Assignment ContentIn this assignment, you will explore group dynamics, team building, team roles, norms and team rules. By understanding how teams work effectively within an organization and how individuals work effectively within teams, you will gain greater insight into how to function effectively within a team. Review Ch. 8, 10, and 12 located in the textbook.Scenario:You have worked at your current employer for five years. Recently your company merged with a much larger Boston Accounting Firm to improve efficiencies, increase revenues, cut costs and adopt best practices in the industry. After the merger, you find yourself on a team of four other individuals whom you have never met. Each individual is from a different department: Auditing, Tax, Corporate Governance, Legal, and Insurance. The purpose of your team is to downsize your department in terms of employees.part 1 Create a 10-slide restructuring/downsizing plan presentation, with speaker notes included, which can be used in each department. The plan should answer the following questions:Why is the change needed?What will change?Who will be affected?How will they be affected?How will potential conflict be managed?How will trust be strengthened or repaired?How will power be shared in the organization after the restructuring/downsizing?What tactics will be used to achieve a successful restructuring/downsizing transition? What tactics will be avoided?What are the benefits of the planned changes?What is the timeframe of implementation?How will changes be communicated to the employees?part 2Write up a 175-word company-wide memo that can be used by the CEO to communicate the change plan to the employees.Cite a minimum of 2 references. One of the references must be the course textbook.Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.

Diagram the formal structure of your organization. Identify the various management positions or titles on the chart and indicate the positions/jobs that would report to each. Identify the various management positions or titles on the chart and indicate the positions/jobs that would report to each.

I have attached the below in a Word DOX. as formatting can be lost. I have also attached the MOD8 Portfolio Project in a Word DOX. for your reference.    Portfolio Milestone (100 Points) Important! Read First Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do  not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title  of your submission. Option #1: Quality Management and Small Cell Infrastructure Design  Go to Module 8 and read the expectations for Option 1, then return here for your Module 3 Milestone effort. In Module 3, you are asked as a first step, to familiarize yourself  with the Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines. Note that two  contract firms were instrumental in the development of the guidelines:  Clanton & Associates, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group. After your  review of the guidelines, you are asked to provide your input to the  following: Are the current Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines (SCIDG)  ones that promote high quality? If yes, how? If no, why not and what  should change to promote quality? Support your position with specific  references to the SCIDG or current scholarly documentation. What do you interpret to be meant by “quality” from the perspective  of the public works personnel, communications companies deploying small  cell infrastructure, the contract companies involved, and the public  both now and in the future? What support do you have for your position  with specific references to the SCIDG or current scholarly  documentation? What are the drivers for change, and the barriers to change from the  perspective of the public works personnel and the public? Are there  competing drivers for change that may impact quality from the public’s  perspective? Support your position with specific references to the SCIDG  or current scholarly documentation. Submission: Write a paper addressing the Module 3 Milestone questions for the  case of The Department of Public Works, Engineering Division for the  City and County of regarding the Small Cell Infrastructure Design  Guidelines and quality management. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in  length, not including the required title and references pages and any  appendix if required. For more information see “How do I do an Appendix in APA style?” (Links to an external site.)  Support the Milestone paper with a minimum of three current  (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the  CSU-Global Library. This is in addition to any course textbooks, lecture  material you decide to use, or the case itself. Of course, you may  always exceed the minimum number of sources. Format the paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Be clear, concise, and focused. Option #2: Total quality management and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on Federal Retirements  Go to Module 8 and read the expectations for Option 2, then return here for your Module 3 Milestone effort. In Module 3, you are asked as a first step, to familiarize yourself  with the Government Accounting Office (GAO), Office of Personnel  Management (OPM) May of 2019, publication of the Federal Retirement: OPM  Actions Needed to Improve Application Processing Times. After your  review of the guidelines, you are asked to provide your input to the  following: Is the current Federal Retirement: OPM Actions Needed to Improve  Application Processing Times document one that promotes high quality? If  yes, how? If no, why not and what should change to promote quality?  Support your position with specific references to the GAO report or  current scholarly documentation. What do you interpret to be meant by “quality” from the perspective  of the GAO OPM, retirees, Congressional leaders, and the public both now  and in the future? What support do you have for your position with  specific references to the GAO report or current scholarly  documentation? What are the drivers for change, and the barriers to change from the  perspective of the GAO OPM, retirees, Congressional leaders, and the  public? Are there competing drivers for change that may impact quality  from the public’s perspective? Support your position with specific  references to the GAO report or current scholarly documentation.