Rubric and Responses attached https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-dobbs/the-duty-to-protect-from-third-persons/tarasoff-v-regents-of-university-of-california/Discuss the Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976) with your classmates in the weekly discussion topic. Using the appropriate terminology, examine the background, participants, and historical significance of this case in relation to violence risk assessments used in today’s forensic practice. In your discussion, provide the psychometrics of two violence risk assessments that are preferred in your battery intervention program.In response to your peers, build upon their analysis. Is there something you notice in your peers’ conclusions that they did not? Is there a different way of interpreting the violence risk assessments?To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.In Module Eight, students will explore forensic psychological assessments in relation to violence risk potential. According to Chandler (2013), the recent occurrence of mass gun shootings in the United States has led to the development of violence risk reduction strategies among forensic professionals. Recent prevalence studies have indicated that over 470,000 U.S. citizens were victims of a gun-related crime and over 11,000 were killed from gun shootings in 2006 (Chandler, 2013). From 2008 to 2009, over 5,700 U.S. children and teens were victims of gun-related violence. Despite the popularity of gang violence in the media, a significant number of gun-related deaths have occurred among known perpetrators: spouses and family members. This is particularly noticed among criminal psychologists who assess for domestic and family violence potential during probation and sentencing hearings.As students examine violence risk assessments, it is essential to understand the importance of Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California (1976). Since this historic case, the duty to warn the potential victims of harm has become paramount to practicing psychotherapists. This is also ethically important for forensic examiners who have accurately testified to psychometric data that support the probability of violence. As students review the various violence risk measures in this module, it may become quickly apparent that many violence measures rely on past collateral information and expert rate evaluations during interviews (Weiner & Hess, 2006). This is particular true for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA). The SARA is a commonly used forensic screening tool for domestic violence (Chandler, 2014). Specifically, the SARA is geared towards male perpetrators. Each subscale is calculated into percentile ranks. Generally, the higher the percentile, the higher the degree of concern is for domestic violence. (See example of SARA questions). As students progress to Module Nine, they will examine sex offender risk assessments commonly seen in forensic practice.ReferencesChandler, D. (2013). Firearm-related child abuse and the development therapeutic risk: typologies for at-risk parents. The Forensic Therapist. The National Association of Forensic Counselors.Chandler, D. (2014). The essentials of forensic family psychotherapy: A brief guide to investigative narrative analysis. Retrieved from http://www.lulu.com/shop/donald-chandler-jr-phd/th...Weiner, I., & Hess, A. (2006). The handbook of forensic psychology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. (1976). Retrieved from http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-key...

Learning Goal: I'm working on a psychology question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.Part II of AI Hypothetical StrikeResource: Automotive Inc. Case StudyRefer back to what you learned in PS390: Intro to Industrial and Organizational Psychology about training and development, recruitment and appraisals. Approach this assignment as an industrial and organizational psychology professional that is to advise and help the management and employees at AI following the hypothetical strike.For Part II of your case study, you will examine the training needs of the AI employees. You will write a 3–4-page expository essay (excluding cover page and reference page) that looks at the employee needs due to job relocation, hiring new employees and employee challenges.Include the following in your essay:Identify training needs for front-line supervisors and employees.Describe the goals and objectives of the training you identified.Consider the impacts and needs of employees who have had to relocate due factory or division closures.Consider the impacts and needs of employees who have been impacted by a new influx of employees into factories or divisions that are still operational.Provide the pros and cons for creating a gateway for temporary employees to become permanent employees.