Consult with your course instructor to develop replacement articles if needed. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Remediation An original published study reference is submitted for the following 5 points 0 points (X) Suggests a replacement before submitting the Week 3 assignment. 3 points Article 1 Article 2 NR621 Week 2 Reference List rev. 1.28.19 Chamberlain College of Nursing Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 Article 10 Totals NR621 Week 2 Reference List rev. 1.28.19 NR621 Concluding Graduate Experience NEd1 Description of the Project An area of consideration in nursing education that I chose to focus on is interactive, online learning modules as a method of didactic learning. It is particularly vital to ensure that nursing students are able to effectively learn and retain information to ensure that they become reliable and efficient evidence-based providers of quality and safe care. With the rise in COVID, many nursing programs have had to change strategies and implement remote learning. Nursing students are now tasked with learning fundamental information via virtual lectures in an environment that may not be free of distraction. These factors have an impact on the future nurse and the actual nursing profession. This educational issue forms the basis for my education practicum project, whereby I aim to develop an intervention meant to help nursing students increase their ability to retain learned information, displayed by a marked rise in test scores. The institution currently utilizes virtual learning for lectures and some clinical days due to COVID restrictions implemented by the clinical sites. My practicum project entails utilizing the ATI learning modules with virtual lectures versus those who utilize lectures alone. PICOT Statement With the rise in remote learning for nursing schools, will nursing students who utilize (P) online interactive learning modules with virtual lectures (I) compared to virtual lecture alone (C) increase nursing student test scores (O) over 12 weeks (T)? Population (P) – my practicum project targets the nursing students in the educational institution who utilize virtual, interactive learning modules and virtual lectures. Intervention (I) – the proposed intervention is using interactive, virtual learning modules with virtual lectures. Comparison (C) - the current strategy uses virtual lectures alone. Outcome (O) – the targeted outcome is to increase nursing student's test scores and knowledge. Time (T) – the time frame is twelve weeks. Key Terms Remote learning, interactive learning, nursing, test scores, nursing online, virtual lecture
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
2 pages
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

Reference Assignment
PICOT Question: With the rise in remote learning for nursing schools, will nursing students who utilize online interactive learning modules with
virtual lectures compared to virtual lectures alone, increase nursing student test scores over 12 weeks?

Article

Assignment Criteria

An original published study reference is submitted for
the following.

1

Castro, T., & Gonçalves, L. (2018). The use of
gamification to teach in the nursing field. Revista
Brasileira De Enfermagem, 71(3), 1038-1045.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0023
https://www.scielo.br/j/reben/a/bGRs38N8BH7GCHY
tMFCVrLr/?lang=en

2

de Tantillo, L., & Christo...


Anonymous
Just what I was looking for! Super helpful.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags