# Quantitative Methods

Feb 25th, 2015
Anonymous
Category:
Mathematics
Price: \$75 USD

Question description

he investment firm of Reynolds and Atherton has \$10 million to invest. The firm wishes to invest a significant fraction of the money in high-yield but relatively risky funds, while keeping much of the money in safer but lower-yield investments. The safe but low-yield possibilities are certificates of deposit (CDs), yielding a 4.9% annual return, and treasury bills that yield 6.3%. High-grade corporate bonds (8.5% annual return) and a real estate fund (10% annual return) are higher-yielding but still reasonably secure possibilities. The firm can also invest in a foreign stock fund and a high-tech stock fund, with anticipated yields of 11.2% and 12.5% per annum, respectively. At the high end of both risk and return is a venture capital fund. This fund has yielded 18% over the last few years and is expected to do so again in the coming year.

To achieve a reasonable balance between potential profit and risk, the firm has decided to restrict the ratio of high-yield investments (foreign stock fund, high-tech stock fund, and venture capital fund) to low-yield investments (CDs and treasury bills) to no more than 1.5. Further, the sum of the investments in corporate bonds and real estate should be no greater than the sum of all of the other investments combined. In order to promote high yield while preventing too much money from being invested in the risky venture capital fund, the firm decides to invest at least twice as much in the foreign and high-tech stocks combined as it does in the venture capital fund and CDs combined. Also, the money invested in the venture capital fund will be at most 30% of the money invested in the foreign and high-tech stock funds combined. As a final gesture toward diversification, it is decided that the combined investment in treasury bills and corporate bonds can be as much as but no more than 20% of the total investment. The firm wants to invest the entire \$10 million. How should Reynolds and Atherton invest the money in order to maximize its annual profit?

(a.) Formulate a linear programming model for this problem, clearly defining the decision variables and listing the objective function and all of the constraints.

(b.) Use Excel to solve the linear programming model and produce a sensitivity analysis report.

(c.) Describe the solution in detail, including any interesting or unusual features.

(d.) Discuss the meaning of the sensitivity ranges of the objective function coefficients.

(e.) What is the shadow price associated with the total investment? What does it mean?

(f.) If the investment firm were to eliminate one constraint inequality, which one would result in the greatest increase in profit? Why do you think that occurs? Would eliminating this constraint increase risk? Why or why not?

(g.) Comply with all of the specifications listed in the description of this assignment in the course shell.

(Top Tutor) Robert F
School: Boston College

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from student
Anonymous
" Totally impressed with results!! :-) "

1827 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors