Link to access scenario: https://health.gov/hcq/trainings/pathways/index.html (Links to an external site.)Complete the character role of the pharmacist Dr. Katrina Lee. You can work through this character more than once, making different decisions to alter the outcome. Once you have completed this role, answer the following:What decisions did you make? Did you change any of your answers? Did anything surprise you? As a public health professional, how can you work with pharmacists on the opioid crisis?

You will perform a history of a musculoskeletal problem that your instructor has provided you or one that you have experienced, and perform an assessment of the musculoskeletal system. You will document your subjective and objective findings, note any abnormal findings, and submit this in a Word document to the drop box provided. Your subjective portion of the documentation should briefly describe your “client”. For example, “This client is a 23-year-old white female complaining of a painful, swollen ankle. States that she stepped ‘funny’ off a step two days ago and thinks she heard a ripping sound. She takes no medications and has no allergies. The client reports pain as 5/10 with sharp twinges when trying to walk, resting and ice decreases pain to 2/10 aching. Pain is primarily in the outer aspect of ankle and foot. Has no prior injury to this area. No significant past medical history.” In terms of your objective findings, remember to only record what you have assessed. Do not make a diagnosis or state the cause of a particular finding.You are not coming to any conclusions within your documentation. When your documentation is complete, you will note any findings that were abnormal.You will submit this documentation as a Word document to the drop box provided.Musculoskeletal Assignment

Reading, understanding, and appreciating original nursing research literature is essential for evidence-based practice (AACN, 2008; QSEN, 2018).PurposeThis assignment provides a learning activity for students to read an original research study and complete a worksheet to demonstrate understanding of the study purpose, design, sample, data collection, analysis, limitations, conclusions, and the importance of reading research literature.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4, 8)CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 & 8)Assignment Directions:Read over each of the following directions, the required Reading Research Literature worksheet, and grading rubric.Review the following link which contains a tutorial for your Week 6 Assignment. Click here for transcript. (Links to an external site.)https://lms.courselearn.net/lms/video/player.html?video=0_jhxsfia6Download and complete the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet (Links to an external site.).Download or access the required article. The required article must be used. de Araujo, D. D., Silva, D. V. A., Rodrigues, C. A. O., Silva, P. O., Macieira, T. G. R., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2019). Effectiveness of nursing interventions to prevent dry eye in critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 28(4), 299–306. Retrieved from https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137294247&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)You must use the grading rubric to ensure you are meeting all grading criteria of the worksheet.You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the ".docx" format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and in-text APA formatting.Submit the completed Reading Research Literature Worksheet to the Week 6 Assignment.ReminderBefore preparing your assignment, please review this "Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)" resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.NOTE: Please use your browser's File setting to save or print this page.ReferencesAmerican Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN). (2008). Executive summary: The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice (2008). Retrieved from http://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AAC...Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2018). Quality and safety education for nurses competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/#e...RubricNR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the StudyUsing information from the required article and mostly your words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Provide details.30.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.26.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.24.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.11.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of Research & the DesignUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSampleUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData CollectionUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData AnalysisUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitationsUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings/DiscussionUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors' findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReading Research LiteratureSummarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Provide details.30.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.26.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.24.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.11.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar10.0 ptsExcellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors or 1-2 errors noted.6.0 ptsGood writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.4.0 ptsFair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.3.0 ptsPoor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences10.0 ptsExcellent APA in-text formatting with no errors. Uses mostly your own words with no more than two direct quotes.5.0 ptsGood APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.4.0 ptsFair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.3.0 ptsPoor APA formatting with many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor APA with errors noted throughout.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired RRL Worksheet and Required Article Use0.0 pts0 points deducted Required RRL Worksheet used for this assignment and Required Article used for this assignment. 0 points deducted0.0 pts20 points (10%) deducted Required RRL Worksheet NOT used and/or Required Article NOT used for this assignment results in a deduction of 20 points (10%). 20 points deducted0.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction0.0 pts0 point deductionSubmitted on time0.0 ptsNot submitted on time - Points deducted1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late0.0 ptsTotal Points: 200.0